Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (566)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 283 KB  
Article
Long-Term Oncological Outcomes in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients Who Are Able to Maintain/Recover Ongoing Anticancer Therapy After SARS-CoV-2 Infection—Results of the MEET-URO 22 Study
by Orazio Caffo, Umberto Basso, Antonello Veccia, Marco Maruzzo, Brigida Anna Maiorano, Consuelo Buttigliero, Claudia Mucciarini, Alessia Mennitto, Paola Ermacora, Mariella Sorarù, Maria Giuseppa Vitale, Cecilia Anesi, Dzenete Kadrija, Francesca Maines, Franco Morelli, Caterina Romeo, Davide Bimbatti, Isabella Saporita and Francesco Pierantoni
Cancers 2026, 18(2), 264; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020264 - 15 Jan 2026
Abstract
Background: Although the relationship between androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PC) and the biological mechanisms of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection remains unequivocally unclear, it is possible that exposure to the virus may influence PC evolution by altering [...] Read more.
Background: Although the relationship between androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PC) and the biological mechanisms of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection remains unequivocally unclear, it is possible that exposure to the virus may influence PC evolution by altering TMPRSS2 expression. This study aims to evaluate the long-term oncological outcomes of patients with metastatic PC who were undergoing medical therapy at the time of contracting SARS-CoV-2 and who resumed/continued anticancer treatment after recovery. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated a consecutive series of 151 metastatic PC patients who developed SARS-CoV-2 infection while receiving one active systemic anticancer therapy (125 metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC) patients and 26 metastatic hormone-sensitive PC (mHSPC) patients). We evaluated variables that influence the ability to maintain or resume the ongoing therapy. For the maintained/resumed therapies, we calculated the post-infection overall survival (piOS) and the overall survival (OS). Results: Of the patients, 12.6% died due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, 10.6% recovered from the infection but failed to maintain/resume the ongoing anticancer treatment, and the remaining 76.8% maintained/resumed the treatment after recovery. Hospitalization, duration of infection, and the type of ongoing anticancer agent influenced these treatment changes. In the cohort of mCRPC patients, the median piOS was 32 months, and the median OS was 67.8 months. The median piOS was not achieved in the cohort of mHSPC patients, while the median OS was 122 months. The outcomes of single anticancer agents were in line with those of pivotal trials. Conclusions: Although observed in a highly selected population of PC patients who survived SARS-CoV-2 infection and were able to resume/maintain anticancer therapy, the survival outcomes of this study appear to be in line with those reported in pivotal studies, and SARS-CoV-2 infection does not seem to have adversely affected long-term oncological outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection The Impact of COVID-19 Infection in Cancer)
39 pages, 2627 KB  
Review
Emerging Therapeutic Strategies in Prostate Cancer: Targeted Approaches Using PARP Inhibition, PSMA-Directed Therapy, and Androgen Receptor Blockade with Olaparib, Lutetium (177Lu)Vipivotide Tetraxetan, and Abiraterone
by Piotr Kawczak and Tomasz Bączek
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(2), 685; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020685 - 14 Jan 2026
Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignancies in men, and advanced or metastatic disease remains associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Therapeutic progress in recent years has been driven by the introduction of targeted treatment strategies, notably poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignancies in men, and advanced or metastatic disease remains associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Therapeutic progress in recent years has been driven by the introduction of targeted treatment strategies, notably poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–directed radioligand therapy (RLT), and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs). This review summarizes evidence from phase II and III clinical trials, meta-analyses, and real-world studies evaluating the efficacy, safety, and clinical integration of olaparib, lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan, and abiraterone in advanced prostate cancer. Emphasis is placed on the practical clinical application of these agents, including patient selection, treatment sequencing, and combination strategies. PARP inhibition with olaparib has demonstrated clear benefits in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations, particularly BRCA1/2 alterations. PSMA-directed RLT offers a survival advantage in PSMA-positive mCRPC following AR pathway inhibition, with distinct toxicity considerations that influence patient selection. Abiraterone remains a cornerstone therapy across disease stages and plays an important role both as monotherapy and as a combination partner. Emerging data suggest a potential synergy between PARP inhibitors and AR-targeted agents, while also highlighting the limitations of biomarker-unselected approaches. We conclude that the optimal use of PARP inhibitors, PSMA-targeted RLT, and ARPIs requires a personalized strategy guided by molecular profiling, functional imaging, prior treatment exposure, and safety considerations. This clinically focused overview aims to support evidence-based decision-making in an increasingly complex treatment landscape. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Treatment Strategies for Prostate Cancer: An Update)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 778 KB  
Review
Immunotherapeutic Strategies for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
by Ana K. Flores-Islas, Cecilia Rico-Fuentes, Erick Sierra-Díaz, Mariel García-Chagollán, Ana Laura Pereira-Suárez, José Sergio Zepeda-Nuño, José M. Moreno-Ortiz and Adrián Ramírez-de-Arellano
Cancers 2026, 18(2), 255; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020255 - 14 Jan 2026
Viewed by 49
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and the second most common cancer among men. Treatment options depend on factors like age, androgen sensitivity, PSA levels, Gleason score, TNM stage, and recurrence risk. Available treatments include hormonal therapy, radiation, [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and the second most common cancer among men. Treatment options depend on factors like age, androgen sensitivity, PSA levels, Gleason score, TNM stage, and recurrence risk. Available treatments include hormonal therapy, radiation, surgery, and chemotherapy. Early immunological treatments were limited by poor lymphocyte infiltration and an immunosuppressive environment. Today, strategies such as dendritic cell vaccines, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and adoptive cell therapy (ACT) are used. ACT, especially CAR T-cell strategies, aims to overcome traditional treatment limitations, particularly in advanced and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), though it remains in early development. Personalized medicine uses molecular insights from the diseased tissue to tailor treatments. Variability in patient response, due to tumor heterogeneity and prior treatments, highlights the importance of personalized and combination therapies as future strategies for effective immunotherapy. This review explores the current landscape of PCa. We analyze treatment guidelines established by NCCN and EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG. We comprehensively examine immunotherapeutic strategies currently available or under investigation for prostate cancer, with particular emphasis on ICIs, ACT with a focus on CAR T-cell therapy, combination approaches and therapeutic synergies, and predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy response. Additionally, we discuss the challenges and future directions in the implementation of immunotherapy for the management of prostate cancer. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 2799 KB  
Review
MicroRNAs in Prostate Cancer Liquid Biopsies: Early Detection, Prognosis, and Treatment Monitoring
by Seyyed Mohammad Yaghoubi, Erfan Zare, Sina Jafari Dargahlou, Maryam Jafari, Mahdiye Azimi, Maedeh Khoshnazar, Solmaz Shirjang and Behzad Mansoori
Cells 2026, 15(1), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15010083 - 4 Jan 2026
Viewed by 356
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a common malignancy in men worldwide, with incidence projected to rise in the coming years. Traditional screening and diagnostic methods, such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and biopsy, face limitations in specificity and invasiveness. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a common malignancy in men worldwide, with incidence projected to rise in the coming years. Traditional screening and diagnostic methods, such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and biopsy, face limitations in specificity and invasiveness. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as stable, non-invasive biomarkers obtainable via liquid biopsies (blood, urine, semen) that could transform PCa management. These small regulatory RNAs reflect underlying tumor biology and are detectable at early disease stages, enabling improved early detection when used alongside or in place of PSA. Distinct miRNA expression patterns correlate with tumor aggressiveness. For example, miR-141 and miR-375 are elevated in metastatic cases, whereas let-7 family members and miR-326 are upregulated in aggressive disease, highlighting their prognostic value. Moreover, dynamic changes in reported miRNAs during therapy provide real-time insights into treatment response. In androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), oncogenic miRNAs, such as miR-21 and miR-125b, increase upon resistance, whereas a decline in tumor-suppressive miRNAs, such as miR-23b/-27b, flags the transition to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). Similarly, baseline levels of miRNAs (e.g., miR-200b/c, miR-20a) can predict chemotherapy outcomes. Integrating multi-miRNA panels has demonstrated superior accuracy for risk stratification and monitoring, paving the way for personalized treatment. Although promising, clinical implementation of miRNA-based assays requires further validation, standardization of protocols, and large-scale prospective studies. Harnessing circulating miRNAs could usher in a new era of precision oncology for PCa, improving early diagnosis, prognostication, and real-time therapeutic guidance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Therapeutic Targeting of MicroRNAs in Human Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1525 KB  
Article
Novel Mixed Cancer-Cell Models Designed to Capture Inter-Patient Tumor Heterogeneity for Accurate Evaluation of Drug Combinations
by Sampreeti Jena, Daniel C. Kim, Adam M. Lee, Weijie Zhang, Kevin Zhan, Radwa M. Elmorsi, Yingming Li, Scott M. Dehm and R. Stephanie Huang
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(1), 413; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010413 - 30 Dec 2025
Viewed by 256
Abstract
Disease heterogeneity across a diverse patient cohort poses challenges to cancer drug development due to inter-patient variability in treatment responses. However, current preclinical models fail to depict inter-patient tumor heterogeneity, leading to a high failure rate when translating preclinical leads into clinical successes. [...] Read more.
Disease heterogeneity across a diverse patient cohort poses challenges to cancer drug development due to inter-patient variability in treatment responses. However, current preclinical models fail to depict inter-patient tumor heterogeneity, leading to a high failure rate when translating preclinical leads into clinical successes. We integrated the expression profiles of prostate cancer (PC) lines and castration-resistant PC (CRPC) patient tumors to identify cell-lines that transcriptomically match distinct tumor subtypes in a clinical cohort. Representative cell-lines were co-cultured to create “mixed-cell” models depicting inter-patient heterogeneity in CRPC, which were employed to assess drug combinations. When drug combinations previously tested in CRPC clinical cohorts were assessed to establish proof of concept, in vitro responses measured in our models concurred with their known clinical efficacy. Additionally, novel drug combinations computationally predicted to be efficacious in heterogeneous tumors were evaluated. They demonstrated preclinical efficacy in the mixed-cell models, suggesting they will likely benefit heterogeneous patient cohorts. Furthermore, we showed that the current practice of screening cell-lines/xenografts separately and aggregating their responses, failed to detect their efficacy. We believe that the application of our models will enhance the accuracy of preclinical drug assessment, thereby improving the success rate of subsequent clinical trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Translational Preclinical Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 918 KB  
Review
Exploiting Oxidative Stress as Achilles’ Heel: From Redox Homeostasis to Ferroptosis in Prostate Cancer
by Sanghyeon Yu, Jihyun Baek, Taesoo Choi and Man S. Kim
Antioxidants 2025, 14(12), 1517; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14121517 - 18 Dec 2025
Viewed by 524
Abstract
Prostate cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is a critical therapeutic challenge. This review establishes a conceptual framework analyzing ferroptosis vulnerability through two principles: “robustness through redundancy” in defense systems and the “evolutionary arms race” between [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is a critical therapeutic challenge. This review establishes a conceptual framework analyzing ferroptosis vulnerability through two principles: “robustness through redundancy” in defense systems and the “evolutionary arms race” between androgen receptor (AR) signaling and oxidative resistance. We traced the evolutionary trajectory of hormone-sensitive diseases, where the AR coordinates ferroptosis defenses via SLC7A11, MBOAT2, and PEX10 regulation through progressive adaptations: AR-V7 splice variants that maintain defense independently of androgens, AR amplification conferring hypersensitivity, and AR-independent JMJD6-ATF4 bypass in SPOP-mutated tumors. This transforms ferroptosis from a static vulnerability to a stage-specific strategy. Novel approaches include menadione-based VPS34 targeting, which induces triaptosis through an oxidative endosomal catastrophe. We categorized the rational combinations mechanistically as vertical inhibition (multi-step targeting of single pathways), horizontal inhibition (synthetic lethality across parallel defenses), and vulnerability induction (creating exploitable dependencies). Ferroptosis-induced immunogenic cell death enables synergy with checkpoint inhibitors, potentially transforming immunologically “cold” prostate tumors. This review establishes ferroptosis targeting as a precision medicine paradigm exploiting the tension between the oxidative requirements of cancer cells and their evolved, yet architecturally vulnerable, defense systems, providing a framework for stage-specific, biomarker-guided interventions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Health Outcomes of Antioxidants and Oxidative Stress)
Show Figures

Figure 1

40 pages, 6116 KB  
Review
The Role of Natural Chalcones and Their Derivatives in Targeting Prostate Cancer: Recent Updates
by Ola J. Hussein, Dana Elkhalifa, Arij Fouzat Hassan, Feras Alali, Ala-Eddin Al Moustafa and Ashraf Khalil
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(24), 12082; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262412082 - 16 Dec 2025
Viewed by 428
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most prevalent cancer among men and a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite an initial favorable response to hormone-based therapies, many patients ultimately develop an advanced and lethal form of the disease, referred to as castration-resistant [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most prevalent cancer among men and a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite an initial favorable response to hormone-based therapies, many patients ultimately develop an advanced and lethal form of the disease, referred to as castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). CRPC is associated with poor prognosis and a lack of effective curative treatments. As a result, new alternatives or improved therapeutic strategies to combat this life-threatening condition are urgently needed. Chalcones, also referred to as 1,3-diphenyl-2-propen-1-ones, have attracted significant attention because of their potent antitumor properties. Owing to their distinctive chemical structure and diverse biological activities, these compounds are promising candidates for treating various cancers, including PCa. Both naturally occurring and synthetically derived chalcones have demonstrated anticancer potential by modulating key cellular processes, including apoptosis, cell cycle regulation, cell migration, invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis, as well as major signaling pathways, such as PI3K/Akt/mTOR, androgen signaling, and NF-κB. This review aims to outline the recent advances in the therapeutic potential of chalcone derivatives in prostate cancer, with a focus on their molecular targets, mechanisms of action, and translational relevance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug Discovery Based on Natural Products)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 1385 KB  
Review
Identification of Actionable Mutations in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Through Circulating Tumor DNA: Are We There Yet?
by Wensi Tao, Amanda Sabel and R. Daniel Bonfil
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(12), 692; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32120692 - 8 Dec 2025
Viewed by 636
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has emerged as a powerful and minimally invasive approach for genomic profiling of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), enabling real-time detection of tumor-derived mutations that guide therapy. Approximately 20% of mCRPC patients harbor alterations in homologous recombination repair [...] Read more.
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has emerged as a powerful and minimally invasive approach for genomic profiling of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), enabling real-time detection of tumor-derived mutations that guide therapy. Approximately 20% of mCRPC patients harbor alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, most commonly BRCA1/2 and ATM, which are actionable with different poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPIs) used as monotherapy or in combination with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs). A smaller subset of patients with mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-high) tumors may benefit from immune checkpoint blockade with pembrolizumab. Different FDA-approved liquid biopsy assays detect these actionable alterations when tissue biopsies are unavailable or insufficient. This review summarizes current evidence on ctDNA-based genotyping in mCRPC, highlighting clinically actionable mutations, corresponding targeted therapies, and technical and analytical considerations for clinical implementation. By capturing DNA shed from multiple metastatic sites, ctDNA profiling provides a comprehensive view of tumor heterogeneity and enables serial monitoring of molecular evolution. Overall, ctDNA analysis represents a transformative advance in precision oncology, supporting personalized treatment selection and ongoing assessment of therapeutic response in mCRPC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Genitourinary Oncology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 1185 KB  
Review
Emerging Therapeutic Approaches to Engage the Androgen Receptor for the Treatment of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
by Isla Henry, Rebecca Foreman, Lakshana Balachandran, Ethan Mortimer and Mohammad Asim
Cancers 2025, 17(23), 3755; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17233755 - 25 Nov 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1097
Abstract
Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains a major clinical challenge, with disease progression frequently occurring despite the use of potent androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies. As AR signalling continues to drive tumour growth in this setting, new therapeutic strategies are being developed to disrupt the [...] Read more.
Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains a major clinical challenge, with disease progression frequently occurring despite the use of potent androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies. As AR signalling continues to drive tumour growth in this setting, new therapeutic strategies are being developed to disrupt the AR axis through both direct and indirect mechanisms. This review highlights a selection of promising agents in preclinical or clinical development that represent the next generation of therapies targeting AR signalling. Direct approaches include novel agents that degrade the AR or target domains beyond the conventional ligand-binding domain, aiming to overcome resistance to existing anti-androgens. Indirect strategies are designed to interfere with AR function by modulating AR-associated transcriptional co-regulators, chromatin accessibility, and other regulatory proteins, such as splicing factors, that are critical for sustaining AR-driven gene expression in prostate cancer. Together, these therapies form the basis of emerging strategies to more effectively suppress AR activity in CRPC. This review discusses AR-activating mechanisms, the mechanisms of action of these agents, their clinical development status, and their potential to reshape future treatment paradigms in CRPC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Updates and Future Perspectives on Anti-Cancer Agents)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2574 KB  
Article
YM155 Inhibition of Survivin Enhances Carboplatin Efficacy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
by Vicenç Ruiz de Porras, Martin K. Bakht, Maria Fernandez-Saorín, Clara Alcon, Luis Palomero, Júlia Francisco-Rodon, Mariona Figols, Joan Montero, Vincenza Conteduca, Himisha Beltran and Albert Font
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(11), 1752; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18111752 - 18 Nov 2025
Viewed by 652
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a major clinical challenge due to its aggressive behavior and resistance to therapy. Survivin, a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family, is overexpressed in various cancers and associated with poor prognosis. YM155 (Sepantronium [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a major clinical challenge due to its aggressive behavior and resistance to therapy. Survivin, a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family, is overexpressed in various cancers and associated with poor prognosis. YM155 (Sepantronium bromide) suppresses survivin expression and has demonstrated antitumor activity in preclinical models. We investigated the association between survivin expression and clinical outcomes in mCRPC patients and evaluated the antitumor activity of YM155, alone and in combination with carboplatin, in mCRPC cell lines. Methods: Analysis of publicly available RNA-seq datasets from mCRPC patients was performed to assess correlations between survivin expression and clinical outcomes. Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared via log-rank or Fisher’s exact tests. In vitro assays were conducted on mCRPC cell lines treated with YM155, carboplatin, or both, to evaluate cell viability, clonogenicity, and apoptosis. Results: Survivin was significantly overexpressed in mCRPC compared with localized prostate cancer and was even higher in castration-resistant neuroendocrine disease. High survivin levels were associated with shorter OS (p = 0.006). In patients treated with platinum-based therapies, high survivin was also linked to shorter rPFS (p = 0.01), reduced OS (p = 0.006), and a smaller PSA decline (p = 0.006). In vitro, YM155 reduced survivin expression, impaired cell viability and colony formation, induced apoptosis, and synergistically enhanced the cytotoxicity of carboplatin. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that survivin may serve as a prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target in platinum-treated, AR-independent mCRPC. The integration of clinical and functional data provides translational support for combining the survivin inhibitor YM155 with platinum-based therapy. These results warrant further validation in larger patient cohorts and in vivo models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Prostate Cancer Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 837 KB  
Article
KELIM PSA as a Prognostic Biomarker in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with ARPI
by Fatih Atalah, Fatih Kuş, Aydın Acarbay, Akgün Karakök, Onur Alkan, İsmail Nazlı, Utku Özilice, Mehmet Beşiroğlu and Mahmut Gümüş
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(22), 8114; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228114 - 16 Nov 2025
Viewed by 535
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. While prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is crucial for monitoring, its static levels are limited in predicting outcomes precisely. The Kinetics of Elimination of PSA (KELIM PSA) has recently emerged as a dynamic [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. While prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is crucial for monitoring, its static levels are limited in predicting outcomes precisely. The Kinetics of Elimination of PSA (KELIM PSA) has recently emerged as a dynamic biomarker of treatment response. This research sought to determine the predictive power of KELIM PSA in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) on androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI). Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 98 CRPC patients treated with enzalutamide or abiraterone. The patients were categorized as either unfavorable (KELIM < 1) or favorable (KELIM ≥ 1). Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared, and survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression. Results: Of the cohort, 42 (42.9%) patients had favorable and 56 (57.1%) unfavorable KELIM values. The unfavorable group had a higher mortality rate (62.5% vs. 38.1%, p = 0.029). Univariate analysis showed that poor KELIM results increased mortality risk twofold (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26–4.19, p = 0.006). In multivariable analysis, unfavorable KELIM remained independently associated with worse overall survival (HR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.12–3.89, p = 0.020), together with second-line ARPI (HR: 3.19, 95% CI: 1.71–5.93, p < 0.001) and ADT + docetaxel during CSPC (HR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.11–4.12, p = 0.022). Kaplan–Meier curves revealed that the unfavorable group had notably reduced overall survival and progression-free survival (log-rank p = 0.018). Conclusions: KELIM PSA is an independent predictor in ARPI-treated CRPC. By integrating PSA kinetics into prognostic models, risk stratification may be improved, and this may guide individualized treatment. Prospective multicenter validation is warranted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 585 KB  
Article
Optimal Timing of Treatment Initiation in Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Based on PSA Level and Doubling Time for Prognostic Benefit
by Takuto Ogasawara, Kohei Hashimoto, Tetsuya Shindo, Ko Kobayashi, Toshiaki Tanaka, Fumimasa Fukuta, Genki Kobayashi, Ryuichi Kato, Shintaro Miyamoto, Yasuharu Kunishima and Naoya Masumori
Cancers 2025, 17(22), 3641; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17223641 - 13 Nov 2025
Viewed by 802
Abstract
Background: To clarify the timing of treatment initiation for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), we investigated the impact of baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at treatment initiation on outcomes, the stability of PSADT estimation at low PSA levels, and the prognostic significance of PSADT. [...] Read more.
Background: To clarify the timing of treatment initiation for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), we investigated the impact of baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at treatment initiation on outcomes, the stability of PSADT estimation at low PSA levels, and the prognostic significance of PSADT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 129 consecutive nmCRPC patients between 2000 and 2023. All patients were divided by PSADT ≤ 10 months (n = 109) or >10 months (n = 20). PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were assessed by the Kaplan–Meier method, with predictive factors analyzed using Cox proportional hazards modeling. PSA-PFS was further compared across baseline PSA subgroups (<3, 3–5, 5–10, >10 ng/mL) in the PSADT ≤ 10 months cohort. Results: Patients with PSADT ≤ 10 months had worse MFS than patients with PSADT > 10 months (4-year: 71.9% vs. 100%; p = 0.021). In the PSADT ≤ 10 months group, novel androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) treatment significantly improved PSA-PFS compared to those who did not (median: 44.0 vs. 16.6 months; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, prior definitive local therapy (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.409, p < 0.001), ARPIs as first-line treatment (HR 0.421, p < 0.001) and lower baseline PSA at treatment initiation (HR 0.961, p = 0.004) were significantly predictive factors for PSA-PFS. PSADT estimation remained accurate when calculated from PSA nadir values ≥0.5 ng/mL. Conclusions: In patients with nmCRPC with PSADT ≤ 10 months, early initiation of ARPIs at lower PSA levels was associated with improved PSA-PFS. PSADT stabilized at PSA levels of >0.5 ng/mL. These findings support earlier ARPI initiation to optimize outcomes in high-risk nmCRPC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Research of Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 7943 KB  
Article
Clofazimine Treatment Modulates Key Non-Coding RNAs Associated with Tumor Progression and Drug Resistance in Lethal Prostate Cancer
by Sarah Batten, Harish Kumar, Jeremiah Pfitzer, Daniel Chinedu Nweze, Suman Mazumder, Robert D. Arnold, Panagiotis Mistriotis, Taraswi Mitra Ghosh and Amit Kumar Mitra
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(22), 10892; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262210892 - 10 Nov 2025
Viewed by 894
Abstract
Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer/PCa (mCRPC) is a clinically advanced form of PCa that is associated with increased aggressiveness, cancer stemness, morbidity, and the risk of developing resistance to taxanes, currently the first-line chemotherapy for mCRPC. Clofazimine (CLF) is a potential immunomodulator drug that [...] Read more.
Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer/PCa (mCRPC) is a clinically advanced form of PCa that is associated with increased aggressiveness, cancer stemness, morbidity, and the risk of developing resistance to taxanes, currently the first-line chemotherapy for mCRPC. Clofazimine (CLF) is a potential immunomodulator drug that is FDA-approved for the treatment of leprosy. Recently, using in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo models, we established the efficacy of CLF in chronic myeloid leukemia and multiple myeloma. Here, we demonstrate that CLF is effective as a single agent and in combination with taxanes in a panel of cell lines representing the diversity of CRPC patients. Using a microfluidic assay, we showed the impact of CLF on cancer cell migration and metastatic potential. Further, we also found that CLF reduces ALDH activity—a marker for cancer ‘stem-like’ cells (CSCs), a subtype of cancer cells with self-renewal and differentiation capacities (epithelial-to-mesenchymal transdifferentiation/EMT). Bulk and single-cell RNAseq followed by functional validation and in silico analysis showed that CLF treatment is associated with apoptosis, ER stress, oxidative phosphorylation, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Most importantly, CLF modulates the expression of several non-coding RNAs, including MALAT1 and NEAT1, that are linked to tumor cell proliferation, cell migration, and drug resistance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Roles of Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 915 KB  
Article
Effects of Metformin on Cancer Survival Among Men Diagnosed with Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated with Androgen-Deprivation Therapy: Emulating a Target Trial
by David S. Lopez, Efstathia Polychronopoulou, Omer Abdelgadir, Raymond Greenberg, Lindsay G. Cowell, Sarah E. Messiah and Yong-Fang Kuo
Cancers 2025, 17(21), 3579; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17213579 - 6 Nov 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1538
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Metformin is one of the most frequently used concomitant medications among prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, the effects of metformin on all-cause and PCa-specific mortality among men diagnosed with advanced/metastatic PCa treated with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) remain poorly understood, but they may [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Metformin is one of the most frequently used concomitant medications among prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, the effects of metformin on all-cause and PCa-specific mortality among men diagnosed with advanced/metastatic PCa treated with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) remain poorly understood, but they may be specifically explained by emulating a target trial. Methods: We emulated a target trial of metformin therapy and survival using observational data on 7361 patients diagnosed with advanced PCa, who were treated with ADT, from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database (2008–2019), with completed follow-up until 2020. We included patients with diabetes, and participants were assigned as either “initiator of metformin within 6 months after advanced PCa diagnosis” or “non-initiator of metformin.” We estimated mortality risks using Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for risk factors via inverse probability weighting using both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. Results: Over 13 years of follow-up, with a maximum 3 years of follow-up after PCa diagnosis, all-cause mortality occurred in 52 metformin initiators (47.7%) versus 3052 non-initiators (42.1%), while PCa-specific mortality occurred in 36 initiators (33.0%) versus 1919 non-initiators (26.5%). In the intention-to-treat analysis, metformin initiation was not associated with all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.98–1.95) or PCa-specific mortality (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.63–1.55). Similarly, in per-protocol analysis, there was no evidence of risk reduction with all-cause (HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.80–1.81) or PCa-specific mortality (HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 0.88–2.38) after adjusting for time-varying covariates and allowing a 30-day gap for metformin discontinuation, adjusted for via inverse probability weighting. Conclusions: Our findings align with prior randomized trials showing no survival benefit of metformin in advanced PCa patients receiving ADT. Timing of metformin discontinuation also showed no significant effect. However, the small size of the metformin initiator group precluded subgroup analyses for hormone-sensitive (HSPC) and castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), limiting our ability to explore potential differential effects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 953 KB  
Article
Age-Related Outcomes of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis
by Nikolaus Schweigert, Nadja Strewinsky, Daniel Köhler, Wencke Lehnert, Jonas Ekrutt, Amir Karimzadeh, Susanne Klutmann, Gunhild von Amsberg and Markus Sauer
Cancers 2025, 17(21), 3515; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17213515 - 31 Oct 2025
Viewed by 1956
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T Radioligand Therapy (PSMA-RLT) in older patients (≥80 years) vs. younger ones with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: In this retrospective single-center analysis, 103 patients treated with PSMA-RLT between 2019 [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T Radioligand Therapy (PSMA-RLT) in older patients (≥80 years) vs. younger ones with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: In this retrospective single-center analysis, 103 patients treated with PSMA-RLT between 2019 and 2024 were included. Overall survival (OS) and therapeutic response were assessed by PSA serum and based on PET/CT Imaging according to the RECIP 1.0 criteria, respectively. Toxicity was additionally assessed via laboratory (hemoglobin, cell counts, and serum creatinine). Adverse events (AEs) were detected according to CTCAE V.5. Results: Median OS did not differ significantly in patients ≥ 80 years vs. <80 years (13.7 vs. 16.1 months, respectively). PSA decline of ≥50% was achieved in 32% patients in total, comparably in both groups (29.4% vs. 34.8%). According to RECIP 1.0, the majority of patients with both ≥80 and <80 years demonstrated stable disease or partial responses in imaging (64% and 71%, post two cycles). Concerning toxicity, the most frequently observed AE was anemia, which occurred in both <80 and ≥80 subgroups (grade 3: 2.8% vs. 5.9%); however, no grade 4 anemia was recorded. Renal function remained stable throughout treatment, and no AE grade 3 or higher was observed. Overall, the safety profile was comparable between age groups. Conclusions: Treatment with PSMA-RLT can be both effective and well tolerated in patients with mCRPC aged 80 years and older. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop