Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (2,472)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = molecular target for tumor therapy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 3441 KiB  
Review
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Targeting Peptides and Their Applications in Tumor Imaging Probe Construction: Current Advances and Future Perspectives
by Lu Huang, Ying Dong, Jinhang Li, Xinyu Yang, Xiaoqiong Li, Jia Wu, Jinhua Huang, Qiaoxuan Zhang, Zemin Wan, Shuzhi Hu, Ruibing Feng, Guodong Li, Xianzhang Huang and Pengwei Zhang
Biology 2025, 14(8), 1011; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14081011 (registering DOI) - 7 Aug 2025
Abstract
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a key target for both cancer diagnosis and therapeutic interventions. Assessing EGFR expression before therapy has become routine in clinical practice, yet current methods like biopsy and immunohistochemistry (IHC) have significant limitations, including invasiveness, limited repeatability, [...] Read more.
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a key target for both cancer diagnosis and therapeutic interventions. Assessing EGFR expression before therapy has become routine in clinical practice, yet current methods like biopsy and immunohistochemistry (IHC) have significant limitations, including invasiveness, limited repeatability, and lack of real-time, whole-body data. EGFR-targeted imaging has emerged as a promising alternative. EGFR-targeting peptides, owing to their favorable physicochemical properties and versatility, are increasingly being explored for a variety of applications, including molecular imaging, drug delivery, and targeted therapy. Recent advances have demonstrated the potential of EGFR-targeting peptides conjugated to imaging probes for non-invasive, real-time in vivo tumor detection, precision therapy, and surgical guidance. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the latest progress in EGFR-targeting peptides development, with a particular focus on their application in the development of molecular imaging agents, including fluorescence imaging, PET/CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and multimodal imaging. Furthermore, we examine the challenges and future directions concerning the development and clinical application of EGFR-targeting peptide-based imaging probes. Finally, we highlight emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, mutation-specific peptides, and multimodal imaging platforms, which offer significant potential for advancing the diagnosis and treatment of EGFR-targeted cancers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 435 KiB  
Review
Molecular and Glycosylation Pathways in Osteosarcoma: Tumor Microenvironment and Emerging Strategies Toward Personalized Oncology
by Georgian Longin Iacobescu, Antonio-Daniel Corlatescu, Horia Petre Costin, Razvan Spiridonica, Mihnea-Ioan-Gabriel Popa and Catalin Cirstoiu
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47(8), 629; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47080629 (registering DOI) - 7 Aug 2025
Abstract
Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone malignancy in children and adolescents, which is also considered an aggressive disease due to its rapid growth rate, ability to metastasize early, and complex and heterogeneous tumor microenvironment (TME). Although we are developing improved surgical [...] Read more.
Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone malignancy in children and adolescents, which is also considered an aggressive disease due to its rapid growth rate, ability to metastasize early, and complex and heterogeneous tumor microenvironment (TME). Although we are developing improved surgical and chemotherapeutic approaches, the presence of metastatic or recurrent disease is still detrimental to the patient’s outcome. Major advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms of OS are needed to substantially improve outcomes for patients being treated for OS. This review integrates new data on the molecular biology, pathophysiology, and immune landscape of OS, as well as introducing salient areas of tumorigenesis underpinning these findings, such as chromothripsis; kataegis; cancer stem cell dynamics; and updated genetic, epigenetic, and glycosylation modifiers. In addition, we review promising biomarkers, diagnostic platforms, and treatments, including immunotherapy, targeted small molecule inhibitors, and nanomedicine. Using genomic techniques, we have defined OS for its significant genomic instability due to TP53 and RB1 mutations, chromosomal rearrangements, and aberrant glycosylation. The TME is also characterized as immunosuppressive and populated by tumor-associated macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and regulatory T cells, ultimately inhibiting immune checkpoint inhibitors. Emerging fields such as glycomics and epigenetics, as well as stem cell biology, have defined promising biomarkers and targets. Preclinical studies have identified that glycan-directed CAR therapies could be possible, as well as metabolic inhibitors and 3D tumor models, which presented some preclinical success and could allow for tumoral specificity and enhanced efficacy. OS is a biologically and clinically complex disease; however, advances in exploring the molecular and immunologic landscape of OS present new opportunities in biomarkers and the development of new treatment options with adjunctive care. Successful treatments in the future will require personalized, multi-targeted approaches to account for tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion. This will help us turn the corner in providing improved outcomes for patients with this resilient malignancy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

42 pages, 939 KiB  
Review
B7-H3 in Cancer Immunotherapy—Prospects and Challenges: A Review of the Literature
by Sylwia Mielcarska, Anna Kot, Miriam Dawidowicz, Agnieszka Kula, Piotr Sobków, Daria Kłaczka, Dariusz Waniczek and Elżbieta Świętochowska
Cells 2025, 14(15), 1209; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14151209 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
In today’s oncology, immunotherapy arises as a potent complement for conventional cancer treatment, allowing for obtaining better patient outcomes. B7-H3 (CD276) is a member of the B7 protein family, which emerged as an attractive target for the treatment of various tumors. The molecule [...] Read more.
In today’s oncology, immunotherapy arises as a potent complement for conventional cancer treatment, allowing for obtaining better patient outcomes. B7-H3 (CD276) is a member of the B7 protein family, which emerged as an attractive target for the treatment of various tumors. The molecule modulates anti-cancer immune responses, acting through diverse signaling pathways and cell populations. It has been implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous malignancies, including melanoma, gliomas, lung cancer, gynecological cancers, renal cancer, gastrointestinal tumors, and others, fostering the immunosuppressive environment and marking worse prognosis for the patients. B7-H3 targeting therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies, antibody–drug conjugates, and CAR T-cells, present promising results in preclinical studies and are the subject of ongoing clinical trials. CAR-T therapies against B7-H3 have demonstrated utility in malignancies such as melanoma, glioblastoma, prostate cancer, and RCC. Moreover, ADCs targeting B7-H3 exerted cytotoxic effects on glioblastoma, neuroblastoma cells, prostate cancer, and craniopharyngioma models. B7-H3-targeting also delivers promising results in combined therapies, enhancing the response to other immune checkpoint inhibitors and giving hope for the development of approaches with minimized adverse effects. However, the strategies of B7-H3 blocking deliver substantial challenges, such as poorly understood molecular mechanisms behind B7-H3 protumor properties or therapy toxicity. In this review, we discuss B7-H3’s role in modulating immune responses, its significance for various malignancies, and clinical trials evaluating anti-B7-H3 immunotherapeutic strategies, focusing on the clinical potential of the molecule. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1557 KiB  
Review
Neoadjuvant Therapy or Upfront Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer—To Whom, When, and How?
by Daria Kwaśniewska, Marta Fudalej, Anna Maria Badowska-Kozakiewicz, Aleksandra Czerw and Andrzej Deptała
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2584; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152584 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
The management of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC) and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) remains a topic of active debate. Although neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has shown clinical benefits in BR-PDAC, especially in increasing resectability and achieving higher rates of margin-negative (R0) resections, [...] Read more.
The management of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC) and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) remains a topic of active debate. Although neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has shown clinical benefits in BR-PDAC, especially in increasing resectability and achieving higher rates of margin-negative (R0) resections, its role in R-PDAC is less clearly defined. Additionally, the role of immunotherapy in PDAC is still being explored, with ongoing trials investigating new combinations to overcome the tumor’s immune-resistant microenvironment. This article provides a comprehensive narrative review of the current evidence comparing NAT with upfront surgery in pancreatic cancer management, focusing on randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses that assess outcomes in R-PDAC and BR-PDAC. The review aims to determine whether NAT offers a significant survival advantage over traditional post-operative strategies and to clarify which clinical scenarios may benefit most from NAT. The literature was identified through a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases up to March 2025. Article selection adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Our review of existing evidence supports NAT as the standard of care for BR-PDAC. Meanwhile, management of R-PDAC should be tailored individually, guided by risk stratification that considers both clinical parameters and molecular features. Immunotherapy and targeted therapies are still in early research phases, and their further integration as NAT remains controversial. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 2414 KiB  
Review
Melittin-Based Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy: Mechanisms, Applications, and Future Perspectives
by Joe Rizkallah, Nicole Charbel, Abdallah Yassine, Amal El Masri, Chris Raffoul, Omar El Sardouk, Malak Ghezzawi, Therese Abou Nasr and Firas Kreidieh
Pharmaceutics 2025, 17(8), 1019; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17081019 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Melittin, a cytolytic peptide derived from honeybee venom, has demonstrated potent anticancer activity through mechanisms such as membrane disruption, apoptosis induction, and modulation of key signaling pathways. Melittin exerts its anticancer activity by interacting with key molecular targets, including downregulation of the PI3K/Akt [...] Read more.
Melittin, a cytolytic peptide derived from honeybee venom, has demonstrated potent anticancer activity through mechanisms such as membrane disruption, apoptosis induction, and modulation of key signaling pathways. Melittin exerts its anticancer activity by interacting with key molecular targets, including downregulation of the PI3K/Akt and NF-κB signaling pathways, and by inducing mitochondrial apoptosis through reactive oxygen species generation and cytochrome c release. However, its clinical application is hindered by its systemic and hemolytic toxicity, rapid degradation in plasma, poor pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity, necessitating the development of targeted delivery strategies to enable safe and effective treatment. Nanoparticle-based delivery systems have emerged as a promising strategy for overcoming these challenges, offering improved tumor targeting, reduced off-target effects, and enhanced stability. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms through which melittin exerts its anticancer effects and evaluates the development of various melittin-loaded nanocarriers, including liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, dendrimers, micelles, and inorganic systems. It also summarizes the preclinical evidence for melittin nanotherapy across a wide range of cancer types, highlighting both its cytotoxic and immunomodulatory effects. The potential of melittin nanoparticles to overcome multidrug resistance and synergize with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, photothermal therapy, and radiotherapy is discussed. Despite promising in vitro and in vivo findings, its clinical translation remains limited. Key barriers include toxicity, manufacturing scalability, regulatory approval, and the need for more extensive in vivo validation. A key future direction is the application of computational tools, such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and artificial-intelligence-based modeling, to streamline development and guide its clinical translation. Addressing these challenges through focused research and interdisciplinary collaboration will be essential to realizing the full therapeutic potential of melittin-based nanomedicines in oncology. Overall, this review synthesizes the findings from over 100 peer-reviewed studies published between 2008 and 2025, providing an up-to-date assessment of melittin-based nanomedicine strategies across diverse cancer types. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development of Novel Tumor-Targeting Nanoparticles, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 3157 KiB  
Review
Deciphering Medulloblastoma: Epigenetic and Metabolic Changes Driving Tumorigenesis and Treatment Outcomes
by Jenny Bonifacio-Mundaca, Sandro Casavilca-Zambrano, Christophe Desterke, Íñigo Casafont and Jorge Mata-Garrido
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 1898; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081898 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 258
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in children and comprises four molecular subtypes—WNT, SHH, Group 3, and Group 4—each with distinct genetic, epigenetic, and metabolic features. Increasing evidence highlights the critical role of metabolic reprogramming and epigenetic alterations in driving [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in children and comprises four molecular subtypes—WNT, SHH, Group 3, and Group 4—each with distinct genetic, epigenetic, and metabolic features. Increasing evidence highlights the critical role of metabolic reprogramming and epigenetic alterations in driving tumor progression, therapy resistance, and clinical outcomes. This review aims to explore the interplay between metabolic and epigenetic mechanisms in medulloblastoma, with a focus on their functional roles and therapeutic implications. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed and relevant databases, focusing on recent studies examining metabolic pathways and epigenetic regulation in medulloblastoma subtypes. Particular attention was given to experimental findings from in vitro and in vivo models, as well as emerging preclinical therapeutic strategies targeting these pathways. Results: Medulloblastoma exhibits metabolic adaptations such as increased glycolysis, lipid biosynthesis, and altered amino acid metabolism. These changes support rapid cell proliferation and interact with the tumor microenvironment. Concurrently, epigenetic mechanisms—including DNA methylation, histone modification, chromatin remodeling, and non-coding RNA regulation—contribute to tumor aggressiveness and treatment resistance. Notably, metabolic intermediates often serve as cofactors for epigenetic enzymes, creating feedback loops that reinforce oncogenic states. Preclinical studies suggest that targeting metabolic vulnerabilities or epigenetic regulators—and particularly their combination—can suppress tumor growth and overcome resistance mechanisms. Conclusions: The metabolic–epigenetic crosstalk in medulloblastoma represents a promising area for therapeutic innovation. Understanding subtype-specific dependencies and integrating biomarkers for patient stratification could facilitate the development of precision medicine approaches that improve outcomes and reduce long-term treatment-related toxicity in pediatric patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomic Insights and Translational Opportunities for Human Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 21916 KiB  
Article
Pentoxifylline and Norcantharidin Synergistically Suppress Melanoma Growth in Mice: A Multi-Modal In Vivo and In Silico Study
by Israel Lara-Vega, Minerva Nájera-Martínez and Armando Vega-López
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(15), 7522; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157522 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 220
Abstract
Melanoma is a highly aggressive skin cancer with limited therapeutic response. Targeting intracellular signaling pathways and promoting tumor cell differentiation are promising therapeutic strategies. Pentoxifylline (PTX) and norcantharidin (NCTD) have demonstrated antitumor properties, but their combined mechanisms of action in melanoma remain poorly [...] Read more.
Melanoma is a highly aggressive skin cancer with limited therapeutic response. Targeting intracellular signaling pathways and promoting tumor cell differentiation are promising therapeutic strategies. Pentoxifylline (PTX) and norcantharidin (NCTD) have demonstrated antitumor properties, but their combined mechanisms of action in melanoma remain poorly understood. The effects of PTX (30 and 60 mg/kg) and NCTD (0.75 and 3 mg/kg), administered alone or in combination, in a DBA/2J murine B16-F1 melanoma model via intraperitoneal and intratumoral (IT) routes were evaluated. Tumor growth was monitored, and molecular analyses included RNA sequencing and immunofluorescence quantification of PI3K, AKT1, mTOR, ERBB2, BRAF, and MITF protein levels, and molecular docking simulations were performed. In the final stage of the experiment, combination therapy significantly reduced tumor volume compared to monotherapies, with the relative tumor volume decreasing from 18.1 ± 1.2 (SD) in the IT Control group to 0.6 ± 0.1 (SD) in the IT combination-treated group (n = 6 per group; p < 0.001). RNA-seq revealed over 3000 differentially expressed genes in intratumoral treatments, with enrichment in pathways related to oxidative stress, immune response, and translation regulation (KEGG and Reactome analyses). Minimal transcript-level changes were observed for BRAF and PI3K/AKT/mTOR genes; however, immunofluorescence showed reduced total and phosphorylated levels of PI3K, AKT1, mTOR, BRAF, and ERBB2. MITF protein levels and pigmentation increased, especially in PTX-treated groups, indicating enhanced melanocytic differentiation. Docking analyses predicted direct binding of both drugs to PI3K, AKT1, mTOR, and BRAF, with affinities ranging from −5.7 to −7.4 kcal/mol. The combination of PTX and NCTD suppresses melanoma progression through dual mechanisms: inhibition of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling and promotion of tumor cell differentiation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2870 KiB  
Review
Etiopathogenesis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
by Mayara Bocchi, Eduardo Vignoto Fernandes, Nathália de Sousa Pereira and Marla Karine Amarante
Immuno 2025, 5(3), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/immuno5030031 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 200
Abstract
Human colorectal cancer (CRC) encompasses tumors affecting a segment of the large intestine (colon) and rectum. It is the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. It is a multifactorial disease, whose carcinogenesis process involves genetic [...] Read more.
Human colorectal cancer (CRC) encompasses tumors affecting a segment of the large intestine (colon) and rectum. It is the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. It is a multifactorial disease, whose carcinogenesis process involves genetic and epigenetic alterations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, including genes related to DNA repair. The pathogenic mechanisms are described based on the pathways of chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability, and CpG island methylator phenotype. When detected early, CRC is potentially curable, and its treatment is based on the pathological characteristics of the tumor and factors related to the patient, as well as on drug efficacy and toxicity studies. Therefore, the aim of this study was to review the pathogenesis and molecular subtypes of CRC and to describe the main targets of disease-directed therapy used in patients refractory to current treatments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 3179 KiB  
Review
Glioblastoma: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Its Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Innovative Therapeutic Strategies
by Felipe Esparza-Salazar, Renata Murguiondo-Pérez, Gabriela Cano-Herrera, Maria F. Bautista-Gonzalez, Ericka C. Loza-López, Amairani Méndez-Vionet, Ximena A. Van-Tienhoven, Alejandro Chumaceiro-Natera, Emmanuel Simental-Aldaba and Antonio Ibarra
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 1882; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081882 - 2 Aug 2025
Viewed by 255
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, characterized by rapid progression, profound heterogeneity, and resistance to conventional therapies. This review provides an integrated overview of GBM’s pathophysiology, highlighting key mechanisms such as neuroinflammation, genetic alterations (e.g., EGFR, PDGFRA), the tumor microenvironment, [...] Read more.
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, characterized by rapid progression, profound heterogeneity, and resistance to conventional therapies. This review provides an integrated overview of GBM’s pathophysiology, highlighting key mechanisms such as neuroinflammation, genetic alterations (e.g., EGFR, PDGFRA), the tumor microenvironment, microbiome interactions, and molecular dysregulations involving gangliosides and sphingolipids. Current diagnostic strategies, including imaging, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and emerging liquid biopsy techniques, are explored for their role in improving early detection and monitoring. Treatment remains challenging, with standard therapies—surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide—offering limited survival benefits. Innovative therapies are increasingly being explored and implemented, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR-T cell therapy, dendritic and peptide vaccines, and oncolytic virotherapy. Advances in nanotechnology and personalized medicine, such as individualized multimodal immunotherapy and NanoTherm therapy, are also discussed as strategies to overcome the blood–brain barrier and tumor heterogeneity. Additionally, stem cell-based approaches show promise in targeted drug delivery and immune modulation. Non-conventional strategies such as ketogenic diets and palliative care are also evaluated for their adjunctive potential. While novel therapies hold promise, GBM’s complexity demands continued interdisciplinary research to improve prognosis, treatment response, and patient quality of life. This review underscores the urgent need for personalized, multimodal strategies in combating this devastating malignancy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 1351 KiB  
Review
Molecular Targets for Pharmacotherapy of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas
by Robert Sarna, Robert Kubina, Marlena Paździor-Heiske, Adrianna Halama, Patryk Chudy, Paulina Wala, Kamil Krzykawski and Ilona Nowak
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47(8), 609; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47080609 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 145
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) represent a heterogeneous group of tumors with a complex molecular profile. Despite therapeutic advances, patient prognosis remains poor, emphasizing the need for more effective treatment strategies. Traditional chemotherapy, with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), remains the gold [...] Read more.
Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) represent a heterogeneous group of tumors with a complex molecular profile. Despite therapeutic advances, patient prognosis remains poor, emphasizing the need for more effective treatment strategies. Traditional chemotherapy, with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), remains the gold standard but is limited by toxicity and tumor resistance. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), has improved overall survival, especially in patients with high PD-L1 expression. In parallel, targeted therapies such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibitors—which impair DNA repair and increase replication stress—have shown promising activity in HNSCC. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors are also under investigation due to their potential to correct dysregulated cell cycle control, a hallmark of HNSCC. This review aims to summarize current and emerging pharmacotherapies for HNSCC, focusing on chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and PARP and CDK inhibitors. It also discusses the evolving role of targeted therapies in improving clinical outcomes. Future research directions include combination therapies, nanotechnology-based delivery systems to enhance treatment specificity, and the development of diagnostic tools such as PARP1-targeted imaging to better guide personalized treatment approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Future Challenges of Targeted Therapy of Cancers: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 231 KiB  
Review
The Current Landscape of Molecular Pathology for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pediatric High-Grade Glioma
by Emma Vallee, Alyssa Steller, Ashley Childress, Alayna Koch and Scott Raskin
J. Mol. Pathol. 2025, 6(3), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp6030017 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 176
Abstract
Pediatric high-grade glioma (pHGG) is a devastating group of childhood cancers associated with poor outcomes. Traditionally, diagnosis was based on histologic and immunohistochemical characteristics, including high mitotic activity, presence of necrosis, and presence of glial cell markers (e.g., GFAP). With advances in molecular [...] Read more.
Pediatric high-grade glioma (pHGG) is a devastating group of childhood cancers associated with poor outcomes. Traditionally, diagnosis was based on histologic and immunohistochemical characteristics, including high mitotic activity, presence of necrosis, and presence of glial cell markers (e.g., GFAP). With advances in molecular tumor profiling, these tumors have been recategorized based on specific molecular findings that better lend themselves to prediction of treatment response and prognosis. pHGG is now categorized into four subtypes: H3K27-altered, H3G34-mutant, H3/IDH-WT, and infant-type high-grade glioma (iHGG). Molecular profiling has not only increased the specificity of diagnosis but also improved prognostication. Additionally, these molecular findings provide novel targets for individual tumor-directed therapy. While these therapies are largely still under investigation, continued investigation of distinct molecular markers in these tumors is imperative to extending event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with pHGG. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Journal of Molecular Pathology)
20 pages, 1138 KiB  
Review
Integrating Circulating Tumor DNA into Clinical Management of Colorectal Cancer: Practical Implications and Therapeutic Challenges
by Nikhil Vojjala, Viktoriya Gibatova, Raj N. Shah, Sakshi Singal, Rishab Prabhu, Geetha Krishnamoorthy, Karen Riggins and Nagaishwarya Moka
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2520; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152520 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 298
Abstract
The American Cancer Society estimates that over 152,000 new cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) were diagnosed in 2024, with more than 105,000 cases affecting the colon and 46,000 involving the rectum. CRC remains the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United [...] Read more.
The American Cancer Society estimates that over 152,000 new cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) were diagnosed in 2024, with more than 105,000 cases affecting the colon and 46,000 involving the rectum. CRC remains the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States, with an estimated 53,010 deaths in 2024. In the era of precision medicine, which incorporates molecular and environmental information into clinical decision-making, identifying patients harboring a deficiency in Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair allowed for targeted immunotherapies and significantly reduced CRC-related mortality. A significant advancement in this domain is the application of liquid biopsy, which has emerged as a promising tool for prognostication, guiding therapy, and monitoring treatment response in CRC. This review aims to comprehensively explore the role of liquid biopsy in colorectal malignancies, describing its practical applications, prognostic significance, and potential to revolutionize CRC management in the future. At the end, we also aim to show a schematic representation of showing integration of Circulating Tumor (Ct) DNA in routine clinical management of CRC. The highlight of this article is the structured and evidence-based schematic framework and its integration into future practice. The schematic pathway is designed to optimize ctDNA utilization across various stages of colorectal cancer management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 294 KiB  
Review
Targeting Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Practical Overview
by Chiara Citterio, Stefano Vecchia, Patrizia Mordenti, Elisa Anselmi, Margherita Ratti, Massimo Guasconi and Elena Orlandi
Gastroenterol. Insights 2025, 16(3), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent16030026 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 295
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the deadliest solid tumors, with a five-year overall survival rate below 10%. While the introduction of multi-agent chemotherapy regimens has improved outcomes marginally, most patients with advanced disease continue to have limited therapeutic options. Molecular [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the deadliest solid tumors, with a five-year overall survival rate below 10%. While the introduction of multi-agent chemotherapy regimens has improved outcomes marginally, most patients with advanced disease continue to have limited therapeutic options. Molecular profiling has uncovered actionable genomic alterations in select subgroups of PDAC, yet the clinical impact of targeted therapies remains modest. This review aims to provide a clinically oriented synthesis of emerging molecular targets in PDAC, their therapeutic relevance, and practical considerations for biomarker testing, including current FDA and EMA indications. Methods: A narrative review was conducted using data from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and international guidelines (NCCN, ESMO, ASCO). The selection focused on evidence published between 2020 and 2025, highlighting molecularly defined PDAC subsets and the current status of targeted therapies. Results: Actionable genomic alterations in PDAC include KRAS G12C mutations, BRCA1/2 and PALB2-associated homologous recombination deficiency, MSI-H/dMMR status, and rare gene fusions involving NTRK, RET, and NRG1. While only a minority of patients are eligible for targeted treatments, early-phase trials and real-world data have shown promising results in these subgroups. Testing molecular profiling is increasingly standard in advanced PDAC. Conclusions: Despite the rarity of targetable mutations, systematic molecular profiling is critical in advanced PDAC to guide off-label therapy or clinical trial enrollment. A practical framework for identifying and acting on molecular targets is essential to bridge the gap between precision oncology and clinical management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Management of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases)
23 pages, 2776 KiB  
Review
Nuclear Receptors in Bladder Cancer: Insights into miRNA-Mediated Regulation and Potential Therapeutic Implications
by José Javier Flores-Estrada, Adriana Jiménez, Georgina Victoria-Acosta, Enoc Mariano Cortés-Malagón, María Guadalupe Ortiz-López, María Elizbeth Alvarez-Sánchez, Stephanie I. Nuñez-Olvera, Yussel Fernando Pérez-Navarro, Marcos Morales-Reyna and Jonathan Puente-Rivera
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(15), 7340; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157340 - 29 Jul 2025
Viewed by 246
Abstract
Nuclear receptors (NRs) are ligand-activated transcription factors that regulate gene expression and are involved in diverse physiological and pathological processes, including carcinogenesis. In bladder cancer (BCa), dysregulation of NR signaling pathways has been linked to tumor initiation, progression, therapy resistance, and immune evasion. [...] Read more.
Nuclear receptors (NRs) are ligand-activated transcription factors that regulate gene expression and are involved in diverse physiological and pathological processes, including carcinogenesis. In bladder cancer (BCa), dysregulation of NR signaling pathways has been linked to tumor initiation, progression, therapy resistance, and immune evasion. Recent evidence highlights the intricate crosstalk between NRs and microRNAs (miRNAs), which are small non-coding RNAs that posttranscriptionally modulate gene expression. This review provides an integrated overview of the molecular interactions between key NRs and miRNAs in BCa. We investigated how miRNAs regulate NR expression and function and, conversely, how NRs influence miRNA biogenesis, thereby forming regulatory feedback loops that shape tumor behavior. Specific miRNA–NR interactions affecting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, metabolic reprogramming, angiogenesis, and chemoresistance are discussed in detail. Additionally, we highlight therapeutic strategies targeting NR–miRNA networks, including selective NR modulators, miRNA mimics and inhibitors, as well as RNA-based combinatorial approaches focusing on their utility as diagnostic biomarkers and personalized treatment targets. Understanding the molecular complexity of NR–miRNA regulation in BCa may open new avenues for improving therapeutic outcomes and advancing precision oncology in urological cancers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urologic Cancers: Molecular Basis for Novel Therapeutic Approaches)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 715 KiB  
Review
Genomic Predictive Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: The Haves and Have Nots
by Kate Beecher, Tivya Kulasegaran, Sunil R. Lakhani and Amy E. McCart Reed
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(15), 7300; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157300 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 303
Abstract
Precision oncology, also known as personalized oncology or precision medicine, is the tailoring of cancer treatment to individual patients based on the specific genetic, molecular, and other unique characteristics of their tumor. The goal of precision oncology is to optimize the effectiveness of [...] Read more.
Precision oncology, also known as personalized oncology or precision medicine, is the tailoring of cancer treatment to individual patients based on the specific genetic, molecular, and other unique characteristics of their tumor. The goal of precision oncology is to optimize the effectiveness of cancer treatment while minimizing toxicities and improving patient outcomes. Precision oncology recognizes that cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease and that each patient’s tumor has a distinct genetic diversity. Precision medicine individualizes therapy by using information from a patient’s tumor in the context of clinical history to determine optimal therapeutic approaches and increasing numbers of drugs target specific tumor alterations. Several targeted therapies with approved companion diagnostics are commercially available, the haves of precision oncology, where predictive biomarkers guide clinical decision-making and improve outcomes. However, many therapies still lack clear biomarkers, the have nots, posing a challenge to fully realizing the promise of precision oncology. Herein, we describe the current state of the art for breast cancer precision oncology and highlight the therapeutic agents that require a more robust biomarker. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in Cancer Biomarkers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop