Skip to Content
SustainabilitySustainability
  • Correction
  • Open Access

17 November 2025

Correction: Du et al. Integrating Fly Ash into High-Temperature Ceramic Glazes: Achieving Sustainability, Cost-Effectiveness, and Aesthetic Appeal. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8017

,
,
,
and
1
School of Design & Arts, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
2
Tangshan Research Institute, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
3
The Future Laboratory, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100190, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The authors would like to make the following corrections about the published paper [1]. The changes are as follows:
Author want to replace the schematic with a photograph of the actual powdered raw materials that were used. This replacement is intended solely to guide readers more accurately and enhance the reproducibility of our study. This change does not affect the content, results, or conclusions of the article in any way. So we need to replace the original Figure 1, the corrected Figure 1 and legend appears below:
Figure 1. Data collection process for identifying social innovation in relation to forestry.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Du, Y.; Chen, M.; Wang, K.; Wang, T.; Wang, L. Integrating Fly Ash into High-Temperature Ceramic Glazes: Achieving Sustainability, Cost-Effectiveness, and Aesthetic Appeal. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.