The origin of Mesozoic granites associated with the Dahutang W-Cu-Mo orefield in northern Jiangxi, which hosts the world’s second-largest tungsten deposit, remains a compelling subject despite extensive geochemical and geochronological studies. In this contribution, we present wolframite mineral and whole-rock geochemistry, as well
[...] Read more.
The origin of Mesozoic granites associated with the Dahutang W-Cu-Mo orefield in northern Jiangxi, which hosts the world’s second-largest tungsten deposit, remains a compelling subject despite extensive geochemical and geochronological studies. In this contribution, we present wolframite mineral and whole-rock geochemistry, as well as monazite and zircon U-Pb ages, for the Mesozoic granites to constrain our understanding of the petrogenesis of these granites and their coupling relationship with the mineralization. The following two magmatic phases and four types of rocks in the study area are identified: the early stage (152–147 Ma) biotite (G1) granites and the late stage (144–130 Ma) two-mica (G2),muscovite (G3), and albite (G4) granite series. These two magmatic phases are temporally coincident with two mineralization stages (~150 Ma and 144–139 Ma). All the Mesozoic granites share the characteristics of high silica content, peraluminosity (A/CNK > 1.1), and low Zr + Nb + Ce + Y values (<200 ppm); they are derived from the partial melting of a Proterozoic crustal source and classified as S-type granites. Specifically, the G1 granites are characterized by relatively high MgO (~0.5%), CaO (~1%), and low P
2O
5 (0.13%–0.20%). They formed through a relatively high degree of partial melting at approximately 766 °C (zircon saturation temperatures), a process influenced by biotite dehydration reactions, with minor contributions from mantle-derived materials. In contrast, the G2–G4 granite series exhibits more typical peraluminous S-type granite features, such as high Al
2O
3, Na
2O, and P
2O
5 (mostly > 0.2%) contents, and low Sr and Ba contents. They are products of low-degree partial melting that occurred under conditions close to muscovite breakdown at ~726 °C. Additionally, fluid–melt interaction is recorded in both granites by distinctive geochemical signatures, including enrichment in Sn (>30 ppm), Cs (>35 ppm), Li (>250 ppm), F (>0.4%), and W (10–1000 ppm), coupled with low K/Rb (<150) and Nb/Ta (<5) ratios. The near-chondritic Zr/Hf (22.6–34.1) and Y/Ho (24.5–31.5) ratios of the G1 granites imply a relatively limited role of magmatic fluid–melt interaction during its evolution. For the G2–G4 granites, however, intense crystal fractionation and late-stage fluid–melt interaction are well-documented by their highly variable and low ratios of Y/Ho (14.8–41.4), Nb/Ta (0.89–5.57), Zr/Hf (8.84–41.67), and K/Rb (13.96–128.29). In the long-lived, reduced, and volatile-rich aqueous environment of the G2–G4 magmas, fractional crystallization and albitization collectively enhanced the solubility and hydrothermal transport capacity of W, Sn, Li, Nb, and Ta by multiple orders of magnitude. In contrast, in the earlier, more oxidized G1 magmas (which incorporated mantle materials), the exsolution and hydrothermal transport of Cu and Mo were associated with localized greisenization, but their capacity diminished with fractional crystallization. Historically, mineral exploration in the Dahutang mining area has focused primarily on W, Cu, and Mo. Based on this research, we conclude that there is significant mineral potential for rare metals (particularly Sn, Li, and Ta), and future exploration should prioritize areas adjacent to the evolved G2–G4 peraluminous leucogranites to search for new concealed mineral occurrences.
Full article