- Article
This article evaluates the institutional and constitutional requirements for governing transnational ecological risks and develops a testable design for a World Environmental Governance System (WEGS). Drawing on qualitative normative institutional analysis, a structured comparison of governance alternatives, and legal-doctrinal assessment, it examines the relationship among ecological integrity, democratic legitimacy, scientific advice, fiscal capacity, and enforceable duties. WEGS proposes a conditional, multilevel constitutional architecture linking Eco-Civic Communities and Eco-Regions to an Ecological World Council, an independent science council, a public-information service, an ecological Guardian, a specialized court, and a rule-governed ecological fund. The analysis distinguishes a prospective constitutional model from interim arrangements achievable through existing treaties and institutions. It identifies unresolved political, distributive, epistemic, and legal trade-offs, including the permanent-member ratification requirement for changes to the United Nations Charter. Rather than empirically evaluating effectiveness, the article develops institutional design criteria, alternative transition scenarios, and indicators for future assessment. It concludes that stronger planetary ecological governance is plausible only if common obligations are accompanied by democratic authorization, subsidiarity, transparent finance, independent review, and safeguards for human and Indigenous rights.
13 November 2026









