Search Results (1,440)

Effective asset management is crucial for improving the reliability, resilience, and cost efficiency of distribution networks throughout the asset life cycle. Distribution transformers are among the most critical components, as their failures can cause extensive service interruptions and substantial economic impacts. Therefore, robust and transparent maintenance prioritization strategies are essential, particularly for utilities managing several transformers. Traditional time-based maintenance, while simple to implement, often results in inefficient resource allocation. Condition-based maintenance provides a more effective alternative; however, its performance depends strongly on the reliability of indicator selection and weighting. This study proposes a systematic weighting framework for distribution transformer maintenance prioritization using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. Each transformer is evaluated across two dimensions, including health condition and operational impact, based on indicators identified from the literature and expert judgment. To address uncertainty and judgmental inconsistency, particularly when the consistency ratio (CR) exceeds the conventional threshold of 0.10, the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) is employed. Seven condition parameters characterize transformer health, while impact is quantified using five indicators reflecting failure consequences. The proposed framework offers a transparent, repeatable, and defensible decision-support tool, enabling utilities to prioritize maintenance actions, optimize resource allocation, and mitigate operational risks in distribution networks. Full article

The maritime sector is undergoing a profound transformation driven by disruptive technologies and global decarbonization objectives, placing new demands on Maritime Education and Training (MET) systems. Equipping maritime professionals with competencies for low-carbon shipping is now as critical as technological advancement itself. This study examines how disruptive technologies can be effectively integrated into MET frameworks to support environmental sustainability, using Panama as a representative case study of a major flag and maritime service state. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining a structured literature review, expert surveys, and a multi-criteria decision-making analysis based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The findings reveal a significant misalignment between existing MET curricula and the competencies required for decarbonized maritime operations. Key gaps include limited training in alternative fuels, emissions measurement and reporting, energy-efficient technologies, digital analytics, and regulatory compliance. Stakeholders also reported fragmented training provision, uneven access to emerging technologies, and weak coordination between academia, industry, and regulators, particularly in developing contexts. The results highlight the urgent need for curriculum reform and stronger cross-sector collaboration to align MET with evolving technological and regulatory demands. The study provides an applied, evidence-based framework for MET reform, with insights transferable to other systems facing similar decarbonization challenges. Full article

Universal accessibility remains a critical challenge for effective public transport and urban equity. This study addresses the need for operational prioritisation tools by proposing a robust hybrid methodology to rank interventions at urban mobility nodes. The approach combines the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for integrating expert and participatory criteria weighting with four Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques (TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and ARAS) to ensure solution reliability. Empirical validation, conducted on 30 bus stops in Segovia, Spain, confirmed the methodological soundness, evidenced by near-perfect correlations (ρ = 0.99) among the compromise and additive ratio models (TOPSIS–VIKOR and COPRAS–ARAS) and stability across over 85% of sensitivity simulations. The findings validate that the methodology effectively guides resource allocation towards interventions yielding maximum social impact and demonstrate its transferability to complex urban supply chain contexts, such as logistics microhubs. Ultimately, this replicable and adaptable model supports the transition towards more equitable, resilient urban systems, aligning directly with Sustainable Development Goal 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities). Full article

This case study in Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil, addresses the urban problem of the degradation of road corridors used by public transport, affecting the accessibility, safety, and efficiency of urban mobility. To address this issue, a multi-criteria methodology based on MIVES (Integrated Value Model for Sustainable Assessments) was applied, combined with the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method, allowing the evaluation of 20 key urban roads using a hierarchical set of indicators linked to infrastructure, accessibility, and mobility. The assessment was operationalized through the Transport Infrastructure Condition Index (TICI), which yielded results ranging from 0.32 to 0.88, reflecting significant contrasts in the road’s upkeep and maintenance conditions. The lowest scores were associated with deficiencies in universal accessibility, cycling infrastructure, signage, and adaptations for people with reduced mobility, highlighting structural limitations in sustainability and urban inclusion. The model facilitates the prioritization of road interventions based on urgency and criticality, becoming a useful tool for guiding public investment decisions. Its comprehensive approach and replicability make it a valuable methodological alternative for other Latin American contexts, where pressure to improve urban services coexists with budgetary constraints, contributing to more efficient and sustainable strategic planning of public transportation. Full article

The design of aircraft components is a complex process that must simultaneously account for environmental impact, manufacturability, cost and structural performance to meet modern regulatory requirements and sustainability objectives. When these factors are integrated from the early design stages, the approach transcends traditional eco-design and becomes a genuinely sustainability-oriented design methodology. This study proposes a sustainability-driven design framework for aircraft components and demonstrates its application to a fuselage panel consisting of a curved skin, four frames, seven stringers, and twenty-four clips. The design variables investigated include the material selection, joining methods, and subcomponent thicknesses. The design space is constructed through a combinatorial generation process coupled with compatibility and feasibility constraints. Sustainability criteria are evaluated using a combination of parametric Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Costing (LCC) regression models, parametric Finite Element Analysis (FEA), and Random Forest surrogate modeling trained on a stratified set of simulation results. Two methodological pathways are introduced: 1. Cluster-based optimization, involving customized clustering followed by multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) within each cluster. 2. Global optimization, performed across the full decision matrix using Pareto front analysis and MCDM techniques. A stability analysis of five objective-weighting methods and four normalization techniques is conducted to identify the most robust methodological configuration. The results—based on a full cradle-to-grave assessment that includes the use phase over a 30-year A319 aircraft operational lifetime—show that the thermoplastic CFRP panel joined by welding emerges as the most sustainable design alternative. Full article

The northern coast of Mauritania presents a strategic opportunity for clean energy investment due to its remarkable potential for green hydrogen production through wind energy. To determine the best location for wind-based green hydrogen production, this paper established a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making framework (MCDM) that combines the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Evidential Reasoning (ER) to assess five coastal sites: Nouakchott, Nouamghar, Tasiast, Boulanoir, and Nouadhibou. Four main criteria (i.e., economic, technical, environmental, and social) and twelve sub-criteria were taken into account in the assessment. To ensure reliability and contextual accuracy, the data used in this study were obtained from geographic databases, peer-reviewed literature, and structured expert questionnaires. The results indicate that site 5 (Nouadhibou) is the most suitable location for green hydrogen generation using wind energy. Sensitivity analysis confirms the robustness of the ranking results, validating the reliability of the proposed hybrid framework. The findings of this study provide critical, data-driven decision-support insights for investors and policymakers, guiding the strategic development of sustainable wind-based green hydrogen projects along Mauritania’s coastline. Full article

Many nations have been investing in hydrogen energy in the most recent wave of development and numerous projects have been proposed, yet a substantial share of these projects remain at the conceptual or feasibility stage and have not progressed to final investment decision or operation. There is a need to identify initial potential sites for green hydrogen production from renewable energy on an objective basis with minimal upfront cost to the investor. This study develops a decision support system (DSS) for identifying optimal locations for green hydrogen production using solar and wind resources that integrate economic, environmental, technical, social, and risk and safety factors through advanced Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques. The study evaluates alternative weighting scenarios using (a) occurrence-based, (b) PageRank-based, and (c) equal weighting approaches to minimize human bias and enhance decision transparency. In the occurrence-based approach (a), renewable resource potential receives the highest weighting (≈34% total weighting). By comparison, approach (b) redistributes importance toward infrastructure and social indicators, yielding a more balanced representation of technical and economic priorities and highlighting the practical value of capturing interdependencies among indicators for resource-efficient site selection. The research also contrasts the empirical and operational efficiencies of various weighting methods and processing stages, highlighting strengths and weaknesses in supporting sustainable and economically viable site selection. Ultimately, this research contributes significantly to both academic and practical implementations in the green hydrogen sector, providing a strategic, data-driven approach to support sustainable energy transitions. Full article

This paper develops a procedure for assessing both supply chain processes and strategic criteria in the context of platform-based supply chains, addressing the problem that organizations often invest in digital platforms without a clear understanding of how process effectiveness, process dysfunction, and strategic platform priorities jointly influence implementation success. The main research objective is to evaluate how effective and dysfunctional supply chain processes, together with prioritized strategic platform criteria, shape performance, productivity, and resilience outcomes in platform-based supply chain integration. The paper further discusses how identified dysfunctional processes and prioritized strategic criteria relate to operational vulnerabilities and resilience-building measures. The research adopts a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach to address the challenges of digital transformation and platform integration. An exploratory study was conducted applying the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to evaluate functional and dysfunctional processes, complemented by the best worst method (BWM) to prioritize critical strategic criteria. The combined assessment highlights effective and dysfunctional processes while also identifying the most influential factors driving platform-based adoption and their potential implications for operational vulnerability and resilience. The results demonstrate how platform integration contributes to performance improvement, process alignment, and productivity gains across supply chain operations. The study contributes to both theory and practice by integrating MCDM techniques to support structured decision-making, enhancing responsiveness, resilience, and alignment with platform-oriented strategies. The primary contribution lies in providing a dual-level framework that enables supply chain managers to diagnose weaknesses, leverage strengths, and strategically guide the transition toward platform-based supply chain operations, with a measurable impact on organizational performance and productivity development. Full article

Scaling Agile in industrial software projects is a process control problem that must balance governance, scalability, and adaptability while keeping decisions auditable. We present a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework that combines Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) for uncertainty-aware weighting with a tunable VIKOR–PROMETHEE ranking stage. Weighting and ranking are kept distinct to support traceability and parameter sensitivity. A three-layer hierarchy organizes twenty-two criteria across organizational, project, group, and framework levels. In a single-enterprise validation with two independent expert panels (n = 10 practitioners), the tuned hybrid achieved lower rank error than single-method baselines (mean absolute error, $\mathrm{MAE}$ = 1.03; Spearman $\rho$ = 0.53) using pre-specified thresholds and a transparent $\alpha +\beta$ = 1 control. The procedure is practical for process governance: elicit priorities, derive fuzzy weights, apply the hybrid ranking, and verify stability with sensitivity analysis. The framework operationalizes modeling, optimization, control, and monitoring of scaling decisions, making trade-offs explicit and reproducible in industrial settings. Full article

Blockchain technology has attracted considerable attention in the supply chain literature for its potential to enhance operational traceability, transparency, and trust, as well as to advance greening initiatives. Given current supply chain configurations, exploring barriers to implementation is a consequential agenda, and current studies have devoted substantial effort to identifying and offering guidance to address them. Despite recent findings, insights into how blockchain technology adoption can support green supply chain management are missing, particularly in the maritime sector, which receives limited attention. Thus, this work outlines a methodological approach to examine the suitability of maritime routes for addressing barriers to implementing blockchain technology in green supply chain management. Viewing the evaluation as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem, the proposed approach performs the following actions on a case study evaluating four maritime lines. Firstly, from the 13 identified barriers in the literature review and expert interviews, nine relevant barriers were determined after one round of a Delphi process. These barriers eventually comprise the set of evaluation criteria. Secondly, to satisfy the assumption of criterion independence in most MCDM methods, this work proposes a novel extended grey relational analysis (GRA) that allows for the measurement of criterion independence based on the concept of grey relational space. Proposed here for the first time, the extended GRA offers a distribution-free overall independence index for each criterion based on pattern similarity. Finally, an integration of SWARA (Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) and ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) methods under Z-information is developed to address the evaluation problem involving expert judgments in a highly uncertain decision-making context. Results show that transaction-level uncertainty is the most critical barrier to blockchain adoption, followed by technology risks and higher sustainability costs. Among the four maritime lines, Line 3 is best prepared for a blockchain-enabled green supply chain. The agreement between these results and those of other MCDM methods is shown in the comparative analysis. Also, ranking remains unchanged even when the criteria weights are adjusted. The proposed approach provides a computationally efficient and tractable framework for maritime managers to make informed decisions about blockchain adoption to promote green supply chains. Full article

This study proposes a multi-dimensional, fuzzy logic-based decision-making framework to assess airport sustainability performance under uncertainty, addressing a notable gap in the literature. The proposed model integrates the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to determine the weights of sustainability criteria and the Intuitionistic Fuzzy COPRAS (IF-COPRAS) method to evaluate airport alternatives. The assessment considers four main sustainability dimensions: environmental, economic, social, and technical/institutional. A case study involving five major airports in Türkiye reveals that environmental and economic indicators play a pivotal role in shaping sustainability performance. While Istanbul Airport (IST) demonstrated the highest performance across all scenarios, a comparison with Airport Carbon Accreditation (ACA) levels indicates that carbon-focused certification alone is insufficient to reflect the full spectrum of sustainability outcomes. This research presents a novel and robust evaluation framework, contributing to the limited body of fuzzy logic-based MCDM applications for airport sustainability in the Turkish context. The findings offer actionable strategic insights for policymakers and airport managers regarding investment prioritization, operational strategy reinforcement, and the alignment of airport development with long-term sustainability goals. The results are validated through rigorous sensitivity analyses, confirming the robustness of the model despite the focused expert panel. Full article

The decision-making process for the adaptive reuse of cultural heritage requires the evaluation of multiple criteria because of its multifaceted structure. The criteria determined through a literature review were weighted by experts and ranked according to their degree of importance via the DEMATEL method, which is a multicriteria decision-making technique. This study, conducted by integrating the importance levels of the criteria determined by the DEMATEL method with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) techniques, was applied to Yediocak Primary School, one of the significant buildings in Osmaniye, affected by the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Pazarcık Earthquake and heavily damaged during the event. The DEMATEL analysis demonstrated that economic value, regional potential, and compatibility with the new function are the primary cause-group criteria, whereas architectural, cultural, and social values are predominantly situated within the effect group. The spatial assessment yielded a low suitability score for the current primary school function (0.3954). The hybrid DEMATEL + GIS index (0.2598) confirmed that a building’s reuse as a high-occupancy school is constrained by seismic risk, its position on a heavily trafficked corridor, and relatively limited access to healthcare and emergency assembly areas. This study aimed to establish a new framework for the adaptive reuse of historic buildings. Full article

The widening digital divide within the Global Critical Mineral Resource Supply Chain (GCMRS) 4.0 creates significant barriers to cross-border governance and operational efficiency. To quantify and address this disparity, this study identifies 20 Critical Success Factors (CSFs) through expert interviews with 15 industry specialists in South Korea. A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework integrating Fuzzy DEMATEL, Analytic Network Process (ANP), and the Choquet integral is developed to map causal relationships and determine factor weights. The empirical results reveal a distinct ‘technology-first’ dependency. Specifically, Scalable Technical Solutions and Cloud Computing Access emerge as the primary driving forces with the highest global weights, while Digital Investment Subsidies serve as the central hub for resource allocation. Unlike generic governance models, this study provides a quantifiable decision-making basis for policymakers. It demonstrates that bridging the hard infrastructure gap is a prerequisite for the effectiveness of soft collaborative mechanisms in the critical mineral sector. Full article

Flood risk has been increasing due to the effects of climate change, frequent rainfall, and urbanization. Therefore, flood risk assessments in urban areas are important issues for the mitigation of flood disaster and sustainable development. Although there has been an increase in studies on flood risk, there remains a scarcity of research examining the effects of rainfall at different return periods on flood risk under non-stationary conditions in Geographic Information System (GIS) - and multi-criteria decision-making model (MCDM)-based flood risk assessments. To address this gap, this study integrated MCDM-based flood hazard mapping techniques with rainfall quantiles calculated for different return periods under non-stationary conditions to identify and prioritize flood risk areas in Izmir, Türkiye. Firstly, to analyze the current flood risk, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was integrated into the GIS and the VIseKriterijumsa Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) approach was used to determine the flood risk priority of 165 points. The results showed that Buca, Menderes, Bornova, Kemalpaşa, Çeşme, Torbalı, Menemen, Seferihisar, and Çiğli were identified as high-flood-risk areas. The VIKOR results indicate that the highest-flood-risk points are R91 (Çeşme), R153 (Buca), and R93 (Çeşme). For a thorough flood risk assessment, the rainfall estimates obtained with the Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape (GAMLSS) at 10-, 20-, 50-, and 100-year return levels under non-stationary conditions were re-weighted with AHP and were incorporated into the hazard criteria, and flood risk analyses were performed for four scenarios. The results showed that as return periods increase, high-risk areas expand, while low-risk areas shrink. Specifically, the proportion of very-low-risk areas declined from 15.12% for the 10-year return period to 13.92% for the 100-year return period, whereas the proportion of very-high-risk areas increased from 6.73% to 7.53% over the same return period levels. VIKOR results, unlike the VIKOR findings for the current case, revealed that points R55, R56, and R54 in Kemalpaşa had the highest flood risk in four scenarios. Full article

The acceleration of financial innovation and pro-crypto regulations in the digital asset space have spurred interest in cryptocurrencies among funds, and institutional and retail investors. Like any risky assets, investment in digital assets offers opportunities in terms of returns and challenges in terms of risk. However, unlike traditional assets, digital assets like cryptocurrencies are highly volatile. Accordingly, applying conventional single-criterion financial metrics for portfolio construction may not be sufficient as the method falls short in capturing the complex, multidimensional risk-return dynamics of innovative financial assets like cryptocurrencies. To address this gap, this study introduces a novel, integrated hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework that provides a structured, transparent, and robust approach to cryptocurrency fund selection. The framework seamlessly integrates three well-established operations research methodologies: the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), the Analytic Network Process (ANP), and the Vlse Kriterijumsk Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) algorithm. DEMATEL is utilized to map and analyze the intricate causal interdependencies among a comprehensive set of evaluation criteria, categorizing them into foundational “cause” factors and resultant “effect” factors. This causal structure informs the ANP model, which computes precise criterion weights while accounting for complex feedback and dependency relationships. Subsequently, the VIKOR algorithm is invoked to use these weights to rank cryptocurrency fund alternatives, delivering a compromise between optimizing group utility and minimizing individual regret. To illustrate the application and efficacy of the proposed method, a diverse set of 20 cryptocurrency funds is analyzed. From the analysis, it is shown that foundational criteria, such as “Fee (%)” and “Annualized Standard Deviation,” are the primary causal drivers of financial performance outcomes of funds. This proposed framework supports strategic capital allocation in a rapidly evolving domains of digital finance. Full article