Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It´s a good job, just in the results, I recommend can be clearer to understand them.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors,

Congratulations on a wonderfully written and interesting article. The amount of thought and effort put in this manuscript is apparent. Apart from some minor suggestions listed below, I believe that this manuscript could be published.

The introduction is long. Several parts can be moved to the literature review section (Lines 78-98). Also please highlight the scope of research in a separate paragraph. It would be useful to present the research questions in a bulleted fashion.

Furthermore, the hypotheses tested in this article should be presented at the end of the introduction following the scope of research (Lines 158-214).

Line 262: Please fix the second “very healthy” scale

A small section dedicated to future research would be useful. The impact of internet on happiness during the pandemic would also be an interesting read.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx