Clinical Treatment and Management of Orthopedic Trauma

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Orthopedics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 25 October 2024 | Viewed by 2351

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Surgical Clinic II, Aschaffenburg-Alzenau Hospital, 63739 Aschaffenburg, Germany
Interests: pelvic and spine surgery; traumatology; trauma network; seriously injured care; telemedicine; augmented reality
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
Interests: knee; ACL; rotatory instability; osteotomy; ligament; meniscus; biomechanics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue of the Journal of Clinical Medicine titled ‘Clinical Treatment and Management of Orthopedic Trauma’ will be a comprehensive collection of research and articles focusing on advancements in the field of orthopedic trauma. It aims to bring together expert perspectives and cutting-edge studies to provide valuable insights into the diagnosis, treatment, and management of various musculoskeletal injuries. The included research will cover a wide range of topics, including fracture management, clinical surgeries, and rehabilitation strategies. Novel approaches such as minimally invasive surgeries, advanced imaging technologies, and regenerative therapies will be discussed, highlighting their potential in improving patient outcomes and enhancing recovery.

We invite researchers in the field of musculoskeletal injuries to submit their original research work to this Special Issue which will provide a comprehensive understanding of orthopedic trauma from a wide spectrum of perspectives.

Prof. Dr. René R.H. Hartensuer
Dr. Elmar Herbst
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • musculoskeletal
  • orthopedics
  • rehabilitation
  • pain
  • trauma
  • osteoporosis
  • fractures

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

12 pages, 1623 KiB  
Article
Patient-Reported Outcomes following Tibial Plateau Fractures: Mid- to Short-Term Implications for Knee Function and Activity Level
by Claas Neidlein, Julius Watrinet, Robert Pätzold, Daniel P. Berthold, Wolf Christian Prall, Wolfgang Böcker, Boris Michael Holzapfel, Julian Fürmetz and Markus Bormann
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(8), 2327; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082327 - 17 Apr 2024
Viewed by 384
Abstract
Background: Patients with complex proximal tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) tend to overestimate the prognosis of their injury, potentially due to factors such as a limited understanding, optimism, and the influence of the pain intensity. Understanding the reasons behind this misperception is crucial [...] Read more.
Background: Patients with complex proximal tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) tend to overestimate the prognosis of their injury, potentially due to factors such as a limited understanding, optimism, and the influence of the pain intensity. Understanding the reasons behind this misperception is crucial for healthcare providers to effectively communicate with patients and establish realistic expectations for treatment outcomes. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of TPFs, with a particular focus on patient-reported outcome measures concerning functional recovery, pain levels, and overall satisfaction with treatment. The authors aim to provide valuable insights into the realistic expectations and potential limitations that patients may encounter during their recovery journey. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, all surgically treated TPFs between January 2014 and December 2019 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included. Several patient-reported outcome measures were obtained, including the International Knee documentation Committee Score (IKDC), Lyholm score, Tegner score, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Fractures were classified according to Schatzker, and then subgrouped into simple (Schatzker I–III) and complex (Schatzker IV–VI) fractures. Results: A total of 54 patients (mean age 51.1 ± 11.9 years, 59.3% female) with a mean follow-up time of 3.9 years were included. Schatzker II fractures were present in 48% (n = 26) of the cases, with Schatzker III in 6% (n = 3), Schatzker IV fractures in 6% (n = 3), and Schatker VI fractures in 41% (n = 22) of the cases. All outcome scores showed a significant improvement between the first year after surgery and the last follow-up (mean: 3.9 years). Simple fractures showed significantly lower patient-reported outcomes when compared to the preinjury state; however, good to excellent results were observed. Patient-reported outcomes of complex fractures showed no significant changes in the study period with good to excellent results. When it comes to the Lysholm score, there were no significant differences in the outcome between simple and complex fractures. Furthermore, there was a return-to-sports rate of 100%, with high rates of changing sporting activity in 25% (simple fractures) and 45% in complex fractures. Conclusions: The data from this study showed that both simple and complex tibial plateau fractures show favorable outcomes at the midterm follow-up, and that injury severity does not correlate with worse results. While patients may tend to overestimate the recovery speed, this research highlights the importance of long-term follow-up, demonstrating a substantial improvement between one year post-surgery and the final evaluation. Return-to-sports rates were high, with adjustments needed for certain activities. However, patients should recognize the need to shift to lower-impact sports and the lengthy recovery process. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Treatment and Management of Orthopedic Trauma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 529 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Follow-Up after Iliosacral Screw Fixation of Unstable Pelvic Ring Fractures
by Josef Stolberg-Stolberg, Moritz F. Lodde, Dominik Seiß, Jeanette Köppe, René Hartensuer, Michael J. Raschke and Oliver Riesenbeck
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(4), 1070; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041070 - 14 Feb 2024
Viewed by 508
Abstract
(1) Background: High-energy injuries of the pelvic ring are rare. The wide application of iliosacral screw fixation of the posterior pelvic ring is relatively new. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term quality of life. (2) Methods: All patients [...] Read more.
(1) Background: High-energy injuries of the pelvic ring are rare. The wide application of iliosacral screw fixation of the posterior pelvic ring is relatively new. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term quality of life. (2) Methods: All patients treated with an iliosacral screw for a posterior pelvic ring stabilization after high-energy trauma at a level 1 trauma center between 2005 and 2015 were included. Pelvic ring injuries were classified according to the Tile classification adapted by AO/ASIF. The clinical evaluation included the patient-oriented questionnaires surveys of the Majeed Score, Iowa Pelvic Score (IPS), Work Ability Index (WAI), SF-36, EQ5D-5L. (3) Results: A total of 84 patients were included with a median follow-up of 130.1 months (IQR 95.0–162.0 months). The median ISS was 22.5 (IQR 16.0–29.0), mean Majeed Score 83.32 (SD ± 19.26), IPS 77.88 (SD ± 13.96), WAI 32.71 (SD ± 11.31), SF-36 PF 71.25 (SD ± 29.61) and EQ5D-5L 0.83 (SD ± 0.21). There was a notably difference between uni- and bilateral pelvic fractures (p = 0.033) as well as a correlation with the ISS (p = 0.043) with inferior functional outcome measured by IPS. (4) Conclusions: Long-term follow-up of iliosacral screw fixation of unstable pelvic ring fractures showed a good quality of life and functional outcome with equal EQ5D-5L results and inferior SF-36 physical functioning compared to the German population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Treatment and Management of Orthopedic Trauma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

8 pages, 1328 KiB  
Case Report
Intraoperative Fracture during the Insertion of Advanced Locking Screws (T2 Alpha Femur Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing System): Report of Two Cases and Identifying Causes and Prevention
by Takashi Higuchi, Atsushi Taninaka, Rikuto Yoshimizu, Katsuhiro Hayashi, Shinji Miwa, Norio Yamamoto, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya and Satoru Demura
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(8), 2393; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082393 - 19 Apr 2024
Viewed by 318
Abstract
Background: Recently, the T2 alpha nailing system (Stryker, Inc.), which has advanced locking screws that can attach a screw to a rod, has been used worldwide and is expected to improve fracture fixation. We analyzed two cases of supracondylar femoral fractures in [...] Read more.
Background: Recently, the T2 alpha nailing system (Stryker, Inc.), which has advanced locking screws that can attach a screw to a rod, has been used worldwide and is expected to improve fracture fixation. We analyzed two cases of supracondylar femoral fractures in older adult patients, in which intraoperative fractures occurred during the insertion of advanced locking screws of the T2 alpha femur retrograde intramedullary nail. Case presentation: A 93-year-old and an 82-year-old woman each underwent T2 alpha femur retrograde nail fixation for supracondylar femur fractures at separate hospitals, and advanced locking screws were used as the proximal transverse locking screws. In both patients, a fracture line was observed at the proximal screw postoperatively, and the fractures were refixed with distal cable wiring and/or femoral distal plates. The patients were subsequently discharged from the same facility with no remarkable pain. Conclusions: When inserting advanced locking screws, it is necessary to enlarge the screw hole in the near-bone cortex with a counterbore drill, which might add torque to the bone cortex that could result in fractures. If the sleeve is distant from the bone, the counterbore drill will not reach the bone, the screw hole will not expand, and the insertion of advanced locking screws will apply a strong torque to the bone cortex and may result in fracture. Moreover, it is important to confirm that the counterbore drill is securely inserted under fluoroscopy and to carefully enlarge the bony foramen manually to prevent fractures during screw insertion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Treatment and Management of Orthopedic Trauma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 657 KiB  
Case Report
Clinical Utility of Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury Caused by Electrical Burns: A Case Report
by Seung-Yeol Lee, Cheong-Hoon Seo, Yoon-Soo Cho and So-Young Joo
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(23), 7220; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237220 - 21 Nov 2023
Viewed by 780
Abstract
Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) has been proven effective in improving gait function in not only patients with central nervous system damage, but also in patients who have undergone musculoskeletal surgery. Nevertheless, evidence supporting the efficacy of such training in burn patients remains insufficient. [...] Read more.
Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) has been proven effective in improving gait function in not only patients with central nervous system damage, but also in patients who have undergone musculoskeletal surgery. Nevertheless, evidence supporting the efficacy of such training in burn patients remains insufficient. This report aimed to evaluate the effect of RAGT in burn patients with spinal cord injuries (SCI) caused by electrical trauma. We reported a case of two patients. The total duration of each session was about 1 h 30 min. This included 10 min to put on the exoskeleton, 30 min of robot-assisted training using SUBAR®, 10 min to remove the exoskeleton, 10 min to observe whether complications such as skin abrasion, ulcer, or pain occur in the scar area after RAGT, and 30 min of conventional physiotherapy, at a rate of 5 days a week for 12 weeks. All measurements were assessed before training (0 week) and after training (12 weeks). The American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) lower extremity motor score (LEMS), passive range of motions (ROMs) of different joints (hip, knee, and ankle), ambulatory motor index (AMI), functional ambulation categories (FAC), and 6 min walking (6 MWT) distances were evaluated to measure the degree of gait function through training. In both patients, manual muscle test measurement and joint ROM in the lower extremities improved after 12 weeks training. The first patient scored 0 in the FAC before training. After 12 weeks of training, he could walk independently indoors, improving to an FAC score of 4. He also reached 92.16 m in the 6 MWT. LEMS improved from 22 before training to 30 after training, and AMI score improved from 12 before training to 16 after training. In the second patient, an independent walking function was not acquired. LEMS improved from 10 before training to 26 after training. AMI scores were the same at 10 points before and after training. The results suggested the possibility of achieving clinical effects in terms of improving lower extremity muscle strength, joint ROMs, and gait performance in patients with SCI caused by electrical trauma. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Treatment and Management of Orthopedic Trauma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop