Search Results (14)

Background: Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) is an established minimally invasive approach for degenerative spinal conditions. Advances in instrumentation and visualization have expanded its application to spinal tumor resection. This review synthesizes reported clinical outcomes and technical considerations of ESS for primary spinal tumors. Methods: PubMed was queried from 2000 to 2025 for studies reporting endoscopic resection of primary spinal tumors. Studies involving metastatic disease or non-resective interventions were excluded. Data were descriptively analyzed given heterogeneity and limited sample size. Results: Eleven patients across seven studies were included (mean age = 50.3 years). Pathologies comprised schwannoma (n = 5), meningioma (n = 3), osteoid osteoma (n = 2), and Ewing sarcoma (n = 1). Seven tumors were intradural extramedullary (63.6%) and four were extradural (36.4%); no intramedullary lesions were included. Of the seven intradural cases, one was performed via uniportal full-endoscopic technique, one via biportal endoscopy, and five via tubular retractor-assisted endoscopy. Across all eleven patients, gross total resection was achieved in 90.9% of cases. Gross total resection was achieved in 100% of cases in which it was the operative intent (10/10); the remaining case was a planned biopsy of recurrent Ewing sarcoma. One transient postoperative lower extremity weakness was reported; no cerebrospinal fluid leaks, reoperations, or perioperative deaths occurred. No recurrences were observed across a mean follow-up of 21.9 months (range 4–48 months), though this duration may be insufficient to assess long-term recurrence for slow-growing tumors such as meningioma and schwannoma. Conclusions: ESS of primary spinal tumors appears feasible and safe in carefully selected cases, particularly for small, well-circumscribed lesions in favorable anatomical locations. Intradural resection introduced distinct technical challenges, including irrigation management and dural closure, which influence platform selection. These findings are limited by small sample size, short follow-up, and likely publication bias. ESS should be considered an emerging minimally invasive option rather than a replacement for established microsurgical approaches. Prospective comparative studies are needed to better define its role in spinal oncology. Full article

Minimally invasive parafascicular surgery (MIPS) represents a paradigm shift in the management of deep-seated brain tumors, enabling function-sparing resections previously limited to biopsy and/or medical therapy. Central to MIPS are structured frameworks guiding preoperative planning and intraoperative execution. The six-pillar concept—comprising imaging, navigation, atraumatic access, optics, resection, and postoperative care—provides a comprehensive approach to integrate advanced neuroimaging, tractography, tubular retractor systems, fluorescence-guided resection, and neuromonitoring to optimize functional outcomes. Five-point target-trajectory complex planning—craniotomy, outer radial corridor, inner radial corridor, target, and resection margins—translates preoperative imaging and functional mapping into a precise surgical trajectory, balancing maximal tumor resection with minimal disruption of eloquent brain structures. Preoperative assessment of tumor characteristics, vascular relationships, and cortical eloquence informs trajectory planning and intraoperative adjustments. A critical determinant of MIPS success is the intraoperative golden hour, referring to the high-risk period surrounding brain cannulation with a tubular retractor. Key principles include (1) precannulation system checks to ensure instrument readiness; (2) access injury prevention through optimized craniotomy sizing and sulcal preparation; (3) tubular-tumor targeting accuracy addressing brain and tubular translation, tumor displacement, and white-matter sleeves; and (4) intracranial pressure control strategies to minimize tissue strain and venous congestion. Overcoming this period enables a controlled resection phase guided by the above-mentioned surgical adjuncts. The six-pillar concept and five-point target-trajectory complex planning are the foundations of MIPS planning, whereas the intraoperative golden hour provides a roadmap for successful intraoperative delivery of the surgical plan. Full article

Background: Intraventricular tumors represent a minority in the context of brain tumors, but their surgical treatment is particularly complex due to their vascularization and visualization, especially in deep localization. The characteristics of these tumors make them ideal candidates for minimally invasive surgical strategies such as the tubular retractor technique, above all in the elderly population. Objectives: A 1-year multi-center, retrospective case series was performed: the authors describe their preliminary experience using a neuronavigated tubular retractor in the management of 11 cases of intraventricular meningiomas. Methods: Clinical and radiological findings were examined to define the outcomes. We used an alternative tubular retractor system obtained using a modified preexisting general surgery trocar (ENDOPATH XCEL 15 mm trocar) or the NICO System BrainPath. Results: Gross total resection, defined as the removal of all the tumor visible from the brain scans, was achieved in all cases. Ten out of eleven of the patients did not experience major complications or permanent neurological deficits. Four patients presented transitory post-operative agitation, visual blurring and transient hemiparesis. All patients (mean age 72.6 years) were discharged from the hospital in 5–7 days. Conclusions: Our preliminary experience suggests that the use of navigated tubular retractors, by displacing the fibers and hence minimizing the damage to the surrounding cerebral parenchyma, is feasible and safe, representing a minimally invasive technique for a personalized and patient-tailored approach. The use of the selective ultrasonic aspirator makes it possible to excise the tumor through the narrow corridor of the tubular lumen of around 2 cm, and this technique can also be improved using both endoscope and microscope guidance. Full article

Background/Objectives: Thoracic minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) offers reduced tissue trauma and faster recovery compared with open approaches, but its adoption remains limited due to technical complexity and uncertainty regarding complication rates. This study aimed to synthesize the available evidence on overall and approach-specific complications of thoracic MISS using tubular, uniportal endoscopic, and biportal endoscopic techniques. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42024594316), PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from January 2013 to March 2024 for studies reporting complication rates after thoracic MISS in adults. Eligible studies included tubular, uniportal, or biportal approaches. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Complication data were extracted and summarized descriptively, with reported rates stratified by surgical approach. Results: Nine studies (234 patients) were included, all retrospective with moderate risk of bias. Across included studies, reported overall complication rates following thoracic MISS ranged from 0% to 42.9%. Stratified by surgical approach, reported complication rates ranged from 0% to 11.8% across six tubular studies, 9.7% to 20.0% across two uniportal endoscopic studies, and 42.9% in a single small biportal endoscopic study. Neural injuries and dural tears were the most frequently reported complications, with reported rates ranging from 0% to 14.3% and 0% to 3.6%, respectively. Symptomatic cerebrospinal fluid leaks and revision surgeries were less common, with reported rates ranging from 0% to 11.8% and 0% to 3.2%, respectively. Conclusions: Thoracic MISS demonstrates a low overall complication rate, particularly for tubular approaches. However, findings should be interpreted with caution given the small number of included studies, retrospective designs, and clinical heterogeneity. Larger comparative investigations are needed to better define safety profiles and support broader adoption of thoracic MISS techniques. Full article

Background: The tubular retractor-assisted minimally invasive parafascicular approach (trMIPS) is a transsulcal approach to deep-seated brain tumours. It is a safe surgical approach but its impact on the microvascular dynamics of the retracted cortex and its clinical implications are unknown. Methods: This was a single-centre prospective study including patients with deep-seated brain tumours operated on with a trMIPS (BrainPath Nico System^©). All patients underwent pre- and post-cannulation indocyanine green study using a FLOW 800 module in a KINEVO Zeiss^© microscope. Speed, delay, time-to-peak (TtP) rise-in-time and cerebral blood flow index (CBFI) metrics were assessed. Results: Thirty-five patients were included, with 144 regions-of-interest (ROIs) selected. The majority of patients were diagnosed with glioblastoma (51.43%), and 37.14% of patients had a preoperative focal neurological deficit (FND) at presentation. A ROI-based analysis concluded that an increase in speed and CBFI was related with a worse neurological outcome when comparing the pre- and post-brain cannulation assessments (speed: deterioration = 43.12 ± 80.60% versus stable = −14.51 ± 57.80% versus improvement = 6.93 ± 31.33%, p < 0.0001; CBFI: deterioration = 50.40 ± 88.17% versus stable = −2.70 ± 67.54% versus improvement = −38.98 ± 26.17%, p = 0.0005). These findings were reproducible in a combined-ROI per patient analysis and confirmed after adjustment for confounding. Conclusion: Microvascular flow dynamics impact trMIPS outcomes as an increase in the speed and CBFI after decannulation was related with worse neurological outcome. Full article

Background/Objectives: 5-aminulevulinic acid (5-ALA)-guided surgery for high-grade gliomas remains a challenge in neuro-oncological surgery. Inconsistent fluorescence visualisation, subjective quantification and false negatives due to blood, haemostatic agents or optical impediments from the external light source are some of the limitations of the present technology. Methods: The preliminary results from this single-centre retrospective study are presented from the first 35 patients operated upon with the novel Nico Myriad Spectra System©. The microdebrider (Myriad) with an additional in situ light system (Spectra) can alternately provide white and blue light (405 nm) to within 15 mm of the tissue surface to enhance the morphology of the anatomical structures and the fluorescence of the pathological tissues. Results: A total of 35 patients were operated upon with this new technology. Eight patients (22.85%) underwent tubular retractor-assisted minimally invasive parafascicular surgery (tr-MIPS). The majority had high-grade gliomas (68.57%). Fluorescence was identified in 30 cases (85.71%), with residual fluorescence in 11 (36.66%). The main applications were better white–blue light alternation and visualisation during tr-MIPS, increase in the extent of resection at the border of the cavity, identification of satellite lesions in multifocal pathology, the differentiation between radionecrosis and tumour recurrence in redo surgery and the demarcation between normal ependyma versus pathological ependyma in tumours infiltrating the subventricular zone. Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study confirms that the novel in situ light-source delivery technology integrated with the usual intraoperative armamentarium provides a spatially, functionally and oncologically informed framework for glioblastoma surgery. It allows for the enhancement of the morphology of anatomical structures and the fluorescence of pathological tissues, increasing the extent of resection and, possibly, the prognosis for patients with high-grade gliomas. Full article

Personalized care models are dominating modern medicine. These models are rooted in teaching future physicians the skill set to keep up with innovation. In orthopedic surgery and neurosurgery, education is increasingly influenced by augmented reality, simulation, navigation, robotics, and in some cases, artificial intelligence. The postpandemic learning environment has also changed, emphasizing online learning and skill- and competency-based teaching models incorporating clinical and bench-top research. Attempts to improve work–life balance and minimize physician burnout have led to work-hour restrictions in postgraduate training programs. These restrictions have made it particularly challenging for orthopedic and neurosurgery residents to acquire the knowledge and skill set to meet the requirements for certification. The fast-paced flow of information and the rapid implementation of innovation require higher efficiencies in the modern postgraduate training environment. However, what is taught typically lags several years behind. Examples include minimally invasive tissue-sparing techniques through tubular small-bladed retractor systems, robotic and navigation, endoscopic, patient-specific implants made possible by advances in imaging technology and 3D printing, and regenerative strategies. Currently, the traditional roles of mentee and mentor are being redefined. The future orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons involved in personalized surgical pain management will need to be versed in several disciplines ranging from bioengineering, basic research, computer, social and health sciences, clinical study, trial design, public health policy development, and economic accountability. Solutions to the fast-paced innovation cycle in orthopedic surgery and neurosurgery include adaptive learning skills to seize opportunities for innovation with execution and implementation by facilitating translational research and clinical program development across traditional boundaries between clinical and nonclinical specialties. Preparing the future generation of surgeons to have the aptitude to keep up with the rapid technological advances is challenging for postgraduate residency programs and accreditation agencies. However, implementing clinical protocol change when the entrepreneur–investigator surgeon substantiates it with high-grade clinical evidence is at the heart of personalized surgical pain management. Full article

Objective: The aim of this work is to define a methodological strategy for the minimally invasive tubular retractor (MITR) parafascicular transulcal approach (PTA) for the management of brain tumors sited in eloquent areas. Methods: An observational prospective study was designed to evaluate the benefits of PTA associated with MITRs, tractography and intraoperative cortical stimulation. They study was conducted from June 2018 to June 2021. Information regarding white matter tracts was processed, preventing a potential damage during the approach and/or resection. All patients older than 18 years who had a single brain tumor lesion were included in the study. Patients with a preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score greater than 70% and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score > 14 points were included. Results: 72 patients were included in the study, the mean age was 49.6, the most affected gender was male, 12.5% presented aphasia, 11.1% presented paraphasia, 41.6% had motor deficit, 9.7% had an affection in the optic pathway, the most frequently affected region was the frontal lobe (26.3%), the most frequent lesions were high-grade gliomas (34.7%) and the measurement of the incisions was on average 5.58 cm. Of the patients, 94.4% underwent a total macroscopic resection and 90.2% did not present new postoperative neurological deficits. In all cases, a PTA was used. Conclusion: Tubular minimally invasive approaches (MIAs) allow one to perform maximal safe resection of brain tumors in eloquent areas, through small surgical corridors. Future comparative studies between traditional and minimally invasive techniques are required to further investigate the potential of these surgical nuances. Full article

Background and Objectives: Percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement is a minimally invasive spinal procedure that has been rapidly adopted over the last decade. However, PPS placement has elicited fear of increased radiation exposure from some surgeons, medical staff, and patients. This is because PPS placement is performed using a K-wire, and the operator must perform K-wire insertion into the pedicle under fluoroscopy. In order to prevent erroneous insertion, there are many occasions when direct insertion is required during radiation exposure, and the amount of radiation exposure to hands and fingers in particular increases. Although these problems are being addressed by navigation systems, these systems are still expensive and not widely available. Attempts have been made to address this situation using instrumentation commonly used in spinal surgery. First, it was considered to visualize anatomical bone markers using a tubular retractor and a microscope. In addition, the use of a self-drilling pin was adopted to locate the pedicle in a narrower field of view. Based on these considerations, a minimally invasive and highly accurate pedicle screw placement technique was developed while avoiding direct radiation exposure. This study evaluated radiation exposure and accuracy of pedicle screw placement using this new procedure in one-level, minimally invasive, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). Materials and Methods: Data were collected retrospectively to review pedicle screw placement in single-level MIS TLIFs using a tubular retractor under a microscope. The total fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and screw placement accuracy were reviewed. Extension of operating time was also evaluated. Results: Twenty-four patients underwent single-level MIS TLIFs, with placement of 96 pedicle screws. There were 15 females and 9 males, with an average age of 64.8 years and a mean body mass index of 25.5 kg/m². The mean operating time was 201.8 min. The mean fluoroscopic time was 26.8 s. The mean radiation dose of the area dose product was 0.0706 mGy∗m². The mean radiation dose of air kerma was 6.0 mGy. The mean radiation dose of the entrance skin dose was 11.31 mGy. Postoperative computed tomography scans demonstrated 93 pedicle screws confined to the pedicle (97%) and three pedicle screw breaches (3.2%; two lateral, one medial). A patient with screw deviation of the medial pedicle wall developed right-foot numbness necessitating reoperation. There were no complications after reoperation. The average added time with this combined procedure was 39 min (range 16–69 min) per patient. Conclusions: This novel pedicle screw insertion technique compares favorably with other reports in terms of radiation exposure reduction and accuracy and is also useful from the viewpoint of avoiding direct radiation exposure to hands and fingers. It is economical because it uses existing spinal surgical instrumentation. Full article

Background and Objectives: The use of minimally invasive retractor systems has significantly decreased the amount of tissue dissection and blood loss, and the duration of post-operative recovery after far-lateral disc herniations (FLDH). In this technical note, the technique of docking the tubular retractor on the caudal transverse process is described for an efficient approach with a decreased need for manipulation of the exiting nerve root. Materials and Methods: The case reported is that of a woman affected by a right-sided FLDH at the L4–5 level causing an L4 radiculopathy with weakness and numbness. A review of the literature for FLDH regarding the key anatomy used during a far lateral approach was also performed. Results: The patient showed a significant improvement of her dorsiflexion weakness and radiating leg pain at her 2-week and 5-week post-operative visits, and at a 6-month follow-up she had near-complete relief of her symptoms, including resolution of foot numbness. Prior techniques for tubular microdiscectomy for FLDH report docking on the facet joint, pars interarticularis, and the cranial transverse process. Conclusions: This technical note details that the utility of docking a tubular retractor at the caudal transverse process improves upon already established techniques for minimally invasive tubular discectomy for FLDH. Full article

Although minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is the most common procedure in minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt), details of the technique remain unclear. This technical report shows the mid-long-term clinical outcomes in patients who underwent posterior oblique square decompression (POSDe) with the three-step wanding technique of tubular MIS-TLIF for degenerative lumbar disease. Tubular MIS-TLIF (POSDe) was performed on 50 patients (males, 19; age, 69.2 ± 9.6 years), and traditional open surgery was performed (OS) on 27 (males, 4; age, 67.9 ± 6.6 years). We evaluated the clinical outcomes using the Visual Analog Scale for back pain, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. We also assessed the fusion rate using the Bridwell grading system with computed tomography or plain radiography for at least 2 years postoperatively. Although there was no significant difference in the improvement rate of JOA scores between the two groups, the mean operation time and blood loss were significantly lower with MIS-TLIF than with OS. In the tubular MIS-TLIF group, there were no cases of deep wound infection; four cases had a pseudarthrosis, two had dural injury, and three had cage retropulsion. We revealed good clinical outcomes in patients who underwent POSDe. Full article

Background and objectives: Minimally invasive surgery has become popular for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Microendoscope-assisted PLIF (ME-PLIF) utilizes a microendoscope within a tubular retractor for PLIF procedures; however, there are no published reports that compare Microendoscope-assisted to open PLIF. Here we compare the surgical and clinical outcomes of ME-PLIF with those of open PLIF. Materials and Methods: A total of 155 consecutive patients who underwent single-level PLIF were registered prospectively. Of the 149 patients with a complete set of preoperative data, 72 patients underwent ME-PLIF (ME-group), and 77 underwent open PLIF (open-group). Clinical and radiographic findings collected one year after surgery were compared. Results: Of the 149 patients, 57 patients in ME-group and 58 patients in the open-group were available. The ME-PLIF procedure required a significantly shorter operating time and involved less intraoperative blood loss. Three patients in both groups reported dural tears as intraoperative complications. Three patients in ME-group experienced postoperative complications, compared to two patients in the open-group. The fusion rate in ME-group at one year was lower than that in the open group (p = 0.06). The proportion of patients who were satisfied was significantly higher in the ME-group (p = 0.02). Conclusions: ME-PLIF was associated with equivalent post-surgical outcomes and significantly higher rates of patient satisfaction than the traditional open PLIF procedure. However, the fusion rate after ME-PLIF tended to be lower than that after the traditional open method. Full article

Background and objectives: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common disease in the meridian of life. Although surgical discectomy is commonly used to treat LDH, there are several different strategies. We compared the outcomes of uniportal full-endoscopic discectomy (FED) with those of microendoscopic discectomy (MED) in treating LDH. Materials and Methods: FED was performed using a 4.1-mm working channel endoscope, and MED was performed using a 16-mm diameter tubular retractor and endoscope. Data of patients with LDH treated with FED (n = 39) or MED (n = 27) by the single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Patient background information and operative data were collected. Pre- and postoperative low back and leg pain were evaluated using the numerical rating scale (NRS) score. Pre- and postoperative disc height index (DHI) values were calculated from plain radiographs, and the disc height loss was evaluated using the ratio (DHI ratio); Results: The median (interquartile range (IQR) Q25–75) operation times for FED and MED were 42 (33–61) and 43 (33–50) minutes, respectively. The median (IQR Q25–75) pre- and postoperative NRS scores for low back pain were 5 (2–7) and 1 (0–4), respectively, for FED and 6 (3–8) and 1 (0–2), respectively, for MED. The median (IQR Q25–75) pre- and postoperative NRS scores for leg pain were 7 (5–8) and 0 (0–2), respectively, for FED and 6 (5–8) and 0 (0–2), respectively, for MED. These data were not different between the FED and MED groups. The median (IQR Q25–75) DHI ratios of FED and MED were 0.94 (0.89–1.03) and 0.90 (0.79–0.95), respectively. The DHI ratio was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the FED group than in the MED group, and there was less blood loss; Conclusions: The pain-relieving effect of FED in treating LDH was almost identical to that of MED. However, FED was superior to MED in preventing disc height loss, which is one of the indicators of postoperative disc degeneration. Full article

Background and Objectives: Ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) is a relatively common cause of thoracic myelopathy. Surgical treatment is recommended for patients with myelopathy. Generally, open posterior decompression, with or without fusion, is selected to treat OLF. We performed minimally invasive posterior decompression using a microendoscope and investigated the efficacy of this approach in treating limited type of thoracic OLF. Materials and Methods: Microendoscopic posterior decompression was performed for 19 patients (15 men and four women) with thoracic OLF with myelopathy aged between 35 to 81 years (mean age, 61.9 years). Neurological examination and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) were used to identify the location and morphology of OLF. The surgery was performed using a midline approach or a unilateral paramedian approach depending on whether the surgeon used a combination of a tubular retractor and endoscope. The numerical rating scale (NRS) and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scores were compared pre- and postoperatively. Perioperative complications and the presence of other spine surgeries before and after thoracic OLF surgery were also investigated. Results: Four midline and 15 unilateral paramedian approaches were performed. The average operative time per level was 99 min, with minor blood loss. Nine patients had a history of cervical or lumbar spine surgery before or after thoracic spine surgery. The mean pre- and postoperative NRS scores were 6.6 and 5.3, respectively. The mean recovery rate as per the mJOA score was 33.1% (mean follow-up period, 17.8 months), the recovery rates were significantly different between patients who underwent thoracic spine surgery alone (50.5%) and patients who underwent additional spine surgeries (13.7%). Regarding adverse events, one patient experienced dural tear, another experienced postoperative hematoma, and one other underwent reoperation for adjacent thoracic stenosis. Conclusion: Microendoscopic posterior decompression was applicable in limited type of thoracic OLF surgery including beak-shaped type and multi vertebral levels. However, whole spine evaluation is important to avoid missing other combined stenoses that may affect outcomes. Full article