Next Issue
Volume 27, December
Previous Issue
Volume 27, August
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..

Curr. Oncol., Volume 27, Issue 5 (October 2020) – 21 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
80 KiB  
Editorial
UNCOVID—A 55-Word Story
by H.S. Wald
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 526; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6805 - 1 Oct 2020
Viewed by 984
Abstract
Life upended [...]
Full article
95 KiB  
Commentary
Improving Formative Assessments in Canadian Medical Oncology Residency Training
by R. Arora and S.D. Mukherjee
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 524-525; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6885 - 1 Oct 2020
Viewed by 604
Abstract
Medical oncology is a subspecialty of internal medicine that involves the treatment of cancer with a variety of complex systemic therapies [...]
Full article
753 KiB  
Article
A Pan-Canadian Prospective Study of Young Women with Breast Cancer: The Rationale and Protocol Design for the RUBY Study
by M.L. Quan, I.A. Olivotto, N.N. Baxter, C.M. Friedenreich, K. Metcalfe, E. Warner, K. MacLennan, J.E. Stephen, M.R. Akbari, D. Howell, S. Narod and the RUBY site investigators
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 516-523; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6751 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 1974
Abstract
Introduction: The understanding of the biology and epidemiology of, and the optimal therapeutic strategies for, breast cancer (bca) in younger women is limited. We present the rationale, design, and initial recruitment of Reducing the Burden of Breast Cancer in [...] Read more.
Introduction: The understanding of the biology and epidemiology of, and the optimal therapeutic strategies for, breast cancer (bca) in younger women is limited. We present the rationale, design, and initial recruitment of Reducing the Burden of Breast Cancer in Young Women (ruby), a unique national prospective cohort study designed to examine the diagnosis, treatment, quality of life, and outcomes from the time of diagnosis for young women with bca. Methods: Over a 4-year period at 33 sites across Canada, the ruby study will use a local and virtual recruitment model to enrol 1200 women with bca who are 40 years of age or younger at the time of diagnosis, before initiation of any treatment. At a minimum, comprehensive patient, tumour, and treatment data will be collected to evaluate recurrence and survival. Patients may opt to complete patient-reported questionnaires, to provide blood and tumour samples, and to be contacted for future research, forming the core dataset from which 4 subprojects evaluating genetics, lifestyle factors, fertility, and local management or delivery of care will be performed. Summary: The ruby study will be the most comprehensive repository of data, biospecimens, and patient-reported outcomes ever collected with respect to young women with bca from the time of diagnosis, enabling research unique to that population now and into the future. This research model could be used for other oncology settings in Canada. Full article
401 KiB  
Article
Musculoskeletal Oncology: Patient Triage and Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic
by N. Olshinka and S. Mottard
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 512-515; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6907 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1695
Abstract
Sarcoma treatment during the covid-19 pandemic is a new challenge. This patient population is often immunocompromised and potentially more susceptible to viral complications. Government guidelines highlight the need to minimize patient exposure to unnecessary hospital visits. However, those guidelines lack practical recommendations [...] Read more.
Sarcoma treatment during the covid-19 pandemic is a new challenge. This patient population is often immunocompromised and potentially more susceptible to viral complications. Government guidelines highlight the need to minimize patient exposure to unnecessary hospital visits. However, those guidelines lack practical recommendations on ways to manage triage and diagnosis expressly for new cancer patients. Furthermore, there are no reports on the efficiency of the guidelines. One of the main issues in treating musculoskeletal tumours is the complexity and variability of presentation. We offer a triage model, used in a quaternary-referral musculoskeletal oncology centre, that allows us to maintain an open pathway for referral of new patients while minimizing exposure risks. A multidisciplinary approach and analysis of existing investigations allow for a pre-clinic evaluation. The model identifies 3 groups of patients: (1) Patients with suspected high-grade malignancy, or benign cases with aggressive features, both in need of further evaluation in the clinic and prompt treatment; (2) Patients with low-grade malignancy, and benign cases whose treatment is not urgent, that are managed during the pandemic by telemedicine, with reassurance and information about their illness; (3) Patients who can be managed by their local medical professionals. In comparison to a pre-pandemic period, that approach resulted in a higher ratio of malignant-to-benign conditions for new patients seen in the clinic (3:4 vs. 1:3 respectively), thus using available resources more efficiently and prioritizing patients with suspected high-grade malignancy. We believe that this triage system could be applied in other surgical oncology fields during a pandemic. Full article
371 KiB  
Review
Strategies for the Delay of Surgery in the Management of Resectable Hepatobiliary Malignancies during the COVID-19 Pandemic
by S. Bennett, K. Søreide, S. Gholami, P. Pessaux, C. Teh, E. Segelov, H. Kennecke, H. Prenen, S. Myrehaug, D. Callegaro and J. Hallet
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 501-511; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6785 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 2316
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to review data about delaying strategies for the management of hepatobiliary cancers requiring surgery during the covid-19 pandemic. Background: Given the covid-19 pandemic, many jurisdictions, to spare resources, have limited access to operating rooms for elective [...] Read more.
Objective: We aimed to review data about delaying strategies for the management of hepatobiliary cancers requiring surgery during the covid-19 pandemic. Background: Given the covid-19 pandemic, many jurisdictions, to spare resources, have limited access to operating rooms for elective surgical activity, including cancer, thus forcing deferral or cancellation of cancer surgeries. Surgery for hepatobiliary cancer is high-risk and particularly resource-intensive. Surgeons must critically appraise which patients will benefit most from surgery and which ones have other therapeutic options to delay surgery. Little guidance is currently available about potential delaying strategies for hepatobiliary cancers when surgery is not possible. Methods: An international multidisciplinary panel reviewed the available literature to summarize data relating to standard-of-care surgical management and possible mitigating strategies to be used as a bridge to surgery for colorectal liver metastases, hepatocellular carcinoma, gallbladder cancer, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Results: Outcomes of surgery during the covid-19 pandemic are reviewed. Resource requirements are summarized, including logistics and adverse effects profiles for hepatectomy and delaying strategies using systemic, percutaneous and radiation ablative, and liver embolic therapies. For each cancer type, the long-term oncologic outcomes of hepatectomy and the clinical tools that can be used to prognosticate for individual patients are detailed. Conclusions: There are a variety of delaying strategies to consider if availability of operating rooms decreases. This review summarizes available data to provide guidance about possible delaying strategies depending on patient, resource, institution, and systems factors. Multidisciplinary team discussions should be leveraged to consider patient- and tumour-specific information for each individual case. Full article
354 KiB  
Article
Reimbursement Recommendations for Cancer Drugs Supported by Phase II Evidence in Canada
by Y.Y.R. Li, H. Mai, M.E. Trudeau, N. Mittmann, K. Chiasson, K.K.W. Chan and M.C. Cheung
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 495-500; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6489 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 1110
Abstract
Background: Phase ii data are increasingly being used as primary evidence for public reimbursement for oncologic drugs. We compared the frequency of reimbursement recommendations for phase ii and phase iii submissions and assessed for variables associated with a positive or conditional recommendation. [...] Read more.
Background: Phase ii data are increasingly being used as primary evidence for public reimbursement for oncologic drugs. We compared the frequency of reimbursement recommendations for phase ii and phase iii submissions and assessed for variables associated with a positive or conditional recommendation. Methods: We identified submissions made to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review’s Expert Review Committee (perc), of the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, July 2011 to July 2019, that were supported only by phase ii data. We identified variables within the perc’s deliberative framework, including clinical and economic factors, associated with the final reimbursement recommendation. We conducted a multivariable analysis with logistic regression for these variables: feasibility of phase iii study, hematologic indication, and unmet need. Results: We identified 139 submissions with a perc final recommendation. In 27 instances (19%), the submission had only phase ii evidence, and a positive recommendation was issued for 63% of them (the positive recommendation rate was 82% for submissions with phase iii evidence). Clinical benefit (p < 0.001), unmet need (p = 0.047), and patient alignment (p = 0.015) were associated with a positive recommendation. If a future phase iii study was deemed feasible for submissions with only phase ii evidence, then in univariable (p = 0.040) and multivariable analysis (p = 0.024), the perc was less likely to recommend reimbursement (odds ratio: 0.132). Conclusions: Although more than half the oncologic submissions with phase ii data were recommended for public reimbursement, compared with submissions having phase iii data, they were less likely to be recommended. A positive or conditional recommendation was more likely if clinical benefit and alignment with patient values was demonstrated. The perc was less likely to recommend reimbursement for submissions with phase ii evidence if a phase iii trial was deemed possible. Full article
806 KiB  
Article
The Risk of Diarrhea and Colitis in Patients with Lung Cancer Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by K. Bishay, P. Tandon, S. Bourassa-Blanchette, S.A. Laurie and J.D. McCurdy
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 486-494; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6251 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 1506
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (icis), including inhibitors of PD-1, PD-L1, and ctla-4, are relatively novel therapies for lung cancer, although their use might be limited by gastrointestinal toxicity. The aim of the present study was to determine the [...] Read more.
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (icis), including inhibitors of PD-1, PD-L1, and ctla-4, are relatively novel therapies for lung cancer, although their use might be limited by gastrointestinal toxicity. The aim of the present study was to determine the risk of diarrhea and colitis associated with icis in lung cancer and the rates of discontinuation because of those toxicities. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for prospective trials reporting the risk of diarrhea and colitis in patients with lung cancer treated with PD-1, PD-L1, and ctla-4 inhibitors. The incidences of diarrhea and colitis and their grades were assessed clinically using standardized reporting criteria. Pooled incidence and weighted relative risk estimates for diarrhea and colitis with 95% confidence intervals (cis) were estimated using a random effects model. The incidence of discontinuations for gi toxicity was also calculated. Results: Twenty-seven studies were included: sixteen studies with PD-1 inhibitors, nine studies with PD-L1 inhibitors, and four studies combining PD-based strategies with ctla-4 inhibitors. The incidence of all-grade diarrhea was 9.1% (95% ci: 7.8% to 10.5%) for anti–PD-1 therapy and 11.0% (95% ci: 7.5% to 14.5%) for anti–PD-L1 therapy. The incidence of all-grade colitis was 0.9% (95% ci: 0.4% to 1.3%) for anti–PD-1 therapy and 0.4% (95% ci: 0.0% to 0.8%) for anti–PD-L1 therapy. The relative risk for all-grade diarrhea was higher with combination anti–PD-1 and anti–ctla-4 than with anti–PD-1 monotherapy (relative risk: 1.61; 95% ci: 1.14 to 2.29). Anti–PD-1 therapy was discontinued in 4.1% of patients with diarrhea (95% ci: 0.7% to 7.4%) and in 35.7% of those with colitis (95% ci: 0.0% to 81.1%); combination therapy was discontinued in 10.1% of patients with diarrhea (95% ci: 4.8% to 15.4%) and in 39.9% of those with colitis (95% ci: 3.9% to 75.9%). Conclusions: Diarrhea is a relatively frequently encountered gi toxicity when ici therapy is used in lung cancer treatment. Colitis is less frequently encountered, although when it does occur, it often results in therapy discontinuation. Full article
424 KiB  
Article
Cigarette-Smoking Characteristics and Interest in Cessation in Patients with Head-and-Neck Cancer
by M.S.C. Conlon, S.A. Santi, M.L. Meigs, S.M. Davidson and D. Saunders
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 478-485; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6019 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 1613
Abstract
Purpose: Many patients diagnosed with head-and-neck cancer are current or former smokers. Despite the well-known adverse effects of smoking, continuation of smoking during cancer treatment is associated with reduced efficacy of that treatment and with cancer recurrence. In the present study, we [...] Read more.
Purpose: Many patients diagnosed with head-and-neck cancer are current or former smokers. Despite the well-known adverse effects of smoking, continuation of smoking during cancer treatment is associated with reduced efficacy of that treatment and with cancer recurrence. In the present study, we examined smoking characteristics in patients with head-and-neck cancer near the time of cancer treatment. Methods: A prospective cohort of patients with head-and-neck cancer who attended a dental oncology clinic before receiving cancer treatment at a regional cancer centre were invited to participate in a study that involved completing an interviewer-administered questionnaire to assess smoking characteristics, intention to quit, motivation to quit, and strategies perceived to potentially aid in successful cessation. Results: The study enrolled 493 ever-smokers, with a response rate of 96.1% and a self-reported current smoker rate of 37.1% (n = 183). Most of the current smokers reported high nicotine dependence, with 84.7% (n = 155) indicating a time to first cigarette of 30 minutes or less. Most had previously attempted to quit smoking (77.0%), and many had prior unsuccessful quit attempts before resuming smoking again. Most were interested in quitting smoking (85.8%), and many (70.5%) were seriously considering quitting smoking within the subsequent 30 days. Conclusions: Patients with head-and-neck cancer reported high nicotine dependence and high interest in cessation opportunities near the time of treatment for cancer. Those results might provide support for provision of smoking cessation opportunities. Full article
348 KiB  
Article
Delay in Diagnosis of Patients with Head-and-Neck Cancer in Canada: Impact of Patient and Provider Delay
by S. Kassirian, A. Dzioba, S. Hamel, K. Patel, A. Sahovaler, D.A. Palma, N. Read, V. Venkatesan, A.C. Nichols, J. Yoo, K. Fung, A. Mendez and S.D. MacNeil
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 467-477; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6547 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 1567
Abstract
Background: Head-and-neck cancers (hncs) often present at an advanced stage, leading to poor outcomes. Late presentation might be attributable to patient delays (reluctance to seek treatment, for instance) or provider delays (misdiagnosis, prolonged wait time for consultation, for example). [...] Read more.
Background: Head-and-neck cancers (hncs) often present at an advanced stage, leading to poor outcomes. Late presentation might be attributable to patient delays (reluctance to seek treatment, for instance) or provider delays (misdiagnosis, prolonged wait time for consultation, for example). The objective of the present study was to examine the length and cause of such delays in a Canadian universal health care setting. Methods: Patients presenting for the first time to the hnc multidisciplinary team (mdt) with a biopsy-proven hnc were recruited to this study. Patients completed a survey querying initial symptom presentation, their previous medical appointments, and length of time between appointments. Clinical and demographic data were collected for all patients. Results: The average time for patients to have their first appointment at the mdt clinic was 15.1 months, consisting of 3.9 months for patients to see a health care provider (hcp) for the first time since symptom onset and 10.7 months from first hcp appointment to the mdt clinic. Patients saw an average of 3 hcps before the mdt clinic visit (range: 1–7). No significant differences in time to presentation were found based on stage at presentation or anatomic site. Conclusions: At our tertiary care cancer centre, a patient’s clinical pathway to being seen at the mdt clinic shows significant delays, particularly in the time from the first hcp visit to mdt referral. Possible methods to mitigate delay include education about hnc for patients and providers alike, and a more streamlined referral system. Full article
800 KiB  
Article
Understanding Clinical Practice and Survival Outcomes in Patients with Unresectable Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in a Single Centre in Quebec
by J. Agulnik, G. Kasymjanova, C. Pepe, M. Hurry, R.N. Walton, L. Sakr, V. Cohen, M. Lecavalier and D. Small
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 459-466; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6241 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 1947
Abstract
Methods: A retrospective cohort study considered patients 18 or more years of age diagnosed between January 2007 and May 2018 with unresectable stage iii non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) who received combined chemoradiation (crt). Survival was analyzed using the [...] Read more.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study considered patients 18 or more years of age diagnosed between January 2007 and May 2018 with unresectable stage iii non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) who received combined chemoradiation (crt). Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method to determine median overall (os) and progression-free survival (pfs) and the associated 95% confidence intervals (cis). Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors prognostic for survival, including age, sex, smoking status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ecog ps), histology, treatment type, tumour size, and nodal status. Results: Of 226 patients diagnosed with unresectable stage iii disease, 134 (59%) received combined crt. Mean age was 63 years; most patients were white, were current smokers, had an ecog ps of 0 or 1, and had nonsquamous histology. Median pfs was 7.03 months (95% ci: 5.6 months to 8.5 months), and os for the cohort was 18.7 months (95% ci: 12.4 months to 24.8 months). Of those patients, 78% would have been eligible for durvalumab consolidation therapy. Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant os benefit (p = 0.010) for concurrent crt (ccrt) compared with sequential crt (scrt). Disease-specific survival remained significantly better in the ccrt group (p = 0.004). No difference in pfs was found between the ccrt and scrt groups. In addition, tumour size and nodal involvement were significant discriminating factors for survival (p < 0.05). In this patient cohort, 64% of patients progressed and received subsequent therapy. Based on multivariate analysis, tumour size and nodal station were the only factors predictive of survival in patients with unresectable stage iii nsclc treated with crt. Conclusions: Combined crt has been the standard treatment for unresectable stage iii nsclc. In our study, a trend of better survival was seen for ccrt compared with scrt. Factors predictive of survival in patients with stage iii disease treated with crt were tumour size and nodal station. Most patients with stage iii disease would potentially be eligible for durvalumab maintenance therapy based on the eligibility criteria from the pacific trial. The use and effectiveness of novel treatments will have to be further studied in our real-world patient population and similar populations elsewhere. Full article
316 KiB  
Article
Quality of Life in a Real-World Study of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Trifluridine/Tipiracil
by W.Y. Cheung, P. Kavan and A. Dolley
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 451-458; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6533 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 1209
Abstract
Background: Quality of life (qol) is important for oncology patients, especially for those with late-stage disease. The present study was initiated to address the lack of published prospective data about the qol benefits of trifluridine/tipiracil (ftd/tpi) compared with [...] Read more.
Background: Quality of life (qol) is important for oncology patients, especially for those with late-stage disease. The present study was initiated to address the lack of published prospective data about the qol benefits of trifluridine/tipiracil (ftd/tpi) compared with best supportive care (bsc) in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc). Methods: This prospective, cross-sectional, non-interventional study used multidimensional validated scales to evaluate patient-reported qol in two study cohorts of patients and also to measure differences in mcrc-related symptoms and pain in a real-world clinical setting. Results: Our findings demonstrate that patients with refractory mcrc report better overall qol when treated with ftd/tpi than with bsc alone. In that population, statistically significant differences in mean qol measures favoured ftd/tpi over bsc for physical symptom distress, psychological distress, activity impairment, overall valuation of life, and symptomatology. The overall better qol for patients receiving ftd/tpi implies that treatment was well tolerated and was associated with a lower symptom burden. No significant differences for pain were observed between the groups. Conclusions: This study suggests that ftd/tpi is a well-tolerated option for the treatment of patients with refractory mcrc, showcasing the value of capturing real-world qol data in routine clinical practice. Full article
438 KiB  
Article
Osteopontin Level and Promoter Polymorphism in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer
by M.A. Elbaiomy, T. Akl, R. Elhelaly, W. El-Beshbishi, M.S. El Ghonemy and R. Elzehery
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 444-450; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6449 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1510
Abstract
Background: Cancer initiation typically occurs when a proto-oncogene’s coding region undergoes mutation, resulting in uncontrollable cell growth and division, or when a tumour suppressor gene’s coding region is affected by a mutation that inhibits activity of the resulting gene product. The pathophysiologic [...] Read more.
Background: Cancer initiation typically occurs when a proto-oncogene’s coding region undergoes mutation, resulting in uncontrollable cell growth and division, or when a tumour suppressor gene’s coding region is affected by a mutation that inhibits activity of the resulting gene product. The pathophysiologic result is, respectively, exaggerated cell-cycle growth or deficient programmed cell death. Osteopontin (opn) is an integrin-binding phosphoprotein that is expressed on the surface of normal cells. Osteopontin has a major role in diverse tumour components, especially those implicated in invasion and metastasis. In the present study, we aimed to illustrate the value of opn as a possible contributor in breast cancer (bca). Methods: This prospective study included 115 patients newly diagnosed with bca and distant metastasis who were recruited from the Oncology Center, Mansoura University, and the Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Mansoura University Hospital, Egypt. The patients recruited had been diagnosed with disseminated visceral metastasis (visceral crisis), with or without bone metastasis; patients with cranial metastasis were excluded from the study. All patients received first-line chemotherapy with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin 6 auc (area under the curve) on day 1 every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles or till development of toxicity. Trastuzumab (in cases of her2-positive disease) was given whenever possible (if government assistance or personal finances permitted). Serum levels of opn were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (elisa) before treatment was started. A group of 30 matched healthy women whose median serum opn level was 15 ng/dL were included, and that level was therefore defined as the cut-off value. In addition, opn gene mutation was determined by polymerase chain reaction (pcr). Correlations of pretreatment serum opn and opn gene mutation with various patient clinicopathologic variables, response to the treatment, progression-free survival (pfs), and overall survival (os) were assessed. Results: Mean serum opn was highest in her2-amplified bca (64.4 ± 42.3 ng/dL), and then in triple-negative bca (55.9 ± 34.7 ng/dL), followed by the luminal B and A subtypes (38.4 ± 33.1 ng/dL and 36.3 ± 32.2 ng/dL respectively, p = 0.017). Testing by pcr revealed that opn gene mutation was highest in triple-negative bca (85% opn mutant vs. 15% non-mutant), and then in her2-overexpressed bca (80% opn mutant vs. 20% non-mutant), followed by luminal B bca (61.9% opn mutant vs. 38.1% non-mutant); the least expression was detected in luminal A bca (57.9% opn mutant vs. 42.1% non-mutant). Interestingly, patients with high serum opn and opn gene mutation experienced both poor pfs (median: 12 months vs. 14 months; p = 0.001) and poor os (median: 14 months vs. 18 months; p = 0.001). Moreover, participants with opn gene mutation experienced a poor response: of those with progressive disease, 74% had opn mutation and 26% had unmutated opn (p = 0.04). Additionally, high pretreatment serum opn was correlated with poor treatment response: 49.1 ± 33.8 ng/dL in patients with progressive disease and 35.5 ± 34.3 ng/dL in those who achieved a complete response, a partial response, or stable disease (p = 0.05). Strong concordance was found between high serum opn and opn gene mutation in 69 tumours (79.3%), and strong concordance was detected between normal or low serum opn and non-mutant opn in 28 tumours (60.8%). Conclusions: The current prospective work helps to highlight opn as a valid prognostic biomarker for patients with metastatic bca and reveals that high pretreatment serum opn and opn gene mutation are both strongly linked with poor response and survival. Concordance between elisa and pcr results indicates that either method can be used for the evaluation of opn. Increased opn gene mutation in triple-negative bca could assist in tailoring the treatment response in this very aggressive tumour subtype and could be considered a targetable molecule in future studies. Full article
746 KiB  
Case Report
Multicentric Chondrosarcoma Involving the Appendicular Skeleton: A Case Report and Literature Review
by V. Aran, W. Meohas, A.C. de Sá Lopes, L. Maciel Cabral, A. Fortuna-Costa, J.A. Matheus Guimarães and M.E. Leite Duarte
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 281-284; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6237 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 957
Abstract
Chondrosarcomas constitute the 3rd most common primary bone malignancy. These tumours grow slowly and rarely metastasize, usually having a good prognosis after surgery. Among patients registered and treated at the Brazilian National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, an uncommon case of chondrosarcoma was [...] Read more.
Chondrosarcomas constitute the 3rd most common primary bone malignancy. These tumours grow slowly and rarely metastasize, usually having a good prognosis after surgery. Among patients registered and treated at the Brazilian National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, an uncommon case of chondrosarcoma was identified in a 63-year-old man, who was diagnosed with multicentric chondrosarcoma of the appendicular skeleton. This example is atypical in the medical literature because multicentric tumours are different from metastatic events, and their frequency in chondrosarcoma is rare. This article therefore provides a rare case report alongside a review of additional cases in the medical literature. Full article
114 KiB  
Commentary
The Implications of COVID-19 in Radiation Oncology in the United States
by B. Odei and A. Quick
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 279-280; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.7095 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 882
Abstract
The corona virus disease of 2019 (covid-19) has been traumatic [...]
Full article
248 KiB  
Article
Prevention and Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis
by S. Ng and M. Carrier
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 275-278; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6873 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1173
Abstract
Cancer is a hypercoagulable state with an associated increased risk of venous thromboembolism (vte) that is further amplified in individuals who undergo chemotherapy. Compared with patients having cancer alone or vte alone, patients who develop cancer-associated vte have a significantly poorer [...] Read more.
Cancer is a hypercoagulable state with an associated increased risk of venous thromboembolism (vte) that is further amplified in individuals who undergo chemotherapy. Compared with patients having cancer alone or vte alone, patients who develop cancer-associated vte have a significantly poorer prognosis. The risks of recurrent vte despite appropriate anticoagulation therapy and of bleeding are also higher in patients with cancer than in those without. For those reasons, the prevention and appropriate management of cancer-associated thrombosis is of paramount importance. Although low-molecular-weight heparin has been the standard of care for the prevention and treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis, direct oral anticoagulants are increasingly being adopted as an effective and safe alternative. Full article
224 KiB  
Article
Canadian Perspective on Managing Multiple Myeloma during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned and Future Considerations
by R. Foley, R. Kaedbey, K. Song, C.P. Venner, D. White, S. Doucette, A. Christofides and D.E. Reece
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 270-274; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.7149 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1072
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) pandemic caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has necessitated changes to the way patients with chronic diseases are managed. Given that patients with multiple myeloma are at increased risk of covid-19 infection [...] Read more.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) pandemic caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has necessitated changes to the way patients with chronic diseases are managed. Given that patients with multiple myeloma are at increased risk of covid-19 infection and related complications, national bodies and experts around the globe have made recommendations for risk mitigation strategies for those vulnerable patients. Understandably, because of the novelty of the virus, many of the proposed risk mitigation strategies have thus far been reactionary and cannot be supported by strong evidence. In this editorial, we highlight some of the risk mitigation strategies implemented at our institutions across Canada during the first wave of covid-19, and we discuss the considerations that should be made when managing patients during the second wave and beyond. Full article
254 KiB  
Article
Oncologists and Medical Assistance in Dying: Where Do We Stand? Results of a National Survey of Canadian Oncologists
by G. Chandhoke, G. Pond, O. Levine and S. Oczkowski
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 263-269; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6295 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1078
Abstract
Background: In June 2016, when the Parliament of Canada passed Bill C-14, the country joined the small number of jurisdictions that have legalized medical assistance in dying (maid). Since legalization, nearly 7000 Canadians have received maid, most of whom [...] Read more.
Background: In June 2016, when the Parliament of Canada passed Bill C-14, the country joined the small number of jurisdictions that have legalized medical assistance in dying (maid). Since legalization, nearly 7000 Canadians have received maid, most of whom (65%) had an underlying diagnosis of cancer. Although Bill C-14 specifies the need for government oversight and monitoring of maid, the government-collected data to date have tracked patient characteristics, rather than clinician encounters and beliefs. We aimed to understand the views of Canadian oncologists 2 years after the legalization of maid. Methods: We developed and administered an online survey to medical and radiation oncologists to understand their exposure to maid, self-perceived knowledge, willingness to participate, and perception of the role of oncologists in introducing maid as an end-of-life care option. We used complete sampling through the Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists and the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology membership e-mail lists. The survey was sent to 691 physicians: 366 radiation oncologists and 325 medical oncologists. Data were collected during March–June 2018. Results are presented using descriptive statistics and univariate or multivariate analysis. Results: The survey attracted 224 responses (response rate: 32.4%). Of the responding oncologists, 70% have been approached by patients requesting maid. Oncologists were of mixed confidence in their knowledge of the eligibility criteria. Oncologists were most willing to engage in maid with an assessment for eligibility, and yet most refer to specialized teams for assessments. In terms of introducing maid as an end-of-life option, slightly more than half the responding physicians (52.8%) would initiate a conversation about maid with a patient under certain circumstances, most commonly the absence of viable therapeutic options, coupled with unmanageable patient distress. Conclusions: In this first national survey of Canadian oncologists about maid, we found that most respondents encounter patient requests for maid, are confident in their knowledge about eligibility, and are willing to act as assessors of eligibility. Many oncologists believe that, under some circumstances, it is appropriate to present maid as a therapeutic option at the end of life. That finding warrants further deliberation by national or regional bodies for the development of consensus guidelines to ensure equitable access to maid for patients who wish to pursue it. Full article
353 KiB  
Article
A Clinical Investigation of the Association between Perioperative Oral Management and Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients with Digestive and Urinary Cancers
by H. Otagiri, S. Yamadav, M. Hashidume, A. Sakurai, M. Morioka, E. Kondo, H. Sakai and H. Kurita
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 257-262; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.5963 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1179
Abstract
Background: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a simple metric calculated using serum albumin and the peripheral lymphocyte count. It was reported that a low PNI score is significantly associated with major postoperative complications and poor prognosis. The purpose of [...] Read more.
Background: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a simple metric calculated using serum albumin and the peripheral lymphocyte count. It was reported that a low PNI score is significantly associated with major postoperative complications and poor prognosis. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of perioperative oral management (POM) on the perioperative PNI profiles of patients with digestive system or urinary cancers. Study Design: The medical records of 181 patients with cancer who underwent surgery and for whom a PNI could be calculated were retrospectively reviewed. Results: The intervention rate with POM was 34.8%. The median preoperative PNI score was 48.25 in all patients with a POM intervention [25% to 75% interquartile range (IQR): 44.38–54.13] and 47.25 in those without an intervention (IQR: 42.0–53.5). Compared with patients not receiving POM, those who received POM had significantly higher PNI scores from the early postoperative period (p < 0.05). Notably, of patients who could resume oral intake within 3 days after surgery, those who received POM intervention, compared with those who did not, had significantly higher PNI scores from the early postoperative period (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Perioperative oral management interventions might have positive effects on the postoperative PNI scores of patients with cancer. Full article
298 KiB  
Article
Nodal Staging Affects Adjuvant Treatment Choices in Elderly Patients with Clinically Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer
by A. Laws, R. Cheifetz, R. Warburton, C.E. McGahan, J.S. Pao, U. Kuusk, C. Dingee, M.L. Quan and E. McKevitt
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 250-256; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6515 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 946
Abstract
Background: In response to Choosing Wisely recommendations that sentinel lymph node biopsy (slnb) should not be routinely performed in elderly patients with node-negative (cN0), estrogen receptor–positive (er+) breast cancer, we sought to evaluate how nodal staging affects adjuvant [...] Read more.
Background: In response to Choosing Wisely recommendations that sentinel lymph node biopsy (slnb) should not be routinely performed in elderly patients with node-negative (cN0), estrogen receptor–positive (er+) breast cancer, we sought to evaluate how nodal staging affects adjuvant treatment in this population. Methods: From a prospective database, we identified patients 70 or more years of age with cN0 breast cancer treated with surgery for er+ her2-negative invasive disease during 2012–2016. We determined rates of, and factors associated with, nodal positivity (pN+), and compared the use of adjuvant radiation (rt) and systemic therapy by nodal status. Results: Of 364 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 331 (91%) underwent slnb, with 75 (23%) being pN+. Axillary node dissection was performed in 11 patients (3%). On multivariate analysis, tumour size was the only factor associated with pN+ (p = 0.007). Nodal positivity rates were 0%, 13%, 23%, 33%, and 27% for lesions preoperatively sized at 0–0.5 cm, 0.5–1 cm, 1.1–2.0 cm, 2.1–5.0 cm, and more than 5.0 cm. Compared with patients assessed as node-negative, those who were pN+ were more likely to receive axillary rt (lumpectomy: 53% vs. 1%, p < 0.001; mastectomy: 43% vs. 2%, p < 0.001), and adjuvant systemic therapy (endocrine: 82% vs. 69%; chemotherapy plus endocrine: 7% vs. 2%, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Of elderly patients with cN0 er+ breast cancer, 23% were pN+ on slnb. Size was the primary predictor of nodal status, and yet significant rates of nodal positivity were observed even in tumours preoperatively sized at 1 cm or less. The use of rt and systemic adjuvant therapies differed by nodal status, although the long-term oncologic implications require further investigation. Multidisciplinary input on a case-by-case basis should be considered before omission of slnb. Full article
424 KiB  
Article
Diagnostic Patterns of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
by M. Nadjafi, M.R. Sung, G.D.C. Santos, L.W. Le, D.M. Hwang, M.S. Tsao and N.B. Leighl
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 244-249; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.5757 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1019
Abstract
Background: Accurate classification of lung cancer subtypes has become critical in tailoring lung cancer treatment. Our study aimed to evaluate changes in diagnostic testing and pathologic subtyping of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over time at a major cancer centre. [...] Read more.
Background: Accurate classification of lung cancer subtypes has become critical in tailoring lung cancer treatment. Our study aimed to evaluate changes in diagnostic testing and pathologic subtyping of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over time at a major cancer centre. Methods: In a review of patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre between 2007–2009 and 2013–2015, diagnostic method, sample type and site, pathologic subtype, and use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and molecular testing were abstracted. Results: The review identified 238 patients in 2007–2009 and 283 patients in 2013–2015. Over time, the proportion of patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma increased to 73.1% from 60.9%, and diagnoses of NSCLC not otherwise specified (NOS) decreased to 6.4% from 18.9%, p < 0.0001. Use of diagnostic bronchoscopy decreased (26.9% vs. 18.4%), and mediastinal sampling procedures, including endobronchial ultrasonography, increased (9.2% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.0001). Use of IHC increased over time to 76.3% from 41.6% (p < 0.0001). Larger surgical or core biopsy samples and those for which IHC was performed were more likely to undergo biomarker testing (both p < 0.01). Conclusions: Customizing treatment based on pathologic subtype and molecular genotype has become key in treating patients with advanced lung cancer. Greater accuracy of pathology diagnosis is being achieved, including through the routine use of IHC. Full article
467 KiB  
Article
Prognostic Utility of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated Using Different Modalities
by G. Nogueira-Costa, I. Fernandes, R. Gameiro, J. Gramaça, A.T. Xavier and I. Pina
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 237-243; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.6573 - 1 Oct 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 904
Abstract
Introduction: Inflammation is a critical component in carcinogenesis. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (nlr) has been retrospectively studied as a biomarker of prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc). Compared with a low nlr, a high nlr is associated [...] Read more.
Introduction: Inflammation is a critical component in carcinogenesis. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (nlr) has been retrospectively studied as a biomarker of prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc). Compared with a low nlr, a high nlr is associated with worse prognosis. In the present study, we compared real-world survival for patients with mcrc based on their nlr group, and we assessed the utility of the nlr in determining first-line chemotherapy and metastasectomy benefit. Methods: In this retrospective and descriptive analysis of patients with mcrc undergoing first-line chemotherapy in a single centre, the last systemic absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte count before treatment was used for the nlr. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to estimate the nlr cut-off value, dividing the patients into low and high nlr groups. Median overall survival (mos) was compared using Kaplan–Meier curves and the log-rank test. A multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox regression model. Results: The 102 analyzed patients had a median follow-up of 15 months. Regardless of systemic therapy, approximately 20% of patients underwent metastasectomy. The nlr cut-off was established at 2.35, placing 45 patients in the low-risk group (nlr < 2.35) and 57 in the high-risk group (nlr ≥ 2.35). The Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a mos of 39.1 months in the low-risk group and 14.4 months in the high-risk group (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression on the nlr estimated a hazard ratio of 3.08 (p = 0.01). Survival analysis in each risk subgroup, considering the history of metastasectomy, was also performed. In the low-risk group, mos was longer for patients undergoing metastasectomy than for those not undergoing the procedure (95.2 months vs. 22.6 months, p = 0.05). In the high-risk group, mos was not statistically different for patients undergoing or not undergoing metastasectomy (24.3 months vs. 12.7 months, p = 0.08). Conclusions: Our real-world data analysis of nlr in patients with mcrc confirmed that this biomarker is useful in predicting survival. It also suggests that nlr is an effective tool to choose first-line treatment and to predict the benefit of metastasectomy. Full article
Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop