Search Results (18,245)

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate sociodemographic factors, features of the acute infection, and post-infection health status in survivors of COVID-19, assessing their association with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS). Methods: A multidisciplinary public clinic in Brazil assessed COVID-19 survivors between June 2020 and February 2022. Patients were classified as having PACS or subacute infection (SI). Data on the history of the acute infection, current symptoms, physical examination, and laboratory findings were collected and analyzed using multivariate models with PACS as the outcome. Results: Among the 113 participants, 63.71% were diagnosed with PACS at a median of 130 days (IQR: 53–196) following acute symptom onset. Admission to the intensive care unit was more frequent among individuals with PACS than those with SI (83.3% vs. 65.0% respectively; p = 0.037). Symptoms significantly more prevalent in the PACS group when compared to the SI cohort included hair loss (44.4% vs. 17.1% respectively; p = 0.004), lower limb paresthesia (34.7% vs. 9.8% respectively; p = 0.003), and slow thinking speed (28.2% vs. 0.0% respectively; p < 0.001). Logistic regression revealed that only the time interval between the onset of acute symptoms and the clinical evaluation was independently associated with a PACS diagnosis (β = 0.057; 95% CI: 1.03–1.08; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with PACS had a higher frequency of intensive care unit admission compared to those with subacute infection. However, in the multivariate analysis, the severity of the acute infection did not predict the final diagnosis of PACS, which was associated only with the time elapsed since symptom onset. Full article

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the etiologic agent that causes the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) identified in Wuhan, in 2019. Men are more prone to developing severe manifestations than women, suggesting a possible crucial role of sex hormones. 17,β-Estradiol (E2) and 1,25 α dihydroxyvitamin D₃ (calcitriol) act upon gene pathways as immunomodulators in several infectious respiratory diseases. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the influence of E2 and calcitriol on the VSV-based pseudovirus SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. We infected Vero E6 cells with the recombinant VSV-based pseudovirus SARS-CoV-2 and the SARS-CoV-2 viruses according to the pre-treatment and pre–post-treatment models. The Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) and Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) gene expression did not change under different treatments. The VSV-based pseudovirus SARS-CoV-2 infection showed a significant decrease in the focus-forming unit count in the presence of E2 and calcitriol (either alone or in combination) in the pre-treatment model, while in the pre–post-treatment model, the infection was inhibited only in the presence of E2. Th SARS-CoV-2 infection highlighted a decrease in viral titres in the presence of E2 and calcitriol only in the pre–post-treatment model. 17,β-Estradiol and calcitriol can exert an inhibitory effect on SARS-CoV-2 infections, demonstrating their protective role against viral infections. Full article

tRNA modifications are crucial for efficient protein synthesis, impacting codon recognition, tRNA stability, and translation rates. RNA viruses hijack the host’s translational machinery, including the pool of modified tRNA, to translate their own genomes. However, the mismatch between viral and host codon usage can lead to a limited availability of specific tRNA leading to ribosome stalling, posing a significant challenge for efficient protein translation. While some viruses address this challenge through codon optimization, we show here that SARS-CoV-2 (Coronavirus) and the Zika virus (ZIKV; Flavivirus) adopt a different approach, manipulating the host tRNA epitranscriptome. Analysis of codon bias indices confirmed a substantial divergence between viral and host codon usage, revealing a strong preference in viral genes for codons decoded by tRNAs requiring U34 wobble modification. Monitoring tRNA modification dynamics in infected cells showed that both SARS-CoV2 and ZIKV enhance U34 tRNA modifications during infection. Strikingly, impairing U34 tRNAs profoundly impacted viral replication, underscoring the strict reliance of SARS-CoV-2 and ZIKV on manipulating the host tRNA epitranscriptome to support the efficient translation of their genome. Full article

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by the destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic beta cells, resulting in lifelong insulin dependence. While genetic susceptibility—particularly human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II alleles—is a major risk factor, accumulating evidence implicates viral infections as potential environmental triggers in disease onset and progression. This narrative review synthesizes current findings on the role of viral pathogens in T1DM pathogenesis. Enteroviruses, especially Coxsackie B strains, are the most extensively studied and show strong epidemiological and mechanistic associations with beta-cell autoimmunity. Large prospective studies—including Diabetes Virus Detection (DiViD), The environmental determinans of diabetes in the young (TEDDY), Miljøfaktorer i utvikling av type 1 diabetes (MIDIA), and Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY)—consistently demonstrate correlations between enteroviral presence and the initiation or acceleration of islet autoimmunity. Other viruses—such as mumps, rubella, rotavirus, influenza A (H1N1), and SARS-CoV-2—have been investigated for their potential involvement through direct cytotoxic effects, immune activation, or molecular mimicry. Interestingly, certain viruses like varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) may exert modulatory or even protective influences on disease progression. Proposed mechanisms include direct beta-cell infection, molecular mimicry, bystander immune activation, and dysregulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Although definitive causality remains unconfirmed, the complex interplay between genetic predisposition, immune responses, and viral exposure underscores the need for further mechanistic research. Elucidating these pathways may inform future strategies for targeted prevention, early detection, and vaccine or antiviral development in at-risk populations. Full article

Background: Statins exhibit pleiotropic anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory effects, suggesting their potential in non-cardiovascular conditions. However, evidence supporting their repurposing remains limited, and off-label prescribing policies vary globally. Objective: To systematically review evidence on statin repurposing in oncology and infectious diseases, and to assess Hungarian regulatory practices regarding off-label statin use. Methods: A systematic literature search (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect; 2010–May 2025) was conducted using the terms “drug repositioning” OR “off-label prescription” AND “statin” NOT “cardiovascular,” following PRISMA guidelines. Hungarian off-label usage data from the NNGYK (2008–2025) were also analyzed. Results: Out of 205 publications, 12 met the inclusion criteria—75% were oncology-focused, and 25% focused on infectious diseases. Most were preclinical (58%); only 25% offered strong clinical evidence. Applications included hematologic malignancies, solid tumors, Cryptococcus neoformans, SARS-CoV-2, and dengue virus. Mechanisms involved mevalonate pathway inhibition and modulation of host immune responses. Hungarian data revealed five approved off-label statin uses—three dermatologic and two pediatric metabolic—supported by the literature and requiring post-treatment reporting. Conclusions: While preclinical findings are promising, clinical validation of off-label statin use remains limited. Statins should be continued in cancer patients with cardiovascular indications, but initiation for other purposes should be trial-based. Future directions include biomarker-based personalization, regulatory harmonization, and cost-effectiveness studies. Full article

Breast milk can provide passive immunity to infants, serving as a valuable source of maternal antibodies while remaining a non-invasive sample for investigating maternal immune responses. To date, no studies have evaluated SARS-CoV-2 and potentially cross-reactive HCoV antibodies in breast milk following bamlanivimab administration. A 36-year-old postpartum female was PCR-positive for SARS-CoV-2 four days post-delivery. Bamlanivimab was administered intravenously two days later. Breast milk was collected before bamlanivimab infusion, daily for two weeks post-infusion, then weekly until 102 days post-infusion. Mother and infant sera were collected only at 102 days post-infusion. All milk and serum samples were tested for IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV. We observed two distinct SARS-CoV-2 antibody peaks at days 3 and 29 post-infusion, likely representing bamlanivimab transfer and the post-infection antibody response. Beta-HCoV antibodies showed two peaks at days 6 and 29, potentially representing backboosted beta-HCoV responses and/or antibody cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV-2. Infant seropositivity for SARS-CoV-2 102 days post-infusion may represent antibodies from passive transfer via breastfeeding or a subclinical infection. This case highlights the value of breast milk as a non-invasive and repeatable sample to help understand maternal immune responses post-infection, exogenous antibody infusion, and passive antibody transfer during breastfeeding, which can provide insights into maternal–infant health research. Full article

Schizophrenia is a challenging multifactorial neuropsychiatric disease that involves interactions between genetic susceptibility and environmental insults. Increasing evidence implicates viral infections as significant environmental contributors, particularly during sensitive neurodevelopmental periods. This review synthesises current findings on the viral hypothesis of schizophrenia, encompassing a wide array of neurotropic viruses, including influenza viruses, herpesviruses (HSV-1 and 2, CMV, VZV, EBV, HHV-6 and 8), hepatitis B and C viruses, HIV, HERVs, HTLV, Zika virus, BoDV, coronaviruses (including SARS-CoV-2), and others. These pathogens can contribute to schizophrenia through mechanisms such as direct microinvasion, persistent central nervous system infection, immune-mediated neuroinflammation, molecular mimicry, and the disturbance of the blood–brain barrier. Prenatal exposure to viral infections can trigger maternal immune activation, resulting in cytokine-mediated alterations in the neurological development of the foetus that persist into adulthood. Genetic studies highlight the role of immune-related loci, including major histocompatibility complex polymorphisms, in modulating susceptibility to infection and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Clinical data also support the “mild encephalitis” hypothesis, suggesting that a subset of schizophrenia cases involve low-grade chronic neuroinflammation. Although antipsychotics have some immunomodulatory effects, adjunctive anti-inflammatory therapies show promise, particularly in treatment-resistant cases. Despite compelling associations, pathogen-specific links remain inconsistent, emphasising the need for longitudinal studies and integrative approaches such as viromics to unravel causal relationships. This review supports a “multi-hit” model in which viral infections interfere with hereditary and immunological susceptibilities, enhancing schizophrenia risk. Elucidating these virus–immune–brain interactions may facilitate the discovery of biomarkers, targeted prevention, and novel therapeutic strategies for schizophrenia. Full article

The focal “hot spot” neuropathologies in COVID-19 infection are revealing footprints of a hidden underlying collapse of a novel ultrafast ultradian Piezo2 signaling system within the nervous system. Paradoxically, the same initiating pathophysiology may underpin the systemic findings in COVID-19 infection, namely the multiorgan SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced vascular pathologies and brain–body-wide systemic pro-inflammatory signaling, depending on the concentration and exposure to infecting SARS-CoV-2 viruses. This common initiating microdamage is suggested to be the primary damage or the acquired channelopathy of the Piezo2 ion channel, leading to a principal gateway to pathophysiology. This Piezo2 channelopathy-induced neural switch could not only explain the initiation of disrupted cell–cell interactions, metabolic failure, microglial dysfunction, mitochondrial injury, glutamatergic synapse loss, inflammation and neurological states with the central involvement of the hippocampus and the medulla, but also the initiating pathophysiology without SARS-CoV-2 viral intracellular entry into neurons as well. Therefore, the impairment of the proposed Piezo2-induced quantum mechanical free-energy-stimulated ultrafast proton-coupled tunneling seems to be the principal and critical underlying COVID-19 infection-induced primary damage along the brain axes, depending on the loci of SARS-CoV-2 viral infection and intracellular entry. Moreover, this initiating Piezo2 channelopathy may also explain resultant autonomic dysregulation involving the medulla, hippocampus and heart rate regulation, not to mention sleep disturbance with altered rapid eye movement sleep and cognitive deficit in the short term, and even as a consequence of long COVID. The current opinion piece aims to promote future angles of science and research in order to further elucidate the not entirely known initiating pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Full article

Background: COVID-19 is associated with coagulopathy and increased mortality. The ABO blood group system has been implicated in modulating susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease severity, but its relationship with viral RNAemia, spike gene mutations, and thrombosis remains underexplored. Methods: We analyzed 446 hospitalized COVID-19 patients between 2021 and 2022. SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia was assessed via RT-qPCR on whole blood, and spike gene mutations were identified through whole-genome sequencing in RNAemia-positive samples. ABO blood groups were determined by agglutination testing, and thrombotic events were evaluated using coagulation markers. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and Kruskal–Wallis tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: RNAemia was detected in 26.9% of patients, with no significant association with ABO blood group (p = 0.175). Omicron was the predominant variant, especially in blood group A (62.5%). The N501Y mutation was the most prevalent in group O (53.2%), and K417N was most prevalent in group B (36.9%), though neither reached statistical significance. Thrombotic events were significantly more common in blood group A (OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.3–3.4, p = 0.002), particularly among RNAemia-positive patients. Conclusions: ABO blood group phenotypes, particularly group A, may influence thrombotic risk in the context of SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia. While no direct association was found between blood group and RNAemia or spike mutations, the observed trends suggest potential host–pathogen interactions. Integrating ABO typing and RNAemia screening may enhance risk stratification and guide targeted thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 patients. Full article

Introduction: Long COVID syndrome is defined as persistent or new symptoms that appear after an acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and last at least three months without explanation. It is estimated that between 10% and 20% of those infected develop long COVID; however, data is not precise in Latin America. Although high immunization rates have reduced acute symptoms and the pandemic’s impact, there is a lack of evidence of its efficacy in preventing long COVID in the region. Methods: This scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies on vaccinated adults with long COVID from Central and South America and the Caribbean were included (Mexico was also considered). A comprehensive search across multiple databases was conducted. Data included study design, participant characteristics, vaccine type, and efficacy outcomes. Results are presented narratively and in tables. Results: Out of 3466 initial records, 8 studies met the inclusion criteria after rigorous selection processes. These studies encompassed populations from Brazil, Mexico, Latin America, and Bonaire, with 11,333 participants, 69.3% of whom were female. Vaccination, particularly with three or more doses, substantially reduces the risk and duration of long COVID. Variability was noted in the definitions and outcomes assessed across studies. Conclusions: This scoping review highlights that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination exhibits potential in reducing the burden of long COVID in the Americas. However, discrepancies in vaccine efficacy were observed depending on the study design, the population studied, and the vaccine regimen employed. Further robust, region-specific investigations are warranted to delineate the effects of vaccination on long COVID outcomes. Full article

The development of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is characterized by extensive lung inflammation, which, in turn, leads to respiratory distress and a decline in blood oxygen levels. Hospital admission, along with intensive care or ventilator usage, becomes necessary because this condition leads to serious respiratory problems. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic methods, and current therapeutic options for pneumonia caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The pathophysiological process of severe pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2 infection is characterized by direct lung damage from viral replication, an excessive immune system response, inflammation, impaired gas exchange, and multi-organ failure. The coexistence of various medical conditions leads to substantial lung impairment, resulting in hypoxia and respiratory failure, which can ultimately lead to fatal outcomes. The diagnosis of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is made through a combination of clinical, radiologic, and laboratory findings. A multifaceted approach integrating antiviral therapy, corticosteroids, oxygen supplementation, ventilatory management, and immunomodulation is imperative to control inflammation and enhance clinical outcomes. Early intervention, meticulous monitoring, and personalized care are paramount for enhancing survival and mitigating complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Full article

Recent outbreaks of highly pathogenic human RNA viruses from probable zoonotic origin have highlighted the relevance of epidemic preparedness as a society. However, research in vaccinology and virology, as well as epidemiologic surveillance, is often constrained by the biological risk that live virus experimentation entails. These also involve expensive costs, time-consuming procedures, and advanced personnel expertise, hampering market access for many drugs. Most of these drawbacks can be circumvented with the use of pseudotyped viruses, which are surrogate, non-pathogenic recombinant viral particles bearing the surface envelope protein of a virus of interest. Pseudotyped viruses significantly expand the research potential in virology, enabling the study of non-culturable or highly infectious pathogens in a safer environment. Most are derived from lentiviral vectors, which confer a series of advantages due to their superior efficiency. During the past decade, many studies employing pseudotyped viruses have evaluated the efficacy of vaccines or monoclonal antibodies for relevant pathogens such as HIV-1, Ebolavirus, Influenza virus, or SARS-CoV-2. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the applications of pseudotyped viruses when evaluating the neutralization capacity of exposed individuals, or candidate vaccines and antivirals in both preclinical models and clinical trials, to further help develop effective countermeasures against emerging neutralization-escape phenotypes. Full article

Background/Objectives: This retrospective multicenter study, conducted within the ORCHESTRA Project, investigated SARS-CoV-2 reinfections among 5777 healthcare workers (HCWs) from four University Hospitals (Modena, Verona, Padova and Trieste) in northern Italy, aiming to assess the risk of reinfection and its determinants, comparing the clinical characteristics of reinfections with those of first infections, and examining the impact of preventive measures and vaccination strategies. Methods: HCWs completed an online questionnaire between June and August 2022. The survey collected demographic, occupational, and clinical data, including information on first infections and reinfections. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 28.0, through bivariate and multivariate approaches. Results: Response rates were 41.8% for Modena, 39.5% for Verona, 17.9% for Padova, and 17.4% for Trieste. Among the respondents, 4.8% (n = 276) experienced 2 infections and 0.5% (n = 27) reported 3 infections, out of a total of 330 reinfection cases. Additionally, 43.0% (n = 2787) reported only one infection, while 51.5% were never infected. Reinfection rates increased across five study phases (based on the epidemiological context), likely due to the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. A booster vaccine dose significantly reduced reinfection risk. Higher reinfection risk was found among HCWs aged ≤30 years, those with chronic respiratory diseases, and those working in COVID-19 wards, particularly nurses and allied health professionals. Reinfections were associated with a lower frequency of symptoms both during the period of swab positivity and after a negative swab, as well as with a shorter duration of swab positivity. No significant differences in symptom duration were found between first infections and reinfections. Conclusions: Despite its limitations, the online questionnaire proved a useful tool. Natural infection and vaccination reduced both reinfection risk and symptom severity. Prior infections should be considered in planning vaccination schedules and prioritizing HCWs. Full article

Background: Since the COVID-19 pandemic, managing acute infections in symptomatic individuals, regardless of vaccination status, has been widely debated and extensively studied. Even more concerning, however, is the impact of COVID-19 on pregnant women—especially its effects on fetuses and newborns. Several studies have documented complications in both expectant mothers and their infants following infection. Methods: In our previous works, we provided scientific evidence of the bacteriophage behavior of SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2). This demonstrated that a well-defined combination of two antibiotics, amoxicillin and rifaximin, is associated with the same statistics for subjects affected by severe cases of SARS-CoV-2, regardless of vaccination status. We considered the few cases in the literature regarding the management of pregnancies infected with SARS-CoV-2, as well as previous data published in our works. In this brief case series, we present two pregnancies from the same unvaccinated mother—one prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and the other during the spread of the Omicron variant—as well as one pregnancy from a mother vaccinated against COVID-19. We describe the management of acute maternal infection using a previously published protocol that addresses the bacteriophage and toxicological mechanisms associated with SARS-CoV-2. Results: The three pregnancies are compared based on fetal growth and ultrasound findings. This report highlights that, even in unvaccinated mothers, timely and well-guided management of symptomatic COVID-19 can result in positive outcomes. In all cases, intrauterine growth remained within excellent percentiles, and the births resulted in optimal APGAR scores. Conclusions: This demonstrates that a careful and strategic approach, guided by ultrasound controls, can support healthy pregnancies during SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of vaccination status. Full article

Background/Objectives: Saliva as a diagnostic medium for COVID-19 requires fewer resources to collect and is more readily adopted across a range of testers. Our study compared an Emergency Use Authorized direct saliva-to-RT-qPCR test against an FDA-authorized nasal swab RT-qPCR assay for participants who reported symptoms of respiratory infection. Methods: We analyzed 737 symptomatic participants who self-selected to test at either a community testing facility or a walk-in clinic due to respiratory symptoms and provided matched saliva and nasal swab samples. Samples were collected between March and September of 2023, both before and after the declared end of the public health emergency. Results: A total of 120 participants tested positive in at least one of the tests. For participants testing in the first 5 days of reported symptoms, the saliva test had a 94.0 positive percent agreement (PPA; 95% C.I. 88.9–99.1%) with the nasal test and a 99.0 negative percent agreement (NPA; 95% C.I. 98.1–99.9%). The viral load decreased beyond day 1 of reported symptoms for saliva testing. Viral load increased up to day 4 for nasal swabs and then decreased. The same number of discordant positive samples (five each) occurred for both tests within 5 days of symptoms onset. Conclusions: In the endemic phase of COVID-19 and for development of new tests, testing methods that are less invasive are more likely to be adopted. The results of saliva-based versus nasal swab PCR measurements relative to days of symptom onset are needed to optimize future testing strategies. Full article