Environ. Earth Sci. Proc. 2025, 36(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2025036006 - 20 Nov 2025
Abstract
Eaton Canyon in California serves as the focal point for a comprehensive post-wildfire ecological impact assessment. This study employs an approach integrating satellite imagery from the European Space Agency’s Sentinel constellation to study an area of 271.49 km2. The data encompasses
[...] Read more.
Eaton Canyon in California serves as the focal point for a comprehensive post-wildfire ecological impact assessment. This study employs an approach integrating satellite imagery from the European Space Agency’s Sentinel constellation to study an area of 271.49 km2. The data encompasses both radar and multispectral data, offering a multi-dimensional view of the affected landscape. The analysis leverages the power of the random forest algorithm. Firstly, three widely used indices—the difference normalized burn ratio (dNBR), relative burn ratio (RBR), and relative difference normalized burn ratio (RdNBR)—were calculated and compared based on their accuracy and Kappa index. Secondly, we developed a fusion approach by using all the fire indices to obtain a precise severity map by classifying the affected area into distinct severity classes. Thirdly, a separate fusion approach was developed utilizing the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), radar vegetation index (RVI), and modified normalized difference vegetation index (MNDVI) to analyze the distribution of vegetation before and after the wildfire. The merger proposals were developed using a combination of index values to obtain better information on the fire severity map and post-fire vegetation distribution. The results indicated an accuracy of 78% when employing the dNBR index. A higher accuracy of 81% was observed with the RBR index, while the RdNBR demonstrated an accuracy of 95%. Our approach, which combines all fire indicators, offers optimal accuracy of 99%. A percentage of 56.76% did not burn due to the topography of the canyon creating natural firebreaks. Areas classified as low severity (7.83%) showed minimal damage with minimal tree mortality. Moderate- to low-severity areas (5.83%) represented regions with partial crown burns and some tree mortality. Moderate- to high-severity areas (7.22%) showed significant tree mortality. Finally, high-severity areas (22.36%), characterized by complete tree mortality and significant loss of vegetation cover, were largely concentrated in specific sections of the canyon, likely influenced by factors such as slope and fuel type. These findings provide valuable information for post-fire ecological recovery efforts and future land management strategies in Eaton Canyon and similar fire-prone landscapes.
Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Land)
►
Show Figures
Figure 1
