Uro

Background/Objectives: The study aimed to find out if the patients without a reTURBT, due to changed protocol in our centre because of the COVID-19 pandemic, had presented higher rates of relapse or progression compared to patients treated by standard reTURBT protocol. Methods: A prospective study was conducted including 43 patients with high-risk T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer diagnosed between March 2020 and June 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent reTURBT and those who did not, due to limitations during the COVID-19 pandemic. All patients received intravesical BCG induction therapy and were followed for 3 years. The institutional research ethics committee approved the study. Results: A total of 43 patients were included, 17 (39.5%) underwent reTURBT and 26 (60.5%) did not. No significant differences were observed in tumour characteristics between groups. Recurrence occurred in 43.8% of the reTURBT group and 15.4% of the non-reTURBT group. Tumour progression to T2G3 was observed only in the reTURBT group. Survival analysis showed no significant differences in recurrence-free survival between groups (p = 0.299). Conclusions: Omitting reTURBT in carefully selected patients did not result in significantly worse oncological outcomes; however, due to the small sample size, the study is underpowered and these findings should be interpreted with caution. Early BCG administration in the non-reTURBT group may have contributed to favourable recurrence-free survival. However, further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and define optimal criteria for safely omitting reTURBT.

Background: Spontaneous regression of testicular cancer with retroperitoneal metastasis is a rare phenomenon and poses challenges in its diagnosis. Methods: A 33-year-old male patient presented with severe lower back pain (10/10) of 4 months’ duration, radiating to the left lower limb, refractory to NSAIDs, and significantly impaired ambulation, accompanied by nausea and vomiting. In addition to difficulty initiating urination and defecation, with weight loss of 30 kg, he was referred to the urology service of our hospital. Results: On physical examination, the left testicle showed signs of varicocele without pain. Therefore, laboratory and imaging studies were requested, highlighting elevated β-hCG (156.4 mIU/mL) and LDH (850 IU/L). Testicular ultrasound confirmed the diagnosis of left varicocele, while computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis with contrast revealed a conglomerated retroperitoneal mass of more than 5 cm, located in the paravertebral, retrocural, paraaortic, and intercavoaortic regions. Based on these findings, primary treatment with left radical orchiectomy was chosen, which showed regression of the seminomatous tumor. Histopathological examination revealed a seminomatous germ cell tumor (pT0, pN3, M0), clinical stage IIC, with a good prognosis. Therefore, chemotherapy was initiated with four cycles of EP (etoposide 170 mg and cisplatin 35 mg). However, despite standard chemotherapy, the disease progressed until the patient died. Conclusions: Cases of testicular tumor with retroperitoneal metastasis are rare and infrequently present with clinical, testicular, and imaging findings. Therefore, histopathology, accompanied by the intentional identification of mutations associated with the TP53 gene when therapeutic failure exists.

Background/Objectives: Pelvic floor disorders affect up to 30% of adult females in the United States. Misdiagnosis occurs in nearly 45% to 90% of cases. Standardized pelvic anatomical measurements could improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning. We aimed to evaluate pelvic anatomical variations using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: We analyzed MRI pelvic measurements from 250 women aged 20–90 years. Exclusion criteria included prior pelvic surgery (except hysterectomy), pelvic cancer, and use of alternative imaging modalities. Key measurements included anterior vaginal wall thickness (AVWT), bladder wall thickness (BWT), vaginal epithelium to bladder urothelium (VWBU), urethral length (UL), and inter-ureteral distances. A comprehensive statistical analysis was performed, including corrections for multiple comparisons. Results: While several anatomical measurements were correlated, a comprehensive analysis was performed to identify markers for clinical diagnoses. After applying Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, we found no statistically significant association between any of the measured anatomical parameters and a diagnosis of incontinence. Notably, an uncorrected difference in Bladder Wall Thickness (BWT) (p = 0.041) did not hold up to rigorous testing. To further assess its clinical utility, a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for BWT as a predictor of incontinence yielded an aArea Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.19, indicating poor predictive validity. Conclusions: In this cohort, static anatomical measurements derived from MRI, including BWT, do not appear to be reliable markers for incontinence. Our findings suggest that the pathophysiology of this disorder is likely more dependent on functional or dynamic factors rather than simple static anatomical variations. Future research should focus on standardizing dynamic imaging parameters to better assess pelvic floor function.