Starczyński, M.; Dudek, S.; Baruś, P.; Niedzieska, E.; Wawrzeńczyk, M.; Ochijewicz, D.; Piasecki, A.; Gumiężna, K.; Milewski, K.; Grabowski, M.;
et al. Intravascular Imaging versus Physiological Assessment versus Biomechanics—Which Is a Better Guide for Coronary Revascularization. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 2117.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122117
AMA Style
Starczyński M, Dudek S, Baruś P, Niedzieska E, Wawrzeńczyk M, Ochijewicz D, Piasecki A, Gumiężna K, Milewski K, Grabowski M,
et al. Intravascular Imaging versus Physiological Assessment versus Biomechanics—Which Is a Better Guide for Coronary Revascularization. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(12):2117.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122117
Chicago/Turabian Style
Starczyński, Miłosz, Stanisław Dudek, Piotr Baruś, Emilia Niedzieska, Mateusz Wawrzeńczyk, Dorota Ochijewicz, Adam Piasecki, Karolina Gumiężna, Krzysztof Milewski, Marcin Grabowski,
and et al. 2023. "Intravascular Imaging versus Physiological Assessment versus Biomechanics—Which Is a Better Guide for Coronary Revascularization" Diagnostics 13, no. 12: 2117.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122117
APA Style
Starczyński, M., Dudek, S., Baruś, P., Niedzieska, E., Wawrzeńczyk, M., Ochijewicz, D., Piasecki, A., Gumiężna, K., Milewski, K., Grabowski, M., Kochman, J., & Tomaniak, M.
(2023). Intravascular Imaging versus Physiological Assessment versus Biomechanics—Which Is a Better Guide for Coronary Revascularization. Diagnostics, 13(12), 2117.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122117
