Next Article in Journal
Green Worship: The Effects of Devotional and Behavioral Factors on Adopting Electronic Incense Products in Religious Practices
Next Article in Special Issue
Using Simulation Training to Promote Nurses’ Effective Handling of Workplace Violence: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Previous Article in Journal
Copper, Manganese, Selenium and Zinc in Wild-Growing Edible Mushrooms from the Eastern Territory of “Green Lungs of Poland”: Nutritional and Toxicological Implications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Varicella Seroprevalence in Healthcare Workers at a Medical Center Following Changes in National and Local Hospital Vaccination Policies
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Analysis of a Historical Accident in a Spanish Coal Mine

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(19), 3615; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193615
by Lluís Sanmiquel-Pera 1,*, Marc Bascompta 1 and Hernán Francisco Anticoi 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(19), 3615; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193615
Submission received: 11 September 2019 / Revised: 23 September 2019 / Accepted: 24 September 2019 / Published: 26 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Workplace Health and Wellbeing 2019)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is an interesting paper that tries to analyse the great accident occurred in a Spanish coal mine in 1975, using two well-known alternatives: 1) the method from the Spanish Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (INSST), and 2) The Feyer and Williamson method.

 

In my opinion is very interesting the comparative between the two methods. There are several studies where is performed an analysis of an accident by some other methods. However, the analysis from two methods and their comparative is not usual.

 

Although the paper is interesting, I have some concerns that should be solved before possible publication.

-          Please improve the accident method's description used in the study.

-          Literature review is weak. Please add references about the two methods in order the readers can consult more details of them.

-          Please appropriately address limitations, and future directions of research.

-          The manuscript needs editing in English language. It has serious language mistakes that undermine the quality of the paper.

Author Response

The revision of the article titled Analysis of a historical accident in a Spanish coal mine has been attached, as well as the comments of the changed done in the paper below.

 

Please improve the accident method's description used in the study.

Further explanation has been included in this regard: lines 112-120; 134-137; 149-150

Literature review is weak. Please add references about the two methods in order the readers can consult more details of them.

Several references have been added to the manuscript

Please appropriately address limitations, and future directions of research.

Further explanation has been included in this regard: lines 267-276

The manuscript needs editing in English language. It has serious language mistakes that undermine the quality of the paper.

The paper has been thoroughly revised

 

Reviewer 2 Report

Overall nice paper. 

Some generic comments apart from the ones in the annotated paper. 

Proofreading is required.  Include some international examples to add more value to the paper. 

Additional comments in the annotated copy. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The revision of the article titled Analysis of a historical accident in a Spanish coal mine has been attached, as well as the comments of the changed done in the paper below.

 

Proofreading is required. 

The paper has been thoroughly revised

Include some international examples to add more value to the paper. 

Some international examples have been added in this regard

Additional comments in the annotated copy

All the changes detailed in the pdf file have been done (highlighted in green).

Comments from the ones in the annotated paper.

Some international examples have been included as mentioned. The Figures have been modified as demanded. All the changes in the text indicated by the reviewer have been done (highlighted in green).
Back to TopTop