nutrients-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Nutritional and Metabolic Support in Critical Illness: Mechanisms, Monitoring, and Clinical Outcomes

A special issue of Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643). This special issue belongs to the section "Clinical Nutrition".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 25 September 2026 | Viewed by 1657

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Pathophysiology, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Târgu Mureș, Gheorghe Marinescu Street No. 38, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania
Interests: pathophysiology; neurocritical care; neurological complications in critical illness; diabetes mellitus; glucose metabolism; metabolic diseases; stress hyperglycemia; inflammation and metabolic dysfunction; critical care medicine; clinical nutrition; metabolic monitoring; neuroinflammation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Târgu Mures, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania
Interests: critical care medicine; sepsis and septic shock; acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); healthcare-associated infections (HAIs); artificial nutrition in critically ill patients
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Critical illness is characterized by dynamic and heterogeneous metabolic phenotypes involving hypercatabolism, insulin resistance, mitochondrial dysfunction, systemic inflammation, and accelerated skeletal muscle degradation. Acute sarcopenia and ICU-acquired weakness are increasingly recognized as central determinants of short- and long-term outcomes, including prolonged mechanical ventilation, infection risk, functional decline, and mortality. However, current nutritional strategies often rely on standardized protocols rather than individualized metabolic profiling.

Major unresolved questions include the identification of metabolic phenotypes that predict differential responses to nutritional interventions; the role of indirect calorimetry, nitrogen balance assessment, and muscle imaging (CT, ultrasound) in guiding therapy; optimal protein dosing to attenuate muscle loss; and the integration of biomarkers such as CRP, glucose variability, inflammatory cytokines, and markers of muscle turnover into clinical decision-making. The timing of parenteral nutrition, the modulation of energy delivery, immunonutrition strategies, and targeted micronutrient supplementation remain areas of ongoing debate.

This Special Issue will advance precise metabolic support in critically ill adults by integrating mechanistic insights with clinical outcomes. We welcome randomized clinical trials, observational studies, translational research, and systematic reviews focusing on metabolic monitoring, sarcopenia assessment, personalized protein–energy strategies, and long-term functional recovery.

By bridging metabolic phenotyping with outcome-driven nutrition therapy, this Special Issue will redefine individualized nutritional care in intensive care medicine.

Dr. Adina Stoian
Dr. Mircea Stoian
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Nutrients is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • critical care nutrition
  • nutrition support
  • precision metabolic support
  • sarcopenia in critical illness
  • neuromuscular dysfunction
  • metabolic monitoring
  • muscle mass and functional recovery

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 307 KB  
Article
Perceptions of Artificial Nutrition and Hydration at the End of Life Among Healthcare Professionals, Medical Students, and Lay Respondents: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Survey
by Mircea Stoian, Dorin Bica, Horatiu Cioloboc, Nicolae Demenciuc, Andrei Manea, Sergio Rares Bandila, Adina Stoian and Leonard Azamfirei
Nutrients 2026, 18(9), 1404; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18091404 - 29 Apr 2026
Viewed by 764
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Artificial Nutrition and Hydration (ANH) at the end of life remains a clinically and ethically complex intervention. Although international guidelines exist, data regarding the awareness of them and their perceived applicability across different population groups remain limited. This study aimed to [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Artificial Nutrition and Hydration (ANH) at the end of life remains a clinically and ethically complex intervention. Although international guidelines exist, data regarding the awareness of them and their perceived applicability across different population groups remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare perceptions and attitudes regarding ANH among healthcare professionals, medical students, and lay respondents. Methods: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based comparative survey was conducted between July 2025 and March 2026, including 470 respondents (338 healthcare professionals, 46 medical students, and 86 lay respondents). The survey assessed perceptions of ANH, factors influencing decision-making, and familiarity with clinical guidelines and legislation. Results: General perceptions regarding ANH were broadly similar across groups. Significant differences were observed for the importance assigned to estimated life expectancy (p < 0.001) and family opinion (p = 0.017). Associations were identified between study group and opinions on clinical guidelines (χ2(6) = 16.366, p = 0.012) and legislation (χ2(6) = 14.712, p = 0.023), with lack of knowledge more frequent among lay respondents and students. Within healthcare professionals, physicians and nurses showed significantly different responses regarding guidelines (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this cross-sectional survey, perceptions of ANH at the end of life were largely shared, but differed in relation to prognostic factors, family involvement, and awareness of guidelines and legislation, suggesting the presence of relevant knowledge gaps in end-of-life decision-making. Full article
Back to TopTop