Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (22)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = atrophic maxillary sinus

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 894 KB  
Review
Zygomatic Implants for Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Maxilla: Clinical Indications, Outcomes, Complications, and Evidence Gaps—A Comprehensive Review
by Alfonso Acerra, Alessandro Santurro, Cristian Coraini, Andrea Enrico Borgonovo, Angelo Aliberti and Francesco Giordano
Medicina 2026, 62(7), 1277; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62071277 - 2 Jul 2026
Viewed by 184
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Zygomatic implants have progressively become a widely adopted graft-free treatment option for the rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy. However, the expansion of their clinical indications has generated debate regarding patient selection, treatment hierarchy, and potential overtreatment. This review aimed to [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Zygomatic implants have progressively become a widely adopted graft-free treatment option for the rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy. However, the expansion of their clinical indications has generated debate regarding patient selection, treatment hierarchy, and potential overtreatment. This review aimed to critically analyze current evidence regarding the use of zygomatic implants in the rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review of the literature was conducted through searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Relevant clinical studies, systematic and narrative reviews, and consensus statements published in English up to 27 March 2026 were critically analyzed to provide a comprehensive narrative synthesis focusing on treatment indications, surgical protocols, complications, patient-reported outcomes, and evidence gaps. Results: The reviewed literature consistently reported high implant survival rates and highlighted the role of zygomatic implants in reducing the need for extensive grafting procedures in selected patients with severe maxillary atrophy. The most frequently reported complications included sinus-related disorders, soft-tissue complications, prosthetic problems, and challenges associated with the management of implant failure. Different surgical approaches, including intra-sinus, sinus-slot, and extra-sinus techniques, were described. However, substantial heterogeneity emerged regarding treatment algorithms, complication reporting, success criteria, and patient-reported outcome assessment. Conclusions: Zygomatic implants represent an established treatment option associated with high reported implant survival in selected patients with severe maxillary atrophy, particularly when conventional implant placement would require extensive reconstructive procedures. However, in borderline clinical situations characterized by partial residual bone availability, treatment planning should also consider less invasive alternatives, including short implants, tilted implants, regenerative procedures, or customized subperiosteal implants, according to individual anatomical, prosthetic, and patient-related factors. Greater standardization of indications, complication reporting, and patient-reported outcome assessment is needed to better define the role of zygomatic implants within evidence-based treatment planning for the atrophic maxilla. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dentistry and Oral Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 7447 KB  
Article
Digital Design of Juxta-Osseous Subperiosteal Implant Rehabilitation for Severe Maxillary Atrophy
by Agron Meto, Emanuele Morella, Algen Isufi and Aida Meto
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(5), 2228; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052228 - 26 Feb 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 967
Abstract
Background: Rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxilla remains a major challenge in implant dentistry, particularly when conventional endosseous implants and regenerative procedures are contraindicated due to extensive bone loss, sinus pathology, or patient-related factors. Advances in digital planning and additive manufacturing have enabled [...] Read more.
Background: Rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxilla remains a major challenge in implant dentistry, particularly when conventional endosseous implants and regenerative procedures are contraindicated due to extensive bone loss, sinus pathology, or patient-related factors. Advances in digital planning and additive manufacturing have enabled the reintroduction of juxta-osseous subperiosteal implants as a graftless, patient-specific treatment option. This case report aimed to describe the complete digital workflow, surgical placement, and immediate prosthetic rehabilitation of a customized juxta-osseous subperiosteal implant in a patient with severe posterior maxillary atrophy and a history of failed sinus augmentation procedures. Case Presentation: A 75-year-old male patient presenting with left severe posterior maxillary atrophy and previous unsuccessful sinus lift surgeries was rehabilitated using a digitally designed, additively manufactured titanium subperiosteal implant. Cone-beam computed tomography–based planning and CAD–CAM technology were used to design a patient-specific framework, which was rigidly fixed to stable maxillofacial support and immediately loaded with a screw-retained provisional prosthesis. Results: Clinical and radiographic follow-up demonstrated stable implant fixation, soft tissue healing, absence of biological or mechanical complications, and satisfactory functional and aesthetic outcomes. The patient reported high levels of comfort and satisfaction throughout the treatment period. Conclusions: Digitally manufactured juxta-osseous subperiosteal implants may represent a predictable and minimally invasive graftless alternative for selected patients with severe maxillary atrophy, particularly when conventional implant placement or extensive bone augmentation is not feasible. Accurate digital planning, rigid fixation, and appropriate patient selection appear to be key factors for clinical success. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2680 KB  
Review
Emerging Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: From In Vitro Insights to In Vivo Clinical Translation
by Nicole Riberti, Michele Furlani and Alessandra Giuliani
Materials 2026, 19(4), 737; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19040737 - 14 Feb 2026
Viewed by 658
Abstract
Maxillary sinus augmentation is a key procedure for rehabilitating the atrophic posterior maxilla and enabling predictable implant-supported restorations. Although autogenous bone remains the biological gold standard due to its osteogenic potential, its clinical use has declined because of donor-site morbidity, limited availability, and [...] Read more.
Maxillary sinus augmentation is a key procedure for rehabilitating the atrophic posterior maxilla and enabling predictable implant-supported restorations. Although autogenous bone remains the biological gold standard due to its osteogenic potential, its clinical use has declined because of donor-site morbidity, limited availability, and increased surgical burden. Deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) is currently the most widely used substitute, providing excellent biocompatibility and long-term volumetric stability. However, its inert nature, limited bioactivity, and slow resorption have driven the development of next-generation graft materials. Recent biomaterial innovations aim to enhance vascularization, accelerate osteogenesis, modulate immune responses, and achieve controlled resorption while maintaining favorable handling properties. These include ion-releasing bioactive ceramics, growth factor-enhanced allografts, polysaccharide–hydroxyapatite composites, smart hydrogels, and synthetic scaffolds with tunable degradation profiles. Given the complexity of bone regeneration, effective clinical translation requires an integrated framework combining in vitro assays, animal models, and human clinical studies. This review synthesizes evidence published since 2018 on emerging biomaterials for sinus floor elevation, critically evaluating their potential to overcome the limitations of DBBM and highlighting the importance of a coordinated preclinical-to-clinical research continuum. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Conventional to Modern Biomaterials in Dentistry—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

26 pages, 7845 KB  
Article
Sinus Lift with Collagenated Porcine Xenograft in Severely Atrophic Posterior Maxillae: Case Series with Histologic Correlation and Long-Term Outcomes
by Alexandru Spînu, Felicia Manole, Alexandru Burcea, Cristina-Crenguţa Albu, Lavinia-Florica Mărcuț, Roxana Daniela Brata, Alexia Manole and Claudia Florina Bogdan-Andreescu
Dent. J. 2025, 13(12), 584; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13120584 - 5 Dec 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 967
Abstract
Background: Maxillary sinus floor augmentation is widely used to enable implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla, yet comparative data for porcine-derived xenografts remain limited. Objective: To evaluate long-term bone regeneration and implant outcomes following sinus augmentation using a collagenated porcine xenograft. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: Maxillary sinus floor augmentation is widely used to enable implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla, yet comparative data for porcine-derived xenografts remain limited. Objective: To evaluate long-term bone regeneration and implant outcomes following sinus augmentation using a collagenated porcine xenograft. Methods: This paper reports a retrospective case series of three partially edentulous patients (aged 46–56 years) who underwent lateral sinus augmentation with a small-particle collagenated porcine xenograft (THE Graft™, Purgo Biologics, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) and staged implant placement. In one case, a controlled perforation of the Schneiderian membrane was performed to access and remove a sinus mucocele, followed by repair using a resorbable collagen membrane. Core biopsies were harvested at implant placement for histology (hematoxylin-eosin, Masson–Goldner) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining. Clinical outcomes included surgical events, vertical bone gain, marginal bone levels, and implant survival at long-term follow-up. Results: Healing was uneventful in all cases. Mean vertical bone gain was 12.0 mm (baseline 1.33 mm to 13.33 mm final). At a mean 46.8-month follow-up (range 38.3–52.2 months), 100% of implants were functional without failure; marginal bone loss remained < 1 mm during the first year and was stable thereafter. Histology at 3.7, 4.7, and 7.5 months showed vascularized new trabecular bone intimately contacting residual xenograft particles (new bone 20–30%, residual biomaterial 30–40%, connective tissue 30–50%). TRAP-positive multinucleated giant cells at 7.5 months indicated ongoing biomaterial degradation without severe inflammatory reactions. Conclusions: Within the limits of a small case series, collagenated porcine xenograft supported predictable bone regeneration and stable long-term implant function after sinus floor elevation, with favorable histologic integration and gradual resorption. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations and Challenges in Dental Implantology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 1617 KB  
Article
A 10-Year Follow-Up Study on the Success Rate of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation and Implant Placement in Relation to Strontium Ranelate
by Eliza Dragan, Mihaela Ghinea, Danisia Haba and Gabriel Melian
Dent. J. 2025, 13(12), 565; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13120565 - 1 Dec 2025
Viewed by 784
Abstract
Background: Maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) is frequently required for implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla. However, limited bone quality and volume can compromise long-term success. Strontium ranelate (SrR), a dual-acting bone agent, stimulates osteoblasts while inhibiting osteoclasts, potentially improving bone density [...] Read more.
Background: Maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) is frequently required for implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla. However, limited bone quality and volume can compromise long-term success. Strontium ranelate (SrR), a dual-acting bone agent, stimulates osteoblasts while inhibiting osteoclasts, potentially improving bone density and osseointegration in grafted sites. Objective: This 10-year preliminary split-mouth study evaluated the long-term effects of SrR on bone density, volume, and implant success following MSFA. Methods: Six patients underwent bilateral MSFA using a lateral window approach. One side received systemic SrR (2 g/day for 6 months) after grafting, while the contralateral side served as a control. CBCT and DEXA analyses were performed to assess bone density and volume. Bone biopsies were examined histologically and by microindentation. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, depending on distribution, with significance at p < 0.05. Results: After 10 years, SrR-treated sites demonstrated a mean 22.9% increase in bone density versus 12.5% in untreated controls. Although both groups experienced minor reductions in bone volume (SrR: −13.3%; control: −12.8%), SrR samples exhibited greater mineralization, hardness, and lamellar bone maturity. Conclusions: SrR improved bone density and mechanical properties but not long-term volume preservation. Given the small sample size (n = 6) and absence of implant stability and patient-reported outcomes, these results should be interpreted with caution. Future large-scale clinical trials incorporating survival, ISQ, and quality-of-life data are warranted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bone Regeneration and Tissue Reconstruction in Dentistry)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 2097 KB  
Article
Pilot Study: Algorithm-Based Assessment of Maxillary Sinus Volume in Zygomatic and Pterygoid Implant Planning
by Pablo García Roza, Iago Vila García, Miguel González Menéndez, Jesús Pato Mourelo, Jose Antonio Vega and M. Zulima Fernández-Muñiz
Dent. J. 2025, 13(11), 515; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13110515 - 5 Nov 2025
Viewed by 754
Abstract
Background/Objetives: Zygomatic implants are an effective solution for the prosthetic rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae, but their placement can alter maxillary sinus anatomy and influence surgical outcomes. This study presents a computational algorithm for automated segmentation and volumetric assessment of the maxillary sinus from [...] Read more.
Background/Objetives: Zygomatic implants are an effective solution for the prosthetic rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae, but their placement can alter maxillary sinus anatomy and influence surgical outcomes. This study presents a computational algorithm for automated segmentation and volumetric assessment of the maxillary sinus from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, offering a reproducible and clinically oriented tool. Methods: Six sinus samples from four patients undergoing pterygoid or zygomatic implant surgery were analyzed. The algorithm was designed to integrate image binarization, surface detection, and iterative reconstruction to delineate sinus boundaries and compute volumes with minimal operator dependence. Results: Postoperative analyses consistently revealed reductions in sinus volume, with relative changes ranging from 1.1% to 24.5%, validated by expert review. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the feasibility of algorithm-driven volumetric assessment as a non-invasive approach to support surgical planning and monitor anatomical changes. Although limited by the small sample size, this pilot study establishes a foundation for further research and highlights the clinical potential of computational methods to enhance precision and safety in zygomatic implantology. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

20 pages, 790 KB  
Systematic Review
The Use of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Combination with Synthetic Bone Grafting: A Systematic Review
by Rosana Costa, Alicia Carvalho, Paula López-Jarana, Vitória Costa, Marta Relvas, Filomena Salazar, Tomás Infante da Câmara, Miguel Nunes Vasques and Marco Infante da Câmara
Biomedicines 2025, 13(9), 2266; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13092266 - 15 Sep 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2511
Abstract
Background: In atrophic posterior maxillary regions, sub-antral surgery is often used for rehabilitation with implants. In order to stimulate bone regeneration, autogenous, xenogenic, alloplastic and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) grafts are commonly used. Aim: To assess the effectiveness of PRF alone or combination with [...] Read more.
Background: In atrophic posterior maxillary regions, sub-antral surgery is often used for rehabilitation with implants. In order to stimulate bone regeneration, autogenous, xenogenic, alloplastic and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) grafts are commonly used. Aim: To assess the effectiveness of PRF alone or combination with synthetic bone substitutes on bone formation, implant stability, and survival in sub-antral surgery. Materials and Methods: A literature review was carried out from September 2024 to April 2025, according to PRISMA guidelines using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Wiley, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases. From a total of 601 articles identified, 11 met the inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. Results: PRF in combination with synthetic materials has shown potential benefits, especially in increasing biomechanical stability and bone formation. Although, most studies have not reported statistically significant differences when comparing the use of synthetic material alone against its combination with PRF. Discussion: The use of synthetic grafts in combination with PRF has become increasingly common in sub-antral implant procedures. PRF promotes angiogenesis, osteoprogenitor cell differentiation and bone regeneration, favouring the healing and remodelling process of the tissues, as well as greater stability and longevity of the implant. Conclusions: The combination of PRF with synthetic bone grafting shows promising results; however, further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of PRF in maxillary sinus grafts in conjunction with the use of biomaterials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 8101 KB  
Article
Long-Term Success of Dental Implants in Atrophic Maxillae: A 3-Year Case Series Using Hydroxyapatite and L-PRF
by Marco Andre Lomba Alves, Jakson Both, Carlos Fernando Mourão, Bruna Ghiraldini, Fabio Bezerra, Jose Mauro Granjeiro, Suelen Cristina Sartoretto and Monica Diuana Calasans-Maia
Bioengineering 2024, 11(12), 1207; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11121207 - 28 Nov 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3162
Abstract
Dental implants are essential for the prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous patients, requiring adequate bone volume and density for osseointegration and load support. The posterior region of the maxilla, commonly deficient in bone quality and quantity, represents a clinical challenge. This case series reports [...] Read more.
Dental implants are essential for the prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous patients, requiring adequate bone volume and density for osseointegration and load support. The posterior region of the maxilla, commonly deficient in bone quality and quantity, represents a clinical challenge. This case series reports an analysis involving 69 dental implants in the atrophic maxilla of nine patients. The procedures adopted combined alloplastic hydroxyapatite grafting and leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) applied to the alveolar ridge and maxillary sinus lift. With an average follow up of three years after the installation of the prostheses, an implant success rate of 98.5% was observed, showing integration and functional stability. The strategy of combining hydroxyapatite with L-PRF proved to be effective in increasing bone volume and promoting osseointegration. These findings indicate that the technique and biomaterials are viable for rehabilitating atrophic maxillae in the posterior region, offering long-lasting clinical results and a high success rate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomaterials for Bone Repair and Regeneration)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 2371 KB  
Article
Radiographic Study of Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation Using Osseodensification Technique with Graft Material: A Pilot Study
by Khrystyna Sulyhan-Sulyhan, Javier Barberá-Millán, Carolina Larrazábal-Morón, Julián Espinosa-Giménez and María Dolores Gómez-Adrián
Biomimetics 2024, 9(5), 276; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9050276 - 4 May 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4316
Abstract
This pilot study aimed to evaluate the level of implant success after transcrestal sinus floor elevation (tSFE) using the osseodensification technique (OD) combined with beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) by analyzing clinical and radiographic results. Moreover, the increase in bone height was analyzed immediately after [...] Read more.
This pilot study aimed to evaluate the level of implant success after transcrestal sinus floor elevation (tSFE) using the osseodensification technique (OD) combined with beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) by analyzing clinical and radiographic results. Moreover, the increase in bone height was analyzed immediately after surgery, 3 months after, and before loading by taking standardized radiographic measurements. Thirteen patients, four males and nine females, with a mean age of 54.69 ± 5.86 years, requiring the placement of one implant in the upper posterior maxilla, with a residual bone height of <8 mm and a minimum bone width of 5 mm, participated in the study. The bone gain data was obtained using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) immediately after surgery and twelve months after the placement. The correlation between initial and final bone height with implant stability was also assessed. The results were analyzed using SPSS 23 software (p < 0.05). The results of the study indicated a 100% implant success rate after a follow-up period of twelve months. Preoperative main bone height was 5.70 ± 0.95 mm. The osseodensification technique allowed a significant increase of 6.65 ± 1.06 mm immediately after surgery. After a twelve-month follow-up, a graft material contraction of 0.90 ± 0.49 mm was observed. No correlation was observed between the bone height at the different times of the study and the primary stability of the implant. Considering the limitations of the size sample of this study, the osseodensification technique used for transcrestal sinus lift with the additional bone graft material (β-TCP) may provide a predictable elevation of the maxillary sinus floor, allowing simultaneous implant insertion with adequate stability irrespective of bone height limitations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 3703 KB  
Case Report
The Use of a Surgical Template for the Insertion of Dental Implants and Sinus Lift with the Summers Technique Based on Digital Planning: A Case Report
by Stefano Speroni, Floriana Bosco, Francesco Ferrini, Laura Pittari, Alessandro Nota and Simona Tecco
Prosthesis 2024, 6(1), 206-215; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis6010016 - 14 Feb 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 6094
Abstract
(1) Background: Computer-guided surgery is now established as the main technique for implant placement, reducing intraoperative complications and helping the clinician avoid damaging sensitive anatomical structures, such as, for example, the maxillary sinus. (2) Methods: A complex case is discussed to suggest how [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Computer-guided surgery is now established as the main technique for implant placement, reducing intraoperative complications and helping the clinician avoid damaging sensitive anatomical structures, such as, for example, the maxillary sinus. (2) Methods: A complex case is discussed to suggest how computer-aided surgery can merge with freehand surgery, as a surgical guide can make a freehand surgical procedure less complicated and more predictable. (3) Results: A surgical procedure was executed following digital planning, except for sites 1.5 and 2.5, where a mixed approach was adopted: they were initially prepared with a milling depth of 1 mm from the base of the maxillary sinus and were then finished using osteotomes, according to the technique described by Summers. Radiography confirmed the correct positioning of the implants and the sinus lift. (4) Conclusions: A mixed digital/analogical approach used in complex cases increases the accuracy of the results and reduces complications and treatment time. The presence of a correctly digitally planned surgical guide helps in the freehand approach and not only in the digital approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Digital Technologies, Materials and Telemedicine in Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 4825 KB  
Article
A New Simplified Autogenous Sinus Lift Technique
by Carlos Aurelio Andreucci, Elza M. M. Fonseca and Renato N. Jorge
Bioengineering 2023, 10(5), 505; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10050505 - 23 Apr 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 5483
Abstract
Oral maxillofacial rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla with or without pneumatization of the maxillary sinuses routinely presents limited bone availability. This indicates the need for vertical and horizontal bone augmentation. The standard and most used technique is maxillary sinus augmentation using distinct techniques. [...] Read more.
Oral maxillofacial rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla with or without pneumatization of the maxillary sinuses routinely presents limited bone availability. This indicates the need for vertical and horizontal bone augmentation. The standard and most used technique is maxillary sinus augmentation using distinct techniques. These techniques may or may not rupture the sinus membrane. Rupture of the sinus membrane increases the risk of acute or chronic contamination of the graft, implant, and maxillary sinus. The surgical procedure for maxillary sinus autograft involves two stages: removal of the autograft and preparation of the bone site for the graft. A third stage is often added to place the osseointegrated implants. This is because it was not possible to do this at the same time as the graft surgery. A new bioactive kinetic screw (BKS) bone implant model is presented that simplifies and effectively performs autogenous grafting, sinus augmentation, and implant fixation in a single step. In the absence of a minimum vertical bone height of 4 mm in the region to be implanted, an additional surgical procedure is performed to harvest bone from the retro-molar trigone region of the mandible to provide additional bone. The feasibility and simplicity of the proposed technique were demonstrated in experimental studies in synthetic maxillary bone and sinus. A digital torque meter was used to measure MIT and MRT during implant insertion and removal. The amount of bone graft was determined by weighing the bone material collected by the new BKS implant. The technique proposed here demonstrated the benefits and limitations of the new BKS implant for maxillary sinus augmentation and installation of dental implants simultaneously. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1982 KB  
Review
Residual Bone Height and New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedure Using Biomaterials: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
by Shahnavaz Khijmatgar, Massimo Del Fabbro, Margherita Tumedei, Tiziano Testori, Niccolò Cenzato and Gianluca Martino Tartaglia
Materials 2023, 16(4), 1376; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16041376 - 6 Feb 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 6176
Abstract
Background. Different factors may affect new bone formation following maxillary sinus floor augmentation for the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous maxilla. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of residual bone height (RBH) on new bone formation after lateral sinus augmentation [...] Read more.
Background. Different factors may affect new bone formation following maxillary sinus floor augmentation for the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous maxilla. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of residual bone height (RBH) on new bone formation after lateral sinus augmentation utilizing different biomaterials, through a network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods. PUBMED, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases were searched until 31 December 2022 to obtain relevant articles. A hand search was also conducted. Randomised controlled studies on maxillary sinus augmentation comparing different grafting materials in patients with atrophic posterior maxilla, in need of prosthetic rehabilitation, were included. The risk of bias was assessed following the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration. The primary outcome was new bone formation (NBF), assessed histomorphometrically. The statistical analysis was performed by splitting the data according to RBH (<4 mm and ≥4 mm). Results. A total of 67 studies were eligible for conducting NMA. Overall, in the included studies, 1955 patients were treated and 2405 sinus augmentation procedures were performed. The biomaterials used were grouped into: autogenous bone (Auto), xenografts (XG), allografts (AG), alloplasts (AP), bioactive agents (Bio), hyaluronic acid (HA), and combinations of these. An inconsistency factor (IF) seen in the entire loop of the XG, AP, and Bio+AP was found to be statistically significant. The highest-ranked biomaterials for the <4 mm RBH outcome were XG+AG, XG+AP, and Auto. Similarly, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of biomaterials for ≥4 mm RBH was Auto, Bio+XG, and XG+Auto. Conclusion. There is no grafting biomaterial that is consistently performing better than others. The performance of the materials in terms of NBF may depend on the RBH. While choosing a biomaterial, practitioners should consider both patient-specific aspects and sinus clinical characteristics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 513 KB  
Article
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Implants Placed in Two Different Biomaterials Used for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
by Francisco Correia, Sónia Alexandre Gouveia, Daniel Humberto Pozza, António Campos Felino and Ricardo Faria-Almeida
Materials 2023, 16(3), 1220; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031220 - 31 Jan 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 5209
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare marginal bone loss, surgical and clinical complications, and dental implant survival rate in bilateral maxillary sinus augmented by autologous or porcine xenograft. A randomized controlled clinical trial using split-mouth design enrolled 12 consent adult patients [...] Read more.
The objective of this study was to compare marginal bone loss, surgical and clinical complications, and dental implant survival rate in bilateral maxillary sinus augmented by autologous or porcine xenograft. A randomized controlled clinical trial using split-mouth design enrolled 12 consent adult patients (59.7 ± 8.7 years), who received bilateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation for oral rehabilitation with implant-supported prosthesis. Each patient received both the autologous bone from the mandible (control) or porcine xenograft (test) during the random bilateral sinus lift surgery. A total of 39 dental implants were placed in the posterior maxilla of the 12 patients after 6 months, being rehabilitated after the respective osseointegration period. Both graft materials demonstrated a high implant survival rate at 12 months: 95% for the xenograft side, only 1 implant without osseointegration, and 100% for the autologous side. Radiographic bone loss was low and similar for both groups: control group with a mean of 0.063 ± 0.126, and test group with a mean of 0.092 ± 0.163. No major surgical-related complications have occurred. Only one patient had several prosthetic complications due to fractures of prosthetic components. The maxillary sinus augmentation procedure, both with autologous bone and porcine xenograft materials, is an excellent clinical option procedure for the prosthetic rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae, with low marginal bone loss after one year follow-up, few clinical complications, and a high implant survival rate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Biomaterials for Bone and Tooth Regeneration)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 2442 KB  
Case Report
Nasal Floor Elevation—An Option of Premaxilla Augmentation: A Case Report
by Ante Jordan, Marko Vuletić, Mato Sušić, Luka Stojić and Dragana Gabrić
Surgeries 2022, 3(4), 306-313; https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries3040033 - 29 Oct 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 5808
Abstract
The atrophic edentulous maxilla is demanding for dental implant placement because of extensive resorption of the alveolar ridge after teeth loss and, consequently, the proximity of the anatomical structures, nasal cavity, and maxillary sinus. Treatment options are short implants, guided bone regeneration, onlay [...] Read more.
The atrophic edentulous maxilla is demanding for dental implant placement because of extensive resorption of the alveolar ridge after teeth loss and, consequently, the proximity of the anatomical structures, nasal cavity, and maxillary sinus. Treatment options are short implants, guided bone regeneration, onlay grafts, Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafting, distraction osteogenesis, or nasal floor elevation. Nasal floor elevation is a method of augmentation of premaxilla by raising the base of the nose. The aim of this case report is to evaluate the success of implants placed after nasal floor elevation. A 75-year-old female patient came to the Clinical Department of Oral Surgery, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, unsatisfied with her complete removable denture. Clinical and radiological examination revealed severe maxillary alveolar ridge atrophy. Nasal floor elevation was made under local anesthesia through aperture piriformis and lateral window in the distal part. After eight months, four implants were placed and, after period of osseointegration, a bar-retained implant overdenture was made. This case report shows that nasal floor augmentation can be considered among the surgical techniques to allow implant-supported rehabilitation of the atrophic anterior maxilla. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1169 KB  
Article
Effect of Sinus Perforation with Flaplessly Placed Mini Dental Implants for Oral Rehabilitation: A 5-Year Clinical and Radiological Follow-Up
by Luc Van Doorne, Geert Hommez, Ewald Bronkhorst, Gert Meijer and Hugo De Bruyn
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(15), 4637; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154637 - 8 Aug 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 7154
Abstract
Background: Flaplessly placed one-piece mini dental implants (MDI) are an option to support maxillary overdentures. Evenly distribution of the implants over the atrophic alveolar process implies a risk of accidental sinus perforation in the posterior area which could induce sinus-related pathology. Methods: Thirty-one [...] Read more.
Background: Flaplessly placed one-piece mini dental implants (MDI) are an option to support maxillary overdentures. Evenly distribution of the implants over the atrophic alveolar process implies a risk of accidental sinus perforation in the posterior area which could induce sinus-related pathology. Methods: Thirty-one patients received 5–6 maxillary MDIs. Schneiderian membrane swelling was assessed with CBCT at the deepest point of the sinus in the mid-sagittal plane prior to surgery (baseline), after 2 and 5 years. Additionally, subjective patient-reported rhinosinusitis complaints, the effect of smoking, and gender differences were investigated. Results: Mean thickness of the Schneiderian membrane was 2.87 mm at baseline, 3.15 mm at 2 years, and 4.30 mm at 5 years in 27 of 31 initially treated patients. MDI perforation was detected in 21/54 sinuses. At 2 years, perforation length does not affect membrane thickness whereas baseline swelling does. In smokers, each perforated mm induced 0.87 mm additional swelling. After 5 years, the effect of baseline swelling becomes smaller whereas perforation length became statistically significant, with 0.53 mm increase for every perforated mm. The effect of smoking lost its significance. No relations between gender, membrane thickness changes, or subjective clinical sinus complaints and MDI perforation were found. Conclusion: Accidental MDI sinus perforation induces Schneiderian membrane swelling but does not interfere with clinical sinusal outcome after 5 years. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Osseointegrated Oral Implants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop