Advances in Mathematical Optimization in Operational Research

A special issue of Mathematics (ISSN 2227-7390). This special issue belongs to the section "D: Statistics and Operational Research".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2025 | Viewed by 2293

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Business, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Interests: operations; supply chain management; inventory management; sustainable operations
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Business, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Interests: supply chain; operations

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to announce a Special Issue on “Advances in Mathematical Optimization in Operational Research”, to be published in Mathematics. This Special Issue aims to provide a platform for researchers, practitioners, and academics to present their latest findings and advancements in the field of mathematical optimization and its applications in operational research.

Mathematical optimization has long been a cornerstone of operational research, enabling the efficient allocation of resources, the optimization of complex systems, and the development of robust decision-making processes. With the increasing complexity and interconnectedness of modern systems, the need for innovative optimization techniques and their effective applications have never been more critical.

We invite original research articles and reviews on topics related (but not limited) to the following:

  • Optimization in logistics and supply chain management;
  • Energy systems optimization;
  • Healthcare operations optimization;
  • Transportation and traffic optimization;
  • Manufacturing and production optimization;
  • Real-world applications of operational research;
  • Integration of optimization with other fields such as data science, engineering, and economics.

Submission Guidelines:

  • All submissions must be original and not under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers).
  • Manuscripts should be well formatted and written in good English.
  • A detailed guide for authors is available on the Mathematics website.
  • Submission deadline: 31 December 2025

We look forward to receiving your contributions and to showcasing the latest advancements in mathematical optimization in operational research. Together, we can drive forward the development of this critical field and contribute to solving real-world challenges through innovative optimization techniques.

Prof. Dr. Ke Fu
Dr. Jiayan Xu
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Mathematics is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • optimization
  • operational research
  • operations and supply chain management
  • real-world applications

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

36 pages, 1030 KB  
Article
Supply Chain Financing Strategies for Capital-Constrained Manufacturers with Blockchain Adoption
by Shuai Feng, Jing Liu and Jiqiong Liu
Mathematics 2025, 13(18), 3020; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13183020 - 18 Sep 2025
Viewed by 234
Abstract
This study investigates the adoption of blockchain technology (BCT) and financing decisions for capital-constrained manufacturers in live streaming supply chains, where product quality information is asymmetric. Although BCT can improve information transparency and consumer trust, its high cost hinders widespread adoption. Based on [...] Read more.
This study investigates the adoption of blockchain technology (BCT) and financing decisions for capital-constrained manufacturers in live streaming supply chains, where product quality information is asymmetric. Although BCT can improve information transparency and consumer trust, its high cost hinders widespread adoption. Based on supply chain financing theory, this research uses a game-theoretic model with linear demand to analyze manufacturers’ BCT adoption and financing strategies under different capital conditions, comparing four scenarios: non-adoption and non-financing (NN), adoption and non-financing (NB), adoption with loan financing from Multi-Channel Networks (MCNs) (LB), and adoption with investment cost-sharing financing from MCNs (CB). Results show that BCT adoption increases market demand and manufacturer profits. The LB strategy is optimal when the manufacturer has sufficient capital and the MCN has a low-investment cost-sharing ratio. In contrast, CB is preferred when the MCN bears a higher share of investment costs, regardless of the manufacturer’s capital. The manufacturer’s financing choice also influences MCN cooperation: MCNs favor CB under high commission rates and low cost-sharing ratios but prefer NB if investment costs are high. These results suggest that manufacturers should select financing based on their capital and cost-sharing terms, while MCNs can adjust cooperation strategies according to commission rates and cost-sharing levels. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Mathematical Optimization in Operational Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 946 KB  
Article
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Standardized Sales Incentive Contracts Under Agent Heterogeneity
by Ning Wang, Housheng Duan and Lang Ning
Mathematics 2025, 13(18), 2968; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13182968 - 13 Sep 2025
Viewed by 264
Abstract
Salespeople, as the core executors of product distribution, form a classical principal–agent relationship with the firm. A substantial body of academic research has focused on how firms can develop optimal sales incentive contracts in various scenarios to achieve precise and effective motivation of [...] Read more.
Salespeople, as the core executors of product distribution, form a classical principal–agent relationship with the firm. A substantial body of academic research has focused on how firms can develop optimal sales incentive contracts in various scenarios to achieve precise and effective motivation of their salespeople. However, in sales management practice, firms face a tradeoff between management precision and control costs. Therefore, instead of tailoring contracts for each individual, they tend to adopt standardized incentive contracts for the broader range of salespeople. This practice has called the effectiveness of standardized incentive schemes into question. These questions have received limited attention in prior research, yet they hold significant theoretical and practical relevance for optimizing sales incentive mechanisms and improving managerial effectiveness. This study underscores the critical role of salesperson heterogeneity in shaping the effectiveness of standardized incentive contracts. By constructing game-theoretical models of standardized sales incentive contracts in two scenarios and analyzing how heterogeneous salespeople respond to these contracts, the study finds that heterogeneity weakens the incentive effectiveness of standardized contracts. To address this challenge, we propose two practical evaluation methods to help firms assess and adjust both the degree of salesperson heterogeneity and the actual effectiveness of standardized incentive contracts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Mathematical Optimization in Operational Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2694 KB  
Article
Appointment Scheduling Considering Outpatient Unpunctuality Under Telemedicine Services
by Wei Chen, Liang Chen, Xiaoxiao Shen, Yutao Zhang and Xiulai Wang
Mathematics 2025, 13(16), 2591; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13162591 - 13 Aug 2025
Viewed by 422
Abstract
Patient unpunctuality substantially complicates appointment scheduling in integrated telemedicine–traditional outpatient systems. The current research frequently ignores behavioral distinctions between telemedicine patients and outpatients, while neglecting to measure the intangible burden on physicians from service mode switches. To address these gaps, this study incorporates [...] Read more.
Patient unpunctuality substantially complicates appointment scheduling in integrated telemedicine–traditional outpatient systems. The current research frequently ignores behavioral distinctions between telemedicine patients and outpatients, while neglecting to measure the intangible burden on physicians from service mode switches. To address these gaps, this study incorporates patient heterogeneity and introduces two novel cost metrics. Specifically, we implement penalties for service-mode switching and penalties for consecutive telemedicine sessions. We develop a Stochastic Mixed-Integer Programming (SMIP) model. This stochastic model is transformed into a deterministic Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) formulation via Sample Average Approximation (SAA). Linearization techniques enhance computational efficiency. In numerical experiments, the dual-penalty model yields balanced schedules with moderate patient mix, reducing physician overtime by 62.5% and service mode switches by 55% compared to baseline approaches. Sensitivity analysis confirms that narrowing outpatient unpunctuality ranges significantly reduces patient waiting and overtime, while raising telemedicine patient proportions bolsters system stability at the cost of increased physician idle time. These insights offer actionable guidance for healthcare institutions managing integrated online–offline services. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Mathematical Optimization in Operational Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 7290 KB  
Article
Freight Rate Decisions in Shipping Logistics Service Supply Chains Considering Blockchain Adoption Risk Preferences
by Yujing Chen, Jiao Mo and Bin Yang
Mathematics 2025, 13(15), 2339; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13152339 - 22 Jul 2025
Viewed by 580
Abstract
This paper explores the strategic implications of technological adoption within shipping logistics service supply chains, with a particular focus on blockchain technology (BCT). When integrating new technologies, supply chain stakeholders evaluate associated risks alongside complexity, profitability, and operational challenges, which influence their strategic [...] Read more.
This paper explores the strategic implications of technological adoption within shipping logistics service supply chains, with a particular focus on blockchain technology (BCT). When integrating new technologies, supply chain stakeholders evaluate associated risks alongside complexity, profitability, and operational challenges, which influence their strategic behaviors. Anchored in the concept of technology trust, this study examines how different risk preferences affect BCT adoption decisions and freight rate strategies. A game-theoretic model is constructed using a mean-variance utility framework to analyze interactions between shipping companies and freight forwarders under three adoption scenarios: no adoption (NN), partial adoption (BN), and full adoption (BB). The results indicate that risk-seeking agents are more likely to adopt BCT early but face greater freight rate volatility in the initial stages. As the technology matures, strategic variability declines and the influence of adaptability on pricing becomes less pronounced. In contrast, risk-neutral and risk-averse participants tend to adopt more conservatively, resulting in slower but more stable pricing dynamics. These findings offer new insights into how technology trust and risk attitudes shape strategic decisions in digitally transforming supply chains. The study also provides practical implications for differentiated pricing strategies, BCT adoption incentives, and collaborative policy design among logistics stakeholders. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Mathematical Optimization in Operational Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 732 KB  
Article
On Minimizing Influences Under Multi-Attribute Models
by Bo-Yao Wang
Mathematics 2025, 13(13), 2064; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13132064 - 21 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 247
Abstract
In classical transferable-utility models, components typically participate in an all-or-nothing manner and are evaluated under a single criterion. This study generalizes such models by allowing each component to engage through multiple acting measures and by incorporating multiple evaluating attributes simultaneously. We introduce two [...] Read more.
In classical transferable-utility models, components typically participate in an all-or-nothing manner and are evaluated under a single criterion. This study generalizes such models by allowing each component to engage through multiple acting measures and by incorporating multiple evaluating attributes simultaneously. We introduce two influence-based assessments, the stable min value and the minimal self-stable value, to evaluate fair assessments of minimal impact across multi-attribute multi-choice environments. These values are rigorously defined via axiomatic characterizations grounded in minimal influence behavior, where coalitions select activity levels that jointly minimize systemic effects. A key theoretical contribution is the identification of a unique, 0-normalized, and efficient multi-attribute potential function corresponding to the minimal self-stable value. The proposed framework enables structured and interpretable evaluation of influence in complex cooperative systems with heterogeneous participation and conflicting objectives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Mathematical Optimization in Operational Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop