Next Article in Journal
The Success of Water Refill Stations Reducing Single-Use Plastic Bottle Litter
Next Article in Special Issue
Relevance of Life-Cycle Assessment in Context-Based Science Education: A Case Study in Lower Secondary School
Previous Article in Journal
Shrinking Suburbs: Analyzing the Decline of American Suburban Spaces
Open AccessArticle

Nordic Student Teachers’ Views on the Most Efficient Teaching and Learning Methods for Species and Species Identification

1
Faculty of Education and Welfare Studies, Åbo Akademi University, Rantakatu 1, FI-65100 Vaasa, Finland
2
School of Applied Educational Science and Teacher Education, Philosophical Faculty, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonkatu 2, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland
3
Faculty of Education, University of Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
4
Faculty of Education, University of Turku, Assistentinkatu 5, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
5
Faculty of Natural Sciences, Kristianstad University, Elmetorpsvägen 15, SE-29188 Kristianstad, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(19), 5231; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195231
Received: 23 August 2019 / Revised: 19 September 2019 / Accepted: 19 September 2019 / Published: 24 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Approaches to Embedding Sustainability in Teacher Education)
Teachers need knowledge of species and species identification skills for teaching the structure and function of ecosystems, and the principles of biodiversity and its role in sustainability. The aim of this study is to analyze Nordic student teachers’ views on the most efficient methods and strategies to teach and learn species and species identification, and to find some trends about how well their views are reflected in a species identification test. Student teachers in Finland, Norway, and Sweden (N = 426) answered a questionnaire consisting of fixed and open-ended questions, and a species identification test. An analysis of variance, Chi-Square, and t-test were used for quantitative data and an inductive content analysis for qualitative data. Results showed that outdoor teaching and learning methods are more efficient than indoor methods. The majority of student teachers considered outdoor experiential learning with living organisms as the most efficient teaching and learning method. Student teachers who highlighted outdoor experiential learning and outdoor project work as their most efficient methods received significantly better results in the species identification test than the others. Field trips and fieldwork were emphasized as the most important sources in schools and universities, while the Internet was the most important source among media. The student teachers underlined teachers’ expertise in the form of in-depth understanding of subjects and supervising skills for efficient teaching both outdoors and indoors. Therefore, teaching and learning of species and species identification as the practical part of biodiversity and sustainability education is emphasized as an integral part of teacher education programs. View Full-Text
Keywords: species knowledge; species identification; biodiversity; sustainability; teaching methods; teaching materials; teacher education; professional development species knowledge; species identification; biodiversity; sustainability; teaching methods; teaching materials; teacher education; professional development
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Palmberg, I.; Kärkkäinen, S.; Jeronen, E.; Yli-Panula, E.; Persson, C. Nordic Student Teachers’ Views on the Most Efficient Teaching and Learning Methods for Species and Species Identification. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5231.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop