A Choreography-Based and Collaborative Road Mobility System for L’Aquila City
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
This paper introduced a meaningful and representative study case of choregraphy-based models on CRMS. Just a few suggestions.
1. the Section 6 "related work" should be moved to the beginning part of paper.
2. the Section 4 "The CHOReVOLUTION systhesis method at work on the CRMS use case" and Section "Experimental evaluation" should be merged into Section 3 as sub-parts.
3. In "Experimental evaluation", I suggest the authors give some illustration about the execution efficiency of the approach. If possible, compare it with the traditional models.
Author Response
Our answers to the reviewer comments are reported in detail in the uploaded .PDF.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
It is very important to define the technology used and why it was selected, together with the description of the mobility system in the region and specifically to see the costs of its implementation. The authors have previous research works so it is assumed that
their implementation of the project has been in a scalable manner.
A real application is of utmost importance to achieve impact on society and potentiate the improvement of a component of a Smart City, the case study that they present, although it is described if they should focus on justifying the achievements that have been
made in Consideration changes in scalability.
One aspect to consider is that a resource platform is created but it is not specified if any will be decisive for a similar situation after the earthquake.
I would have liked a description of their future work, because although they describe a technological niche, they do not adjust their focus on improving the population after suffering an earthquake, such as specialized services that should continue to work for patients and injured.
Explain how they came to evaluate with a more "traditional" model, as when they describe this at the end of their conclusions: "By experimenting with the realization of the CRMS use case, we evaluated our CHOReVOLUTION synthesis approach against a set of Key Performance Indicators".
This research is very interesting, but will be improved detail a few aspects of this research.
This research is very adequate, but will be improved using a correct design of experiments as in:
| Augmented Reality Labels for Security Signs based on Color Segmentation with PSO for Assisting Colorblind People MM Rivera, AP Díaz, JC Reich, JCP Gallegos, AO Zezzatti International Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Problems and Informatics … | 2019 |
Is very important describe more the porposed technolgy used as in:
| Application of IoT with haptics interface in the smart manufacturing industry RAC Masse, A Ochoa-Zezzatti, V García, J Mejía, S Gonzalez International Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Problems and Informatics … | 2019 |
And finally is very important describe better the concept of mobility system as in:
Aleksander Orlowski, Patrycja Romanowska:
Smart Cities Concept: Smart Mobility Indicator. Cybernetics and Systems 50(2): 118-131 (2019)
Saud Althunibat, Osamah S. Badarneh, Raed Mesleh:
Random Waypoint Mobility Model in Space Modulation Systems. IEEE Communications Letters23(5): 884-887 (2019)
Author Response
Our answers to the reviewer comments are reported in detail in the uploaded .PDF.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
