Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (888)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = aortic stenosis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 1183 KiB  
Article
Head-to-Head Comparison of Meril Myval Series Balloon-Expandable and Abbott Portico Series Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valves—A Single-Center Experience
by Matjaž Bunc, Gregor Verček, Luka Vitez, Primož Holc, Klemen Steblovnik and Miha Šušteršič
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1419; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081419 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Transcatheter heart valve (THV) selection is challenging as self-expanding valves (SEVs) are associated with lower post-procedural mean aortic gradients, while balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) have lower rates of paravalvular leak (PVL) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). We aimed to compare [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Transcatheter heart valve (THV) selection is challenging as self-expanding valves (SEVs) are associated with lower post-procedural mean aortic gradients, while balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) have lower rates of paravalvular leak (PVL) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). We aimed to compare the 30-day and 1-year outcomes following Myval BEV (Meril Life Sciences, Vapi, Gujarat, India) and intra-annular Portico SEV (Abbott, St. Paul, MN, USA) implantation. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from the all-comer TAVI registry of the University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia, from October 2017 to August 2023. Safety and efficacy outcomes following Myval BEV and Portico SEV implantation were compared overall and after propensity score matching. Results: Of the total 1152 THVs implanted, 97 patients (8%) received a Myval BEV and 47 (4%) a Portico SEV. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences between the two patient cohorts regarding 30-day (Myval 0.0% vs. Portico 2.9%, p = 1.000) and 1-year mortality (Myval 0.0% vs. Portico 5.9%, p = 0.492). Likewise, the rates of new PPI, device failure (mean aortic gradient and more than mild PVL), and periprocedural in-hospital complications were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis of two intra-annular THVs, the Myval BEV was associated with comparable short- and mid-term outcomes as the Portico SEV. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 569 KiB  
Systematic Review
Intravascular Lithotripsy in the Aorta and Iliac Vessels: A Literature Review of the Past Decade
by Nicola Troisi, Giulia Bertagna, Sofia Pierozzi, Valerio Artini and Raffaella Berchiolli
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5493; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155493 - 4 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Nowadays, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a novel technique for treatment of vascular calcifications, first in coronary and then in peripheral arteries. In the current literature there is little evidence that describes IVL as an effective and safe solution in [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Nowadays, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a novel technique for treatment of vascular calcifications, first in coronary and then in peripheral arteries. In the current literature there is little evidence that describes IVL as an effective and safe solution in treating severe aortic and aorto-iliac calcifications. The aim of this study is to report current available data about the use of IVL in treating aortic and aorto-iliac calcified lesions and its application in facilitating other endovascular procedures. Methods: the present review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. Preliminary searches were conducted on MEDLINE and Pubmed from January 2015 to February 2025. Studies were divided into 3 main categories depending on the location of calcifications and the type of treatment: IVL in visceral and infrarenal obstructive disease (group 1), IVL in aorto-iliac obstructive disease (group 2), IVL used to facilitate other endovascular procedures. Main primary outcomes in the perioperative period were technical and clinical successes and perioperative complications. Primary outcomes at 30 days and mid-term (2 years) were overall survival, limb salvage rate, primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and residual stenosis. Results: Sixteen studies were identified for a total of 1674 patients. Technical and clinical successes were 100%, with low rates of perioperative complications. Dissection rate reaches up to 16.1% in some studies, without any differences compared to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) alone (22.8%; p = 0.47). At 30 days, limb salvage and survival rates were 100%. At 2 years, primary patency, assisted primary patency, and secondary patency were 95%, 98%, and 100%, respectively, with no difference compared to IVL + stenting. Conclusions: IVL has emerged as a novel approach to treat severe calcified lesions in visceral and aorto-iliac atherosclerotic disease and to facilitate other endovascular procedures. This technique seems to offer satisfactory early and mid-term outcomes in terms of primary, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency with low complication rates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endovascular Surgery: State of the Art and Clinical Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 623 KiB  
Article
A TAVI Programme Without an On-Site Cardiac Surgery Department: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
by Rami Barashi, Mustafa Gabarin, Ziad Arow, Ranin Hilu, Ilya Losin, Ivan Novikov, Karam Abd El Hai, Yoav Arnson, Yoram Neuman, Koby Pesis, Ziyad Jebara, David Pereg, Edward Koifman, Abid Assali and Hana Vaknin-Assa
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5449; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155449 - 2 Aug 2025
Viewed by 158
Abstract
Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease, associated with poor outcomes if left untreated. Current guidelines recommend that transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures be performed in hospitals with an on-site cardiac surgery unit due to potential complications [...] Read more.
Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease, associated with poor outcomes if left untreated. Current guidelines recommend that transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures be performed in hospitals with an on-site cardiac surgery unit due to potential complications requiring surgical intervention. Objective: Based on our experience, we evaluated the feasibility and outcomes of implementing a TAVI program in a cardiology department without an on-site cardiac surgery unit, in collaboration with a remote hospital for surgical backup. Methods: The TAVI program involved pre- and post-procedural evaluations conducted at Meir Medical Center (Kfar Saba, Israel) with a remote surgical team available. The study population included 149 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis treated at the Meir valve clinic between November 2019 and December 2023. Procedures were performed by the center’s interventional cardiology team. Results: The mean age of the 149 patients was 80 ± 6 years, and 75 (50%) were female. The average STS score was 4.3, and the EuroSCORE II was 3.1. Among the patients, 68 (45%) were classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV. The valve types used included ACURATE neo2 (57 patients, 38%), Edwards SAPIEN 3 (43 patients, 28%), Evolut-PRO (41 patients, 27%), and Navitor (7 patients, 4%). There were no cases of moderate to severe paravalvular leak and no elevated post-implantation gradients, and there was no need for urgent cardiac surgery. One case of valve embolization was successfully managed percutaneously during the procedure. In-hospital follow-up revealed no deaths and only one major vascular complication. At one-year follow-up, six patients had died, with only one death attributed to cardiac causes. Conclusions: Our findings support the safe and effective performance of transfemoral TAVI in cardiology departments without on-site cardiac surgery, in collaboration with a remote surgical team. Further prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to confirm these results and guide broader clinical implementation of this practice. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1168 KiB  
Article
Importance of Imaging Assessment Criteria in Predicting the Need for Post-Dilatation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with a Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis
by Matthias Hammerer, Philipp Hasenbichler, Nikolaos Schörghofer, Christoph Knapitsch, Nikolaus Clodi, Uta C. Hoppe, Klaus Hergan, Elke Boxhammer and Bernhard Scharinger
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2025, 12(8), 296; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12080296 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 101
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has revolutionized the treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). Balloon post-dilatation (PD) remains an important procedural step to optimize valve function by resolving incomplete valve expansion, which may lead to paravalvular regurgitation and other potentially adverse [...] Read more.
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has revolutionized the treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). Balloon post-dilatation (PD) remains an important procedural step to optimize valve function by resolving incomplete valve expansion, which may lead to paravalvular regurgitation and other potentially adverse effects. There are only limited data on the predictors, incidence, and clinical impact of PD during TAVI. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study analyzed 585 patients who underwent TAVI (2016–2022). Pre-procedural evaluations included transthoracic echocardiography and CT angiography to assess key parameters, including the aortic valve calcium score (AVCS); aortic valve calcium density (AVCd); aortic valve maximal systolic transvalvular flow velocity (AV Vmax); and aortic valve mean systolic pressure gradient (AV MPG). We identified imaging predictors of PD and evaluated associated clinical outcomes by analyzing procedural endpoints (according to VARC-3 criteria) and long-term survival. Results: PD was performed on 67 out of 585 patients, with elevated AV Vmax (OR: 1.424, 95% CI: 1.039–1.950; p = 0.028) and AVCd (OR: 1.618, 95% CI: 1.227–2.132; p = 0.001) emerging as a significant independent predictor for PD in TAVI. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed no significant differences in short- and mid-term survival between patients who underwent PD and those who did not. Interestingly, patients requiring PD exhibited a lower incidence of adverse events regarding major vascular complications, permanent pacemaker implantations and stroke. Conclusions: The study highlights AV Vmax and AVCd as key predictors of PD. Importantly, PD was not associated with increased procedural adverse events and did not predict adverse events in this contemporary cohort. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Applications of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (CT))
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2614 KiB  
Article
Impact of Pre- and Post-Dilatation on Long-Term Outcomes After Self-Expanding and Balloon-Expandable TAVI
by Alexandru Stan, Ayman Elkahlout, Marius Mihai Harpa, Marian Pop, Mihaly Veres, Antonela Delia Stan, Paul-Adrian Călburean, Anda-Cristina Scurtu, Klara Brînzaniuc and Horatiu Suciu
J. Funct. Biomater. 2025, 16(8), 282; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16080282 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 194
Abstract
The main objective of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis, focusing on differences between self-expanding valve (SEV) versus balloon-expandable valve (BEV) prostheses and the influence of balloon pre- and [...] Read more.
The main objective of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis, focusing on differences between self-expanding valve (SEV) versus balloon-expandable valve (BEV) prostheses and the influence of balloon pre- and post-dilatation on clinical results. The secondary objective was to report the long-term outcomes after TAVI in Romania. All patients who underwent a TAVI procedure for severe AS between November 2016 and May 2025 at a tertiary center in Romania were included in the present study. A total of 702 patients were included, of which 455 (64.8%) and 247 (35.1%) patients received a BEV (Sapien3 platform) and a SEV (Accurate, Boston, Portico, Evolut, or Navitor platforms), respectively. Pre-dilatation was performed in 514 (73.2%) cases, and post-dilatation was performed in 189 (26.9%) cases. There were 10.5 and 7.8 all-cause and cardiovascular-cause mortality event rates per 100 patient years, respectively. In regard to the univariable Cox regression, a BEV has significantly lower mortality than an SEV (HR = 0.67[0.46–0.96], p = 0.03), pre-dilatation did not influence mortality (HR = 0.71[0.48–1.04], p = 0.08), and post-dilatation significantly increased mortality (HR = 1.51[1.05–2.19], p = 0.03). In regard to the multivariable Cox regression, survival was not influenced by pre-dilatation or the valve platform, while post-dilatation had a trend towards higher mortality (p = 0.06). The BEV and SEV have similar survival rates, with no heterogeneity among a large number of TAVI platforms. While pre-dilatation had no impact on mortality, post-dilatation was associated with a trend towards increased mortality (p = 0.06), which was independent of the transprosthetic gradient. Survival after TAVI in Romania is comparable to that reported in Western registries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Biomaterials and Technologies for Cardiovascular Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 2260 KiB  
Review
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Cardiogenic Shock: Current Evidence, Clinical Challenges, and Future Directions
by Grigoris V. Karamasis, Christos Kourek, Dimitrios Alexopoulos and John Parissis
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5398; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155398 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 247
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) in the setting of severe aortic stenosis (AS) presents a critical and high-risk scenario with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), initially reserved for inoperable or high-risk surgical candidates, is increasingly being considered in patients [...] Read more.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) in the setting of severe aortic stenosis (AS) presents a critical and high-risk scenario with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), initially reserved for inoperable or high-risk surgical candidates, is increasingly being considered in patients with CS due to improvements in device technology, operator experience, and supportive care. This review synthesizes current evidence from large registries, observational studies, and meta-analyses that support the feasibility, safety, and potential survival benefit of urgent or emergent TAVI in selected CS patients. Procedural success is high, and early intervention appears to confer improved short-term and mid-term outcomes compared to balloon aortic valvuloplasty or medical therapy alone. Critical factors influencing prognosis include lactate levels, left ventricular ejection fraction, renal function, and timing of intervention. The absence of formal guidelines, logistical constraints, and ethical concerns complicate decision-making in this unstable population. A multidisciplinary Heart Team/Shock Team approach is essential to identify appropriate candidates, manage procedural risk, and guide post-intervention care. Further studies and the development of TAVI-specific risk models in CS are anticipated to refine patient selection and therapeutic strategies. TAVI may represent a transformative option for stabilizing hemodynamics and improving outcomes in this otherwise high-mortality group. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aortic Valve Implantation: Recent Advances and Future Prospects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 457 KiB  
Article
Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Revascularization in Patients Presenting with Critical Limb Ischemia and Aortic Valve Stenosis
by Luca Attisani, Alessandro Pucci, Matteo A. Pegorer, Luca Luzzani, Francesco Casali, Giorgio Luoni, Stefano Tanagli, Gabriele Piffaretti and Raffaello Bellosta
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2025, 12(8), 292; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12080292 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 228
Abstract
(1) Background: Comparison of clinical outcomes between patients with moderate-severe aortic valve stenosis and those with mild or no aortic valve stenosis undergoing surgical revascularization for critical limb threating ischemia (CLTI). (2) Methods: Single center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing surgical lower [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Comparison of clinical outcomes between patients with moderate-severe aortic valve stenosis and those with mild or no aortic valve stenosis undergoing surgical revascularization for critical limb threating ischemia (CLTI). (2) Methods: Single center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing surgical lower limb revascularization with femoro-distal bypass for critical ischemia between 2016 and 2022. All patients were evaluated preoperatively by echocardiographic examination and divided into two cohorts: group A with moderate-severe aortic valve stenosis (AVA-cm2 < or =1.5 cm2) and group B with mild or absent stenosis (AVA-cm2 > 1.5 cm2). Primary outcomes were major limb amputation and mortality between the two groups. The rate of major cardiovascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death) and change in “preoperative functional status” were the secondary outcomes. Descriptive statistics for continuous variables were performed by calculating means, standard deviation (SD) medians, and interquartile range (IQR) while, for categorical variables, frequencies and percentages were performed. Intergroup comparison tests, for continuous variables, were performed by t-test or corresponding nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney test) while, for categorical variables, Chi-square test was used. Evaluation of cut-offs for the variable AVA-fx-cm2, in terms of predictive of outcome outcomes, was calculated by ROC curves. Comparison between clinical and outcome variables was performed using logistic regression models. A total of 316 patients were analyzed and divided in two groups: 50 (16%) patients with moderate or severe aortic valve stenosis (group A) and 266 (84%) with no or mild aortic valve stenosis (AVA > 1.5 cm2). Patients in group A were significantly older than those in group B (78 years vs. 74 years, p value = 0.005); no other significant comorbidity differences were found between the two groups. The mean follow-up was 1178 days (SD 991 days; 2–3869 days). There were no statistically significant differences between group A and group B in terms of major amputation rate (20% vs. 16.5%; p = 0.895) and overall mortality (48.0% vs. 40.6%; p = 0.640). In the total cohort, the statistically significant variables associated with the major amputation were systemic perioperative complication (OR 5.83, 95% CI: 2.36, 14.57, p < 0.001), bypass-related complication within 30 days of surgery (OR 2.74, 95% CI: 1.17, 6.45, p = 0.020), surgical revascularization below the knee (OR 7.72, 95% CI: 1.53, 140.68, p = 0.049), and the presence of a previous cardiovascular event (OR 2.65, 95% CI: 1.14, 6.26, p = 0.024). In patients undergoing surgical revascularization for CLTI, no significant difference in major amputation rate and overall mortality was found between subjects with mild or no aortic valve stenosis and those with moderate/severe stenosis. As expected, overall mortality was higher in older patients with worse functional status. A significantly higher rate of limb amputation was found in those subjects undergoing subgenicular revascularization, early bypass failure, or previous cardiovascular event. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endovascular Intervention for Peripheral Artery Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 365 KiB  
Review
Unraveling the Link Between Aortic Stenosis and Atherosclerosis: What Have We Learned?
by Corina Cinezan, Camelia Bianca Rus and Ioana Tiberia Ilias
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1375; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081375 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 336
Abstract
Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) has long been considered a degenerative disease and is typically diagnosed in older men at an advanced stage. However, accumulating evidence has highlighted the similarities between AS and atherosclerosis, particularly regarding shared risk factors and overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms. [...] Read more.
Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) has long been considered a degenerative disease and is typically diagnosed in older men at an advanced stage. However, accumulating evidence has highlighted the similarities between AS and atherosclerosis, particularly regarding shared risk factors and overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms. This connection has led to a paradigm shift, suggesting that AS may be preventable in its early stages. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes the existing literature exploring the parallels between AS and atherosclerosis, focusing on common risk factors, pathogenic pathways, and evolving therapeutic strategies. Clinical trials and translational studies were examined to assess the effectiveness of atherosclerosis-based treatments for AS. Results: Multiple studies have confirmed the shared inflammatory, lipid-mediated, and calcific mechanisms of AS and atherosclerosis. Despite these similarities, therapeutic strategies effective in atherosclerosis, such as statin therapy, have not consistently shown benefits in AS. New medical approaches aim to delay aortic valve replacement and reduce the associated morbidity. The partially overlapping pathogenesis continues to guide future research. Conclusions: While AS and atherosclerosis share several pathogenic features, their clinical courses and treatment responses diverge. Understanding the limits and potential of their overlap may inform future preventive and therapeutic strategies. Earlier detection and targeted intervention in AS remain key goals, drawing on insights from cardiovascular disease management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aortic Stenosis: Diagnosis and Clinical Management)
20 pages, 2027 KiB  
Review
SGLT2 Inhibitors: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Outcomes in Cardiology and Diabetology
by Marlena Stielow, Łukasz Fijałkowski, Aidas Alaburda, Grzegorz Grześk, Elżbieta Grześk, Jacek Nowaczyk and Alicja Nowaczyk
Molecules 2025, 30(15), 3112; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30153112 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 866
Abstract
Studies have shown that sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors not only help lower blood glucose levels but also offer cardioprotective effects, reduce the progression of heart failure, and may even slow the progression of aortic stenosis. The mechanisms of these beneficial properties [...] Read more.
Studies have shown that sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors not only help lower blood glucose levels but also offer cardioprotective effects, reduce the progression of heart failure, and may even slow the progression of aortic stenosis. The mechanisms of these beneficial properties are thought to involve multiple pathways, including reducing inflammation, oxidative stress, and improving cellular energy metabolism. Advancing knowledge about the mechanisms of action of these drugs and their effects on the course of the aforementioned diseases has become the subject of intensive clinical and scientific research. This publication aims to provide insight into the role of SGLT2 inhibitors in the context of diabetes mellitus, heart failure and acute coronary syndrome, through clinical analysis, mechanistic insights and comparison of the effects of these drugs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organic Molecules in Drug Discovery and Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1360 KiB  
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the BeGraft Peripheral and BeGraft Peripheral PLUS Outcomes as Bridging Covered Stents in Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair
by George Apostolidis, Petroula Nana, José I. Torrealba, Giuseppe Panuccio, Athanasios Katsargyris and Tilo Kölbel
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5221; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155221 - 23 Jul 2025
Viewed by 215
Abstract
Background/Objective: Bridging stent optimal choice in fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (f/bEVAR) is under investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis studied the outcomes of the BeGraft peripheral and peripheral PLUS as bridging stents in f/bEVAR. Methods: The methodology was pre-registered [...] Read more.
Background/Objective: Bridging stent optimal choice in fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (f/bEVAR) is under investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis studied the outcomes of the BeGraft peripheral and peripheral PLUS as bridging stents in f/bEVAR. Methods: The methodology was pre-registered to the PROSPERO (CRD420251007695). Following the PRISMA guidelines and PICO model, the PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases were searched for observational studies and randomized control trials, in English, from 2015 to 2025, reporting on f/bEVAR patients using the second-generation BeGraft peripheral or the BeGraft peripheral PLUS balloon expandable covered stent (BECS; Bentley InnoMed, Hechingen, Germany) for bridging. The ROBINS-I assessed the risk of bias and GRADE the quality of evidence. Target vessel technical success, occlusion/stenosis, endoleak Ic/IIIc, reintervention and instability during follow-up were primary outcomes, assessed using proportional meta-analysis. Results: Among 1266 studies, eight were included (1986 target vessels; 1791 bridged via BeGraft); all retrospective, except one. The ROBINS-I showed that seven were at serious risk of bias. According to GRADE, the quality of evidence was “very low” for primary outcomes. Target vessel technical success was 99% (95% CI 98–100%; I2 = 12%). The mean follow-up was 20.2 months. Target-vessel instability was 3% (95% CI 2–5%; I2 = 44%), occlusion/stenosis was 1% (95% CI 1–4%; I2 = 8%) and endoleak Ic/IIIc was 1% (95% CI 0–3%; I2 = 0%). The estimated target-vessel reintervention was 2% (95% CI 2–4%; I2 = 12%). Celiac trunk, superior mesenteric and renal artery instability were 1% (95% CI 0–16%; I2 = 0%;), 1% (95% CI 0–5%; I2 = 14%) and 4% (95% CI 2–7%; I2 = 40%), respectively. Conclusions: The BeGraft peripheral and peripheral PLUS BECS performed with high technical success and low instability when used for bridging in f/bEVAR. Cautious interpretation is required due to the very low quality of evidence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: Second Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 290 KiB  
Article
Platelet-Related Biomarkers and Efficacy of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease
by Paweł Bańka, Kinga Czepczor, Maciej Podolski, Agnieszka Kosowska, Wojciech Garczorz, Tomasz Francuz, Maciej Wybraniec and Katarzyna Mizia-Stec
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(15), 7083; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157083 - 23 Jul 2025
Viewed by 194
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the serum biomarkers implicated in the interaction of platelets and endothelium, as well as the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD). A total of 78 adult [...] Read more.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the serum biomarkers implicated in the interaction of platelets and endothelium, as well as the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD). A total of 78 adult patients with CAD on aspirin therapy participated in this study, including 49 consecutive patients with AS and 29 control subjects. The analysis included the following serum biomarkers: thrombomodulin (TM), platelet factor 4 (PF4), P-selectin, and CD40L. The efficacy of antiplatelet treatment was evaluated using the VerifyNow Aspirin test (ASPI test) and P2Y12 assay test (ADP test). Patients with AS exhibited increased serum levels of TM (7.64 ± 3.5 ng/mL vs. 6.28 ± 2.1 ng/mL, p = 0.011) and PF4 (25.16; Q1: 8.3; Q3: 29.6 μg/mL vs. 12.85; Q1: 5.7; Q3: 14.5 μg/mL, p = 0.021) compared to the control group. P-selectin and CD40L levels did not differ between groups. There were no significant differences in platelet aggregation in the ASPI (474.04 ± 66.7 ARU vs. 471.31 ± 56.2 ARU; p = 0.822) or ADP (224.88 ± 46.4 PRU vs. 216.62 ± 29.6 PRU; p = 0.394) tests. Bleeding incidence did not differ significantly between groups. The coexistence of AS in patients with CAD is associated with elevated levels of the aforementioned biomarkers, which are indicative of endothelial damage and platelet activation. However, the efficacy of antiplatelet treatment was independent of the presence of AS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Molecular Role of Platelets in Human Diseases)
12 pages, 1214 KiB  
Article
Quadruple Fenestrated Stentgrafts for Complex Aortic Aneurysms: Outcomes of Non-Stented Celiac Artery Fenestrations
by Daniela Toro, Kim Bredahl, Katarina Björses, Tomas Ohrlander, Katja Vogt and Timothy Resch
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5189; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155189 - 22 Jul 2025
Viewed by 268
Abstract
Background: Fenestrated stentgrafting has become a first-line treatment for juxtarenal aneurysms, and the incorporation of all renovisceral vessels with fenestrations has become common to increase the proximal sealing zone. This increases the complexity of the repair compared to using fewer fenestrations, and [...] Read more.
Background: Fenestrated stentgrafting has become a first-line treatment for juxtarenal aneurysms, and the incorporation of all renovisceral vessels with fenestrations has become common to increase the proximal sealing zone. This increases the complexity of the repair compared to using fewer fenestrations, and stenting of the celiac artery (CA), in particular, can be technically challenging. Objective: This study evaluates the mid-term outcomes of leaving the celiac artery unstented during quadruple fenestrated stentgrafting for complex aortic aneurysms. Additionally, it explores the clinical and anatomical factors that influence the decision to not stent the celiac artery. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients with complex aortic aneurysms who underwent elective fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) between 2018 and 2023. Custom Cook Zenith grafts were used, and all patients underwent preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) as well as follow-up CTA to assess the celiac artery. This study evaluated celiac artery anatomic factors, such as proximal and distal diameter; presence of stenosis (<50% or >50%) and patency; length of any CA stenosis; CA takeoff angulation, CA tortuosity, early CA division; calcification; and presence of CA aneurysm or ectasia anatomical abnormalities. Recorded outcomes of CA instability included any stent stenosis, target vessel occlusion, reintervention, or endoleak (types 1C and 3). Results: A total of 101 patients underwent FEVAR, with 72 receiving a stent in the celiac artery and 29 not receiving it. Rates of technical success (96.5% vs. 100%), intervention times (256 min vs. 237 min), and lengths of hospital stay (5.1 vs. 4.7 days) were similar between unstented vs. stented groups. At one year, no significant difference in celiac artery instability was noted (17.2 vs. 5.5%; p = 0.06). Risk factors for CA occlusion on univariate analysis included a steep takeoff angle (≥140°), length of stenosis >6.5 mm, proximal diameter ≤6.5 mm, preoperative stenosis ≥50%, and celiac artery tortuosity. Conclusions: Anatomical features of the CA impact the ability to achieve routine CA stenting during FEVAR. Selectively not stenting the celiac artery during FEVAR might simplify the procedure without compromising patient safety and mid-term outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aortic Aneurysms: Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1174 KiB  
Article
The Influence of Diabetes Mellitus and Kidney Dysfunction on Oxidative Stress, a Reflection of the Multisystem Interactions in Aortic Stenosis
by Laura Mourino-Alvarez, Inés Perales-Sánchez, Germán Hernández-Fernández, Gabriel Blanco-López, Emilio Blanco-López, Rocío Eiros, Cristian Herrera-Flores, Miryam González-Cebrian, Teresa Tejerina, Jesús Piqueras-Flores, Pedro Luis Sánchez, Luis F. López-Almodóvar, Luis R. Padial and Maria G. Barderas
Antioxidants 2025, 14(7), 888; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14070888 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 346
Abstract
Progression of aortic stenosis (AS) is aggravated by type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and kidney dysfunction (KD). Oxidative stress is one of the main mechanisms that triggers AS and is also disturbed among subjects with T2DM and KD. Consequently, we studied the redox [...] Read more.
Progression of aortic stenosis (AS) is aggravated by type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and kidney dysfunction (KD). Oxidative stress is one of the main mechanisms that triggers AS and is also disturbed among subjects with T2DM and KD. Consequently, we studied the redox homeostasis in four groups of patients, also classifying each patient based on their kidney function: control subjects, T2DM, AS, and AS+T2DM. Free reduced thiols in plasma were analyzed using a colorimetric assay, and the redox state of human serum albumin (HSA) was assessed by immunodetection and PEG-PCMal labeling. Lower levels of thiols were evident in patients with AS and AS+T2DM, while reduced and mildly oxidized HSA was more abundant in T2DM and AS+T2DM patients, reflecting less protection against oxidation. Moreover, the thiol levels decreased as KD increased in patients with AS and AS+T2DM. Differences also exist in reduced and mildly oxidized HSA between patients with normal and severely impaired kidney function, whereas AS patients with severe KD had more strongly oxidized HSA. Our results confirm an imbalance in oxidative stress associated with AS that is aggravated by the coexistence of T2DM and KD. Moreover, T2DM treatment might mitigate this dysfunction, opening the door to new therapeutic approaches for these patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 9892 KiB  
Article
Alternative Transaxillary Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
by Konrad Wisniewski, Gerrit Kaleschke, Fernando De-Torres-Alba, Sven Martens and Heinz Deschka
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 5127; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14145127 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 331
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Currently, the transfemoral approach is recognized as the primary method for accessing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, alternative techniques are needed when the transfemoral access is not suitable. We proposed that a modified transaxillary approach through the distal left axillary artery [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Currently, the transfemoral approach is recognized as the primary method for accessing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, alternative techniques are needed when the transfemoral access is not suitable. We proposed that a modified transaxillary approach through the distal left axillary artery is both viable and safe for conducting TAVI, potentially offering benefits for patients. Methods: From December 2018 to February 2024, a total of 24 patients (7 women, average age 77.9 ± 8 years) received TAVI using transaxillary access via the left axillary artery. The participants suffered from symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and were deemed TAVI candidates with iliofemoral anatomy unsuitable for a transfemoral route. The patient group displayed a high perioperative risk profile, with significant peripheral artery disease or severe obstructive infrarenal aortic conditions. The implantation of the aortic prosthesis was carried out through the left distal axillary artery. A balloon-expandable valve was used in every instance. Results: In the examined cohort, the 30-day mortality rate was 4.2%. A new pacemaker was necessary for four patients (16.7%). One case exhibited a new moderate neurological dysfunction. Additionally, one patient required surgical revision of the access point due to ischemia. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that transaxillary TAVI via the distal left axillary artery has yielded encouraging outcomes. This approach is practicable and safe, does not prolong the procedure, minimizes surgical trauma, ensures excellent access regardless of chest anatomy, and is sparing for the brachial plexus. As a single-center pilot study, our findings require confirmation in larger, prospective cohorts with extended follow-up to fully validate the safety and long-term efficacy of this technique. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1625 KiB  
Article
Flow Characteristics by Blood Speckle Imaging in Non-Stenotic Congenital Aortic Root Disease Surrounding Valve-Preserving Operations
by Shihao Liu, Justin T. Tretter, Lama Dakik, Hani K. Najm, Debkalpa Goswami, Jennifer K. Ryan and Elias Sundström
Bioengineering 2025, 12(7), 776; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12070776 - 17 Jul 2025
Viewed by 437
Abstract
Contemporary evaluation and surgical approaches in congenital aortic valve disease have yielded limited success. The ability to evaluate and understand detailed flow characteristics surrounding surgical repair may be beneficial. This study explores the feasibility and utility of echocardiographic-based blood speckle imaging (BSI) in [...] Read more.
Contemporary evaluation and surgical approaches in congenital aortic valve disease have yielded limited success. The ability to evaluate and understand detailed flow characteristics surrounding surgical repair may be beneficial. This study explores the feasibility and utility of echocardiographic-based blood speckle imaging (BSI) in assessing pre- and post-operative flow characteristics in those with non-stenotic congenital aortic root disease undergoing aortic valve repair or valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) surgery. Transesophageal echocardiogram was performed during the pre-operative and post-operative assessment surrounding aortic surgery for ten patients with non-stenotic congenital aortic root disease. BSI, utilizing block-matching algorithms, enabled detailed visualization and quantification of flow parameters from the echocardiographic data. Post-operative BSI unveiled enhanced hemodynamic patterns, characterized by quantified changes suggestive of the absence of stenosis and no more than trivial regurgitation. Rectification of an asymmetric jet and the reversal of flow on the posterior aspect of the ascending aorta resulted in a reduced oscillatory shear index (OSI) of 0.0543±0.0207 (pre-op) vs. 0.0275±0.0159 (post-op) and p=0.0044, increased peak wall shear stress of 1.9423±0.6974 (pre-op) vs. 3.6956±1.4934 (post-op) and p=0.0035, and increased time-averaged wall shear stress of 0.6885±0.8004 (pre-op) vs. 0.8312±0.303 (post-op) and p=0.23. This correction potentially attenuates cellular alterations within the endothelium. This study demonstrates that children and young adults with non-stenotic congenital aortic root disease undergoing valve-preserving operations experience significant improvements in flow dynamics within the left ventricular outflow tract and aortic root, accompanied by a reduction in OSI. These hemodynamic enhancements extend beyond the conventional echocardiographic assessments, offering immediate and valuable insights into the efficacy of surgical interventions. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop