Testing the Quality of GeoAI-Generated Data for VGI Mapping

A special issue of ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information (ISSN 2220-9964).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2026) | Viewed by 3065

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Spatial Technologies Research Group, School of Media, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Interests: spatial information systems; GeoAI

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Spatial Dynamics Laboratory, UCD School of Architecture Planning and Environmental Policy, Dublin, Ireland
Interests: GeoAI; big data analytics for smart cities

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) trains models on large spatial datasets to discover patterns and make predictions for various purposes. For example, it can use these models to generate, update, and analyse geographic information, fundamentally reshaping how maps are produced, maintained, and consumed. Compared to traditional (still largely manual) methods, GeoAI-generated data can quickly create detailed maps of built environments (e.g., roads, buildings), which are essential for urban planning, disaster management, environmental monitoring, and many other location-based services and downstream applications.

While several prestigious GIScience journals have recently published Special Issues to highlight GeoAI’s remarkable potential as a tool for automated mapping, none have explicitly focused on the rising problem of “AI slop” in this domain. To address this problem, this Special Issue presents the latest research findings that assess the quality of contemporary GeoAI model outputs in terms of map feature accuracy and reliability, with the goal of maintaining VGI maps. AI data quality/reliability is a concern to all VGI/crowd-source mappers. For example, the OpenStreetMap community follows a “code of conduct” to control the uploading of automated edits into the live OSM database; this is a well-known policy to both VGI practitioners and GIScience researchers alike.

In this context, GeoAI data quality refers to both the accuracy and reliability of model-predicted map features. Where accuracy relates to its real-world position, orientation, and shape - to answer the question: Is GeoAI ready to take over? While reliability is more subjective, referring to a model’s consistency/trustworthiness, e.g., does it pass the eye-test - to answer the question: Are we ready to let it?

Previous studies published in IJGI and elsewhere have demonstrated that an accuracy/consistency gap exists between VGI/crowd-source map features and various authoritative “ground truth” spatial datasets, and that modern GeoAI solutions could potentially bridge this gap.

To explore this claim, this IJGI Special Issue is especially interested in empirical GeoAI studies from GIScience researchers around the world to attest the quality, in terms of accuracy and reliability, of their model outputs (map feature predictions) when compared directly to either/both authoritative (e.g., national mapping agency) “ground truth” data and/or current VGI maps (e.g., OSM) within their respective regions. The aim is to inform today’s VGI mapping community of the current state-of-the-art regarding GeoAI accuracy and inherent reliability, or not, for keeping crowd-source maps up-to-date.

  • Applications of GeoAI to online mapping;
  • Use cases integrating GeoAI data into VGI maps;
  • Empirical accuracy and reliability evaluations of GeoAI map feature predictions;
  • Benchmarking frameworks for GeoAI;
  • Investigations of QA metrics for GeoAI-generated data;
  • Investigations of QA metrics for crowd-source data;
  • Future directions/challenges of GeoAI for mapping;

Dr. James D. Carswell
Dr. Lasith Niroshan
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • GeoAI
  • segmentation
  • deep learning
  • automated mapping
  • OpenStreetMap (OSM)
  • volunteered geographic information (VGI)

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 2477 KB  
Article
Addressing GeoAI Governance: An Automated Gatekeeper for Building Outlines in OpenStreetMap
by Lasith Niroshan and James D. Carswell
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2026, 15(5), 217; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi15050217 - 19 May 2026
Viewed by 735
Abstract
Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) enables the automated generation of built environment map features, such as building outlines/footprints, on a global scale. However, the integration of these AI-generated datasets into Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) platforms like OpenStreetMap (OSM) risks incorporating ‘AI slop’, consisting of [...] Read more.
Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) enables the automated generation of built environment map features, such as building outlines/footprints, on a global scale. However, the integration of these AI-generated datasets into Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) platforms like OpenStreetMap (OSM) risks incorporating ‘AI slop’, consisting of geometrically inconsistent/unreliable data, into the online map. While the OSM “Code of Conduct for Automated Edits” provides a policy framework for data ingestion, it lacks a machine-enforceable mechanism for real-time quality gating. This paper proposes a GeoAI-Gatekeeper to perform this task—an automated process that applies empirical Acceptable Quality Thresholds (AQT) to address the GeoAI data governance problem. Because the Gatekeeper utilizes an intrinsic, no-reference evaluation of geometric fidelity, it can assess incoming AI-generated data streams in real-time without requiring ground-truth benchmarks. Importantly, it focuses exclusively on the geometric validation of building footprints, acknowledging for now that semantic enrichment, such as tagging, remains a human-centric task. The presented GeoAI-Gatekeeper is a working prototype developed for a specific urban area, systematically triaging incoming AI-generated data into three tiers; Auto-Accept, Manual Review, and Reject. It provides a Web-GIS interface for Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) functionality to ensure the OSM community remains the final arbiter of acceptable data quality. Testing the Gatekeeper in Dublin (Ireland) demonstrates that our solution can auto-ingest 93.6% of features with a 14x reduction in human review effort while still adhering to OSM’s cartographic integrity standards. By implementing qualitative community guidelines into machine-enforceable thresholds, our approach introduces a viable methodology for next-generation hybrid VGI systems. Importantly, it ensures that the transition towards automated data ingestion reinforces, rather than undermines, the reliability of global crowd-source mapping datasets. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Testing the Quality of GeoAI-Generated Data for VGI Mapping)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 5754 KB  
Article
Low-Cost Deep Learning for Building Detection with Application to Informal Urban Planning
by Lucas González, Jamal Toutouh and Sergio Nesmachnow
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2026, 15(1), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi15010036 - 9 Jan 2026
Viewed by 1307
Abstract
This article studies the application of deep neural networks for automatic building detection in aerial RGB images. Special focus is put on accuracy robustness in both well-structured and poorly planned urban scenarios, which pose significant challenges due to occlusions, irregular building layouts, and [...] Read more.
This article studies the application of deep neural networks for automatic building detection in aerial RGB images. Special focus is put on accuracy robustness in both well-structured and poorly planned urban scenarios, which pose significant challenges due to occlusions, irregular building layouts, and limited contextual cues. The applied methodology considers several CNNs using only RBG images as input, and both validation and transfer capabilities are studied. U-Net-based models achieve the highest single-model accuracy, with an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 0.9101. A soft-voting ensemble of the best U-Net models further increases performance, reaching a best ensemble IoU of 0.9665, improving over state-of-the-art building detection methods on standard benchmarks. The approach demonstrates strong generalization using only RGB imagery, supporting scalable, low-cost applications in urban planning and geospatial analysis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Testing the Quality of GeoAI-Generated Data for VGI Mapping)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop