Previous Issue
Volume 5, December
 
 

Uro, Volume 6, Issue 1 (March 2026) – 6 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
27 pages, 870 KB  
Systematic Review
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature
by Raffaella Lucchini, Rodrigo Cartes, Ciro Franzese, Lorenzo Lo Faro, Luciana Di Cristina, Giuseppe Roberto D’Agostino, Marco Badalamenti, Andrea Girlando, Rosario Mazzola, Stefano Arcangeli and Marta Scorsetti
Uro 2026, 6(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/uro6010006 - 4 Feb 2026
Viewed by 389
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is increasingly used for localized prostate cancer (PCa), but evidence supporting its use in high-risk PCa (HRPC) remains limited. Standard management continues to favor conventional or moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with long-course androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). This [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is increasingly used for localized prostate cancer (PCa), but evidence supporting its use in high-risk PCa (HRPC) remains limited. Standard management continues to favor conventional or moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with long-course androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). This systematic review aimed to synthesize current data on SBRT biochemical outcomes, toxicity, and technical aspects in localized HRPC. Methods: A systematic PubMed search was conducted on 1 May 2024, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO ID CRD420251235649). Studies reporting biochemical control (BC) for HRPC treated definitively with SBRT, with or without ADT, were included. Studies not meeting these criteria or including ≤10 HRPC patients were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed through qualitative appraisal of study methodology. Substantial heterogeneity across study design, SBRT schedules, cohort composition, and ADT integration precluded a meta-analysis; data were synthesized descriptively. Results: Thirty studies contributed biochemical control data after prostate SBRT for 1354 patients meeting inclusion criteria. SBRT was delivered using diverse platforms and dose-fractionation schemes, frequently in combination with ADT. Across studies, BC was generally favorable, though follow-up duration varied widely. Toxicity profiles were acceptable, with most reports describing predominantly grade 1–2 events and low rates of severe toxicity. Marked variability was observed in target volume definition, focal-boost strategies, urethra-sparing techniques, and the use of rectal spacers. Conclusions: Although current evidence is heterogeneous and largely derived from non-randomized studies, BC and toxicity outcomes are consistently promising, supporting SBRT as a potentially effective strategy for localized HRPC. Randomized prospective trials are needed to confirm these findings and refine optimal SBRT regimens and the role of ADT. This review received no funding. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 636 KB  
Article
Updated Analysis: Blue-Light Transurethral Resection and Biopsy of Bladder Cancer with Hexaminolevulinate in a Single UK Centre
by Anushree Kucheria, Elaina Gubbay, Aoife Meabh Linzell, Irfan Kar, Mohammad Alomari, Kimberley Chan, Christine Gan and Nikhil Vasdev
Uro 2026, 6(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/uro6010005 - 2 Feb 2026
Viewed by 239
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of blue-light cystoscopy (BLC) compared with white-light cystoscopy (WLC) in detecting carcinoma in situ (CIS) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and to assess recurrence-free survival (RFS) following BLC-HAL resection. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analysed 238 patients [...] Read more.
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of blue-light cystoscopy (BLC) compared with white-light cystoscopy (WLC) in detecting carcinoma in situ (CIS) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and to assess recurrence-free survival (RFS) following BLC-HAL resection. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analysed 238 patients undergoing BLC-HAL between July 2017 and July 2024. Seventy-two underwent primary BLC at initial resection, and 166 underwent BLC re-resection following WLC. Endpoints were CIS detection, tumour upstaging, and recurrence-free survival at 12 and 24 months using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results: Overall, malignancy was confirmed in 113/238 patients (47%). Detection was higher in the secondary arm (55%) compared with the primary arm (29%). In the primary arm, CIS was detected in 19% and MIBC in 24%. In the secondary arm, CIS increased from 18% on WLC to 38% with BLC (p = 0.001), with 26% detected only under blue light; 10% were upstaged to MIBC (p = 0.022). Over one-third of patients were reclassified into a higher EAU NMIBC risk group. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed 12- and 24-month RFS of 71% (95% CI: 36–92%) and 67% (95% CI: 35–88%) in the primary arm, and 62% (95% CI: 49–74%) and 63% (95% CI: 43–79%) in the secondary arm. Median RFS was not reached within 24 months. Conclusions: BLC significantly enhances CIS detection and identifies MIBC and higher-risk disease not seen on WLC, directly influencing patient management. Despite improved detection, recurrence-free survival remains modest, consistent with high-risk NMIBC, supporting guideline recommendations for routine use of BLC at TURBT, particularly in suspected CIS and high-grade disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Clinical Management of Urologic Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 275 KB  
Review
The Role of Nutraceuticals and Phytotherapy in Andrological Diseases: Tips and Tricks for Everyday Clinical Practice
by Andrea Abramo, Tommaso Ceccato, Simone Botti, Daniele Mattevi, Nicola Mondaini, Luca Gallelli, Truls E. Bjerklund Johansen, Michele Rizzo, Giovanni Liguori, Alessandro Zucchi, Alessandro Palmieri, Luca Boeri and Tommaso Cai
Uro 2026, 6(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/uro6010004 - 30 Jan 2026
Viewed by 211
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Interest in the use of nutraceuticals and phytotherapy for the management of andrological diseases has increased markedly in recent years. In particular, growing attention has been directed toward the treatment of patients affected by erectile dysfunction (ED), male infertility, chronic prostatitis/chronic [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Interest in the use of nutraceuticals and phytotherapy for the management of andrological diseases has increased markedly in recent years. In particular, growing attention has been directed toward the treatment of patients affected by erectile dysfunction (ED), male infertility, chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS), and induratio penis plastica (IPP). However, several areas of uncertainty remain. This narrative review aims to examine the role of nutraceuticals and phytotherapeutic agents in the management of andrological disorders. Methods: A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and EMBASE to identify relevant studies published over the past 25 years. Only articles published in English and involving adult populations were included in the analysis. Results: Nutraceuticals and phytotherapeutic compounds have been extensively investigated in the current literature, and certain formulations—particularly specific combinations—have been evaluated in high-quality studies. Conversely, other compounds lack sufficient scientific evidence and therefore should not be recommended in routine clinical practice. In the management of ED, the following compounds, administered either alone or in combination, have demonstrated clinically significant effects: Panax ginseng, Tribulus terrestris, L-arginine, and Withania somnifera. L-carnitine, combined with micronutrients, antioxidants, and various traditional herbal supplements, appears to be an effective therapeutic option for male infertility and subfertility. Pollen extracts play an important role in the management of CP/CPPS, while carnitine, coenzyme Q10, silymarin, bromelain, and curcumin show promising potential in the treatment of IPP. Conclusions: Nutraceuticals and phytotherapeutic agents may provide favorable outcomes in the management of andrological diseases. Although current evidence is encouraging, larger prospective studies employing standardized protocols and treatment schedules are required to confirm long-term efficacy and to optimize therapeutic strategies. Full article
10 pages, 421 KB  
Article
Differences in Quality of Life Related to Lower Urinary Tract, Bowel and Sexual Function After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with and Without Nerve-Sparing
by Danae Merentitis, Julia Neuenschwander, Beat Foerster, Hubert John, Lucas M. Bachmann, Nicolas S. Bodmer and Jure Tornic
Uro 2026, 6(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/uro6010003 - 4 Jan 2026
Viewed by 376
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare nerve-sparing (NS) and non-nerve-sparing (NNS) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) techniques used to treat localized prostate cancer. Numerous studies have evaluated the impact of NS techniques on patient-reported outcomes. However, there are unaddressed methodological [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare nerve-sparing (NS) and non-nerve-sparing (NNS) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) techniques used to treat localized prostate cancer. Numerous studies have evaluated the impact of NS techniques on patient-reported outcomes. However, there are unaddressed methodological issues making interpretation of results difficult. Therefore, we performed a comparison of the two techniques, accounting for methodological threats, including patient selection and confounding. Methods: We sampled 120 patients with similar disease burden who underwent RARP by the same surgeon, either with NS (n = 84) or NNS (n = 36) and assessed changes in lower urinary tract (LUT) function and bother, and bowel function/bother using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire and the six-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-6) survey at 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. Multivariable linear regression models were used to adjust for differences in age, preoperative PSA levels, pathological tumor stage and Gleason-score of patients receiving either NS or NNS. Results: At 6 weeks postoperatively, the NNS group had a significantly larger decrease in LUT function compared to the NS group (−17.42; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): −31.31, −3.53; p = 0.0145). At 12 months, both groups recovered substantially, and no group differences were observed (p > 0.9). No significant differences were observed between the NS and NNS groups for the EPIC bowel subscores, whereas the IIEF-6 showed borderline significance at 12 months. Conclusions: The results suggest a small impact of NS vs. NNS RARP on important patient-reported outcomes when controlling for tumor biology, surgeon skill, and patient characteristics. These results need to be confirmed by larger studies using similar sampling strategies and design considerations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Clinical Management of Urologic Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 403 KB  
Systematic Review
Effect of Preoperative Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Erectile Dysfunction After Radical Prostatectomy—A Systematic Review
by Vahid Mehrnoush, Dhruv Lalkiya, Nilanga Aki Bandara, Fatemeh Darsareh, Emmanuelle Rousseau, Sara Paziraei, Omar AbdelAziz, Waleed Shabana and Walid Shahrour
Uro 2026, 6(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/uro6010002 - 29 Dec 2025
Viewed by 1066
Abstract
Background: The societal effects of prostate cancer are profound. Prostate surgeries remain one of the main treatment modalities in the care of prostate cancer, and one of the common complications associated with this procedure is postoperative erectile dysfunction (ED). ED can have [...] Read more.
Background: The societal effects of prostate cancer are profound. Prostate surgeries remain one of the main treatment modalities in the care of prostate cancer, and one of the common complications associated with this procedure is postoperative erectile dysfunction (ED). ED can have a significant negative impact on men’s quality of life. The included articles from the last systematic review on effect of pre-operative pelvic floor muscle training (PPFMT) on ED after radical prostatectomy (RP) showed mixed findings but recommended the need for better exercise regime to witness better outcome. Therefore, this systematic review aims to provide further evidence from 2018 to understand the impact of PPFMT on postoperative ED and provide latest insights for future research. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Google Scholar from 2018 to June 2025, with the assistance of a subject-expert librarian. The inclusion criteria include articles which examine the effect of PPFMT on ED post prostatectomy from 2018 to June 2025 and have a minimum of two comparative groups (control vs. case). In addition, non-English articles were excluded from the study. The included articles were further assessed by two independent reviewers using Covidence, and disagreements were resolved by another independent reviewer. Results: A total of 344 articles were located and after removing duplicates, 250 articles remained. Following the abstract and title screening, nine articles were assessed for eligibility. Upon full-text review, three studies (two randomized control trials (RCTs) and one non-RCT) were ultimately included. The two RCTs showed no significant impact of PPFMT on post-operative ED. On the other hand, the non-RCT reported a significant difference in the post-operative ED rate in the case (5%) vs. control (48.6%) group. PPFMT was defined as ten pre-operative physiotherapy sessions in ten consecutive working days using anal biofeedback. Conclusions: The current study, since 2018, reveals mixed findings on the effect of PPFMT on postoperative ED. However, upon reviewing the evidence on the positive role of PPFMT in other fields (e.g., gynecology, general surgery), we noticed that the included studies may be lacking some major components like knowledge assessment, subjective and objective assessment, along with characteristics of sessions (number, duration, intensity, interval to surgery, and biofeedback) that play a crucial role in the effectiveness of the PPFMT in strengthening the pelvic floor muscle and improving the outcomes. Further research with robust designs is warranted. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 689 KB  
Article
Prostate Cancer Health Information on Google Using the Quality Evaluation Scoring Tool (Quest): A Cross-Sectional, Multilingual Analysis
by Nikola Jeker, Matthias Walter and Christian Wetterauer
Uro 2026, 6(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/uro6010001 - 19 Dec 2025
Viewed by 363
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The internet is a major source of health information, including prostate cancer, but the quality of such content is inconsistent and may influence patient decision-making. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of online prostate cancer information by language, location, and [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The internet is a major source of health information, including prostate cancer, but the quality of such content is inconsistent and may influence patient decision-making. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of online prostate cancer information by language, location, and user mode (“Logged off” vs. “Anonymous”) using the Google search engine. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study between 5 and 11 December 2022, evaluating Google search results for prostate cancer information across three European cities (Basel, Munich, and Paris) and three languages (English, German, and French) in both “Logged off” and “Anonymous” user modes. A total of 900 websites (450 per mode) were retrieved and classified as: (1) university, (2) hospital, (3) governmental/medical societies, (4) industrial/commercial/NGOs, or (5) other. Website quality was assessed using the validated QUEST, which evaluates authorship, attribution, conflicts of interest, currency, and evidence. Inclusion rates and QUEST scores were compared across languages, locations, and categories using Kruskal-Wallis tests with multiple comparison adjustments. A total of 900 websites (450 per mode) were retrieved in English, German, and French from searches conducted in Basel, Munich, and Paris. Websites were classified as: (1) university, (2) hospital, (3) governmental/medical societies, (4) industrial/commercial/NGOs, or (5) other. Quality was assessed using the QUEST, which evaluates authorship, attribution, conflicts of interest, currency, and evidence. Inclusion rates and QUEST scores were compared across languages, locations, and categories using Kruskal-Wallis tests with multiple comparison adjustments. Results: Inclusion rates were high for both modes (Logged off: 86%; Anonymous: 85%). Location-based differences were significant for Basel (p = 0.04) and Paris (p = 0.02), while language-based differences were not significant. In “Logged off” mode, Category 1 achieved the highest median QUEST score (18.3), followed by 3 (17.8), while Category 2 scored lowest (14.2). Differences were significant (χ2 = 50, p < 0.001), particularly between Categories 2 vs. 3 and 2 vs. 4 (p < 0.001). Similar patterns were observed in the “Anonymous” mode. Conclusions: Online prostate cancer information varies substantially in quality. French-language sites, despite high inclusion rates, were of lower quality, while English and German content more frequently met high-quality standards. University websites were the most reliable, hospital websites the least. Language, location, and site type influence the accessibility and reliability of online prostate cancer information. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop