Next Article in Journal
Clinical, Cognitive and Demographic Determinants of Work Participation in Multiple Sclerosis: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Non-Invasive and Invasive Diagnostic Methods for Coronary Artery Disease: Single-Centre Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prospective Evaluation of Clinical and Laboratory Profiles of Febrile and Afebrile Immunosuppressed Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

ALM Resuscitation Without Transfusion Improves Platelet Function and Survival After Liver Injury and Uncontrolled Hemorrhage

Heart, Sepsis and Trauma Research Laboratory, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2026, 62(3), 453; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62030453
Submission received: 31 December 2025 / Revised: 19 February 2026 / Accepted: 25 February 2026 / Published: 27 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and Challenges in Prehospital Emergency Care)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Traumatic hemorrhage is a leading cause of death. Our aim was to examine the effect of adenosine, lidocaine and magnesium (ALM) resuscitation therapy with and without fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or fresh whole blood (FWB) in a rat model of non-compressible hemorrhage. Materials and Methods: Anesthetized adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (439 ± 46 g) randomly assigned to (1) Shams (surgical trauma and liver isolation only without hemorrhage) (n = 34), (2) Saline controls (n = 34), or (3) ALM therapy (n = 34), underwent liver resection and uncontrolled bleeding. After 5 h 3% NaCl ± ALM bolus and 0.9% NaCl ± ALM drip fluid resuscitation, each group was randomized to receive no transfusion (NT) (n = 10 per treatment group), FFP (n = 12), or FWB (n = 12), and monitored for 72 h. Survival, hemodynamics, lactate, hematology, coagulation, platelet function, and lung histopathology were measured. Results: Sham, Saline and ALM NT survival were 50%, 0% and 100%. Sham survival increased to 75% with FFP, but not FWB (50%), and only marginally in the Saline group (8% and 17%, respectively). ALM protection was lost after 1–2 days with FFP and FWB (8% and 0% survival). Mortality was associated with acute lung injury, inflammation, activation of innate immunity, intrinsic hypocoagulopathy, and metabolic acidosis. Survival was associated with maintained platelet count and aggregation. Acute phase protein fibrinogen increased ~2.5 times in both survivors and non-survivors. Conclusions: ALM therapy without FFP or FWB transfusion significantly improved survival, reduced lung injury, preserved platelet function, and decreased immune and metabolic dysfunction. Blood products administered 5 h after injury did not significantly improve survival after non-compressible hemorrhage. Surgical trauma (laparotomy and liver isolation) also contributed to poor outcomes. The trauma and transfusion-related multi-system failure requires further investigation.

1. Introduction

Traumatic hemorrhagic shock is a leading cause of potentially preventable mortality, particularly in far-forward battlefield environments and prehospital civilian environments [1,2,3]. Volume resuscitation at the point-of-injury is essential to raise mean arterial pressure (MAP) and ensure adequate oxygen delivery to tissues [4]. Fresh whole blood (FWB) was the primary resuscitation fluid during World Wars I and II and the Korean War until the Vietnam War, with a wider adoption of crystalloids and colloids [5]. However, the use of high fluid volumes became associated with hemodynamic compromise, trauma-induced coagulopathy, acidosis and “shock lung” [6,7]. In recent years, crystalloids have mostly been replaced with component therapy (1:1:1 plasma:platelets:red blood cells) [4,5,8]. Two randomized clinical trials have also shown a survival benefit with fresh frozen plasma (FFP), although its use remains controversial [9,10]. In addition, there are logistical problems using FFP far-forward because it requires special handling, storage and preparative requirements compared to whole blood, which can be obtained from ‘buddy’ donors in the field [6,11]. Fresh whole blood has other physiological advantages, and two retrospective trials have shown a potential survival benefit of FWB or equivalence to component therapy in severe combat casualties [12,13]. Despite this, use of prehospital transfusion remains rare and widespread adoption faces ongoing challenges, particularly in rural and remote areas, which are disadvantaged by limited resources and availability of medical support [14,15].
We have been developing a small-volume adenosine, lidocaine and magnesium (ALM) fluid therapy for point-of-injury and prolonged field care after hemorrhagic shock [16,17]. ALM bolus and drip resuscitation therapy led to 3-day survival in the rat model of non-compressible hemorrhage, compared to 22 h for Saline controls [18]. The ALM survival phenotype was associated with improved cardiac function, correction of coagulopathy, platelet preservation, reduced inflammation, and upregulation of the master genes of metabolism and mitochondrial function (Ampk, Sirt-1, Pgc1a, Mtco3, and Tfam) in central tissues [18,19,20,21]. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of FFP or FWB transfusion in addition to ALM therapy in the rat model of laparotomy, liver resection and non-compressible hemorrhage.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Ethics

This study was approved by James Cook University Animal Ethics Committee (A2296) and US Army Animal Care and Use Review Office (ACURO: SO150053) and complies with the Australian Code for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes (8th Edition, 2013) and National Institutes of Health Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (8th Edition, 2011). The study is reported in accordance with the Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines [22] (Supplementary Material S1). Conventional adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 102; 439 ± 46 g) sourced from the non-specific pathogen-free James Cook University breeding colony, were housed in individually ventilated Tecniplast cages in a 14–10 h dark–light cycle with free access to environmental enrichment, food and water ad libitum. Animals were randomly assigned using a random number generator (GraphPad Prism 8; GraphPad Software L.L.C, San Diego, CA, USA) to (1) Sham No Transfusion (NT) (n = 10), (2) Saline NT (n = 10), (3) ALM NT (n = 10), (4) Sham FFP (n = 12), (5) Saline FFP (n = 12), (6) ALM FFP (n = 12), (7) Sham FWB (n = 12), (8) Saline FWB (n = 12), or (9) ALM FWB (n = 12). Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane 1.5–5% in 100% oxygen during surgical instrumentation, laparotomy, liver resection, and throughout Phase 1 bolus resuscitation. Carprieve® (Norbrook Laboratories; Newry, Northern Ireland) (carprofen 5 mg/kg s.c.) was administered prior to recovery from anesthesia for postoperative analgesia and again at 24 h and 48 h (Figure 1).

2.2. Surgical Protocol

Anesthetized animals had sterile chronic catheters (Access Technologies, Skokie, IL, USA) implanted in the left femoral artery and vein for blood pressure monitoring (BridgeAMP coupled to Powerlab; ADInstruments, Bella Vista, Australia), blood sampling, and fluid/drug infusions respectively. Lead II electrocardiogram was subcutaneously implanted for heart rate monitoring (BioAMP/Powerlab). Animals had a 30 min baseline stabilization period after surgical instrumentation, with the exclusion of any animal that exhibited complex ventricular arrhythmias or a sustained fall in MAP < 80 mmHg (Figure 1).

2.3. Liver Injury and Uncontrolled Bleeding

Animals had a 3 cm transverse laparotomy, and 50% of the left lateral and medial liver lobes were resected with sharp dissection and allowed to bleed freely into the peritoneal cavity, as in previous studies [19,20]. This model of liver resection-induced non-compressible hemorrhage has been validated [23], and is more clinically relevant than other pressure- or volume-controlled hemorrhage models [24,25]. As the largest solid abdominal organ, the liver is susceptible to both blunt and penetrating injury, and subsequent non-compressible hemorrhagic shock [26,27]. Consistency of liver injury was ensured by comparing the weight of resected liver with total body weight (Saline NT: 0.52 ± 0.04%, ALM NT: 0.54 ± 0.05%, Saline FFP: 0.53 ± 0.04%, ALM FFP: 0.57 ± 0.06%, Saline FWB: 0.54 ± 0.07%, ALM FWB: 0.58 ± 0.05%; p = 0.117). Sham animals underwent surgical instrumentation, laparotomy and liver isolation, without resection and bleeding, to determine surgical trauma-induced responses in the absence of traumatic hemorrhagic shock.

2.4. Resuscitation and Transfusion

Fifteen minutes after liver injury, animals received a 0.7 mL/kg intravenous (IV) bolus of 3% NaCl (Saline and Sham) or 3% NaCl ALM (ALM; 1 mM adenosine, 3 mM lidocaine, 2.5 mM MgSO4; Sigma-Aldrich. Castle Hill, Australia [19]) via the femoral vein catheter (Figure 1). Animals were recovered from anesthesia after 60 min Phase 1 bolus resuscitation and received a 4 h infusion of 0.5 mL/kg/h 0.9% NaCl (Saline and Sham) or 0.9% NaCl ALM (ALM; 0.25 mg/kg/h adenosine, 0.5 mg/kg/h lidocaine, 0.25 mg/kg/h MgSO4 [19]) (Figure 1). After Phase 2 drip resuscitation was complete, animals received NT, FFP or FWB according to group allocation for Phase 3 transfusion. The timing of resuscitation and transfusion was chosen to reflect prehospital times for trauma patients in regional, rural and remote Australia, which are significantly prolonged (4–9 h) [28,29] compared to those in the United States [14,30] and Europe [31], which average 50–60 min. Northern Australia currently has very limited capability for prehospital transfusion due to availability and logistic challenges, with transfusion commencing on hospital admission, often hours after injury. FFP and FWB, equivalent to 20% total blood volume calculated from [(0.06 × weight) + 0.77] [32], warmed to 37 °C, were transfused at 0.25 mL/min through a Hemo-Nate Syringe Filter (Sound Veterinary Equipment; Rowville, Australia). Mean transfusion time was 21.7 ± 2.2 min. Animals were monitored for 72 h post-injury with administration of 0.7 mL/kg IV bolus of 0.9% NaCl (Saline and Sham) or 0.9% NaCl ALM (ALM; 1 mM adenosine, 3 mM lidocaine, 2.5 mM MgSO4) at 24 h and 48 h (Figure 1).

2.5. Preparation of FFP and FWB

FFP and FWB were prepared from donor syngeneic female Sprague-Dawley rats, matched according to breeding pair. Fresh shed citrated blood (FWB) collected from anesthetized donors was incubated at 37 °C with gentle rolling to maintain homogeneity until transfusion. For fresh frozen plasma (FFP), blood was left to sit at room temperature for 30 min, then passed through a neonatal leukocyte reduction filter (Nanodyne Filter 0.2 μm; Pall Corporation, Dandenong South, Australia) and centrifuged at 4000× g for 15 min [33]. Plasma was separated from red cells and stored at −80 °C until use.

2.6. Blood Sampling, Moribund Score and Mortality

Animals were continuously monitored for the first 6 h after liver injury and reconnected for hemodynamic monitoring every 12 h until 72 h. Blood was sampled at baseline (post-surgical instrumentation), end Phase 3 transfusion (6.25 h post-injury), and at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h for lactate, blood chemistry, complete blood count, and coagulation and platelet function assessments (Figure 1). Mortality was defined as MAP < 25 mmHg for 5 min. Animals were assessed twice daily using the humane endpoints of Morton [34], Toth [35], and Nemzek and colleagues [36]. Weight loss, behavior/alertness, mobility, appearance/coat condition, wound healing, breathing/respiration, food/water intake and feces were scored 0–3. Any animal scoring ≥10, or 3 in any category, was categorized as being in a moribund state preceding imminent death and was euthanized. Surviving animals were sacrificed at the end of the 72 h experimental period. At the time of sacrifice, animals were re-anesthetized with isoflurane for blood sampling from the femoral artery catheter, followed by euthanasia with 100 mg/kg IV pentobarbitone sodium (Lethabarb®; Virbac Australia; Milperra, Australia).

2.7. Blood Chemistry, Hematology, Coagulation and Platelet Function

Blood chemistry and lactate were measured using a Radiometer ABL800 analyzer (Radiometer Pacific; Mount Waverley, Australia), and VetScan HM5 (Zoetis Diagnostics; Rhodes, Australia) was used for complete blood counts, as in previous studies [18,20].
Prothrombin time (PT, s), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT, s), fibrinogen (g/dL), tissue activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI, %), Protein C (%), and antiplasmin (%) were measured in citrated plasma on the STA Compact (Diagnostica Stago; Doncaster, Australia).
Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®; Tem International, Munich, Germany) was conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions and previous studies [20,37]. Whole blood collected in 3.2% sodium citrate tubes was warmed to 37 °C. Three assays were performed: EXTEM (extrinsically activated test using tissue factor), INTEM (intrinsically activated test using ellagic acid), and FIBTEM (fibrin-based EXTEM-activated test with 50 μg/mL cytochalasin D, to inhibit platelet contribution to clot formation).
Platelet function was assessed in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) using the PAP-8e Platelet Aggregation Profiler (BioData Corporation; Horsham, PA, USA) and agonists ADP (200 μM) and Collagen (equine tendon, 100 μg/mL) from Helena Laboratories (Mount Waverley, Australia). PRP was prepared using a standardized technique of double centrifugation [38].

2.8. Lung Histopathology

Sections of lung collected at the time of sacrifice were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, processed, and paraffin-embedded. Six 4 μm paraffin-embedded sections were cut from each block, spaced at 100 μm intervals and spanning the entire tissue sample. Alternate sections (2nd, 4th and 6th sections) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Stained sections were visualized with light microscopy (Nikon Eclipse i50; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and digitized (Nikon NIS-Elements Basic Research Software) for semi-quantitative assessment of pathological changes. Lungs were examined for vacuolation, alveolar infiltration, inflammation, hemorrhage/congestion, and epithelial degeneration. Sections were scored from 0 to 4 (none-severe, >80% tissue affected) for each parameter by two blinded investigators (total possible score = 20).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

A priori power analysis was conducted using the G-power3 program (Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf; Düsseldorf, Germany) to determine the minimum sample size to minimize Type 1 errors (outcome measure = MAP 6.25 h post-injury [19]; effect size = 1.33; α err prob = 0.05; Power (1-β error prob) = 0.8; calculated sample size n = 10). SPSS Statistical Package 25 was used for all statistical analyses (IBM, Sydney, Australia). Survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method with a log-rank test for comparison between groups. Data normality was assessed graphically and with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Normally distributed data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Longitudinal data were assessed with General Linear Model Repeated Measures ANOVA. Within-group differences were assessed using a paired-samples t-test. Non-parametric data were analyzed using a Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test. Point-biserial correlations were conducted to determine the relationship between continuous variables and mortality. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Survival

Survival in Sham, Saline and ALM NT groups was 50%, 0% and 100%. Saline NT had significantly reduced mean survival time (23 h) compared to Sham (53 h) and ALM (72 h) (p < 0.05) (Table 1, Figure 2). FFP increased Sham survival to 75%, with no change after FWB (50%). FFP and FWB increased overall survival in Saline controls from 0% to 8% and 17%, respectively, but did not increase survival time (16 h and 19 h). In contrast to 100% survival to 72 h in the ALM NT group, ALM FFP and ALM FWB had significantly reduced survival (8%, 34 h and 0%, 22 h, respectively) (p < 0.05) (Table 1, Figure 2).

3.2. Hemodynamics

Liver resection and uncontrolled bleeding led to a marked ~50% fall in MAP (p < 0.05 vs. Sham groups), which recovered at 15 min Phase 1 with a 0.7 mL/kg bolus of 3% NaCl or 3% NaCl ALM (Supplementary Figure S1A). There were no significant differences in heart rate (HR) between groups during Phases 1–3, or in survivors and non-survivors during the 72 h monitoring period (Supplementary Figure S1B). MAP and HR increased after Phase 1 when animals were recovered from anesthesia, and there was a trend towards higher HR at 36 h and 60 h (evening measurements) compared to 48 h and 72 h (Supplementary Figure S1A,B).

3.3. Blood Lactate and Chemistry

Saline NT and FFP animals, and all FWB animals that died early (Phase 1–2), were profoundly acidotic with blood pH ranging from 6.7 to 7.14, and high lactates (7–20 mM) (Table 2). In contrast to other groups that became moribund from Phase 3 to 24 h, which had significantly increased lactates and reduced pH, ALM FWB non-survivors during the same period had no change in blood pH (7.44) or lactate (1.65 mM). After 24 h, pH returned to 7.3–7.6 in non-survivors (except Sham FFP), but lactates remained elevated. In addition to prolonged acidemia, Sham FFP survivors had increased lactate at 72 h compared to all other groups (3.76 vs. <1.8 mM) (Table 2).
Survivors also had blood K+ levels comparable to baseline (~4.5 mM), whereas K+ increased up to 14.25 mM in moribund animals (Supplementary Table S1). Blood Na+ and Cl increased in earlier moribund groups (Phase 1–2), and after transfusion (Phase 3) in Sham and Saline FFP and FWB groups, but not ALM FFP and FWB. ALM FFP and FWB animals that died after 24 h also maintained normal base excess and bicarbonate, compared to other moribund groups, which showed marked falls (Supplementary Table S1).

3.4. Red Cell and Platelet Profile

Survivors at 72 h had significant 30–37% decreases in red blood cell (RBC) numbers and hematocrit (Hct), and 29–39% falls in hemoglobin (Hb) (Table 3). Non-survivors had similar percentage falls of up to 30% in RBC, Hb and Hct, except for ALM FWB, which only dropped 5–10%. At 72 h, platelet numbers in Sham NT, FFP and FWB survivors fell by 53%, 36% and 53% from baseline, respectively (Table 3). There was a significant negative correlation between platelet count from Phase 1 to 24 h and survival time (rpb = −0.451; p = 0.010). Sham and Saline animals that became moribund after 24 h had 54–95% and 80–94% falls in platelet numbers, respectively. Total platelets fell in ALM FFP and ALM FWB non-survivors at 24–48 h by 16% and 35% respectively, whereas platelet count in ALM NT survivors was only 7% lower than baseline (Table 3).

3.5. White Blood Cell (WBC) Profile

Total white cell count at 72 h in ALM NT group with 100% survival was comparable to baseline (10.68 × 109/L vs. 12.19 × 109/L), compared to a 25% decrease in WBCs in Sham NT survivors (Table 4). Transfusion of FWB in Shams led to a more profound leukopenia at 72 h (48% fall), whereas FFP preserved WBC in Shams (11% increase vs. baseline at 72 h). White cells fell significantly in all FFP and FWB moribund groups between 24 and 72 h (<2.85 × 109/L), indicating immunosuppression; however, in contrast to the Saline NT group, which showed an exponential early decrease in WBC, FFP or FWB appeared to defend against these large falls in the first 48 h (Table 4).
Similar to WBC, Sham survivors also had 33–67% falls in lymphocytes, and 38–45% falls in monocytes, with the exception of Sham FFP animals, where circulating monocytes increased 1.35-fold at 72 h (Table 4). In the Saline and ALM groups, lymphocytes fell significantly in both survivors and non-survivors. Monocytes also decreased in Saline and ALM moribund groups (Table 4). Neutrophils increased 1.3 to 2.2-fold from baseline to 72 h in all survivors; however, there was no evidence of neutrophilia in moribund groups after 24 h. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio was increased in both survivors and moribund groups, including 4- to 16-fold increases in Sham survivors, 3.4- to 6-fold and 4- to 20-fold in Saline survivors and non-survivors, and 5.2-fold and 2.9- to 5.4-fold in ALM survivors and non-survivors, with no differences between NT, FFP, and FWB (Table 4). The monocyte/neutrophil ratio at 72 h fell 48–70% in Shams, and 80–86% in Saline FFP and FWB, compared to only 25% in ALM NT with 100% survival.

3.6. Coagulation

PT remained relatively constant except for the early FWB deaths (Phase 1–24 h), where it increased 3- to 8-fold (Table 5). In contrast, aPTT in all NT groups increased up to 2.6-fold, and similar prolongation was found after FFP and FWB transfusion, indicating hypocoagulopathy, which was not corrected until 72 h. These results were very similar to the small changes in EXTEM clot time (CT) and increases in INTEM CT in non-survivors (Table 5 and Table 6). In contrast to the correction of aPTT in survivors, the INTEM ROTEM equivalent showed increases at 72 h, indicating persistent hypocoagulopathy. However, maximum clot firmness (MCF) and maximum lysis (ML) indicated that the clots were stable with little hyperfibrinolysis (Table 6). Sham NT had a 3.5-times prolongation of INTEM CT, which was reduced by ~50% after FFP (1.24-times) or FWB (1.6-times).
Fibrinogen fell significantly by ~70% in early deaths to 24 h, but increased 2.5 times in 72 h survivors (p < 0.05 vs. baseline), which was consistent with FIBTEM results (Table 5 and Table 6). The increase occurred in the first 24 h and appears to remain high for 3 days. Similar to fibrinogen, TAFI levels increased up to 2-fold in survivors at 72 h (Table 5). In early moribund groups (Phase 1–24 h), no change in TAFI occurred with the exception of ALM FWB, which fell by 50% (p < 0.05 vs. ALM NT and FFP). In contrast, TAFI increased by 1.3 to 1.5-fold in Sham FWB and Saline FWB over the same period (p < 0.05 vs. ALM FWB), and almost doubled in ALM NT group to 112% at 24 h and 119% at 72 h. Protein C in early moribund groups (Phase 1–24 h) for Saline NT and ALM FWB underwent no change, whereas Saline FWB and all FFP groups increased 3- to 6-fold to 48 h (Table 5). Transfusion of FWB significantly reduced Protein C levels at 24–72 h with falls of 57%, 67% and 87% in Sham FWB, Saline FWB, and ALM FWB, respectively. Early deaths (Phase 1–24 h) were associated with reduced antiplasmin, except ALM FWB, which was comparable to baseline. Antiplasmin fell by 35% in the Sham NT group and did not recover, but increased by 15% and 37% in Sham FFP at 24 h and 72 h, respectively (Table 5). Antiplasmin also increased 1.5 to 1.8-fold in ALM NT and Sham FWB survivors.

3.7. Platelet Function

ADP-induced primary platelet aggregation (ADP PA), defined as the extent of aggregation during the first minute, for Sham NT survivors was 13% lower than baseline (79 vs. 91%), whereas Sham NT non-survivors fell by 69% (Figure 3). Platelet aggregation was restored in Sham FFP and FWB survivors (1.1-times baseline), but fell by 31% and 93% in Sham FFP and FWB non-survivors, respectively. Similarly, the addition of FFP or FWB in Saline survivors restored platelet aggregation to ~1.3-times baseline, compared to falls of 83–93% in non-survivors (p < 0.05 vs. ALM NT). ALM NT aggregation was 1.27 × baseline, and all survived, whereas aggregation in ALM FFP and FWB non-survivors were 45% and 35% of baseline (Figure 3). ADP PA was very strongly correlated with survival (rpb = 0.857; p < 0.0001) and strongly correlated with survival time (rpb = 0.766; p < 0.0001). Collagen-induced platelet aggregation showed similar findings, including strong positive associations with survival (rpb = 0.667; p < 0.0001) and survival time (rpb = 0.627; p < 0.0001).

3.8. Lung Pathology

Total lung injury scores were significantly higher in Sham FWB, Saline FFP, ALM FFP, and ALM FWB compared to all NT groups (Figure 4A). Lung injury score showed a weak significant correlation with mortality (rpb = 0.296; p < 0.012), while hemorrhage/congestion score was moderately associated with death (rpb = 0.330; p < 0.005). ALM FFP had significantly increased hemorrhage and inflammation compared to ALM NT, and all ALM FWB animals showed mild-to-moderate hemorrhage and epithelial degeneration (p < 0.05 vs. ALM NT) (Figure 4B). ALM FWB animals had a distinct gross pathophysiological profile of lung congestion, edema, and excess pericardial fluid. No such lesions or congestion were found in the ALM NT group.

4. Discussion

Uncontrolled hemorrhage remains a leading cause of potentially survivable death in prehospital civilian and military environments [1,2,3]. We have previously shown that small-volume ALM therapy can resuscitate, correct trauma-induced coagulopathy, and provide multiple organ protection, in both small and large animal models of traumatic hemorrhage [17,18,19,20,21,39]. We report in the rat model of laparotomy, liver resection and uncontrolled hemorrhage, that transfusion of 20% total blood volume of FFP or FWB 5 h after resuscitation with ALM therapy reduced 72 h survival. In contrast, ALM without transfusion led to 100% survival. Mortality appeared to be related to transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI), reduced platelet function, metabolic and immune dysfunction, and hypocoagulopathy. We also found that surgical and abdominal trauma from laparotomy and liver isolation was a major contributor to poor outcomes because Shams (no hemorrhage) had similar profiles. Higher systemic fibrinogen levels in survivors and non-survivors appeared to be due to activation of the innate immune response induced by surgical trauma. These results are discussed next.

4.1. Sham Mortality Was Due to the Trauma of Surgery, Not Hemorrhage

An unexpected result was that 50% of Sham animals that did not receive a transfusion died, which was slightly improved after FFP infusion (75% survival), but not with FWB. Shams underwent anesthesia, surgical catheterization involving groin and neck cut-downs, a 3 cm open laparotomy, and liver isolation, but no resection. Our data emphasize the importance of including Shams to accurately interpret the physiological responses to resuscitation therapies in animal models. Unfortunately, many preclinical studies investigating blood product transfusion efficacy either do not include Shams or they are not present for the entire experiment [40,41,42], which may lead to contradictory results in the literature.

4.2. ALM Therapy Led to 100% Survival Without Blood Products

The other unexpected finding of our study was that transfusion of FFP or FWB 5 h after ALM resuscitation resulted in higher mortality than ALM alone, which led to 100% survival after 3 days. Possible reasons include the timing of transfusion, currently unknown contraindications, as well as the effect of these blood products on lung pathology and immune function, and are discussed below. Similarly, FFP or FWB failed to improve survival in Saline controls, although the sample sizes were smaller due to high early mortality prior to the transfusion phase. The limited resuscitative and hemostatic capacity of saline alone is supported by previous studies [37,43,44].

4.3. FWB and FFP Led to Poor Outcomes in All Groups

Mortality in FFP and FWB groups appeared to be associated with TRALI, which was not apparent in groups without transfusion. In addition, lung hemorrhage was not present in the Sham group that did not receive blood products, confirming that this effect was directly related to transfusion. Mortality in ALM animals receiving FWB or FFP was accompanied by pulmonary congestion and hemorrhage, edema, inflammation, and epithelial degeneration, which may be associated with varying degrees of early or delayed TRALI. The pathophysiology of TRALI is believed to arise from a breach of endothelial, interstitial, and epithelial barriers driven by inflammation and exacerbated by fluid therapies, leading to extravasation of proteinaceous fluid into the airspace [45], and similar to the pathology we observed. Our findings are consistent with studies reporting TRALI and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) following both FFP and FWB administration after hemorrhagic trauma [40,46].

4.4. Mortality, Platelet Exhaustion and Coagulopathy

In addition to transfusion, another important factor associated with mortality was a dramatic loss of ADP- and collagen-induced platelet aggregation. Our findings of a significant strong correlation between both ADP- and collagen-induced primary platelet aggregation are consistent with clinical studies reporting reduced platelet function in trauma patients, which was associated with increased mortality (up to 10-fold) [47,48]. An “exhausted platelet syndrome” begins with an initial hyperactivation of platelets from the widespread release of ADP from injured endothelial cells, which subsequently become unresponsive via mechanisms not well understood [49]. Loss of platelet aggregation may also be exacerbated by reduced platelet numbers. Since Sham NT non-survivors had 69% and 93% falls in platelet aggregation and count, respectively, we conclude that reduced platelet function was most likely due to surgical trauma [50], not the use of blood products or hemorrhage. This illustrates the complexity of our polytrauma model, on one hand, and yet its ability to tease apart the different mechanisms contributing to death after hemorrhagic shock, on the other.
Platelet exhaustion was also associated with hypocoagulopathy in all groups, as indicated by a prolonged aPTT and prolonged INTEM clot times, with some failing to form a clot. The use of FFP or FWB partially corrected hypocoagulopathy, with reduced INTEM clot times and improved INTEM and FIBTEM clot firmness. Stronger clots after administration of blood products are often supported by higher circulating fibrinogen levels, which is consistent with significantly higher FIBTEM MCF. However, increased fibrinogen normally favors platelet aggregation by binding to platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptors [51], yet this was not the case in our moribund animals with or without blood products. How do we explain this paradox? One possibility is that the 2- to 2.8-fold increase in systemic fibrinogen, irrespective of treatment, was part of the positive acute-phase response to inflammation, trauma, and/or tissue damage, separate from its effect in combining with platelets and forming strong clots [52]. Once present in blood, fibrinogen and other acute-phase proteins, such as C-reactive protein, C3 complement and alpha-globulin glycoprotein, can in turn modulate the inflammatory response via the recruitment of immune cells and cytokine production [52]. This may also be related to the leukopenia and lymphopenia we found over the 72 h experimental period, and may contribute to a trauma-induced immunosuppression. Thus, we conclude that viscoelastic INTEM and FIBTEM parameters in vitro do not necessarily imply that increased clot firmness is occurring in vivo, given impaired platelet aggregation, reduced platelet count, and 50% falls in platelet/fibrinogen ratios that are incompatible with the formation of viable clots. This linkage between acute-phase response to trauma, inflammation and coagulopathy is an area that requires further study.

4.5. Survivors Preserved Platelet Aggregation and Reduced Coagulopathy and Immune Activation

In contrast to non-survivors, platelet aggregation in survivors was maintained close to baseline, regardless of the use of blood products. Maintenance of platelet aggregation in survivors occurred despite ~50% falls in platelet numbers in most groups. Preserved platelet function was also associated with reduced coagulopathy among the survivors, including normal PT, aPTT, EXTEM and FIBTEM clot times, as well as a recovery of INTEM CT towards baseline. This is consistent with what is now known about the significant contribution platelet dysfunction makes to early trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) and the potential limitation of FFP alone [10].
Key to ALM therapy survival, in addition to preservation of platelet function, was attenuation of immune activation, reduced blood lactate and normal acid-base status. Immune dysfunction and hyperinflammation after traumatic injury and hemorrhage are important contributors to secondary injury progression, including immunosuppression, infection and development of multiple organ dysfunction, including lung injury [53]. Trauma-induced immune dysfunction and inflammation may, in turn, be exacerbated by blood product administration, an effect known as transfusion-associated immunomodulation (TRIM) [54]. It is possible in this study that delayed administration of FFP or FWB after successful resuscitation, correction of TIC and stabilization with ALM therapy led to a “second-hit” injury.

4.6. Clinical Significance and Limitations

While administration of fresh whole blood in humans appears to offer clinical advantages over balanced component therapy (red blood cells, plasma, and platelets) [55], the quality of the data is poor, and more high-quality studies are required [3,56]. In our rat model, transfusion with FWB or FFP 5 h after fluid resuscitation surprisingly led to poor outcomes, which may be a reflection of the severity of our model and timing of transfusion, with multiple clinical studies demonstrating benefit with earlier transfusion [57,58,59]. Our preclinical model combining uncontrolled hemorrhage with a laparotomy and liver manipulation had a high mortality and high individual variability, which limited time-matched comparisons of all endpoints. Despite this, the model may have military significance in Role 2 facilities where casualties with suspected abdominal hemorrhage requiring an emergent laparotomy have high mortality rates [60]. Our data showing that ALM therapy alone was effective against non-compressible hemorrhage and major surgical trauma with 100% survival is directly relevant to battlefield medicine and forward surgical facilities when blood products may be in short supply. In addition to the model’s severity, another limitation of our study was that the individual effects of FFP or FWB alone were not tested in our model. Finally, in order to comply with ethical restrictions and the 3Rs of preclinical studies, only male rats were evaluated, with female rats used exclusively as donors for blood products. Despite no current evidence in rats, clinical studies have shown that sex-mismatched transfusion is associated with increased mortality [61]. Further studies are required to determine any sex-specific differences, particularly relating to sex hormones and transfusion-induced immunoinflammatory responses.

5. Conclusions

In the rat model of laparotomy, liver resection, and hemorrhage, Sham groups had 25–50% mortality, indicating that the trauma of surgery was a significant contributor to poor outcomes. ALM resuscitation therapy without blood products led to 100% survival, and was associated with improved hemostasis, platelet aggregation and metabolic and immune function. Our study showed that ALM protection was lost with administration of FFP or FWB, which led to reduced survival, and was related to acute lung injury, platelet exhaustion, hypocoagulopathy, and transfusion-associated immunomodulation. Further studies are required to evaluate the underlying mechanisms and to assess the clinical significance of our findings.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/medicina62030453/s1, Supplementary Material S1: ARRIVE Checklist; Supplementary Figure S1: Hemodynamics; Supplementary Table S1: Blood Chemistry.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L. and G.D.; methodology, H.L. and G.D.; formal analysis, H.L.; investigation, H.L.; resources, G.D.; data curation, H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, G.D.; writing—review and editing, H.L.; funding acquisition, H.L. and G.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by USSOCOM, USAMRMC proposal SO150053 under Award No. W81XWH-USSOCOM-BAA-15-1. The opinions, interpretations and conclusions are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the US Department of Defense.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of James Cook University (Approval Code: A2296; 5 February 2018) and the US Army Animal Care and Use Review Office (Approval Code: SO150053; 16 April 2018).

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jodie Morris for histopathological assistance, and Jemma Green from James Cook University Clinical Diagnostics Laboratory for conducting Stago testing. The authors would particularly like to thank the US Department of Defense for continued support of our work and the College of Medicine and Dentistry at James Cook University.

Conflicts of Interest

GPD is the inventor of the ALM concept for cardiac surgery, trauma and sepsis. HLL has no conflicts of interest to declare. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ALMAdenosine, lidocaine, magnesium
FFPFresh frozen plasma
FWBFresh whole blood
NTNo transfusion
MAPMean arterial pressure
Ampk5′ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase
Sirt1Sirtuin 1
Pgc1aPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha
MtCo3Mitochondrially encoded cytochrome C oxidase III
TfamTranscription factor A, mitochondrial
ACUROAnimal Care and Use Review Office
ARRIVEAnimal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments
s.c.Subcutaneous
IVIntravenous
NaClSodium chloride
MgSO4Magnesium sulfate
PTProthrombin time
aPTTActivated partial thromboplastin time
TAFITissue activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor
PRPPlatelet-rich plasma
ADPAdenosine diphosphate
H&EHematoxylin and eosin
SDStandard deviation
ANOVAAnalysis of variance
HRHeart rate
K+Potassium
RBCRed blood cell
HctHematocrit
HbHemoglobin
WBCWhite blood cell
CTClot time
MCFMaximum clot firmness
TRALITransfusion-related lung injury
ARDSAcute respiratory distress syndrome
TICTrauma-induced coagulopathy
GPIIb/IIIaGlycoprotein IIb/IIIa
TRIMTransfusion-associated immunomodulation

References

  1. Eastridge, B.J.; Mabry, R.L.; Seguin, P.; Cantrell, J.; Tops, T.; Uribe, P.; Mallett, O.; Zubko, T.; Oetjen-Gerdes, L.; Rasmussen, T.E.; et al. Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): Implications for the future of combat casualty care. J. Trauma. Acute Care Surg. 2012, 73, S431–S437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Spinella, P.C.; Cap, A.P. Prehospital hemostatic resuscitation to achieve zero preventable deaths after traumatic injury. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2017, 24, 529–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Brunskill, S.J.; Disegna, A.; Wong, H.; Fabes, J.; Desborough, M.J.R.; Dorée, C.; Davenport, R.; Curry, N.; Stanworth, S.J. Blood transfusion strategies for major bleeding in trauma. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2025, 4, CD012635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Anand, T.; Shin, H.; Ratnasekera, A.; Tran, M.L.; Huckeby, R.; Butts, L.; Stejskal, I.; Magnotti, L.J.; Joseph, B. Rethinking balanced resuscitation in trauma. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Bloch, E.M.; Jacobs, J.W.; Sachais, B.S.; Ziman, A.; Cushing, M.; Cap, A.P.; Gurney, J.M.; Beckett, A.; Yazer, M.H.; Spinella, P.C.; et al. Revisiting whole blood transfusion for the massively bleeding patient: The origins of resistance to change. Transfusion, 2025; Online Ahead of Print. [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Cap, A.P.; Pidcoke, H.F.; DePasquale, M.; Rappold, J.F.; Glassberg, E.; Eliassen, H.S.; Bjerkvig, C.K.; Fosse, T.K.; Kane, S.; Thompson, P.; et al. Blood far forward: Time to get moving! J. Trauma. Acute Care Surg. 2015, 78, S2–S6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Dobson, G.P.; Morris, J.L.; Davenport, L.M.; Letson, H.L. Traumatic-induced coagulopathy as a systems failure: A new window into hemostasis. Sem. Thromb. Hemost. 2020, 46, 199–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Holcomb, J.B.; Tilley, B.C.; Baraniuk, S.; Fox, E.E.; Wade, C.E.; Podbielski, J.M.; del Junco, D.J.; Brasel, K.J.; Bulger, E.M.; Callcut, R.A.; et al. Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma. JAMA 2015, 313, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Makris, M.; Iorio, A. Prehospital fresh frozen plasma: Universal life saver or treatment in search of a target population? Res. Pract. Thromb. Haemost. 2018, 3, 12–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Walsh, M.; Moore, E.E.; Moore, H.B.; Thomas, S.; Kwaan, H.C.; Speybroeck, J.; Marsee, M.; Bunch, C.M.; Stillson, J.; Thomas, A.V.; et al. Whole blood, fixed ratio, or goal-directed blood component therapy for the initial resuscitation of severely hemorrhaging trauma patients: A narrative review. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Jackson, B.; Murphy, C.; Fontaine, M.J. Current state of whole blood transfusion for civilian trauma resuscitation. Transfusion 2020, 60, S45–S52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  12. Spinella, P.C.; Perkins, J.G.; Grathwohl, K.W.; Beekley, A.C.; Holcomb, J.B. Warm fresh whole blood Is independently associated with improved survival for patients with combat-related traumatic injuries. J. Trauma: Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 2009, 66, S69–S76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Perkins, J.G.; Cap, A.P.; Spinella, P.C.; Shorr, A.F.; Beekley, A.C.; Grathwohl, K.W.; Rentas, F.J.; Wade, C.E.; Holcomb, J.B.; the 31st Combat Support Hospital Research Group. Comparison of platelet transfusion as fresh whole blood versus apheresis platelets for massively transfused combat trauma patients. Transfusion 2011, 51, 242–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Acharya, P.; Hurson, T.; Annesi, C.; Carico, C.; Lammers, D.; Mann, N.C.; Levy, M.; Jarman, M.P.; Kerby, J.D.; Jansen, J.O.; et al. Unequal access to timely care: Geographic variation in prehospital time among injured patients at risk of hemorrhagic shock. Transfusion, 2026; Online ahead of print. [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Burns, B.; Nolan, B.; Ferguson, I.; Peddle, M.; Partyka, C.; Healy, G.; Shackelford, S.; Cotton, B. Prehospital transfusion strategies in haemorrhagic shock. Scand. J. Trauma. Resusc. Emerg. Med. 2026, 34, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Dobson, G.P.; Letson, H.L. Adenosine, lidocaine, and Mg2+ (ALM): From cardiac surgery to combat casualty care-Teaching old drugs new tricks. J. Trauma. Acute Care Surg. 2016, 80, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Dobson, G.P.; Morris, J.; Letson, H.L. Adenosine, lidocaine and Mg2+ update: Teaching old drugs new tricks. Front. Med. 2023, 10, 1231759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Letson, H.; Morris, J.L.; Biros, E.; Dobson, G.P. Adenosine, lidocaine, and Mg2+ fluid therapy leads to 72-hour survival after hemorrhagic shock: A model for studying differential gene expression and extending biological time. J. Trauma. Acute Care Surg. 2019, 87, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Letson, H.L.; Dobson, G.P. 3% NaCl adenosine, lidocaine, Mg2+ (ALM) bolus and 4 hours “drip” infusion reduces noncompressible hemorrhage by 60% in a rat model. J. Trauma. Acute Care Surg. 2017, 82, 1063–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Letson, H.L.; Dobson, G.P. Adenosine, lidocaine and Mg2+ (ALM) fluid therapy attenuates systemic inflammation, platelet dysfunction and coagulopathy after non-compressible truncal hemorrhage. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0188144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Letson, H.L.; Biros, E.; Morris, J.L.; Dobson, G.P. ALM fluid therapy shifts sympathetic hyperactivity to parasympathetic dominance in the rat model of non-compressible hemorrhagic shock. Shock 2022, 57, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Percie du Sert, N.; Ahluwalia, A.; Alam, S.; Avey, M.T.; Baker, M.; Browne, W.J.; Clark, A.; Cuthill, I.C.; Dirnagl, U.; Emerson, M.; et al. Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLoS Biol. 2020, 18, e3000411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Morgan, C.E.; Prakash, V.S.; Vercammen, J.M.; Pritts, T.; Kibbe, M.R. Development and validation of 4 different rat models of uncontrolled hemorrhage. JAMA Surg. 2015, 150, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Fulop, A.; Turoczi, Z.; Garbaisz, D.; Harsanyi, L.; Szijarto, A. Experimental models of hemorrhagic shock: A review. Eur. Surg. Res. 2013, 50, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Stach, P.; Skowron, K.; Sobocinska, W.; Gil, K. Experimental rat models of hemorrhagic shock: Insights into controlled, uncontrolled, and trauma-associated protocols. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2026, 76, 621–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gurney, J.M.; Kotwal, R.S.; Holcomb, J.B.; Staudt, A.M.; Eastridge, B.; Sirkin, M.; Jensen, S.M.; Shackelford, S.M.; Sonka, B.J.M.; Wilson, J.N.; et al. A trauma expert consensus: Capabilities are required early to improve survivability from traumatic injury. J. Trauma. Acute Care Surg. 2024, 97, S82–S90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  27. Shah, K.G.; Jacob, A.; Rajan, D.; Wu, R.; Molmenti, E.P.; Nicastro, J.; Coppa, G.F.; Wang, P. Resuscitation of uncontrolled traumatic hemorrhage induced by severe liver injury: The use of human adrenomedullin and adrenomedullin binding protein-1. J. Trauma 2010, 69, 1415–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Heathcote, K.; Devlin, A.; McKie, E.; Cameron, P.; Earnest, A.; Morgan, G.; Gardiner, B.; Campbell, D.; Wullschleger, M.; Warren, J. Rural and urban patterns of severe injuries and hospital mortality in Australia: An analysis of the Australia New Zealand Trauma Registry: 2015–2019. Injury 2022, 53, 1893–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. de Souza, J.C.; Letson, H.L.; Gibbs, C.R.; Dobson, G.P. The burden of head trauma in rural and remote North Queensland, Australia. Injury 2024, 55, 111181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Jones, A.R.; Miller, J.; Brown, M. Epidemiology of trauma-related hemorrhage and time to definitive care across North America: Making the case for bleeding control education. Prehosp. Disaster Med. 2023, 38, 780–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Lundberg, O.H.M.; Lapidus, O.; Backstrom, D. Prehospital time intervals for trauma patients according to population density levels in Sweden; a national retrospective cohort study. Scand. J. Trauma. Resusc. Emerg. Med. 2025, 3, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Lee, H.B.; Blaufox, M.D. Blood volume in the rat. J. Nucl. Med. 1985, 26, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Cardenas, J.C.; Cap, A.P.; Swartz, M.D.; Huby, M.D.P.; Baer, L.A.; Matijevic, N.; Cotton, B.A.; Holcomb, J.B.; Wade, C.E. Plasma resuscitation promotes coagulation homeostasis following shock-induced hypercoagulability. Shock 2016, 45, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  34. Morton, D.B. A systematic approach for establishing humane endpoints. ILAR J. 2000, 41, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Toth, L.A. Defining the moribund condition as an experimental endpoint for animal research. ILAR J. 2000, 41, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Nemzek, J.A.; Xiao, H.Y.; Minard, A.E.; Bolgos, G.L.; Remick, D.G. Humane endpoints in shock research. Shock 2004, 21, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Letson, H.L.; Dobson, G.P. Correction of acute traumatic coagulopathy with small-volume 7.5% NaCl adenosine, lidocaine, and Mg2+ occurs within 5 minutes: A ROTEM analysis. J. Trauma. Acute Care Surg. 2015, 78, 773–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Messora, M.R.; Nagata, M.J.H.; Furlaneto, F.A.C.; Dornelles, R.C.M.; Bomfim, S.R.M.; Deliberador, T.M.; Garcia, V.D.; Bosco, A.F. A standardized research protocol for platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation in rats. RSBO 2011, 8, 299–304. [Google Scholar]
  39. Letson, H.L.; Granfeldt, A.; Jensen, T.H.; Mattson, T.H.; Dobson, G.P. Adenosine, lidocaine, and magnesium support a high flow, hypotensive, vasodilatory state with improved oxygen delivery and cerebral protection in a pig model of noncompressible hemorrhage. J. Surg. Res. 2020, 253, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Pati, S.; Matijevic, N.; Doursout, M.F.; Ko, T.; Cao, Y.; Deng, X.; Kozar, R.A.; Hartwell, E.; Conyers, J.; Holcomb, J.B. Protective effects of fresh frozen plasma on vascular endothelial permeability, coagulation, and resuscitation after hemorrhagic shock are time dependent and diminish between days 0 and 5 after thaw. J. Trauma: Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 2010, 69, S55–S63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Deng, X.; Cao, Y.; Huby, M.P.; Duan, C.; Baer, L.; Peng, Z.; Kozar, R.A.; Doursout, M.-F.; Holcomb, J.B.; Wade, C.E.; et al. Adiponectin in fresh frozen plasma contributes to restoration of vascular barrier function after hemorrhagic shock. Shock 2016, 45, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Wirtz, M.R.; Jurgens, J.; Zuurbier, C.J.; Roelofs, J.; Spinella, P.C.; Muszynski, J.A.; Goslings, J.C.; Juffermans, N.P. Washing or filtering of blood products does not improve outcome in a rat model of trauma and multiple transfusion. Transfusion 2019, 59, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Delano, M.J.; Rizoli, S.B.; Rhind, S.G.; Cuschieri, J.; Junger, W.; Baker, A.J.; Dubick, M.A.; Hoyt, D.B.; Bulger, E.M. Prehospital resuscitation of traumatic hemorrhagic shock with hypertonic solutions worsens hypocoagulation and hyperfibrinolysis. Shock 2015, 44, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Letson, H.L.; Dobson, G.P. Unexpected 100% survival following 60% blood loss using small-volume 7.5% NaCl with adenocaine and Mg2+ in the rat model of extreme hemorrhagic shock. Shock 2011, 36, 586–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. McVey, M.J.; Kapur, R.; Cserti-Gazdewich, C.; Semple, J.W.; Karkouti, K.; Kuebler, W.M. Transfusion-related acute lung injury in the perioperative patient. Anesthesiology 2019, 131, 693–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Moreno, A.R.; Fisher, A.D.; Long, B.J.; Douin, D.J.; Wright, F.L.; Rizzo, J.A.; April, M.D.M.; Cohen, M.J.; Getz, T.M.; Schauer, S.G.D. An analysis of the association of whole blood transfusion with the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit. Care Med. 2024, 53, e109–e116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  47. Kutcher, M.E.; Redick, B.J.; McCreery, R.C.; Crane, I.M.; Greenberg, M.D.; Cachola, L.M.; Nelson, M.F.R.; Cohen, M.J. Characterization of platelet dysfunction after trauma. J. Trauma. Acute Care Surg. 2012, 73, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Solomon, C.; Traintinger, S.; Ziegler, B.; Hanke, A.; Rahe-Meyer, N.; Voelckel, W.; Schöchl, H. Platelet function following trauma. A multiple electrode aggregometry study. Thromb. Haemost. 2011, 106, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  49. White, N.J.; Newton, J.C.; Martin, E.J.; Mohammed, B.M.; Contaifer, D., Jr.; Bostic, J.L.; Brophy, G.M.; Spiess, B.D.; Pusateri, A.E.; Ward, K.R.; et al. Clot formation is associated with fibrinogen and platelet forces in a cohort of severely injured emergency department trauma patients. Shock 2015, 44, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  50. Dobson, G.P.; Morris, J.L.; Biros, E.; Davenport, L.M.; Letson, H.L. Major surgery leads to a proinflammatory phenotype: Differential gene expression following a laparotomy. Ann. Med. Surg. 2021, 71, 102970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Esmon, C.T.; Xu, J.; Lupu, F. Innate immunity and coagulation. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2011, 9, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Luyendyk, J.P.; Schoenecker, J.G.; Flick, M.J. The multifaceted role of fibrinogen in tissue injury and inflammation. Blood 2019, 133, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  53. Dobson, G.P.; Morris, J.L.; Letson, H.L. Immune dysfunction following severe trauma: A systems failure from the central nervous system to mitochondria. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 968453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  54. Pérez-Calatayud, A.A.; Görlinger, K. Molecular mechanisms of transfusion-associated immunomodulation and its impact in the critically ill. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Lammers, D.; Betzold, R.; McClellan, J.; Eckert, M.; Bingham, J.; Hu, P.; Hurst, S.; Baird, E.; Hashmi, Z.; Kerby, J.; et al. Quantifying the benefit of whole blood on mortality in trauma patients requiring emergent laparotomy. J. Trauma. Acute Care Surg. 2024, 97, 747–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  56. Malkin, M.; Nevo, A.; Brundage, S.I.; Schreiber, M. Effectiveness and safety of whole blood compared to balanced blood components in resuscitation of hemorrhaging trauma patients—A systematic review. Injury 2021, 52, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Meyer, D.E.; Vincent, L.E.; Fox, E.E.; O’Keeffe, T.; Inaba, K.; Bulger, E.; Holcomb, J.B.; Cotton, B.A. Every minute counts: Time to delivery of initial massive transfusion cooler and its impact on mortality. J. Trauma. Acute Care Surg. 2017, 83, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Ketchum, L.; Hess, J.R.; Hiippala, S. Indications for early fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate, and platelet transfusion in trauma. J. Trauma: Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 2006, 60, S51–S58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Torres, C.M.; Kenzik, K.M.; Saillant, N.N.; Scantling, D.R.; Sanchez, S.E.; Brahmbhatt, T.S.; Dechert, T.A.; Sakran, J.V. Timing to first whole blood transfusion and survival following severe hemorrhage in trauma patients. JAMA Surg. 2024, 159, 374–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Pumiglia, L.; Williams, J.M.; Beiling, M.; Francis, A.D.; Prey, B.J.; Lammers, D.T.; McClellan, J.M.; Bingham, J.R.; Gurney, J.; Schreiber, M. Mortality in hypotensive combat casualties who require emergent laparotomy in the forward deployed environment. Am. J. Surg. 2024, 231, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Alshalani, A.; van Manen, L.; Boshuizen, M.; van Bruggen, R.; Acker, J.P.; Juffermans, N.P. The Effect of sex-mismatched red blood cell transfusion on endothelial cell activation in critically ill patients. Transfus. Med. Hemother 2022, 49, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Figure 1. Schematic of the Study Protocol. Animals had 30 min baseline stabilization period after surgical instrumentation prior to laparotomy, liver resection, and uncontrolled bleeding. Phase 1 resuscitation commenced 15 min after liver resection, and animals received a 0.7 mL/kg bolus 3% NaCl ± ALM. Sixty minutes after bolus administration, Phase 2 resuscitation of 0.9% NaCl ± ALM drip commenced and continued for 4 h. During Phase 3 transfusion, animals received either no transfusion, 20% TBV FFP, or 20% TBV FWB. Animals received an additional 0.7 mL/kg 0.9% NaCl ± ALM bolus 24 h and 48 h after liver resection. Sham animals underwent surgical instrumentation, laparotomy and liver isolation without resection and bleeding and received the same Phase 1 and 2 treatment as Saline controls (3% NaCl bolus/0.9% NaCl drip). Animals received 5 mg/kg Carprieve® s.c. prior to recovery from anesthesia and at 24 h and 48 h after liver injury. ALM, adenosine, lidocaine, magnesium; CBC, complete blood count; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; FWB, fresh whole blood; ROTEM, rotational thromboelastometry; SAL, saline; TBV, total blood volume.
Figure 1. Schematic of the Study Protocol. Animals had 30 min baseline stabilization period after surgical instrumentation prior to laparotomy, liver resection, and uncontrolled bleeding. Phase 1 resuscitation commenced 15 min after liver resection, and animals received a 0.7 mL/kg bolus 3% NaCl ± ALM. Sixty minutes after bolus administration, Phase 2 resuscitation of 0.9% NaCl ± ALM drip commenced and continued for 4 h. During Phase 3 transfusion, animals received either no transfusion, 20% TBV FFP, or 20% TBV FWB. Animals received an additional 0.7 mL/kg 0.9% NaCl ± ALM bolus 24 h and 48 h after liver resection. Sham animals underwent surgical instrumentation, laparotomy and liver isolation without resection and bleeding and received the same Phase 1 and 2 treatment as Saline controls (3% NaCl bolus/0.9% NaCl drip). Animals received 5 mg/kg Carprieve® s.c. prior to recovery from anesthesia and at 24 h and 48 h after liver injury. ALM, adenosine, lidocaine, magnesium; CBC, complete blood count; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; FWB, fresh whole blood; ROTEM, rotational thromboelastometry; SAL, saline; TBV, total blood volume.
Medicina 62 00453 g001
Figure 2. (A) Kaplan–Meier survival curve for Shams, Saline controls and ALM treatment group receiving no transfusion (black), FFP (blue), or FWB (red) following laparotomy, liver resection and uncontrolled hemorrhage. Log Rank (Mantel Cox): χ2 = 59.715, df = 8, p < 0.001. (B) Number of deaths per study phase. ALM, adenosine, lidocaine, magnesium; NT, no transfusion; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; FWB, fresh whole blood.
Figure 2. (A) Kaplan–Meier survival curve for Shams, Saline controls and ALM treatment group receiving no transfusion (black), FFP (blue), or FWB (red) following laparotomy, liver resection and uncontrolled hemorrhage. Log Rank (Mantel Cox): χ2 = 59.715, df = 8, p < 0.001. (B) Number of deaths per study phase. ALM, adenosine, lidocaine, magnesium; NT, no transfusion; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; FWB, fresh whole blood.
Medicina 62 00453 g002
Figure 3. ADP-induced primary platelet aggregation in Shams, Saline controls and ALM treatment group survivors vs. non-survivors receiving no transfusion, FFP, or FWB after laparotomy, liver resection and uncontrolled hemorrhage. Samples were taken 72 h following liver resection (survivors, S) or at time of sacrifice in moribund animals (non-survivors, NS) (refer Section 2.6). Survivors indicated with solid fill and non-survivors indicated with diagonal pattern. * p < 0.05 compared to ALM NT survivors, Sham FFP survivors, and Sham FWB survivors; p < 0.05 compared to ALM NT survivors. ADP, adenosine disphosphate; ALM, adenosine, lidocaine, magnesium; NT, no transfusion; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; FWB, fresh whole blood; S, survivors; NS, non-survivors.
Figure 3. ADP-induced primary platelet aggregation in Shams, Saline controls and ALM treatment group survivors vs. non-survivors receiving no transfusion, FFP, or FWB after laparotomy, liver resection and uncontrolled hemorrhage. Samples were taken 72 h following liver resection (survivors, S) or at time of sacrifice in moribund animals (non-survivors, NS) (refer Section 2.6). Survivors indicated with solid fill and non-survivors indicated with diagonal pattern. * p < 0.05 compared to ALM NT survivors, Sham FFP survivors, and Sham FWB survivors; p < 0.05 compared to ALM NT survivors. ADP, adenosine disphosphate; ALM, adenosine, lidocaine, magnesium; NT, no transfusion; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; FWB, fresh whole blood; S, survivors; NS, non-survivors.
Medicina 62 00453 g003
Figure 4. (A) Lung histology injury scores for Shams, Saline controls and ALM treatment group receiving no transfusion, FFP, or FWB after laparotomy, liver resection and uncontrolled hemorrhage. Data represent mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 compared to Saline NT and ALM NT;  p < 0.05 compared to all NT groups. (B) Representative histopathology images from ALM NT (a,d), ALM FFP (b,e), and ALM FWB group (c,f) at 10× and 40× magnification, showing evidence of inflammation, hemorrhage, cytoplasmic vacuolation, and epithelial degeneration (ED) in FFP and FWB groups. ALM, adenosine, lidocaine, magnesium; NT, no transfusion; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; FWB, fresh whole blood.
Figure 4. (A) Lung histology injury scores for Shams, Saline controls and ALM treatment group receiving no transfusion, FFP, or FWB after laparotomy, liver resection and uncontrolled hemorrhage. Data represent mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 compared to Saline NT and ALM NT;  p < 0.05 compared to all NT groups. (B) Representative histopathology images from ALM NT (a,d), ALM FFP (b,e), and ALM FWB group (c,f) at 10× and 40× magnification, showing evidence of inflammation, hemorrhage, cytoplasmic vacuolation, and epithelial degeneration (ED) in FFP and FWB groups. ALM, adenosine, lidocaine, magnesium; NT, no transfusion; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; FWB, fresh whole blood.
Medicina 62 00453 g004
Table 1. Survival summary.
Table 1. Survival summary.
TimeSham
NT
Saline
NT
ALM
NT
Sham
FFP
Saline
FFP
ALM
FFP
Sham FWBSaline FWBALM FWB
72 h Survival
(%)
5/10 (50%)0/10
(0%)
10/10
(100%)
9/12
(75%)
1/12
(8%)
1/12
(8%)
6/12
(50%)
2/12
(17%)
0/12
(0%)
Survival Time (h)53 ± 2123 ± 14 *72 ± 061 ± 2016 ± 21 34 ± 18 50 ± 2819 ± 28 22 ± 11 *
Phase 1–2No deaths2No deathsNo deaths7No
deaths
182
Phase 3–<24 hNo deaths3No deathsNo deaths13212
24–<48 h45No deaths3351No
deaths
8
48–<72 h1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo
deaths
321No survivors
Survival time presented as mean ± SD. ALM, adenosine, lidocaine, magnesium; NT, no transfusion; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; FWB, fresh whole blood. * p < 0.05 vs. Sham NT, Sham FFP, Sham FWB, and ALM NT;  p < 0.01 vs. Sham NT, Sham FFP, Sham FWB, and ALM NT;  p < 0.05 compared to Sham FFP and ALM NT.
Table 2. Arterial pH and Lactate for Shams, Saline controls, and ALM group without transfusion, and with FFP or FWB following laparotomy, liver resection and hemorrhage.
Table 2. Arterial pH and Lactate for Shams, Saline controls, and ALM group without transfusion, and with FFP or FWB following laparotomy, liver resection and hemorrhage.
Parameter
(Reference Range)
TimeSham NTSaline NTALM NTSham FFPSaline FFPALM FFPSham FWBSaline FWBALM FWB
pH
[7.366–7.462]
P1–P2No deathsNANo deathsNo deaths7.14 ± 0.24 7No deaths6.72 16.94 ± 0.22 87.00 ± 0.05 2
P37.44 ± 0.047.45 ± 0.07 87.47 ± 0.047.48 ± 0.037.39 ± 0.12 57.40 ± 0.177.43 ± 0.07 117.39 ± 1.0 47.44 ± 0.04 10
P3–<24 hNo deaths7.10 1No deathsNA7.30 17.16 ± 0.27 37.09 ± 0.42 27.26 17.44 ± 0.15 2
24–<48 h7.49 17.38 ± 0.18 4No deaths7.21 ± 0.20 37.32 ± 0.40 37.44 ± 0.10 57.46 1No deaths7.43 ± 0.08 8
48–<72 hNo sampleNo survivorsNo deathsNANo deaths7.35 ± 0.25 37.42 ± 0.06 27.44 1No survivors
72 h7.54 ± 0.03 5**No survivors7.52 ± 0.077.54 ± 0.04 9†7.53 17.45 17.56 ± 0.04 67.56 ± 0.0.4 2No survivors
Lactate
(mM)
Baseline1.11 ± 0.351.30 ± 0.431.37 ± 0.241.72 ± 0.41 ††1.58 ± 0.301.62 ± 0.211.30 ± 0.321.28 ± 0.381.20 ± 0.27
P1–P2No deaths8.95 ± 1.48 2*No deathsNo deaths7.43 ± 2.73 7No deaths20.0 110.25 ± 5.36 8*10.70 ± 4.10 2
P32.21 ± 1.40 †††1.15 ± 0.14 81.66 ± 0.65 ‡‡3.15 ± 3.48 ¶¶2.84 ± 2.80 5‡‡1.82 ± 0.912.57 ± 2.70 113.13 ± 3.20 4‡‡1.41 ± 0.45 10
P3–<24 hNo deaths7.90 ± 2.18 3||No deathsNo deaths5.30 16.57 ± 2.83 312.85 ± 8.70 27.90 11.65 ± 0.50 2
24 h2.79 ± 1.45 *2.60 ± 0.19 5†2.29 ± 0.70 2.93 ± 0.56 ||2.88 ± 0.83 4**2.32 ± 0.86 9†2.61 ± 0.43 9‡1.83 ± 0.21 3*1.50 ± 0.52 8
24–<48 h7.13 ± 4.08 45.48 ± 2.56 5†No deaths5.30 ± 2.60 35.53 ± 4.00 33.80 ± 1.47 2.1 1No deaths2.44 ± 0.98
48 h2.93 ± 0.76 6***No survivors1.94 ± 0.58 2.19 ± 0.70 92.6 14.23 ± 1.73 42.70 ± 1.42 2.60 ± 0.76 No survivors
48–<72 hNo sampleNo survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths4.57 ± 1.95 34.55 ± 2.76 22.9 1No survivors
72 h1.78 ± 0.49 5*No survivors1.29 ± 0.653.76 ± 4.29 91.7 12.7 11.30 ± 0.21 61.55 ± 0.50 2No survivors
Measurements were taken at baseline, end of Phase 3, 24 h (lactate only), 48 h (lactate only), and 72 h (survivors), or at time of sacrifice according to humane endpoints (non-survivors) (see Section 2.6). Data represent mean ± SD. Results for P1–2, P3–<24 h, 24–<48 h, and 48–<72 h indicated by grey shading are for moribund animals sacrificed prior to experimental end (72 h), i.e., non-survivors. n values for NT, FFP, and FWB groups are n = 10, n = 12, and n = 12, respectively, or indicated by superscript number. P1, Phase 1 (60 min bolus resuscitation); P2, Phase 2 (4 h drip resuscitation); P3, Phase 3 (60 min transfusion); ALM, adenosine, lidocaine, magnesium; NT, no transfusion; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; FWB, fresh whole blood; NA, not available. No baseline measurements and reduced sample numbers for pH due to effect of anesthesia or oximetry measuring errors (indicated by NA or reduced n value). No sample for Sham NT animal sacrificed at 49 h. * p < 0.05 compared to baseline;  p < 0.05 compared to baseline and Phase 3;  p < 0.05 compared to baseline, Phase 3, and 72 h; § p < 0.05 compared to baseline, Phase 3, and 24 h; || p < 0.05 compared to baseline and 48 h;  p < 0.05 compared to baseline and 72 h; ** p < 0.05 compared to Phase 3; †† p < 0.05 compared to Sham NT and Saline FWB; ‡‡ p < 0.05 compared to Saline NT; ¶¶ p < 0.05 compared to Sham FWB; *** p < 0.05 compared to ALM NT, baseline, Phase 3, and 72 h; ††† p < 0.05 compared to baseline and Saline NT.
Table 3. Red blood cell parameters and platelet count for Shams, Saline controls, and ALM group without transfusion, and with FFP or FWB following laparotomy, liver resection, and hemorrhage.
Table 3. Red blood cell parameters and platelet count for Shams, Saline controls, and ALM group without transfusion, and with FFP or FWB following laparotomy, liver resection, and hemorrhage.
Parameter
[Reference Range]
TimeSham NTSaline NTALM NTSham FFPSaline FFPALM FFPSham FWBSaline FWBALM FWB
RBC
(×1012/L)
[5.30–10.00]
Baseline7.90 ± 0.35 7.52 ± 0.65 8.42 ± 0.468.72 ± 0.188.50 ± 1.10879 ± 0.598.99 ± 0.298.45 ± 0.538.67 ± 0.52
P1–P2No deaths5.38 ± 0.89 2No deathsNo deaths6.52 ± 1.60 7No deaths8.12 16.08 ± 1.42 8*7.61 ± 0.32 2*
P3–<24 hNo deaths7.35 ± 0.51 3No deathsNo deaths5.06 16.32 ± 0.77 35.67 ± 0.91 24.94 18.01 ± 0.24 2
24–<48 h5.57 ± 0.75 4*6.14 ± 1.53 5No deaths6.73 ± 3.49 38.57 ± 2.16 36.10 ± 1.32 5*7.30 1No deaths7.92 ± 1.33 8
48–<72 h5.48 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths7.46 ± 1.84 3*5.69 ± 0.93 26.58 1No survivors
72 h5.00 ± 0.95 5*No survivors5.63 ± 1.01 *6.02 ± 0.83 9*5.20 12.39 15.77 ± 1.54 6*6.05 ± 0.79 2No survivors
HgB
(g/dL)
[14.0–18.0]
Baseline15.0 ± 0.514.9 ± 0.615.4 ± 0.815.5 ± 1.514.6 ± 2.015.4 ± 0.615.6 ± 0.514.7 ± 1.215.6 ± 1.1
P1–P2No deaths10.0 ± 0.3 2*No deathsNo deaths11.3 ± 2.9 7No deaths14.2 110.4 ± 2.4 8*13.3 ± 0.3 2
P3–<24 hNo deaths13.1 ± 2.6 3No deathsNo deaths8.4 111.2 ± 0.7 39.5 ± 1.4 29.3 114.8 ± 1.2 2
24–<48 h9.4 ± 1.1 4*11.4 ± 2.7 4*No deaths11.4 ± 5.9 314.5 ± 4.4 311.0 ± 2.4 5*12.2 1No deaths14.4 ± 2.7 8
48–<72 h9.7 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths12.5 ± 3.2 39.5 ± 1.7 211.7 1No survivors
72 h9.2 ± 1.7 5*No survivors10.2 ± 1.7 *10.7 ± 1.8 9*8.5 14.1 110.8 ± 3.5 6*10.5 ± 1.2 2No survivors
HCT
(%)
[35.00–52.00]
Baseline44.87 ± 3.71 §42.64 ± 2.91 ||48.21 ± 2.8048.20 ± 2.4447.20 ± 5.7847.78 ± 2.9849.78 ± 1.9646.88 ± 3.9045.98 ± 2.93
P1–P2No deaths29.27 ± 5.06 2No deathsNo deaths34.28 ± 7.89 7No deaths45.63 132.71 ± 7.25 8*38.35 ± 0.07 2*
P3–<24 hNo deaths40.90 ± 2.96 3No deathsNo deaths25.32 133.51 ± 4.83 3*30.34 ± 6.57 226.26 140.72 ± 1.24 2*
24–<48 h29.31 ± 5.26 434.75 ± 8.85 4No deaths36.40 ± 19.88 346.83 ± 11.45 332.45 ± 6.88 5*39.46 1No deaths41.93 ± 8.00 8
48–<72 h29.43 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths40.23 ± 11.41 331.01 ± 6.18 237.15 1No survivors
72 h28.23 ± 5.24 5*No survivors32.03 ± 5.29 *33.05 ± 4.03 9*28.91 113.44 132.42 ± 9.31 6*32.75 ± 5.28 2No survivors
MCHC
(g/dL)
[31.0–40.0]
Baseline33.5 ± 2.235.1 ± 2.931.9 ± 1.032.2 ± 3.930.9 ± 1.532.2 ± 1.431.4 ± 0.931.4 ± 0.934.0 ± 2.0 §
P1–P2No deaths34.6 ± 5.2 2No deathsNo deaths32.8 ± 1.6 7*No deaths31.2 131.5 ± 1.8 834.8 ± 0.6 2
P3–<24 hNo deaths32.0 ± 5.3 3No deathsNo deaths33.2 133.6 ± 3.3 331.7 ± 2.1 235.4 136.1 ± 1.8 2
24–<48 h32.5 ± 2.5 432.9 ± 1.9 4No deaths31.9 ± 2.0 330.7 ± 1.7 333.7 ± 0.9 530.8 1No deaths34.3 ± 2.1 8
48–<72 h33.1 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths31.2 ± 1.2 330.7 ± 0.8 231.4 1No survivors
72 h32.7 ± 2.9 5No survivors32.1 ± 1.2 *32.2 ± 2.529.3 130.6 133.4 ± 5.7 632.0 ± 1.5 2No survivors
PLT
(×109/L)
[100–500]
Baseline279 ± 115300 ± 111135 ± 71123 ± 113 **163 ± 149202 ± 138242 ± 122154 ± 133175 ± 129
P1–P2No deaths257 ± 11 2No deathsNo deaths256 ± 121 7*No deaths7 1248 ± 179 8227 ± 168 2
P3–<24 hNo deaths52 ± 25 3No deathsNo deaths162 1207 ± 122 3149 ± 119 2241 1203 ± 90 2
24–<48 h54 ± 35 418 ± 19 4*No deaths54 ± 75 336 ± 51 3169 ± 138 50 1No deaths114 ± 98 8
48–<72 h20 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths15 ± 4 311 ± 16 217 1No survivors
72 h131 ± 61 5*No survivors125 ± 10079 ± 71 9120 194 1114 ± 66 6145 ± 32 2No survivors
PCT
(%)
Baseline0.21 ± 0.080.21 ± 0.080.10 ± 0.050.09 ± 0.08 **0.11 ± 0.100.14 ± 0.100.18 ± 0.060.11 ± 0.090.12 ± 0.07
P1–P2No deaths0.17 ± 0.02 2No deathsNo deaths0.15 ± 0.07 7No deaths0.00 10.14 ± 0.10 80.14 ± 0.10 2
P3–<24 hNo deaths0.04 ± 0.02 3No deathsNo deaths0.09 10.13 ± 0.08 3*0.09 ± 0.07 20.14 10.13 ± 0.06 2
24–<48 h0.04 ± 0.03 40.01 ± 0.02 4*No deaths0.03 ± 0.04 30.06± 0.06 30.11 ± 0.10 5Not calculableNo deaths0.07 ± 0.07 8
48–<72 h0.01 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths0.01 ± 0.00 30.01 10.01 1No survivors
72 h0.10 ± 0.05 5No survivors0.10 ± 0.070.06 ± 0.06 90.07 10.06 10.08 ± 0.05 60.10 ± 0.01 2No survivors
Measurements were taken at baseline and 72 h (survivors), or at time of sacrifice according to humane endpoints (non-survivors) (see Section 2.6). Data represent mean ± SD. Results for P1–P2, P3–<24 h, 24–<48 h, and 48–<72 h indicated by grey shading are for moribund animals sacrificed prior to experimental end (72 h), i.e., non-survivors. n values for NT, FFP, and FWB groups are n = 10, n = 12, and n = 12, respectively, or indicated by superscript number. P1, Phase 1 (60 min bolus resuscitation); P2, Phase 2 (4 h drip resuscitation); P3, Phase 3 (60 min transfusion); ALM, adenosine, lidocaine, magnesium; NT, no transfusion; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; FWB, fresh whole blood; RBC, red blood cell; HgB, hemoglobin; HCT, hematocrit; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (average [HgB]/RBC); PLT, platelet; PCT, plateletcrit (total platelet mass); * p < 0.05 compared to baseline;  p < 0.05 compared to Sham FFP and Sham FWB;  p < 0.05 compared to ALM NT, Saline FFP, and Saline FWB; § p < 0.05 compared to Sham FWB; || p < 0.05 compared to ALM NT;  p < 0.05 compared to ALM NT, Sham FFP, and Sham FWB; ** p < 0.05 compared to Sham NT.
Table 4. White blood cell differential in Shams, Saline controls, and ALM group without transfusion, and with FFP or FWB following laparotomy, liver resection, and hemorrhage.
Table 4. White blood cell differential in Shams, Saline controls, and ALM group without transfusion, and with FFP or FWB following laparotomy, liver resection, and hemorrhage.
Parameter
[Reference Range]
TimeSham NTSaline NTALM NTSham FFPSaline FFPALM FFPSham FWBSaline FWBALM FWB
WBC
(×109/L)
[2.10–19.50]
Baseline8.02 ± 3.108.92 ± 2.0512.19 ± 2.8010.24 ± 3.079.85 ± 3.6211.35 ± 4.0211.79 ± 3.9211.31 ± 3.9110.56 ± 3.91
P1–P2No deaths4.04 ± 3.48 2No deathsNo deaths7.12 ± 5.33 7No deaths8.42 13.87 ± 3.14 8*5.76 ± 4.60 2
P3–<24 hNo deaths2.31 ± 1.31 3No deathsNo deaths8.07 17.09 ± 3.27 39.46 ± 2.92 21.79 18.69 ± 1.67 2
24–<48 h4.48 ± 6.76 40.76 ± 0.39 5*No deaths1.83 ± 1.13 3*2.46 ± 2.33 3*2.85 ± 1.64 5*1.34 1No deaths1.89 ± 1.80 8*
48–<72 h0.56 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths1.38 ± 1.55 3*0.73 ± 0.12 22.63 1No survivors
72 h6.03 ± 3.79 5No survivors10.68 ± 4.0811.38 ± 5.35 94.84 11.29 16.10 ± 4.13 6*7.28 ± 5.12 2No survivors
LYM
(×109/L)
[2.00–14.10]
Baseline5.76 ± 1.986.65 ± 1.178.62 ± 2.127.59 ± 2.427.07 ± 2.237.62 ± 2.468.81 ± 3.377.80 ± 2.836.39 ± 2.40
P1–P2No deaths1.65 ± 1.00 2No deathsNo deaths2.82 ± 1.80 7*No deaths8.42 11.94 ± 1.75 8*1.42 ± 0.66 2*
P3–<24 hNo deaths0.75 ± 0.36 3*No deathsNo deaths4.11 12.65 ± 2.31 34.95 ± 2.58 20.71 12.75 ± 1.29 2
24–<48 h0.92 ± 0.72 4*0.52 ± 0.31 4*No deaths1.02 ± 0.45 3*0.29 ± 0.21 3*1.15 ± 0.53 5*0.67 1No deaths0.89 ± 0.48 8*
48–<72 h0.42 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths0.53 ± 0.58 3*0.51 ± 0.251.05 1No survivors
72 h1.92 ± 0.79 5*No survivors4.66 ± 2.78 *5.12 ± 2.66 9*1.75 10.97 11.71 ± 1.78 6*3.45 ± 2.89 2*No survivors
MON
(×109/L)
[0.00–0.98]
Baseline0.55 ± 0.440.39 ± 0.310.59 ± 0.640.57 ± 0.610.69 ± 0.500.84 ± 0.590.67 ± 0.680.81 ± 0.53 10.41 ± 0.62
P1–P2No deaths0.32 ± 0.33 2No deathsNo deaths0.35 ± 0.32 7No deaths0.89 10.26 ± 0.25 80.40 ± 0.31 2
P3–<24 hNo deaths0.15 ± 0.09 3No deathsNo deaths0.90 10.53 ± 0.31 3*0.54 ± 0.04 20.21 10.67 ± 0.02 2
24–<48 h0.38 ± 0.69 40.04 ± 0.03 4No deaths0.12 ± 0.11 30.24 ± 0.29 30.21 ± 0.27 50.13 1No deaths0.10 ± 0.11 8*
48–<72 h0.03 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths0.07 ± 0.07 30.03 ± 0.04 20.24 1No survivors
72 h0.34 ± 0.27 5No survivors0.95 ± 0.730.77 ± 0.49 90.15 10.01 10.37 ± 0.27 60.19 ± 0.07 2No survivors
NEU
(×109/L)
[0.10–5.40]
Baseline1.72 ± 0.991.89 ± 1.092.98 ± 1.222.08 ± 1.032.10 ± 1.222.89 ± 1.392.31 ± 0.852.68 ± 1.012.53 ± 1.38
P1–P2No deaths2.07 ± 2.14 2No deathsNo deaths3.95 ± 3.71 7No deaths2.72 12.04 ± 1.70 83.94 ± 3.63 2
P3–<24 hNo deaths1.42 ± 1.50 3No deathsNo deaths3.06 13.91 ± 1.60 33.98 ± 0.37 20.87 15.27 ± 0.40 2
24–<48 h3.18 ± 5.65 40.33 ± 0.18 4*No deaths0.69 ± 0.57 31.93 ± 1.84 31.50 ± 1.30 50.54 1No deaths0.91 ± 1.58 8*
48–<72 h0.11 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths0.77 ± 0.93 30.20 ± 0.11 21.34 1No survivors
72 h3.76 ± 2.96 5No survivors5.07 ± 0.96 *5.50 ± 2.62 9*2.94 10.31 14.03 ± 2.13 63.65 ± 2.16 2No survivors
LYM
(%)
Baseline72.5 ± 7.775.5 ± 6.871.1 ± 8.175.0 ± 9.373.6 ± 8.668.6 ± 7.274.0 ± 8.769.1 ± 7.570.1 ± 7.1
P1–P2No deaths47.9 ± 16.2 2No deathsNo deaths47.7 ± 20.9 7*No deaths57.1 145.5 ± 19.3 8*29.5 ± 12.0 2
P3–<24 hNo deaths43.7 ± 30.5 3No deathsNo deaths50.9 134.0 ± 17.0 350.5 ± 11.7 239.5 130.9 ± 8.8 2
24–<48 h46.3 ± 30.4 458.2 ± 23.7 4No deaths60.8 ± 15.0 314.2 ± 5.9 3*49.8 ± 27.0 549.6 1No deaths65.1 ± 24.7 8
48–<72 h74.5 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths46.6 ± 29.1 368.1 ± 23.3 239.8 1No survivors
72 h34.9 ± 10.4 5*No survivors40.0 ± 13.8 *44.2 ± 5.9 9*36.2 175.3 123.7 ± 11.3 6†44.4 ± 8.6 2No survivors
MON
(%)
Baseline3.9 ± 4.04.3 ± 3.55.0 ± 4.85.2 ± 5.16.5 ± 3.77.0 ± 4.05.9 ± 5.06.7 ± 3.76.7 ± 3.1
P1–P2No deaths7.0 ± 2.1 2No deathsNo deaths4.9 ± 2.5 7No deaths10.5 16.4 ± 3.9 87.1 ± 0.3 2
P3–<24 hNo deaths6.3 ± 0.4 3No deathsNo deaths11.2 17.0 ± 1.4 36.0 ± 2.3 211.7 17.8 ± 1.7 2
24–<48 h5.5 ± 3.9 43.9 ± 2.6 4No deaths6.0 ± 2.0 38.8 ± 3.8 35.9 ± 4.6 59.8 1No deaths4.5 ± 2.0 8
48–<72 h6.1 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths6.0 ± 6.6 33.9 ± 4.6 29.2 1No survivors
72 h5.5 ± 3.4 5No survivors8.4 ± 3.9 *6.6 ± 1.9 93.1 10.6 15.9 ± 1.4 63.1 ± 1.2 2No survivors
NEU
(%)
Baseline20.5 ± 5.020.2 ± 6.723.9 ± 7.619.9 ± 7.219.9 ± 6.824.4 ± 5.220.1 ± 5.524.2 ± 6.523.3 ± 6.0
P1–P2No deaths45.2 ± 14.1 2No deathsNo deaths47.4 ± 20.3 7*No deaths32.3 148.1 ± 17.0 8*63.5 ± 12.3 2
P3–<24 hNo deaths50.1 ± 30.1 3No deathsNo deaths37.9 158.9 ± 18.0 343.5 ± 9.5 248.8 161.4 ± 7.1 2*
24–<48 h48.2 ± 29.4 437.9 ± 21.4 4No deaths33.2 ± 13.4 376.9 ± 8.3 3*44.3 ± 24.1 540.5 1No deaths30.3 ± 24.2 8
48–<72 h19.4 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths47.4 ± 23.5 328.2 ± 18.7 251.0 1No survivors
72 h59.7 ± 11.8 5*No survivors51.6 ± 14.3 *49.2 ± 7.2 9*60.7 124.2 170.5 ± 11.3 6†52.6 ± 7.4 2No survivors
NEU:LYM Baseline0.29 ± 0.100.28 ± 0.130.35 ± 0.140.28 ± 0.130.28 ± 0.130.37 ± 0.110.28 ± 0.110.36 ± 0.130.71 ± 1.31
P1–P2No deaths0.05 ± 0.06 2*No deathsNo deaths0.12 ± 0.13 7No deaths0.05 10.53 ± 0.04 8*0.17 ± 0.19 2
P3–<24 hNo deaths3.20 ± 4.54 3No deathsNo deaths0.74 12.16 ± 1.28 30.91 ± 0.40 21.23 12.11 ± 0.84 2
24–<48 h2.59 ± 3.47 41.00 ± 1.13 4No deaths0.69 ± 0.33 36.04 ± 2.49 3‡1.43 ± 1.32 50.81 1No deaths1.02 ± 1.82 8
48–<72 h0.26 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths1.53 ± 1.26 30.50 ± 0.46 21.28 1No survivors
72 h1.90 ± 0.84 5*No survivors1.84 ± 1.95 *1.15 ± 0.30 9*1.68 10.32 14.54 ± 4.36 61.23 ± 0.40 2No survivors
MON:NEUBaseline0.33 ± 0.180.23 ± 0.200.24 ± 0.220.27 ± 0.270.36 ± 0.200.29 ± 0.150.29 ± 0.260.29 ± 0.140.31 ± 0.14
P1–P2No deaths0.16 ± 0.01 2No deathsNo deaths0.13 ± 0.13 7*No deaths0.33 10.14 ± 0.08 80.11 ± 0.03 2
P3–<24 hNo deaths0.16 ± 0.08 3No deathsNo deaths0.29 10.13 ± 0.07 3*0.14 ± 0.02 20.24 10.13 ± 0.01 2
24–<48 h0.15 ± 0.10 40.10 ± 0.07 4No deaths0.19 ± 0.06 30.12 ± 0.06 30.15 ± 0.10 50.24 1No deaths0.23 ± 0.18 8
48–<72 h0.27 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths0.10 ± 0.11 30.09 ± 0.13 20.18 1No survivors
72 h0.10 ± 0.07 5*No survivors0.18 ± 0.110.14 ± 0.06 90.05 10.03 11.16 ± 2.63 60.06 ± 0.07 2No survivors
Measurements were taken at baseline and 72 h (survivors), or at time of sacrifice according to humane endpoints (non-survivors) (see Section 2.6). Data represent mean ± SD. Results for P1–P2, P3–<24 h, 24–<48 h, and 48–<72 h indicated by grey shading are for moribund animals sacrificed prior to experimental end (72 h), i.e., non-survivors. n values for NT, FFP, and FWB groups are n = 10, n = 12, and n = 12, respectively, or indicated by superscript number. P1, Phase 1 (60 min bolus resuscitation); P2, Phase 2 (4 h drip resuscitation); P3, Phase 3 (60 min transfusion); ALM, adenosine, lidocaine, magnesium; NT, no transfusion; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; FWB, fresh whole blood; WBC, white blood cell; LYM, lymphocyte; MON, monocyte; NEU, neutrophil; NEU:LYM, neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio calculated from total neutrophils divided by total lymphocytes; MON:NEU, monocyte:neutrophil ratio calculated from total monocytes divided by total neutrophils. * p < 0.05 compared to baseline;  p < 0.05 compared to baseline and Sham FFP;  p < 0.05 compared to Saline NT and ALM FFP.
Table 5. Coagulation parameters measured in plasma for Shams, Saline controls, and ALM group without transfusion, and with FFP or FWB following laparotomy, liver resection, and hemorrhage.
Table 5. Coagulation parameters measured in plasma for Shams, Saline controls, and ALM group without transfusion, and with FFP or FWB following laparotomy, liver resection, and hemorrhage.
ParameterTimeSham NTSaline NTALM NTSham FFPSaline FFPALM FFPSham FWBSaline FWBALM FWB
PT
(s)
Baseline16.5 ± 2.0 1116.5 ± 2.0 1116.5 ± 2.0 1116.5 ± 2.0 1116.5 ± 2.0 1116.5 ± 2.0 1116.5 ± 2.0 1116.5 ± 2.0 1116.5 ± 2.0 11
P1–P2No deaths25.3 1No deathsNo deaths46.0 ± 45.1 7No deaths180.1 162.4 ± 65.0 8*108.3 ± 53.6 2
P3–<24 hNo deaths21.0 1No deathsNo deaths24.0 127.5 ± 4.0 3102.6 ± 109.6 230.5 119.5 ± 2.5 2
24 h22.1 ± 8.5 9†20.0 ± 1.7 419.2 ± 2.2 5†18.9 ± 3.3 11†20.5 ± 1.8 417.6 ± 2.3 817.8 ± 4.2 921.0 ± 3.0 319.0 ± 1.4 6
24–<48 h19.5 ± 4.5 424.5 ± 12.0 5No deaths25.5 ± 9.9 321.4 ± 4.6 318.5 ± 2.7 515.3 1No deaths18.1 ± 1.8 8
48–<72 h14.9 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths27.1 ± 8.3 315.4 ± 0.6 216.3 1No survivors
72 h14.9 ± 1.1 4No survivors18.7 ± 4.6 715.1 ± 0.9 915.4 115.8 115.7 ± 0.8 615.6 ± 1.3 2No survivors
aPTT
(s)
Baseline76.4 ± 32.1 876.4 ± 32.1 876.4 ± 32.1 876.4 ± 32.1 876.4 ± 32.1 876.4 ± 32.1 876.4 ± 32.1 876.4 ± 32.1 876.4 ± 32.1 8
P1–P2No deaths200.1 1No deathsNo deaths200.1 ± 0 4*No deathsNA182.7 ± 39.0 5*200.1 ± 0 2*
P3–<24 hNo deaths94.1 1No deathsNo deaths200.1 163.3 1200.1 1200.1 145.6 ± 3.6 2
24 h200.1 ± 0 7‡200.1 ± 0 4*200.1 ± 0 4‡195.8 ± 11.4 7*200.1 ± 0 2186.0 ± 28.2 4175.7 ± 54.5 6200.1 ± 0 3*103.5 ± 51.7 6
24–<48 h141.3 ± 77.8 4199.7 ± 0.8 3No deaths184.8 1200.1 1178.6 ± 30.5 2NANo deaths90.7 ± 76.0 7
48–<72 hNANo survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deathsNA148.8 ± 72.5 2*117.0 1No survivors
72 h88.0 ± 67.4 4No survivors57.4 ± 23.5 4126.9 ± 60.9 6200.1 1176.5 198.3 ± 59.0 5NANo survivors
Fibrinogen (g/dL)Baseline2.43 ± 0.31 112.43 ± 0.31 112.43 ± 0.31 112.43 ± 0.31 112.43 ± 0.31 112.43 ± 0.31 112.43 ± 0.31 112.43 ± 0.31 112.43 ± 0.31 11
P1–P2No deaths1.60 ± 0.03 2*No deathsNo deaths1.17 ± 0.47 6*No deathsNA1.30 ± 0.37 6*1.05 ± 1.09 2
P3–<24 hNo deaths3.17 ± 1.99 2No deathsNo deaths1.01 12.11 ± 1.62 30.70 ± 0.54 21.06 12.65 ± 1.65 2
24 h5.14 ± 0.78 8*4.63 ± 0.89 4*4.83 ± 1.39 9*5.47 ± 0.81 11*4.64 ± 0.54 4*4.99 ± 0.65 8*5.11 ± 0.65 9‡5.19 ± 0.39 3*5.32 ± 0.44 6*
24–<48 h4.07 ± 1.81 4*4.25 ± 2.41 5*No deaths4.56 ± 1.51 3*4.44 ± 1.51 3*4.67 ± 1.53 5*6.65 1No deaths5.23 ± 1.35 8*
48–<72 h6.68 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths4.20 ± 1.61 25.64 ± 0.60 2*4.40 1No survivors
72 h6.77 ± 0.61 5*No survivors6.03 ± 1.03 8*5.94 ± 1.05 9*6.24 12.91 16.54 ± 0.77 6*6.55 ± 0.30 2*No survivors
TAFI
(%)
Baseline62 ± 35 1162 ± 35 1162 ± 35 1162 ± 35 1162 ± 35 1162 ± 35 1162 ± 35 1162 ± 35 1162 ± 35 11
P1–P2No deaths68 1No deathsNo deaths59 ± 7 7No deaths66 169 ± 9 836 ± 33 2
P3–<24 hNo deaths39 1No deathsNo deathsNA49 ± 18 359 ± 6 262 125 ± 17 2
24 h37 ± 27 554 ± 25 4112 ± 17 60 ± 28 1143 ± 14 458 ± 14 782 ± 20 9†90 ± 7 319 ± 9
24–<48 h26 ± 9 37 1No deaths45 ± 22 339 ± 13 236 ± 15 463 1No deaths21 ± 27 6
48–<72 hNANo survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths33 ± 21 379 ± 22 2116 1No survivors
72 h79 ± 12 3No survivors119 193 ± 37 9133 186 1125 ± 9 5**135 1No survivors
Protein C (%)Baseline3 ± 0 103 ± 0 103 ± 0 103 ± 0 103 ± 0 103 ± 0 103 ± 0 103 ± 0 103 ± 0 10
P1–P2No deaths3 1No deathsNo deaths12.9 ± 11.8 7*No deaths38 110.2 ± 10.5 69 1
P3–<24 hNo deaths2 ± 2.8 2No deathsNo deaths3 110.3 ± 11.8 39 ± 12.7 22 10.5 ± 0.7 2
24 h3.1 ± 0.4 83 ± 0 42.6 ± 2.1 103.1 ± 1.9 111.8 ± 0.5 41.4 ± 1.3 80.2 ± 0.4 9**0 ± 0 3**0 ± 0 6‡
24–<48 h3 ± 0 43 ± 0 5No deaths4.5 ± 2.1 25 ± 0 22.6 ± 1.5 53 1No deaths0.3 ± 0.5
48–<72 h3 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths2 ± 1.7 30.5 ± 0.7 2*1 1No survivors
72 h5.5 ± 3.1 4‡‡No survivors2.1 ± 2.4 93 ± 0 93 17 11.5 ± 1.4 6§§3.5 ± 0.7 2No survivors
Antiplasmin
(%)
Baseline156 ± 51 11156 ± 51 11156 ± 51 11156 ± 51 11156 ± 51 11156 ± 51 11156 ± 51 11156 ± 51 11156 ± 51 11
P1–P2No deaths115 1No deathsNo deaths107 ± 17 7*No deaths110 195 ± 22 7*131 1
P3–<24 hNo deaths112 1No deathsNo deaths115 183 ± 5 3||95 ± 16 2*101 1159 ± 50 2
24 h101 ± 10 6†††119 ± 2 4152 ± 46 3179 ± 35 11¶¶129 ± 49 3101 ± 4 8***146 ± 42 9125 ± 5 3126 ± 3 6
24–<48 h103 ± 7 4‡‡‡127 ± 4 3No deaths151 ± 110 385 ± 27 2‡‡‡101 ± 9 5‡‡‡122 1No deaths127 ± 3 6
48–<72 hNANo survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths116 ± 39 3139 ± 93 2121 1No survivors
72 h113 ± 3 4No survivors230 ± 8 3§§§216 ± 16 9§§§227 152 1202 ± 21 6177 ± 16 2No survivors
Measurements were taken at 24 h and 72 h, or time of sacrifice, according to humane endpoints (non-survivors) (refer to Section 2.6). Data represent mean ± SD. n value indicated by superscript number. Samples were run on the STA Compact (Diagnostica Stago) in the following order: PT, fibrinogen, TAFI, Antiplasmin, Protein C, aPTT, with some results not available due to insufficient sample (indicated by NA or reduced n value). Results for P1–P2, P3–<24 h, 24–<48 h, and 48–<72 h indicated by grey shading are for moribund animals sacrificed prior to experimental end (72 h), i.e., non-survivors. Baseline values taken from healthy male Sprague-Dawley rats. P1, Phase 1 (60 min bolus resuscitation); P2, Phase 2 (4 h drip resuscitation); P3, Phase 3 (60 min transfusion); ALM, adenosine, lidocaine, magnesium; NT, no transfusion; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; FWB, fresh whole blood; NA, not available; PT, prothrombin time; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; TAFI, tissue activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor. Maximum recorded time for PT was 180.1 s, and for aPTT was 200.1 s. * p < 0.05 compared to baseline;  p < 0.05 compared to 72 h;  p < 0.05 compared to baseline and 72 h; § p < 0.05 compared to baseline, Sham NT, ALM FFP, and ALM FWB;  p < 0.05 compared to ALM NT, ALM FFP, Sham FWB, and Saline FWB; ** p < 0.05 compared to baseline, Sham NT, and Sham FFP; ‡‡ p < 0.05 compared to baseline, ALM NT, Sham FFP, and Sham FWB; §§ p < 0.05 compared to baseline, Sham NT, Sham FFP, and Saline FWB; || p < 0.05 compared to baseline and ALM FWB; ¶¶ p < 0.05 compared to Sham NT and ALM FFP; *** p < 0.05 compared to Sham FFP, and ALM FWB; ††† p < 0.05 compared to Sham FFP; ‡‡‡ p < 0.05 compared to baseline, Saline NT, and ALM FWB; §§§ p < 0.05 compared to baseline and Sham NT.
Table 6. ROTEM parameters for Shams, Saline controls, and ALM group without transfusion, and with FFP or FWB following hemorrhage.
Table 6. ROTEM parameters for Shams, Saline controls, and ALM group without transfusion, and with FFP or FWB following hemorrhage.
TestParameterTimeSham NTSaline NTALM NTSham FFPSaline FFPALM FFPSham FWBSaline FWBALM FWB
EXTEMCT
(s)
Baseline42 ± 342 ± 342 ± 342 ± 342 ± 342 ± 342 ± 342 ± 342 ± 3
P1–P2No deaths48 ± 7 2No deathsNo deaths94 ± 108 7*No deathsDNC202 ± 367 8*253 ± 255 2*
P353 ± 2750 ± 6 851 ± 945 ± 644 ± 4 554 ± 6 *45 ± 5 939 ± 3 365 ± 9 10‡
P3–<24 hNo deaths135 ± 77 3No deathsNo deaths43 150 ± 10 359 ± 4 241 177 ± 25 2
24–<48 h49 ± 9 455 ± 7 5
n = 1 DNC
No deaths89 ± 34 355 ± 1 356 ± 8 542 1No deaths65 ± 7 8
48 h41 ± 3 5No survivors47 ± 543 ± 3 948 146 151 ± 12 851 ± 11 3No survivors
48–<72 h36 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths187 ± 199 348 ± 9 262 1No survivors
72 h47 ± 8 5No survivors43 ± 442 ± 3 948 145 146 ± 4 647 ± 11 2No survivors
MCF
(mm)
Baseline77 ± 177 ± 177 ± 177 ± 177 ± 177 ± 177 ± 177 ± 177 ± 1
P1–P2No deaths69 ± 1 2*No deathsNo deaths59 ± 22 7*No deathsDNC55 ± 26 8*36 ± 40 2*
P366 ± 1870 ± 4 872 ± 373 ± 3 1269 ± 2 572 ± 3 1273 ± 1 973 ± 3 371 ± 3 10
P3–<24 hNo deaths30 ± 33 3No deathsNo deaths65 168 ± 4 3*67 ± 6 267 171 ± 11 2
24–<48 h51 ± 29 457 ± 13 4
n = 1 DNC
No deaths52 ± 29 358 ± 14 374 ± 13 554 1No deaths72 ± 8 8
48 h76 ± 9 5No survivors78 ± 676 ± 9 955 180 177 ± 7 880 ± 3 3No survivors
48–<72 h59 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths29 ± 33 365 ± 6 276 1No survivors
72 h82 ± 2 5No survivors81 ± 482 ± 2 981 178 183 ± 5 683 ± 4 2No survivors
ML
(%)
Baseline6.5 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.9
P1–P2No deaths6.5 ± 3.5 2No deathsNo deaths4.3 ± 6.7 7No deathsDNC5.5 ± 0.9 8*5.0 ± 2.8 2*
P33.3 ± 7.11.5 ± 2.6 8*1.2 ± 1.2 *1.9 ± 0.92.6 ± 2.6 52.3 ± 3.81.2 ± 0.8 93.7 ± 4.7 31.2 ± 1.0 10*
P3–<24 hNo deaths9.3 ± 16.2 3No deathsNo deaths1 119.7 ± 17.1 30.5 ± 0.7 20 11.0 ± 1.4 2
24–<48 h1.0 ± 14 40.5 ± 1.0 4
n = 1 DNC
No deaths2.3 ± 4.0 30 ± 0 32.8 ± 4.7 50 1No deaths0.1 ± 0.4 8*
48 h1.6 ± 1.1 5*No survivors1.2 ± 1.3 *1.2 ± 1.5 9*0 11 11.1 ± 1.1 8*0.7 ± 1.2 3*No survivors
48–<72 h0 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths0 ± 0 30 ± 0 20 1No survivors
72 h0.3 ± 0.5 5¶¶No survivors1.6 ± 1.5 *1.8 ± 1.4 9*0 10 10.8 ± 1.0 6*1.0 ± 0 2No survivors
INTEMCT
(s)
Baseline100 ± 28100 ± 28100 ± 28100 ± 28100 ± 28100 ± 28100 ± 28100 ± 28100 ± 28
P1–P2No deaths381 1
n = 1 DNC
No deathsNo deaths148 ± 86 7No deathsDNC189 ± 142 8198 ± 5 2
P31332 ± 1205 4
n = 6 DNC
41 1
n = 7 DNC
1391 ± 1228 2*
n = 8 DNC
137 ± 29 *130 ± 19 9172 ± 38§149 ± 28 9*140 ± 28 3172 ± 34*
P3–<24 hNo deaths309 1
n = 2 DNC
No deathsNo deaths129 1128 ± 28 3174 ± 2 2*129 1146 ± 41 3
24–<48 h154 ± 85 2
n = 2 DNC
468 1
n = 4 DNC
No deaths275 ± 153 3291 ± 20 3††183 ± 53 5*254 1No deaths184 ± 24 8*
48 h2210 ± 837 3*
n = 2 DNC
No survivors765 ± 498 3
n = 4 DNC
165 ± 72 9*211 1152 1170 ± 39 8*159 ± 14 3*No survivors
48–<72 h2977 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths431 1
n = 1 DNC
218 ± 7 2224 1No survivors
72 h351 ± 103 4*
n = 1 DNC
No survivors255 ± 181124 ± 11 9*187 1226 1161 ± 13 6***144 ± 14 2No survivors
MCF
(mm)
Baseline77 ± 177 ± 177 ± 177 ± 177 ± 177 ± 177 ± 177 ± 177 ± 1
P1–P2No deaths68
n = 1 DNC
No deathsNo deaths56 ± 22 7No deathsDNC52 ± 25 857 ± 2 2
P319 ± 17
n = 6 DNC
20 1
n = 7 DNC
9 ± 5 2*
n = 8 DNC
73 ± 3 *69 ± 3 70 ± 3§72 ± 2 9*65 ± 14 368 ± 4 10**
P3–<24 hNo deaths38 1
n = 2 DNC
No deathsNo deaths62 165 ± 8 363 ± 9 269 169 ± 13 3
24–<48 h49 ± 16 2
n = 2 DNC
29 1
n = 4 DNC
No deaths52 ± 29 360 ± 11 371 ± 11 550 1No deaths70 ± 9 8
48 h5 ± 1
n = 2 DNC
No survivors40 ± 38 3
n = 4 DNC
69 ± 20 953 177 175 ± 7 878 ± 3 3No survivors
48–<72 h4 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths27 1
n = 1 DNC
66 ± 6 275 1No survivors
72 h55 ± 13 4
n = 1 DNC
No survivors75 ± 2281 ± 2 979 177 181 ± 6 665 ± 24 2No survivors
ML
(%)
Baseline6.5 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.96.5 ± 1.9
P1–P2No deaths0n = 1 DNCNo deathsNo deaths6.3 ± 8.5 7No deathsDNC3.9 ± 5.2 836.5 ± 12.0 2
P325 ± 50 4
n = 6 DNC
0 1
n = 7 DNC
0 ± 0 2
n = 8 DNC
2.2 ± 1.01.3 ± 1.0 91.1 ± 0.81.4 ± 1.1 91.0 ± 1.7 31.2 ± 0.9 10
P3–<24 hNo deaths7 1
n = 2 DNC
No deathsNo deaths0 114.3 ± 12.9 30.5 ± 0.7 20 11.5 ± 2.1 3
24–<48 h0.5 ± 0.7 2
n = 2 DNC
0 1
n = 4 DNC
No deaths0 ± 0 30 ± 0 31.8 ± 4.0 50 1No deaths0 ± 0 8*
48 h57 ± 49.9 3
n = 2 DNC
No survivors0.3 ± 0.6 3*
n = 4 DNC
1.2 ± 1.1 9*0 11 11.4 ± 1.5 8*1.0 ± 1.0 3*No survivors
48–<72 h78 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths0 1
n = 1 DNC
0 ± 0 20 1No survivors
72 h0 ± 0 4*
n = 1 DNC
No survivors0.8 ± 1.1 *1.4 ± 1.4 90 10 11.2 ± 1.5 61.0 ± 1.4 2No survivors
FIBTEMCT
(s)
Baseline37 ± 337 ± 337 ± 337 ± 337 ± 337 ± 337 ± 337 ± 337 ± 3
P1–P2No deaths47 ± 1 2No deathsNo deaths390 ± 820 7*No deaths1862 1157 ± 272 8*65
n = 1 DNC
P375 ± 10848 ± 13 7
n = 1 DNC
45 ± 6 2
n = 1 DNC
41 ± 642 ± 5 548 ± 641 ± 4 937 ± 2 354 ± 5 10
P3–<24 hNo deaths324 ± 368 3No deathsNo deaths43 147 ± 16 358 ± 3 240 159 ± 7 2
24–<48 h45 ± 11 437 ± 24 2
n = 2 DNC
No deaths77 ± 26 3‡‡48 ± 0 3*49 ± 5 5*41 1No deaths59 ± 13 8*
48 h39 ± 6 5No survivors42 ± 539 ± 3 944 142 146 ± 10 845 ± 7 3No survivors
48–<72 h32 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths48 1
n = 1 DNC
41 ± 4 258 1No survivors
72 h30 ± 20 5No survivors39 ± 338 ± 4 943 140 142 ± 2 641 ± 9 2No survivors
MCF
(mm)
Baseline18 ± 218 ± 218 ± 218 ± 218 ± 218 ± 218 ± 218 ± 218 ± 2
P1–P2No deaths12 ± 0 2*No deathsNo deaths10 ± 6 7*No deaths4 110 ± 4 8*11
n = 1 DNC
P321 ± 1315 ± 3 7
n = 1 DNC
16 ± 3 2
n = 1 DNC
20 ± 316 ± 2 521 ± 1615 ± 2 916 ± 2 312 ± 3 10
P3–<24 hNo deaths14 ± 15 3No deathsNo deaths10 118 ± 10 310 ± 1 211 116 ± 13 2
24–<48 h33 ± 13 437 ± 10 2
n = 2 DNC
No deaths36 ± 14 344 ± 6 335 ± 9 550 1No deaths35 ± 15 8
48 h50 ± 23 5*No survivors45 ± 7 *48 ± 7 9*44 152 145 ± 7 8*46 ± 3 3*No survivors
48–<72 h54 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths26 1
n = 1 DNC
48 ± 8 245 1No survivors
72 h50 ± 5 5*No survivors44 ± 8 *45 ± 8 9*48 145 150 ± 8 6*49 ± 1 2*No survivors
ML
(%)
Baseline2.0 ± 3.22.0 ± 3.22.0 ± 3.22.0 ± 3.22.0 ± 3.22.0 ± 3.22.0 ± 3.22.0 ± 3.22.0 ± 3.2
P1–P2No deaths0 ± 0 2No deathsNo deaths16 ± 37 7No deaths72 18 ± 18 80n = 1 DNC
P30.7 ± 2.20.4 ± 1.1 7
n = 1 DNC
0 ± 0 2
n = 1 DNC
0 ± 00.2 ± 0.4 50.1 ± 0.30 ± 0 90 ± 0 30.7 ± 2.2 10
P3–<24 hNo deaths14.3 ± 24.8 3No deathsNo deaths1 10 ± 0 30 ± 0 20 10 ± 0 2
24–<48 h0 ± 0 40 ± 0 2
n = 2 DNC
No deaths0 ± 0 30 ± 0 30 ± 0 50 1No deaths0.1 ± 0.4 8
48 h0 ± 0 5No survivors0.5 ± 1.60 ± 0 90 10 10 ± 0 80 ± 0 3No survivors
48–<72 h0 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths0 1
n = 1 DNC
0 ± 0 20 1No survivors
72 h0 ± 0 5*No survivors1.4 ± 4.40.3± 1.0 9*0 10 10 ± 0 60 ± 0 2No survivors
FIBTEM MCF:
EXTEM MCF
Baseline0.23 ± 0.020.23 ± 0.020.23 ± 0.020.23 ± 0.020.23 ± 0.020.23 ± 0.020.23 ± 0.020.23 ± 0.020.23 ± 0.02
P1–P2No deaths0.17 ± 0.00 2No deathsNo deaths0.16 ± 0.07 7No deaths0.17 10.17 ± 0.03 70.17 1
P30.29 ± 0.18 90.22 ± 0.04 70.22 ± 0.04 90.27 ± 0.050.23 ± 0.02 50.29 ± 0.230.21 ± 0.02 90.22 ± 0.02 30.17 ± 0.04 10
P3–<24 hNo deaths0.60 ± 0.48 3No deathsNo deaths0.15 10.26 ± 0.07 30.14 ± 0.02 20.16 10.21 ± 0.16 2
24–<48 h0.72 ± 0.23 4*0.67 ± 0.19 4*No deaths0.79 ± 0.31 3*0.77 ± 0.09 3†††0.45 ± 0.06 5*0.93 1No deaths0.48 ± 0.18 8*
48 h0.68 ± 0.14 5*No survivors0.57 ± 0.07 *0.64 ± 0.11 9*0.65 10.61 10.60 ± 0.12 8*0.58 ± 0.05 3*No survivors
48–<72 h0.92 1No survivorsNo deathsNo deathsNo deaths0.67 ± 0.38 20.74 ± 0.18 20.59 1No survivors
72 h0.61 ± 0.04 4*No survivors0.54 ± 0.08 *0.54 ± 0.09 9*0.59 10.58 10.60 ± 0.07 6*0.59 ± 0.03 2*No survivors
Measurements were taken at end of Phase 3, 48 h, and 72 h (survivors), or at time of sacrifice according to humane endpoints (non-survivors) (see Section 2.6). Data represent mean ± SD. Results for P1–P2, P3–<24 h, 24–<48 h, and 48–<72 h indicated by grey shading are for moribund animals sacrificed prior to experimental end (72 h), i.e., non-survivors. n values for NT, FFP, and FWB groups are n = 10, n = 12, and n = 12, respectively, or indicated by superscript number. Baseline values taken from n = 6 healthy male Sprague-Dawley rats. P1, Phase 1 (60 min bolus resuscitation); P2, Phase 2 (4 h drip resuscitation); P3, Phase 3 (60 min transfusion); ALM, adenosine, lidocaine, magnesium; NT, no transfusion; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; FWB, fresh whole blood; CT, clot time; MCF, maximum clot firmness; ML, maximum lysis; DNC, did not clot. * p < 0.05 compared to baseline;  p < 0.05 compared to baseline, Sham FWB, and Saline FWB; § p < 0.05 compared to baseline and Sham FFP;  p < 0.05 compared to baseline, Sham FFP, and Sham FWB; ** p < 0.05 compared to baseline and Sham FWB; †† p < 0.05 compared to baseline, ALM FFP, and ALM FWB; ††† p < 0.05 compared to baseline and ALM FFP; ‡‡ p < 0.05 compared to ALM FFP; ¶¶ p < 0.05 compared to baseline and ALM NT; *** p < 0.05 compared to Sham FFP.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Letson, H.; Dobson, G. ALM Resuscitation Without Transfusion Improves Platelet Function and Survival After Liver Injury and Uncontrolled Hemorrhage. Medicina 2026, 62, 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62030453

AMA Style

Letson H, Dobson G. ALM Resuscitation Without Transfusion Improves Platelet Function and Survival After Liver Injury and Uncontrolled Hemorrhage. Medicina. 2026; 62(3):453. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62030453

Chicago/Turabian Style

Letson, Hayley, and Geoffrey Dobson. 2026. "ALM Resuscitation Without Transfusion Improves Platelet Function and Survival After Liver Injury and Uncontrolled Hemorrhage" Medicina 62, no. 3: 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62030453

APA Style

Letson, H., & Dobson, G. (2026). ALM Resuscitation Without Transfusion Improves Platelet Function and Survival After Liver Injury and Uncontrolled Hemorrhage. Medicina, 62(3), 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62030453

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop