You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
  • 13 daysTime to First Decision

LabMed

LabMed is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal devoted to laboratory medicine and clinical chemistry published quarterly online by MDPI.

All Articles (28)

Usefulness of Dried Blood Spot Samples for Syphilis Screening

  • Victoria González Soler,
  • Gema Fernández-Rivas and
  • Héctor Martínez Riveros
  • + 7 authors

Dried blood spots (DBSs) are a practical tool for diagnosing infectious diseases, especially in remote or resource-limited settings. This study assessed the efficacy of DBS-based serological assays for syphilis screening. EDTA blood samples from 171 syphilis-seropositive and 122 seronegative individuals were used to prepare DBSs by spotting whole blood onto filter paper. After drying, 12 mm disks were punched, incubated overnight in buffered solution, and centrifuged. Syphilis serological screening was conducted using the Liaison® Treponema Screen assay, Macro-Vue™ Reagin Plasma Rapid (RPR) card test, and Dual Path Platform (DPP) Syphilis Screen and Confirm test. The Liaison® assay demonstrated 100% sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) with an optimized cut-off. The nontreponemal RPR test showed very low sensitivity (2.9%) on DBS but perfect specificity (100%). The DPP test for treponemal antibodies achieved high sensitivity (92.1%) and specificity (98.2%) with microreader adjustment. Visual reading of the DPP test had variable accuracy, with sensitivity reaching 100% but lower specificity (42.1%). Nontreponemal antibody detection by DPP showed moderate sensitivity and specificity. Although nontreponemal testing requires refinement, DBS testing combined with point-of-care tests like DPP holds promise for expanding syphilis screening accessibility and decentralization globally, particularly in resource-constrained environments.

4 November 2025

Workflow for serological syphilis screening on DBS samples.

Laboratory Science Students’ Reflections on Clinical Educators and Clinical Training Experiences

  • Shelley Robin Latchem,
  • Benedict K. Jikong and
  • Heather L. Phillips
  • + 1 author

A 39-question survey targeting recent graduates was deployed by the American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) to its membership nationwide by email. Participants were prompted to reflect on clinical educators from whom they had learned the most and least. This survey was open for approximately six weeks with 177 respondents. Participants included medical laboratory scientists (71.8%), medical laboratory technicians (21.8%), phlebotomists (4.5%), blood bank specialists (0.9%) and laboratory administration (0.9%). This paper focuses on three survey questions. The first question asked participants to reflect on clinical educators from whom they had learned the most and explain why. Themes included teaching ability (37.2%), engagement (25.6%), passion (18.6%) and knowledge (16.3%). The second question asked participants to reflect on educators they had learned the least from and explain why. Themes included teaching challenges (48.8%), disengagement (29.3%) and unprofessionalism (19.5%). The third question asked about barriers to clinical training. Main themes included staffing shortages (25.8%), COVID-19-related issues (12.9%) and work culture (12.9%). Little research has been published on the student perspective of clinical training in laboratory sciences. This research provides insight into what students consider helpful in their training and what hinders their learning.

30 October 2025

Timely reporting of microbiological results is critical for clinical decision-making, particularly in pediatric hospitals where delays can significantly impact outcomes. Despite advances in laboratory automation, workflow inefficiencies and resistance to change remain barriers to improvement in Latin America. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of implementing a Kaizen-based change management strategy on reducing turnaround time (TAT) in the microbiology laboratory of Hospital Roberto del Río, Santiago, Chile. We conducted a prospective, pre–post intervention study focusing on blood culture processing. The baseline period (July 2022) included 961 cultures processed with the BacT/ALERT® 3D system. A Kaizen/LEAN intervention was designed, comprising workflow redesign, staff training, and installation of the BACT/ALERT® Virtuo® (bioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) continuous-loading blood culture system. The intervention engaged all technical and professional staff in a five-day Kaizen immersion, followed by eight months of monitoring. Outcomes were assessed by comparing TAT for positive blood cultures before and after implementation (June 2023, 496 samples). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test, with p < 0.05 considered significant. The intervention achieved a median reduction in TAT from 68.22 h (IQR 56.14–88.59) pre-intervention to 51.52 h (IQR 41.17–66.57) post-intervention, corresponding to a 24.48% improvement (p < 0.001), surpassing the 20% target. Time to preliminary Gram reporting also decreased, and workflow standardization enhanced staff productivity and culture validation frequency. Implementation of Kaizen principles in a pediatric microbiology laboratory significantly reduced blood culture TAT and improved workflow efficiency. Beyond technological upgrades, active staff engagement and structured change management were key to success. These findings support the applicability of Kaizen-based interventions to optimize laboratory performance in resource-constrained public healthcare systems.

25 October 2025

Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) continue to pose a major global health threat, particularly among vulnerable populations. These infections often present with similar clinical symptoms, complicating accurate diagnosis and facilitating unmonitored transmissions. Genomic surveillance has emerged as an invaluable tool for pathogen identification and monitoring of such infectious pathogens; however, its implementation is frequently limited by high costs. The widespread use of high-throughput sequencing during the COVID-19 pandemic has created an opportunity to repurpose existing genomic platforms for broader respiratory virus surveillance. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of adapting the Illumina COVIDSeq assay—initially designed for SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome sequencing—for use with Influenza A/B, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), and Rhinovirus. Positive control samples were processed using two approaches for library preparation: four virus-specific multiple workflows and a combined rapid workflow. Both workflows incorporated pathogen-specific primers for amplification and followed the Illumina COVIDSeq protocol for library preparation and sequencing. Sequencing quality metrics were analysed, including Phred scores, read length distribution, and coverage depth. The study did not identify significant differences in genome coverage and genetic diversity metrics between workflows. Genome Detective consistently identified the correct species across both methods. The findings of this study demonstrate that the COVIDSeq assay can be effectively adapted for multi-pathogen genomic surveillance and that the combined rapid workflow can offer a cost- and labour-efficient alternative with minimal compromise to data quality.

4 October 2025

News & Conferences

Issues

Open for Submission

Editor's Choice

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

XFacebookLinkedIn
LabMed - ISSN 2813-9038Creative Common CC BY license