jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Advances in Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Therapy for Coronary Artery Disease: 2nd Edition

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Cardiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 August 2026 | Viewed by 934

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Policlinico G Martino, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
2. Division of Cardiology, IRCCS Hospital Galeazzi-Sant’Ambrogio, 20157 Milan, Italy
Interests: STEMI; platelet and antiplatelet therapies; coronary stenting; genetic polymorphisms; atherosclerosis
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We sincerely invite you to contribute to this Special Issue "Advances in Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Therapy for Coronary Artery Disease: 2nd Edition". The first edition is available at https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jcm/special_issues/4ZNJ8HNECK. This Special Issue combines original research and review papers with a focus on the recent advances in coronary artery disease.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the most significant threats to cardiovascular health, and the selection and optimization of antithrombotic therapy remains a core challenge in clinical practice. Antiplatelet therapy, represented by aspirin and P2Y12 receptor antagonists, is the cornerstone of secondary prevention of CAD and post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) management. However, increasingly complex situations arise in clinical practice, particularly in patients with CAD complicated by atrial fibrillation who require long-term oral anticoagulation after stent placement. Balancing anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy has become a thorny issue. Treatment for these patients requires reducing the risk of in-stent thrombosis, stroke, and other ischemic events while strictly preventing serious complications such as gastrointestinal or intracranial hemorrhage.

In recent years, with the accumulation of evidence regarding the use of new drugs and the continuous refinement of treatment strategies, clinical guidelines have been continuously updated, providing a clearer path for the individualized management of these high-risk patients. This Special Issue aims to gather the latest research progress and clinical practice experience in this field, focusing on key issues such as antithrombotic strategy selection, treatment course formulation, risk assessment, and complication prevention for patients with acute coronary syndrome and those undergoing PCI with anticoagulation indications. We welcome original research and review articles to jointly update and promote the progress of antithrombotic therapy for coronary artery disease.

Prof. Dr. Giuseppe De Luca
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • platelet
  • anticoagulant therapy
  • antiplatelet therapy
  • coronary artery disease (CAD)
  • atrial fibrillation (AF)
  • thromboembolic events
  • myocardial ischemic
  • bleeding events
  • aspirin
  • clopidogrel
  • cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases
  • diagnosis and treatment
  • percutaneous coronary intervention
  • acute coronary syndrome

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 470 KB  
Article
Association Between Heparin Dose, Body Mass Index, and Stroke Risk in Patients Undergoing TAVR
by Ziad Arow, Juri Iwata, Akiko Masumoto, Arthur Clement, Laurent Lepage, Laurent Bonfils, Rawia Hussein-Aro, Abid Assali, Nicolas Dumonteil, Didier Tchetche and Chiara De Biase
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(3), 1201; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031201 - 3 Feb 2026
Viewed by 685
Abstract
Background: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is routinely administered during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to prevent thromboembolic complications. However, there are no clear evidence-based guidelines defining optimal heparin dosing or target activated clotting time (ACT) values. This study aimed to evaluate the association between [...] Read more.
Background: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is routinely administered during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to prevent thromboembolic complications. However, there are no clear evidence-based guidelines defining optimal heparin dosing or target activated clotting time (ACT) values. This study aimed to evaluate the association between intraprocedural UFH dosing, ACT values, and peri-procedural stroke risk in the overall population of patients undergoing TAVR, with a prespecified stratified analysis according to body mass index (BMI ≥ 30 vs. <30 kg/m2). Methods: This analysis enrolled consecutive individuals with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who were treated with TAVR using either balloon-expandable or self-expanding valves. The primary outcome was the occurrence of stroke during the periprocedural period in the overall population and according to BMI (<30 vs. ≥30 kg/m2). Secondary endpoints included periprocedural parameters, clinical outcomes (in-hospital and 1-year mortality), and safety outcomes. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess stroke risk according to ACT values. Patients with atrial fibrillation or receiving chronic oral anticoagulation were excluded. Results: A total of 1045 patients underwent TAVR between 2022 and 2024, including 827 with BMI < 30 and 218 with BMI ≥ 30. The study population had a mean age of 82 ± 6 years, and 56% of patients were male. In the overall study population, the mean heparin dose was 47 U/kg and the mean ACT value was 218 s. Patients with lower BMI received higher heparin doses (50 vs. 40 U/kg, p < 0.01) and had higher ACT values (221 vs. 208 s, p < 0.01). Protamine use was low and similar between groups. Periprocedural stroke rates were low overall (1.1%) and comparable between study groups (1.2% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.71). One-year mortality was also similar (3% vs. 4%, p = 0.53), with no significant differences in other safety outcomes. Subgroup analysis by ACT (≤250 vs. >250 s) showed no difference in stroke rates (1% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.60). Conclusions: In this single-center cohort, differences in heparin dosing and ACT values were not associated with differences in peri-procedural stroke or overall procedural outcomes. However, given the low number of stroke events, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Prospective randomized studies are needed to define optimal anticoagulation strategies during TAVR. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop