Background/Objectives: Sport participation and nutrition are increasingly recognized as key determinants of cognitive function and academic achievement in student populations. However, the biological mechanisms underpinning these associations remain only partially understood. This scoping review aimed to map and synthesize the current evidence on neuroendocrine and autonomic mechanisms linking physical activity, sport participation, and nutrition to cognitive and academic outcomes in students.
Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases was performed following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies involving student populations that examined physical activity, sport participation, or dietary patterns in relation to cognitive function and/or academic performance were included. Particular attention was given to studies reporting biological or physiological indicators of underlying mechanisms, including neuroendocrine, autonomic, and brain-based measures. Data were extracted and synthesized qualitatively, with studies categorized according to the type of mechanistic evidence.
Results: A total of 76 studies met the inclusion criteria. The available evidence was more extensive for physical activity, sport participation, and fitness-related exposures than for nutrition-related variables or integrated lifestyle models. Cognitive outcomes, particularly executive function, attention, working memory, and memory performance, were assessed more frequently and showed more consistent associations with lifestyle behaviors than academic outcomes, which were less commonly and more heterogeneously evaluated. Mechanistic evidence was unevenly distributed: only a limited subset of studies included direct biological or psychophysiological measures, mainly neuroimaging, brain-derived neurotrophic factors, cortisol-related indices, or heart rate variability. In contrast, inflammatory, metabolic, and gut microbiota-related mechanisms were mostly discussed at a conceptual or indirect level. Overall, the findings indicate a broad associative literature but a relatively small body of studies directly testing biological pathways linking physical activity, nutrition, cognition, and academic performance.
Conclusions: Current evidence indicates potential associations between sport participation, nutrition, cognitive outcomes, and multiple biological pathways. However, the scoping nature of the review, the predominance of observational designs, and the limited use of direct mechanistic assessments prevent firm causal conclusions. Future research should prioritize longitudinal and intervention studies integrating behavioral, nutritional, cognitive, academic, and biological measures within the same design.
Full article