Topic Editors

Department of Political Science, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
Department of Political Sciences, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80138 Napoli, Italy

The Synthetic Society: Processes and Products

Abstract submission deadline
closed (30 June 2026)
Manuscript submission deadline
30 September 2026
Viewed by
3015

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues, 

This Topic explores the emerging concept of the Synthetic Society (Van der Sloot, 2024; Wiederhold, 2025), a contemporary socio-technological configuration in which advanced technologies reproduce—and transform—biological, cognitive, and social processes. From artificial intelligence simulating human reasoning to lab-grown food, synthetic environments, and bioengineered bodies, the synthetic society redefines the boundaries between nature, culture, and technology. This Topic aims to investigate how such developments impact identity, social relationships, consumer behavior, and the human condition more broadly.

We welcome theoretical and empirical contributions on topics including synthetic relationships (e.g., dating apps, AI companions), synthetic environments (e.g., social networks, virtual and augmented environments), synthetic food (e.g., cultivated meat, precision fermentation), synthetic bodies (e.g., bio-technological hybridation, body augmentation, synthetic prosthetics), synthetic intelligence (e.g., ethical AI, algorithmic bias), and synthetic futures (e.g., singularity, control, trans-human scenarios). The complexity of this Topic demands consideration from multiple perspectives within the social sciences; therefore, contributions from scholars across diverse disciplines and fields are encouraged.

References:

  1. Van der Sloot, Bart. Regulating the synthetic society: Generative AI, legal questions, and societal challenges. Bloomsbury Academic, 2024, 296.
  2. Wiederhold, Brenda K. The Rise of Synthetic Societies: Is There a Role for Humans? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2025, 28(4), 224–226.

Dr. Francesco La Barbera
Dr. Roberta Riverso
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • virtual environment
  • augmented reality
  • digital identity
  • AI ethics
  • synthetic food
  • trans-humanism
  • science and technology studies
  • reproduction of inequalities
  • dark pattern
  • algorithmic bias
  • singularity
  • welfare and technology
  • value alignment
  • governance and rules

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
AI
ai
6.5 7.3 2020 20.4 Days CHF 1800 Submit
Behavioral Sciences
behavsci
3.2 4.1 2011 27.7 Days CHF 2400 Submit
Future Internet
futureinternet
4.6 10.0 2009 15 Days CHF 1800 Submit
Nutrients
nutrients
5.8 10.2 2009 15.8 Days CHF 2900 Submit
Social Sciences
socsci
2.0 3.5 2012 30.3 Days CHF 1800 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 333 KB  
Article
Organizational Time as Lived Temporality: Acceleration, Embodiment, and Existential Positioning in Digital Work
by Mocrei-Rebrean Lucian
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(9), 639; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15090639 (registering DOI) - 19 Sep 2026
Abstract
This article examines the phenomenological constitution of time in digital work, focusing on how senior IT professionals retrospectively articulate the relation between organizational rhythms, embodied experience, and biographical meaning. Based on an anamnetic and metaphor-oriented analysis of interviews with ten senior professionals from [...] Read more.
This article examines the phenomenological constitution of time in digital work, focusing on how senior IT professionals retrospectively articulate the relation between organizational rhythms, embodied experience, and biographical meaning. Based on an anamnetic and metaphor-oriented analysis of interviews with ten senior professionals from the emerging technology hub of Iași, Romania, the study approaches organizations as intersubjective worlds of embodied practice, structured by shared rhythms, technological mediation, and historically sedimented forms of corporeal participation. Drawing on theories of organizational temporality, acceleration, embodiment, and historical intercorporeality, the analysis shows how participants make sense of their professional trajectories through recurring metaphors of immersion, gravitation, impossible puzzles, hamster wheels, and chronophagous machines. These figurative constructions condense complex experiences of synchronization and desynchronization, revealing how work may be lived either as resonance, continuity, and existential investment, or as fragmentation, bodily dissonance, exhaustion, and alienation. The findings suggest that digital work cannot be understood only as a sequence of tasks, deadlines, and technological cycles, but must also be interpreted as a spatio-temporal field in which the body, memory, and professional identity are gradually formed. In this sense, organizational life appears as an existential negotiation between acceleration and sedimentation, collective rhythm and subjective temporality, technological demands and the embodied history of the working subject. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic The Synthetic Society: Processes and Products)
20 pages, 578 KB  
Article
Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks with Edge-Heterogeneous Confidence Bounds: Clustering, Polarization, and Implications for Online Platforms
by Zumei Huang, Zhuangzhuang Ma, Lei Shi and Lulu Chen
Future Internet 2026, 18(7), 355; https://doi.org/10.3390/fi18070355 - 9 Jul 2026
Viewed by 461
Abstract
Opinion polarization, echo chambers, and the rapid formation of opinion clusters have become defining features of debates on contemporary online social platforms. To explain these phenomena from a control-theoretic perspective, this paper investigates opinion dynamics in social networks with edge-heterogeneous confidence bounds, focusing [...] Read more.
Opinion polarization, echo chambers, and the rapid formation of opinion clusters have become defining features of debates on contemporary online social platforms. To explain these phenomena from a control-theoretic perspective, this paper investigates opinion dynamics in social networks with edge-heterogeneous confidence bounds, focusing on clustering and polarization behaviors driven by pair-dependent trust and asymmetric influence. Two discrete-time models are proposed, including an unsigned bounded-confidence model and a more general signed model that incorporates both supportive and oppositional interactions. The interaction structures are described by time-varying unsigned and signed digraphs, respectively, in which heterogeneous interpersonal influence is characterized by edge-dependent confidence bounds that naturally encode platform-mediated trust. For the proposed models, rigorous sufficient conditions are established for invariant cluster consensus and structurally balanced polarization. Numerical simulations, including a case study on the Slashdot Zoo signed social network with 50 controversial users, illustrate the theoretical results and demonstrate their relevance for understanding opinion evolution on internet-scale platforms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic The Synthetic Society: Processes and Products)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop