Journal of Respiration

Background: The incidence of iatrogenic pneumothorax (IPTX) following transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLCB) ranges from 1.4% to 20.2%. While chest X-ray (CXR) is the standard imaging modality to exclude IPTX, thoracic ultrasound (TUS) has demonstrated superior accuracy in detecting pneumothorax across various contexts. This study evaluates TUS as a reliable alternative to routine CXR for ruling out IPTX after TBLCB. Methods: A retrospective observational study included 51 patients undergoing ambulatory TBLCB. Pre- and post-TBLCB TUS were performed. CXR was reserved for cases where TUS findings were inconclusive (absence of sliding lung [SL] and seashore sign [SS] in any lung zones) or if patients exhibited symptoms or signs of IPTX. Results: TUS findings were concordant in 44 (86.1%) patients, of whom 42 (95.5%) did not require CXR. Two patients (4.5%) with symptomatic IPTX were identified and managed. Among the seven patients (13.7%) requiring CXR due to inconclusive TUS or symptoms, five (71.4%) were negative for IPTX, and two (28.6%) had asymptomatic IPTX. Conclusion: Our TUS protocol effectively ruled out clinically significant IPTX, eliminating routine CXR in 95.5% of patients. TUS is a safe alternative to CXR post-TBLCB, with CXR reserved for inconclusive TUS findings or symptomatic cases.

Background: Triple therapy (long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), long-acting beta agonists (LABAs) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs)) is a recommended treatment for moderate-to-severe asthma at GINA Steps 4 and 5. However, little is known about the acceptance and use of triple therapy in everyday practice. The EU-LAMA Survey assessed specialists’ knowledge and views on triple therapy in daily practice. Methods: A 19-question survey was administered to 630 pulmonologists, allergologists, general practitioners, and internal medicine specialists in Poland (58%), Greece (27%), Sweden (6.3%), Slovenia (5.4%), and Austria (3.7%) using a dedicated online platform and computer-assisted web interviews. Results: The majority of the physicians were pulmonologists (59%), followed by allergologists (15.7%). For uncontrolled asthma at GINA Step 4, 81% of the respondents preferred increasing the ICS dose to the maximum level, whereas 76% opted to add LAMAs to medium-dose ICSs. At GINA Step 5, 79% of the respondents chose LAMAs first, followed by biological therapy (51%). Oral corticosteroids were favored over increasing the ICS dose and adding LAMAs. Triple therapy was mostly administered in one inhaler (70% and 82% at GINA Steps 4 and 5, respectively). Barriers to the use of LAMAs included a lack of reimbursement (31%), unclear guidelines (24%), lack of experience (18%), insufficient evidence (13%), fear of step-up regimens (10%), and the ease of increasing ICS doses (9%). Conclusion: Many physicians continue to rely on oral corticosteroids at GINA Steps 4 and 5 and infrequently refer patients to triple therapy or biological treatments at GINA Step 5.

Introduction: Radon is a radioactive noble gas formed from uranium decay in the Earth’s crust. The most significant isotope, 222Rn, emits alpha particles capable of damaging lung tissue and inducing cancer. Radon exposure is affected by geophysical and building characteristics and is recognized as a Group 1 carcinogen by the IARC. Despite regulatory thresholds (e.g., EURATOM standards), health risks remain. Various mitigation methods aim to reduce indoor radon exposure and its impact. Materials and Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched up to 28 February 2025, using a defined string. Studies with original data on radon exposure and lung cancer risk or mitigation efficacy were included. Independent screening and quality assessment (Newcastle–Ottawa Scale) were conducted by multiple reviewers. Results: Of the 457 studies identified, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Eleven of these investigated the link between indoor radon and lung cancer risk, and three evaluated mitigation strategies. Radon levels were commonly measured using passive alpha track detectors. Levels varied depending on geographical location, season, building design and ventilation, these were higher in rural homes and during the colder months. Case–control studies consistently found an increased lung cancer risk with elevated radon exposure, especially among smokers. Effective mitigation methods included sub-slab depressurisation and balanced ventilation systems, which significantly reduced indoor radon concentrations. Adenocarcinoma was the most common lung cancer subtype in non-smokers, whereas squamous and small cell carcinomas were more prevalent in smokers exposed to radon. Discussion and Conclusions: This review confirms the robust association between indoor radon exposure and lung cancer. Risks persist even below regulatory limits and are amplified by smoking. While mitigation techniques are effective, their application remains uneven across regions. Stronger public education, building codes, and targeted interventions are needed, particularly in high-risk areas. To inform future prevention and policy, further research should seek to clarify radon’s molecular role in lung carcinogenesis, especially among non-smokers.