Next Article in Journal
Oncologists and Medical Assistance in Dying: Where Do We Stand? Results of a National Survey of Canadian Oncologists
Previous Article in Journal
Nodal Staging Affects Adjuvant Treatment Choices in Elderly Patients with Clinically Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Clinical Investigation of the Association between Perioperative Oral Management and Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients with Digestive and Urinary Cancers

Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(5), 257-262; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.5963
Submission received: 6 July 2020 / Revised: 4 August 2020 / Accepted: 2 September 2020 / Published: 1 October 2020

Abstract

Background: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a simple metric calculated using serum albumin and the peripheral lymphocyte count. It was reported that a low PNI score is significantly associated with major postoperative complications and poor prognosis. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of perioperative oral management (POM) on the perioperative PNI profiles of patients with digestive system or urinary cancers. Study Design: The medical records of 181 patients with cancer who underwent surgery and for whom a PNI could be calculated were retrospectively reviewed. Results: The intervention rate with POM was 34.8%. The median preoperative PNI score was 48.25 in all patients with a POM intervention [25% to 75% interquartile range (IQR): 44.38–54.13] and 47.25 in those without an intervention (IQR: 42.0–53.5). Compared with patients not receiving POM, those who received POM had significantly higher PNI scores from the early postoperative period (p < 0.05). Notably, of patients who could resume oral intake within 3 days after surgery, those who received POM intervention, compared with those who did not, had significantly higher PNI scores from the early postoperative period (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Perioperative oral management interventions might have positive effects on the postoperative PNI scores of patients with cancer.
Keywords: perioperative oral management; prognostic nutritional index; digestive cancer; urinary cancer; serum; crp perioperative oral management; prognostic nutritional index; digestive cancer; urinary cancer; serum; crp

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Otagiri, H.; Yamadav, S.; Hashidume, M.; Sakurai, A.; Morioka, M.; Kondo, E.; Sakai, H.; Kurita, H. A Clinical Investigation of the Association between Perioperative Oral Management and Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients with Digestive and Urinary Cancers. Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27, 257-262. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.5963

AMA Style

Otagiri H, Yamadav S, Hashidume M, Sakurai A, Morioka M, Kondo E, Sakai H, Kurita H. A Clinical Investigation of the Association between Perioperative Oral Management and Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients with Digestive and Urinary Cancers. Current Oncology. 2020; 27(5):257-262. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.5963

Chicago/Turabian Style

Otagiri, H., S. Yamadav, M. Hashidume, A. Sakurai, M. Morioka, E. Kondo, H. Sakai, and H. Kurita. 2020. "A Clinical Investigation of the Association between Perioperative Oral Management and Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients with Digestive and Urinary Cancers" Current Oncology 27, no. 5: 257-262. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.5963

APA Style

Otagiri, H., Yamadav, S., Hashidume, M., Sakurai, A., Morioka, M., Kondo, E., Sakai, H., & Kurita, H. (2020). A Clinical Investigation of the Association between Perioperative Oral Management and Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients with Digestive and Urinary Cancers. Current Oncology, 27(5), 257-262. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.5963

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop