materials-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Biomaterials in Conservative Dentistry

A special issue of Materials (ISSN 1996-1944). This special issue belongs to the section "Biomaterials".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 May 2022) | Viewed by 7156

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Head of Departament of Conservative Dentistry with Endodontics Medical University of Silesia, 41-902 Bytom, Poland
Interests: dental materials; biomaterials; endodontic treatment; dental hypersensitivity

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Dental biomaterials are evolving every year, from biologically inert materials to bioactive materials and following trends toward cellular and molecular responses. The ideal dental biomaterial is characterized by a favorable biological response leading to regeneration of lost tissue. Biomaterial is used to produce devices that replace a part or function of the teeth and periodontium structures in a safe, reliable, economical and physiologically acceptable manner.

It is my pleasure to invite you to submit a manuscript for this Special Issue "Biomaterials in Conservative Dentistry". Full papers, communications, and reviews are all welcome.

Prof. Dr. Marta Tanasiewicz
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Materials is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • biomaterials
  • bioactive materials
  • bioresorbable materials
  • tissue regeneration
  • bioinert
  • ceramics
  • bioglass
  • hydroxyapatite mineral trioxide aggregate
  • biodentine
  • dental hypersensitivity

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 1899 KiB  
Article
Biodegradation of a Magnesium Alloy Fixation Screw Used in a Guided Bone Regeneration Model in Beagle Dogs
by Patrick Rider, Željka Perić Kačarević, Akiva Elad, Daniel Rothamel, Gerrit Sauer, Fabien Bornert, Peter Windisch, Dávid Hangyási, Balint Molnar, Bernhard Hesse, Michel Assad and Frank Witte
Materials 2022, 15(12), 4111; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124111 - 9 Jun 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 2717
Abstract
Nowadays, the most commonly used fixation systems are non-resorbable, but new resorbable magnesium alloy fixation screws have been introduced recently. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the magnesium fixation screw and the commonly used non-resorbable titanium screw in an animal [...] Read more.
Nowadays, the most commonly used fixation systems are non-resorbable, but new resorbable magnesium alloy fixation screws have been introduced recently. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the magnesium fixation screw and the commonly used non-resorbable titanium screw in an animal model. Four 3-wall defect sites were covered with collagen membranes in the mandible of twenty beagle dogs (two sites on the left and two on the right). Each membrane was fixed with either four magnesium screws or four titanium screws. Post-operative follow-up revealed the expected observations such as transient inflammation and pain. Both groups showed a good healing response, with no differences between groups. Micro-CT analysis showed no significant difference between groups in terms of BV/TV or soft tissue volume. The void volume in the magnesium fixation screw group continued to decrease on average between the different timepoints, but not significantly. Furthermore, a gradual progression of the degradation process of the magnesium screws was observed in the same group. Magnesium screws and titanium screws showed equal performance in tissue regeneration according to GBR principles. An additional advantage of magnesium screws is their resorbable nature, which eliminates the need for a second surgical step to remove the screws. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomaterials in Conservative Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1947 KiB  
Article
Collagen Cross-Linking Lignin Improves the Bonding Performance of Etch-and-Rinse Adhesives to Dentin
by Diego Martins de Paula, Diego Lomonaco, Antônio Moisés Parente da Ponte, Karen Evellin Cordeiro, Madiana Magalhães Moreira, Massimo Giovarruscio, Salvatore Sauro and Victor Pinheiro Feitosa
Materials 2022, 15(9), 3218; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093218 - 29 Apr 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1890
Abstract
To evaluate the biomodification ability of lignin used as pre-treatment in human dentin before the application of an etch-and-rinse adhesive. Experimental hydroethanolic solutions with different cross-linking agents were used: 6.5% proanthocyanidins (PAC, from grape-seed extract); 2% cardanol (CARD, from cashew-nut shell liquid); lignin [...] Read more.
To evaluate the biomodification ability of lignin used as pre-treatment in human dentin before the application of an etch-and-rinse adhesive. Experimental hydroethanolic solutions with different cross-linking agents were used: 6.5% proanthocyanidins (PAC, from grape-seed extract); 2% cardanol (CARD, from cashew-nut shell liquid); lignin (LIG, from eucalyptus) at 1, 2 or 4% concentrations. The negative control (NC) was ethanol 50 v%. Extracted molars were prepared, and dentin microtensile bond strength (μTBS) was evaluated after 24 h water storage or 10,000 thermocycling aging. Further specimens were processed for SEM nanoleakage, micropermeability confocal microscopy evaluation and in situ degree of conversion (DC) through micro-Raman spectroscopy. Demineralized dentin sticks were submitted to a three-point bending test to evaluate the elastic modulus (E) before and after 1 min biomodification using the tested solutions. Moreover, it was also evaluated the mass changes and hydroxyproline (HYP) release after 4-weeks of water storage. Vibrational collagen crosslinking identification was evaluated through micro-Raman spectroscopy. The results were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). A significant reduction in μTBS was observed in groups NC (p < 0.001) and CARD (p = 0.026). LIG-4% showed no significant reduction in μTBS after aging (p = 0.022). Nanoleakage micrographs showed hybrid layer protection with all agents, but reduced micropermeability was attained only with lignin. Polymerization was negatively affected in the presence of all tested cross-linking agents, except LIG-1%. Lignin and cardanol increased the dentin E values, but only lignin reduced the mass loss in dentin specimens. Effective collagen crosslinking (1117 cm−1 and 1235 cm−1) was detected for all agents. HYP release was significantly lower with LIG-1% than NC (p < 0.001). Lignin was able to perform collagen cross-linking and prevent the degradation of unprotected dentin collagen, thereby improving the bonding performance of the composite restorations performed in this study. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomaterials in Conservative Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 10991 KiB  
Article
Effect of Different Root Canal Irrigant Solutions on the Release of Dentin-Growth Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Sandro Tavares, Andrea Pintor, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Mourão, Marcela Magno, Pietro Montemezzi, Roberto Sacco, Gutemberg Alves and Miriam Zaccaro Scelza
Materials 2021, 14(19), 5829; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195829 - 5 Oct 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1968
Abstract
Irrigant solutions are used to promote dentin-growth factors (GF) release for regenerative endodontics. This review aimed to evaluate the reports comparing the release of GFs using different root canal irrigant solutions. Eligible studies compared the in vitro GF release in human teeth after [...] Read more.
Irrigant solutions are used to promote dentin-growth factors (GF) release for regenerative endodontics. This review aimed to evaluate the reports comparing the release of GFs using different root canal irrigant solutions. Eligible studies compared the in vitro GF release in human teeth after the use of at least two distinct solutions. A search was conducted on Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Lilacs on 11 August 2021. Risk of bias was assessed using SciRAP. Study characteristics and quantitative data were extracted, and meta-analyses were performed for the mean difference (95% confidence interval) of the release of transforming growth factors Beta 1 (TGF-β1) by EDTA compared to other irrigants. Of sixteen eligible studies, eight were included in quantitative analysis. ELISA assays showed higher TGF-β1 release from 10% EDTA compared to 10% citric acid (p < 0.00001). Immunogold assays showed higher levels of TGF-β1 for 17% EDTA (p < 0.00001) compared to 10% citric acid. GRADE identified a low to very low certainty of evidence. These results point to an increased release of TGF-β1 in dentin treated with EDTA. The high heterogeneity and very low certainty of the evidence demand further studies before EDTA indication as a better irrigant for regenerative endodontics. Registration: CRD42020160871 (PROSPERO). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomaterials in Conservative Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop