jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Bariatric Surgery: Challenges and Future Trends

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "General Surgery".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 February 2026 | Viewed by 297

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Integrated Obesity Center (CRI-O) & Center of Excellence in Obesity (CED-O), São João University Hospital Center (CHUSJ), Porto, Portugal
2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal
3. Obesity Clinic, Casa de Saúde da Boavista (CSB), Porto, Portugal
Interests: obesity; metabolic and bariatric surgery; metabolic syndrome; minimally invasive surgery; clinical and translational research
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

I am delighted to welcome you to this Special Issue of the Journal of Clinical Medicine, titled “Bariatric Surgery: Challenges and Future Trends", which particularly focuses on sleeve gastrectomy, its long-term outcomes, and the evolving field of revisional interventions after sleeve gastrectomy.

Sleeve gastrectomy has become the most frequently performed bariatric surgery globally, primarily due to its technical simplicity and strong early results, leading to its widespread acceptance. However, over time, two significant issues have arisen—gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) and weight regain. These concerns are not only clinically important but also increasingly prevalent, highlighting the need for re-evaluation of surgical techniques and the incorporation of new solutions.

This Special Issue explores emerging techniques in order to address pressing challenges. The Nissen-sleeve fundoplication merges the advantages of sleeve gastrectomy with an anti-reflux mechanism of partial fundoplication. This approach is particularly pertinent for patients grappling with obesity and GERD, which frequently coexist and present a treatment challenge. Initial evidence indicates that this method could enhance reflux control without compromising weight loss, thereby presenting a significant opportunity for select patients.

The single-anastomosis sleeve ileum (SASI) procedure is also gaining traction as both a primary and a revisional bariatric option. By uniting the restrictive nature of a sleeve gastrectomy with a malabsorptive ileal bypass in a single anastomosis, SASI yields strong metabolic results while also simplifying the surgical process. Its increasing versatility renders it an appealing choice for various patient demographics, especially those with type 2 diabetes or elevated surgical risks. This trend reflects a broader movement towards physiology-driven, minimally invasive, and reversible interventions.

Revisional bariatric surgery has emerged as a pivotal issue in clinical practice. With a growing number of patients in long-term follow-up after primary sleeve gastrectomy, there is an increasing demand for managing inadequate weight loss, weight regain, or complications related to the procedure. This Special Issue emphasizes the necessity of developing clear, consensus-based definitions and criteria for revisional surgeries to enhance standardization, patient selection, and surgical outcomes.

In the context of revisional surgery, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) distalization is experiencing renewed interest, particularly for patients facing metabolic failure after initial RYGB or as a subsequent intervention following sleeve gastrectomy. Extending the length of the biliopancreatic limb increases malabsorption and further encourages weight loss, albeit at the expense of heightened nutritional challenges. When used judiciously, it provides an effective strategy for metabolic recovery in complex cases.

Collectively, these evolving techniques signify more than just technical advancements; they denote a shift towards personalized metabolic surgery. The future of bariatric care lies in tailored, evidence-based solutions that take anatomical, metabolic, and behavioral factors into account rather than adhering to a one-size-fits-all methodology. As surgeons and clinicians, we bear the responsibility of not only expanding our procedural toolkit but also applying it with precision, foresight, and compassion.

This Special Issue gathers leading thinkers and innovative research to shed light on these advancements and outline a path forward. I encourage you to engage with these contributions, which reflect the dynamic intersection of clinical necessity, surgical creativity, and scientific progress in bariatric surgery.

Dr. Hugo Santos-Sousa
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • obesity
  • metabolic and bariatric surgery
  • sleeve gastrectomy
  • metabolic syndrome
  • novel surgical procedures
  • Nissen-sleeve fundoplication
  • Roux-en-Y gastric bypass distalization
  • single-anastomosis procedures

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 377 KB  
Article
Association Between Preoperative Psychological Distress and Successful Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery: A Retrospective Study
by Warut Aunjitsakul, Kamthorn Yolsuriyanwong, Siripong Cheewatanakornkul, Darawan Promchan and Chaitong Churuangsuk
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(20), 7333; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207333 - 17 Oct 2025
Abstract
Objectives: The relationship between preoperative psychological distress and weight loss following bariatric surgery remains limited in Asian populations. This study aimed to investigate whether preoperative psychological distress, as a general screening measure, predicted weight loss following bariatric surgery in a Thai population. [...] Read more.
Objectives: The relationship between preoperative psychological distress and weight loss following bariatric surgery remains limited in Asian populations. This study aimed to investigate whether preoperative psychological distress, as a general screening measure, predicted weight loss following bariatric surgery in a Thai population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 464 patients who underwent bariatric surgery at a university hospital between 2020 and 2023. Preoperative psychological distress was assessed using the General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28), with a score of ≥6 indicating high psychological distress. The primary outcome was successful weight loss (SWL), defined as achieving >50% excess weight loss at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. We used multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for age, sex, surgery type, obesity-related comorbidities, and baseline body weight, to analyze the association between psychological distress and SWL outcomes. Results: Patients with high psychological distress (n = 270) demonstrated significantly higher rates of SWL compared to those with low distress (n = 194) at both 6 months (59.7% vs. 43.5%, p = 0.003) and 12 months (83.6% vs. 74.6%, p = 0.068). In adjusted regression analyses, patients with high distress had approximately twice the odds of achieving SWL at 6 months (adj. OR 1.99, 95% CI: 1.25–3.17, p = 0.004), with this association persisting at 12 months (adj. OR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.02–3.39, p = 0.044). Subgroup analyses revealed consistent associations across both sexes, with no significant interaction effects. Conclusions: Contrary to traditional assumptions, higher preoperative psychological distress was associated with greater odds of achieving successful weight loss after bariatric surgery. This suggests that psychological distress may not be a barrier to successful outcomes but could, when supported appropriately, be a predictor for significant weight loss. These findings highlight the value of psychological assessment in optimizing, rather than restricting, bariatric surgery candidates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bariatric Surgery: Challenges and Future Trends)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 236 KB  
Article
Predicting Type 2 Diabetes Remission After Bariatric Surgery: The Role of Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (Homa-IR), Visceral Adiposity Index (Vai) and Triglyceride-Glucose (TyG) Index
by Serhat Ocakli and Oktay Banli
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(20), 7273; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207273 - 15 Oct 2025
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of changes in the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI), and Triglyceride-Glucose (TyG) index in predicting type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission following bariatric surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort [...] Read more.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of changes in the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI), and Triglyceride-Glucose (TyG) index in predicting type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission following bariatric surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed anthropometric, biochemical, and metabolic parameters from 66 T2DM patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2021 and 2024. Data from the preoperative and 6-month postoperative periods were classified for diabetes remission using American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) criteria. Results: The mean participant age was 49.9 ± 9.3 years; 72.7% were female. Post-surgery, 51.5% achieved complete remission, 24.25% partial remission, and 24.25% no remission. Only one patient continued insulin, and 83.8% discontinued oral antidiabetics. Significant postoperative improvements were observed in BMI, waist circumference, fasting glucose, HbA1c, triglycerides, HOMA-IR, VAI, and TyG indices, with increased HDL levels (p < 0.001). However, preoperative HOMA-IR, VAI, and TyG did not differ significantly across remission groups in univariate analyses. Multivariate logistic regression identified only younger age, higher preoperative BMI, and elevated postprandial insulin as independent predictors of complete remission. Other preoperative biochemical markers were not significantly related to remission outcomes. Conclusions: This study indicates that preoperative HOMA-IR, VAI, and TyG have limited standalone value for predicting diabetes remission after bariatric surgery. While they reflect postoperative metabolic improvements, their individual utility in pre-surgical risk stratification is insufficient. More large-scale, prospective studies are needed to determine if these markers could enhance future personalized predictive models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bariatric Surgery: Challenges and Future Trends)
Back to TopTop