Topic Editors

School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
UniSA Online, Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
Dr. Chayakan Siamphukdee
School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia

Revitalizing Buildings and Our Urban Heritage

Abstract submission deadline
28 February 2027
Manuscript submission deadline
31 May 2027
Viewed by
1178

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Buildings inevitably grow old and become unfit for use, either because the purpose they once served is no longer needed or simply because they are falling apart. This is also true of whole industrial and urban areas. Mostly, such defunct buildings are torn down, while the precious few with heritage value are preserved in a museum-like state. However, throughout history, there has also existed a practice of revitalization of urban assets to perform new functions—adapting to the present while preserving the memory and legacy of the past. Various theories have emerged to inform how such adaptations should be undertaken, while numerous examples around the world and throughout history attest to the success or otherwise of these various approaches.

The adaptive reuse of buildings is an architectural intervention that has been explored incidentally in architectural texts, but, to date, the theoretical approaches, breadth of building reimagining, and exemplar cases have not yet been curated into a comprehensive text. This project aims to produce a definitive exploration of the phenomenon of rejuvenating old, derelict, and defunct building sites for contemporary use, with the goal of showcasing research undertaken in this area, the outcome being a welcome addition to architectural libraries.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Making the case for (or against) the adaptive reuse of buildings (financial, environmental, cultural, architectural considerations);
  • Exploring the various theoretical models invoked in approaching building reuse/urban revitalization;
  • Examining significant examples from the past (building use conversions, adaptations, remodeling, urban revitalization);
  • Discussion of the cultural traditions (using single-nation examples or cross-border comparisons) that impact adaptive building reuse approaches;
  • Assessments of how new uses can be served by old buildings;
  • Detailed case analyses of specific adaptive reuse projects;
  • Discussion on current and future trends of sustainability (building operations, construction management, design) with regard to heritage buildings/structures;
  • Exploration of how building and/or urban revitalization have contributed to an urban transition (agendas, economy, climate, etc.);
  • Policies and governance models related to revitalizing buildings or the built environment (through adaptation, adaptive reuse, redesign, rehabilitation, retrofitting, refit) as a sustainable practice;
  • Measures/assessments of urban revitalization projects;
  • Detailed case analyses of specific urban revitalization projects at a large scale (addressing key areas/issues such as urbanization, urban environment, urban housing).

We expect to attract studies from across the globe, and it is evident that a wide range of political, cultural, financial, and practical considerations has informed the approach to the reuse of old buildings, generating vastly different outcomes. For example, in Australia, the practice of ‘facadism’ becomes a common excuse to heritage sensitivity, where the shell (outward appearance) of heritage buildings might be retained, while their use is converted to serve a more banal function, such as to contain coffee shops. Meanwhile, in Japan, centuries-old temples have been upgraded with aluminum-framed windows in order to better serve the monks pursuing age-old traditions. In Italy, Roman ruins are maintained to preserve the memory of the land’s former grandeur, while the Cultural Revolution of China made a point of destroying as much of its Imperial legacy as could be managed. Given these diverse perspectives and approaches, it is our hope that this collection of studies will bring together broader social considerations as well as detailed, practical insights into how to better manage historical buildings and formations. We welcome the submission of papers focusing on these discussions in relation to single buildings as well as extended urban areas.

Dr. Igor Martek
Dr. Mehdi Amirkhani
Dr. Chayakan Siamphukdee
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • adaptive building reuse
  • building rehabilitation
  • building retrofitting
  • building redesign
  • heritage buildings refit
  • adaptive urban redesign
  • urban revitalization
  • urban transition
  • sustainable cities
  • urban policy and governance

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Buildings
buildings
3.1 4.4 2011 15.1 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Heritage
heritage
1.9 3.7 2018 19.9 Days CHF 1800 Submit
Land
land
3.2 5.9 2012 17.5 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Sustainability
sustainability
3.3 7.7 2009 17.9 Days CHF 2400 Submit
Urban Science
urbansci
2.9 3.7 2017 21.6 Days CHF 1800 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 5457 KB  
Article
A Perception-Driven Layered Selection and Design Response Model for Traditional Decorative Pattern
by Xiaochen Wang, Ruhe Zhang, Guanyu Hou and Weiwei Wang
Buildings 2026, 16(7), 1416; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16071416 - 3 Apr 2026
Viewed by 187
Abstract
Traditional architectural decorative patterns are increasingly reused in contemporary design, yet the link between object selection and design generation often remains experience-driven: public perceptual differences are rarely formalized, and evaluation outcomes seldom constrain generative decisions. This study proposes a perceptual demand-driven layered filtering [...] Read more.
Traditional architectural decorative patterns are increasingly reused in contemporary design, yet the link between object selection and design generation often remains experience-driven: public perceptual differences are rarely formalized, and evaluation outcomes seldom constrain generative decisions. This study proposes a perceptual demand-driven layered filtering and design response model (PD–LFDR) that treats traditional architectural decorative patterns as comparable and traceable design resources. Perceptual inputs from multiple stakeholders are converged via Kansei-based semantic aggregation into four core dimensions—symbolism, heritage authenticity, recognition and regionality—and are organized as a perceptual evaluation matrix. Grey relational analysis (GRA) is then applied using an expected perceptual level as the reference sequence to identify representative pattern samples suitable for design intervention. An empirical study on decorative patterns from Shaanxi vernacular dwellings demonstrates a closed-loop workflow: (i) first-round GRA filters representative theme samples, (ii) a second-round GRA selects operable minimal gene units, and, under a unified parametric rule set and a traceable two-layer parameter basis (parameter domain definition and parameter selection), (iii) multiple alternatives are generated and re-evaluated through a third-round GRA to support scheme selection. Robustness checks indicate stable rankings under moderate parameter and weight variation, improving interpretability, reproducibility, and decision efficiency for the computational translation of regional cultural visual resources. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Revitalizing Buildings and Our Urban Heritage)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop