Topic Editors

Prof. Dr. Mowen Xie
School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China
Associate Professor, School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China
School of Engineering, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 8528521, Japan
College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
College of Energy and Mining Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China
Dr. Santos Daniel Chicas
Kyushu University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agro-environmental Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan

Geotechnics for Hazard Mitigation, 2nd Edition

Abstract submission deadline
31 October 2026
Manuscript submission deadline
31 December 2026
Viewed by
312

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Among all the geological disasters (GDs), collapses, landslides, and debris flow are the most serious. The prediction of geological disasters is the most effective means to reduce casualties and property losses. However, early identification and warning technology for collapses have been difficult to achieve effectively. Therefore, the scope of this research topic is about the quantitative identification of dangerous rock, the risk assessment of landslide instability precursors, the quantitative model of a movable solid source in a debris flow source area, the application of research on new monitoring and early warning technology systems, and the corresponding control and reinforcement measures. In addition, this Topic also welcomes papers of remote sensing technologies (e.g., InSAR, LiDAR, and multispectral/hyperspectral imagery) in early detection of precursory deformation, large-scale hazard mapping, and real-time monitoring of landslides, rockfalls, and debris flows. Submissions exploring how advanced remote sensing approaches can effectively bridge field-scale observations and regional risk assessment are particularly encouraged. We cordially invite relevant scholars to submit their research findings to the article collection of this Topic, which will hopefully improve the early warning technology of GDs and serve as a platform for the exchange of knowledge and the discovery of new innovations. The subtopics include but are not limited to the following:

  • Rock dynamics and failure precursor of rock collapse.
  • Quantitative dynamic damage identification of unstable rock or rock landslides.
  • Analysis of the causative mechanism and disaster-causing factors of GDs.
  • Risk and stability assessment method for GDs.
  • Quantitative model of movable solid source in debris flow source area.
  • Application research of new monitoring technology for GDs and establishment of the early warning index system.
  • The corresponding control and reinforcement measures for GDs.

Prof. Dr. Mowen Xie
Dr. Yan Du
Prof. Dr. Yujing Jiang
Prof. Dr. Bo Li
Dr. Xuepeng Zhang
Dr. Santos D. Chicas
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • geological disaster
  • early identification
  • warning technology
  • stability analysis
  • reinforcement measures
  • rock collapse
  • landslide debris flow

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Applied Sciences
applsci
2.5 5.5 2011 19.8 Days CHF 2400 Submit
Geosciences
geosciences
2.1 5.1 2011 23.4 Days CHF 1800 Submit
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
ijgi
2.8 7.2 2012 34.2 Days CHF 1900 Submit
Remote Sensing
remotesensing
4.1 8.6 2009 24.9 Days CHF 2700 Submit
GeoHazards
geohazards
1.6 2.2 2020 17.2 Days CHF 1400 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 4185 KiB  
Article
The Reactivated Residual Strength: Laboratory Tests and Practical Considerations
by Paolo Carrubba
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(14), 7976; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15147976 - 17 Jul 2025
Viewed by 106
Abstract
As is already known, some currently stable landslides may have been activated in the past along a pre-existing sliding surface and reached the residual strength there, as a consequence of high-cumulative displacements. After a fairly long period of quiescence, these landslides can reactivate [...] Read more.
As is already known, some currently stable landslides may have been activated in the past along a pre-existing sliding surface and reached the residual strength there, as a consequence of high-cumulative displacements. After a fairly long period of quiescence, these landslides can reactivate due to a temporary increase in destabilising forces capable of mobilising the residual strength along the same sliding surface again. Some recent studies have suggested that, under certain conditions, the strength mobilised upon reactivation may slightly exceed the residual value and then decay towards the latter as the displacement progresses. Regarding this matter, many previous studies have hypothesised that some geotechnical variables could affect the recovered strength more significantly: the length of the ageing time, the vertical stress, the stress history, and the speed with which the reactivation occurs. The aim of this research is to confirm whether such recovery of strength upon reactivation is possible and which geotechnical parameters have the greatest influence on the process. To this end, laboratory tests were carried out with the Bromhead ring shear apparatus on normally consolidated saturated samples of both natural soils and clays provided by industry (bentonite and kaolin). The coupling effect of the ageing time, the vertical stress, and the reactivation speed on the mobilised strength upon reactivation were investigated, starting from a pre-existing residual state of these samples. Within the limits of this research, the results seem to confirm that all three geotechnical variables are influential, with a greater impact on the reactivation speed and, subordinately, on the ageing time for long quiescence periods. Therefore, it is concluded that a quiescent landslide could show a reactivated strength slightly higher than the residual value if the destabilising action could arise with a certain rapidity. Conversely, if the destabilising action occurs very slowly, the mobilised strength could correspond to the residual value. The experimental results of this research may find some application in the design of strengthening works for a stable quiescent landslide that could experience a fairly rapid increase in destabilising actions, such as in the case of seismic stress, morphological modification of the slope, or a rising water table. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Geotechnics for Hazard Mitigation, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop