Can Agroforestry Grow beyond Its Niche and Contribute to a Transition towards Sustainable Agriculture in Sweden?
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
No comments
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
thanks for your comments. The manuscript have been changed by Rewiever 2 suggestion and by a professional language editor. And now we hope the English is satisfying.
kind regards
Christina Schaffer
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
The MS has improved since last evaluation.
However, it still has some issues in formating.
The figure 1 is taken from the authors own already published article. Then it must be cited in the text.
Is the data from "Edible forest gardens experiences" section come from this manuscript or it is a compilation from Eksvärd et al 2016 and Björklund et al. 2019 results?
Suggestions are given in the text.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
thank you for your comments. We have changed everything that you suggested. in the text. However, after that the manuscript was also sent to professional editing language service, according to Reviewer 2, therefor for even more have been changed in the manuscript regarding the language.
kind regards
Christina Schaffer
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
The MS presentation quality has improved.
This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The work is poor. It does not present figures, tables, graphs, maps ... The conclusions are not supported by data or series of data.
With regret I must reject the paper.
Reviewer 2 Report
The manuscript deals with a very interesting topic with growing popularity in both science and general population. The agroforestry systems are vital for sustainable agriculture and informations provided in Sweden with this MS could generate data for further discussion of agroforestry systems fortress and weakness around the world.
The MS content is well organized and full of important informations concerning the current project conducted by the authors.
However, this MS does not follow the journal style standard for citation in the text and reference list.
Some words in the text are in different font size and there are "too many space" between words.
I suggest that a complete revision in the MS style must be done.
Reviewer 3 Report
Very interessant article. It would be enlightening to have some more details about particular results that have allowed the conclsions presented.
