jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Misconceptions and Myths in Dermatology: From Clinic to Clarity

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Dermatology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 March 2027 | Viewed by 2982

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital and University of Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
Interests: pruritus; itch; inflammatory dermatoses; graft-versus-host disease; psychodermatology; skin-brain axis
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital and University of Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
Interests: pruritus; itch; dermatology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Dermatology, as a highly visual and descriptive specialty, has historically accumulated numerous misnomers in terminology—linguistic constructs that once served to classify diseases but now contribute to conceptual ambiguity. Yet, misconceptions and myths in dermatology extend beyond such linguistic imprecision. They may encompass inadequate patient communication, clinical misinterpretation, and outdated or erroneous approaches to the management of skin diseases, including pharmacological, physical, surgical, and cosmetic interventions, as well as scientific pitfalls. In the digital era, misinformation on social media not only perpetuates but also creates new misconceptions, shaping public perception and influencing patient behavior. Meanwhile, the uncritical adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning introduces novel diagnostic and ethical challenges.

This Special Issue, titled “Misconceptions and Myths in Dermatology: From Clinic to Clarity”, brings together diverse perspectives to identify, analyze, and rectify sources of misunderstanding that obscure dermatologic science and practice. Critical reflection of these aspects may help to foster greater precision and clarity in clinical and scientific dermatology.

In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome. Research areas may include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Misnomers in dermatology and other medical specialties—how to deal with science fiction?
  • The awareness and attitude of dermatologists towards misnomers based on a questionnaire-based online survey.
  • How misnomers mislead medical students.
  • Perils with artificial intelligence/machine learning in dermatology.
  • Misconceptions and myths about pigmented skin lesions.
  • Misinformation and fake news on dermatologic topics on social media.
  • Dermatosurgery gone wrong.
  • Body dysmorphic disorders in dermatology.
  • Misconceptions in cosmetic dermatology.
  • Pharmacological mistakes in dermatology.
  • The misdiagnosed cutaneous lymphoma.
  • Misconceptions on nutrition in skin diseases.
  • Misconceptions in the terminology of skin color.
  • Barriers to optimal care: misconceptions in atopic dermatitis.
  • Misconceptions and pitfalls in psoriasis.
  • Misconceptions in urticaria.
  • Misconceptions in hidradenitis suppurativa.
  • Misconceptions in mastocytosis.
  • Common mistakes in tattoo removal.
  • Missed important tropical skin diseases.
  • Misconceptions in genodermatoses.
  • Myths and misinformation about people with albinism.
  • Unnecessary laboratory testing in dermatology.
  • Common mistakes when treating nail diseases.
  • Common pitfalls in cutaneous microbiome research.
  • Misconceptions and myths about hair diseases.
  • Misconceptions and myths about bullous autoimmune diseases.

Prof. Dr. Simon M. Mueller
Dr. Oliver Brandt
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • misconceptions
  • misunderstanding
  • myths
  • errors
  • mistakes
  • skin
  • dermatology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 865 KB  
Article
Misnomers in Dermatology and Other Medical Specialties—How to Deal with Science Fiction?
by Vera L. Baumann Griss, Radina V. Velikova, Peter Itin, Deborah R. Vogt, Adam Daunton, Zita-Rose Manjaly Thomas, Michael Geiges and Simon M. Mueller
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(10), 3608; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103608 - 8 May 2026
Viewed by 555
Abstract
Background/Objectives: A “misnomer” is a term that is erroneous or inaccurate. Dermatology is replete with well-established misnomers such as “Mycosis fungoides”, “keratoacanthoma”, “actinomycosis”, “granuloma pyogenicum”, or “Kaposi sarcoma”. Misnomers have originated from misconceptions or mistranslations that were passed down historically, and reflect [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: A “misnomer” is a term that is erroneous or inaccurate. Dermatology is replete with well-established misnomers such as “Mycosis fungoides”, “keratoacanthoma”, “actinomycosis”, “granuloma pyogenicum”, or “Kaposi sarcoma”. Misnomers have originated from misconceptions or mistranslations that were passed down historically, and reflect the comparative–descriptive origin of terminology. We aimed to collect and categorize (non-)dermatological misnomers and to assess strategies for abandoning them. Methods: A questionnaire-based survey with 411 senior academic physicians of five university hospitals in Switzerland was conducted to evaluate the frequency of misnomers across dermatology and other specialties. In addition, a systematic review was conducted, complemented by manual searches to collect medical misnomers. Results: The survey and systematic review yielded 536 non-dermatological and 168 dermatological misnomers, pointing to a particular abundance of misnomers in dermatology, which could be categorized into seven categories. A wrong pathological concept was the most common origin of misnomers. Amongst dermatologists, 60.0% regarded misnomers as a relevant problem in their specialty compared to only 35.5% of non-dermatologists. Preferred strategies for abandoning misnomers were avoidance, consensus definitions, and information in teaching. Conclusions: Our results show that misnomers are particularly abundant in dermatology, indicating the need to modernize terminology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Misconceptions and Myths in Dermatology: From Clinic to Clarity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop