Topic Editors

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy
Department of Sustainable Energy Development, Faculty of Energy and Fuels, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy

Clean Energy Technologies and Assessment, 2nd Edition

Abstract submission deadline
30 September 2026
Manuscript submission deadline
31 December 2026
Viewed by
1659

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Topic, titled “Clean Energy Technologies and Assessment, 2nd Edition”, invites submissions on all aspects and scales of technologies for clean and efficient energy generation and utilization that reduce the environmental impact of energy production and use, from laboratory research to commercial applications.

This Topic’s scope covers, but is not limited to, numerical and experimental investigations into technological development, improvement, and integration, alongside case studies and analyses related to regulations, standards, and policies, covering the following areas:

  • Clean energy conversion, utilization, and storage;
  • Modeling, simulation, and computational optimization of energy systems;
  • Experimental analysis of energy systems;
  • Renewable energy sources and technologies;
  • Alternative fuel technologies;
  • Advanced energy conversion technologies;
  • Conventional energy sources in energy transition;
  • Energy storage technologies;
  • Cogeneration, trigeneration, and polygeneration technologies;
  • Distributed generation, smart grids, and local self-sufficiency in energy supply;
  • Energy efficiency;
  • Hybrid energy systems;
  • Smart buildings and energy-saving, passive, and nearly zero-energy buildings;
  • Green fuel/energy for mobility;
  • Modeling for pollution avoidance;
  • Measurements, automation, and monitoring in energy systems;
  • Green economy;
  • Energy markets;
  • Energy policy;
  • Renewable energy community;
  • Power to x technologies;
  • Novel approach for handling the excess of renewable energy as compressed air energy storage or liquid CO2 energy storage;
  • Other topics connected with clean and green energy engineering and related technologies;
  • Life cycle assessment of renewable energy plants;
  • Power to water;
  • Wast to water.

Prof. Dr. Francesco Calise
Dr. Maria Vicidomini
Dr. Rafał Figaj
Dr. Francesco Liberato Cappiello
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • clean energy
  • simulation
  • energy systems
  • renewables
  • alternative fuels
  • energy conversion
  • energy storage
  • distributed generation
  • smart grids
  • hybrid energy systems
  • buildings
  • energy markets
  • energy policy

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Applied Sciences
applsci
2.5 5.5 2011 19.8 Days CHF 2400 Submit
Clean Technologies
cleantechnol
4.7 8.3 2019 33.7 Days CHF 1600 Submit
Energies
energies
3.2 7.3 2008 16.2 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Sustainability
sustainability
3.3 7.7 2009 19.3 Days CHF 2400 Submit
Thermo
thermo
2.3 3.9 2021 23 Days CHF 1200 Submit
Solar
solar
- 4.3 2021 21.3 Days CHF 1000 Submit
Batteries
batteries
4.8 6.6 2015 18.5 Days CHF 2700 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 3359 KiB  
Article
Integrating Hybrid Energy Solutions into Expressway Infrastructure
by Muqing Yao, Zunbiao Wang, Song Zhang, Zhufa Chu, Yufei Zhang, Shuo Zhang and Wenkai Han
Energies 2025, 18(12), 3186; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123186 - 18 Jun 2025
Viewed by 228
Abstract
To explore the feasibility of renewable hybrid energy systems for expressway infrastructure, this study proposes a scenario-based design methodology integrating solar, wind, and hydropower resources within the expressway corridor. A case study was conducted on a highway service area located in southern China, [...] Read more.
To explore the feasibility of renewable hybrid energy systems for expressway infrastructure, this study proposes a scenario-based design methodology integrating solar, wind, and hydropower resources within the expressway corridor. A case study was conducted on a highway service area located in southern China, where a solar/wind/hydro hybrid energy system was developed based on the proposed approach. Using the HOMER Pro 3.14 software platform, the system was simulated and optimized under off-grid conditions, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate performance variability. The results demonstrate that the strategic integration of corridor-based natural resources—solar irradiance, wind energy, and hydrodynamic potential—enables the construction of a technically and economically viable hybrid energy system. The system includes 382 kW of PV, 210 kW of wind, 80 kW of hydrokinetic power, a 500 kW diesel generator, and 180 kWh of battery storage, forming a hybrid configuration for a stable and reliable energy supply. The optimized configuration can supply up to 1,095,920 kWh of electricity annually at a minimum levelized cost of energy of USD 0.22/kWh. This system reduces CO2 emissions by 23.2 tons/year and NOx emissions by 23 kg/year. demonstrating strong environmental performance and long-term sustainability potential. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Clean Energy Technologies and Assessment, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2357 KiB  
Article
Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) of Different Photovoltaic Technologies
by Maria Cristea, Ciprian Cristea, Radu-Adrian Tîrnovan and Florica Mioara Șerban
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(12), 6710; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126710 - 15 Jun 2025
Viewed by 423
Abstract
Renewable energy sources are critical to the global effort to achieve carbon neutrality. Alongside hydropower, wind and nuclear plants, the photovoltaic (PV) systems developed greatly, with new PV technologies emerging in recent years. Although the conversion efficiencies are improving and the materials used [...] Read more.
Renewable energy sources are critical to the global effort to achieve carbon neutrality. Alongside hydropower, wind and nuclear plants, the photovoltaic (PV) systems developed greatly, with new PV technologies emerging in recent years. Although the conversion efficiencies are improving and the materials used have a lower impact on the environment, the feasibility of these technologies is required to be assessed. This paper proposes a levelized cost of energy (LCOE) model to assess the feasibility of five PV technologies: high-efficiency silicon heterojunction cells (HJT), N-type monocrystalline silicon cells (N-type), P-type passivated emitter and rear contact cells (PERC), N-type tunnel oxide passivated contact cells (TOPCon) and bifacial TOPCon. The LCOE considers capital investment, government incentives, operation and maintenance costs, residual value of PV modules and total energy output during the PV system’s life span. To determine the influence of PV system’s capacity over the LCOE values, three systems are analyzed for each technology: 3 kW, 5 kW and 7 kW. The results show that the largest PV systems have the lowest LCOE values, ranging from 2.39 c€/kWh (TOPCon) to 2.92 c€/kWh (HJT) when incentives are accessed, and ranging from 6.05 c€/kWh (TOPCon) to 6.51 c€/kWh (HJT) without subsidies. The 3 kW and 5 kW PV systems have higher LCOE values due to lower energy output during lifetime. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Clean Energy Technologies and Assessment, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 4056 KiB  
Review
Sustainable Anodes for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells: Advancing Beyond Platinum Scarcity with Low-Pt Alloys and Non-Pt Systems
by Liangdong Zhao and Yankun Jiang
Sustainability 2025, 17(11), 5086; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115086 - 1 Jun 2025
Viewed by 435
Abstract
Direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) represent a promising pathway for energy conversion, yet their reliance on platinum-group metal (PGM)-based anode catalysts poses critical sustainability challenges, which stem from finite mineral reserves, environmentally detrimental extraction processes, and prohibitive lifecycle costs. Current anode catalysts for [...] Read more.
Direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) represent a promising pathway for energy conversion, yet their reliance on platinum-group metal (PGM)-based anode catalysts poses critical sustainability challenges, which stem from finite mineral reserves, environmentally detrimental extraction processes, and prohibitive lifecycle costs. Current anode catalysts for DMFCs are dominated by platinum materials; therefore, this review systematically evaluates the following three emerging eco-efficient design paradigms using platinum materials as a starting point: (1) the atomic-level optimization of low-Pt alloy surfaces to maximize catalytic efficiency per metal atom, (2) Earth-abundant transition metal compounds (e.g., nitrides and sulfides) and coordination-tunable metal–organic frameworks as viable PGM-free alternatives, and (3) mechanically robust carbon architectures with engineered topological defects that enhance catalyst stability through covalent metal–carbon interactions. Through comparative analysis with pure Pt benchmarks, we critically examine how these strategic material innovations collectively mitigate CO intermediate poisoning risks and improve electrochemical durability. Such fundamental advances in catalyst design not only address immediate technical barriers, but also establish essential material foundations for the development of DMFC technologies compatible with circular economy frameworks and United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 7 targets. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Clean Energy Technologies and Assessment, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 3946 KiB  
Article
Diffusion Modeling of Carbon Dioxide Concentration from Stationary Sources with Improved Gaussian Plume Modeling
by Yang Wei, Yufei Teng, Xueyuan Liu, Yumin Chen, Jie Zhang, Shijie Deng, Zhengyang Liu and Qian Li
Energies 2025, 18(11), 2827; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18112827 - 29 May 2025
Viewed by 321
Abstract
To achieve the precise quantification and real-time monitoring of CO2 emissions from stationary sources, this study developed a Gaussian plume model-based dispersion framework incorporating emission characteristics. Critical factors affecting CO2 dispersion were systematically analyzed, with model optimization conducted through plume rise [...] Read more.
To achieve the precise quantification and real-time monitoring of CO2 emissions from stationary sources, this study developed a Gaussian plume model-based dispersion framework incorporating emission characteristics. Critical factors affecting CO2 dispersion were systematically analyzed, with model optimization conducted through plume rise height adjustments and reflection coefficient calibrations. MATLAB-based simulations on an industrial park case study demonstrated that wind speed, atmospheric stability, and effective release height constituted pivotal determinants for enhancing CO2 dispersion modeling accuracy. Furthermore, the inverse estimation of source strength at emission terminals was implemented via particle swarm optimization, establishing both theoretical foundations and methodological frameworks for the precision monitoring and predictive dispersion analysis of stationary-source CO2 emissions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Clean Energy Technologies and Assessment, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop