Article Versions Notes

Persons AK, Middleton C, Parker E, Carroll W, Turner A, Talegaonkar P, Davarzani S, Saucier D, Chander H, Ball JE, et al. Comparison of the Capacitance of a Cyclically Fatigued Stretch Sensor to a Non-Fatigued Stretch Sensor When Performing Static and Dynamic Foot-Ankle Motions. Sensors. 2022; 22(21):8168. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218168

Persons, Andrea Karen, Carver Middleton, Erin Parker, Will Carroll, Alana Turner, Purva Talegaonkar, Samaneh Davarzani, David Saucier, Harish Chander, John E. Ball, and et al. 2022. "Comparison of the Capacitance of a Cyclically Fatigued Stretch Sensor to a Non-Fatigued Stretch Sensor When Performing Static and Dynamic Foot-Ankle Motions" Sensors 22, no. 21: 8168. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218168

Persons, A. K., Middleton, C., Parker, E., Carroll, W., Turner, A., Talegaonkar, P., Davarzani, S., Saucier, D., Chander, H., Ball, J. E., Elder, S. H., Simpson, C. L., Macias, D., & Burch V., R. F. (2022). Comparison of the Capacitance of a Cyclically Fatigued Stretch Sensor to a Non-Fatigued Stretch Sensor When Performing Static and Dynamic Foot-Ankle Motions. Sensors, 22(21), 8168. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218168