The Education of d/Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children: Perspectives on Language and Literacy Development

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2019) | Viewed by 104610

Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, 1945 North High Street, Columbus, OH 43210-1172, USA
Interests: education of d/deaf and hard-of-hearing students; language development; literacy development; inclusion; literate thought
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Historically, the development of English language and literacy has been one of the most contentious issues in the education of children and adolescents who are d/Deaf and hard of hearing (d/Dhh). This development has continued to challenge theorists, researchers, and educators because a number of d/Dhh students not only do not read or write as well as their typical literacy peers, but also they may not even reach a level of functional English literacy upon graduation from compulsory education (i.e., high school). The complexity of this development has increased in light of the growing number of minorities, including immigrants, in the United States, particularly the growth of d/Dhh students whose home language is not English—that is, English language learners. There is ongoing disputatious debate on the interpretation of the role and research findings associated with the use of assistive hearing technology (e.g., digital hearing aids, cochlear implants). There is also a need to address the development of language and literacy in d/Dhh individuals with disabilities or additional disabilities—the so-called “deaf plus” cohort.

Using either a professional review or a meta-analysis format, this Special Issue provides a state-of-the-art rendition of the development of language and literacy in d/Dhh children and adolescents. Although this is not an exhaustive exploration of all areas, it is hoped that the Issue has covered the most salient domains. The focus is on d/Dhh individuals; however, there may be a need to discuss the use of findings from the larger field of literacy (i.e., on typical literacy learners) due to the dearth of evidence-based research results for d/Dhh individuals.

There are ten articles with the following titles and descriptions:

  1. Language and Literacy: Issues and Considerations

This article provides background on the major perspectives involving the development of English language and literacy with respect to the evolving demography of d/Dhh children and adolescents. It synthesizes research and controversies on the developmental similarity hypothesis—that is, whether the acquisition of English language and literacy of d/Dhh students is developmentally similar to that of typical language/literacy learners. The outcomes of this discussion have instructional implications and proffer guidelines for teacher preparation programs. The article concludes with directions for further research.

  1. Language Development

The development of “through-the-air” language proficiency is examined with a focus on the relation of language to the acquisition of English literacy. With the focus on language development, the article synthesizes the findings of evidence-based research and practices. This synthesis covers not only language instruction/intervention, but also the current findings re the use of the various communication systems associated with English (e.g., sign systems, oral English approaches, cued speech/language). The article concludes with recommendations for further research.

  1. English Reading Development

This article focuses on the development of English reading at two broad timeframes—emergent and conventional. Emergent reading/literacy is concerned with early development and conventional literacy refers to mature or later development. The article synthesizes research on the fundamentals for developing early reading skills and for maintaining reading throughout the school years. In addition to providing a synthesis of evidence-based research and practices, the article concludes with recommendations for further research.

  1. English Writing Development

This article focuses on the development of English writing at two broad timeframes—emergent and conventional. The article synthesizes evidence-based research on the fundamentals for developing early writing and conventional writing skills; albeit, there has not been much research on writing and d/Deaf and hard of hearing children. Also discuss is the relationship between reading and writing. The article concludes with recommendations for further research.

  1. English Language Learners

If English is not the home language, then it is imperative to explore the merits of bilingual and second-language programs for d/Dhh individuals. The use of a signed language in the education of d/Dhh children has engendered debates on the rights of d/Dhh individuals to develop a native language and to have unlimited access to information. Much of the focus has been on the use of American Sign Language (ASL) as the language of instruction for developing English as a second (or third) language. There has been some recent debate on the merits of creating a written form of ASL to facilitate the second-language and literacy development of English. The article synthesizes evidence-based research and practices and proffers recommendations for further research.

  1. Deaf “Plus” Learners

Estimates of individuals who are d/Dhh and who possess either a disability or an additional disability (e.g., cognitive disability) range from about 30% to more than 50%. There is also the challenge of enumerating and addressing the needs of individuals who are deaf-blind with or without accompanying additional disabilities. Even the nature of the “additional disability” (i.e., beyond deafness and/or blindness) is not always clear, given the limitations of our current state of assessment. This article synthesis the available research on the development of language and literacy in this sub-population. The article concludes with recommendations for further research.

  1. Assistive Hearing Technology

There is little doubt that advances in technology have altered the demographic landscape of children and adolescents with a wide range of hearing acuity/loss. In one sense, as a result of technology, our thinking has evolved on what it means to be human. This article synthesizes the research on cochlear implants and other assistive hearing technology (notably digital hearing aids) on the development of language and literacy in d/Dhh students. There is a discussion of the design of studies, which may have contributed to equivocal findings. The article concludes with recommendations for further research.

  1. Assessment Issues

This article covers current assessment models; that is, the manner in which language and literacy are evaluated.  With respect to children and adolescents who are d/Deaf and hard of hearing, it is important to discuss concerns such as cultural relevancy, accommodations, and what makes a test appropriate or inappropriate. Also discussed are the challenges of assessing d/Dhh students who are English language learners. The article concludes with recommendations for further research.

  1. Inclusion and Language/Literacy Achievement

There has been much debate on the effects of educational environment, a global entity, on academic achievement. One of the most controversial issues is the merits of inclusion. This article synthesizes the research on inclusion and the development of language and literacy skills in d/Dhh children and adolescents. The article concludes with recommendations for further research.

  1. Conclusion: What Now, What Next, Where To?

This concluding article provide final reflections and direction for further dialogue and inquiry on the various controversial topics discussed in this Special Issue.  The article will comment on the contributors’ conclusions and recommendations for further research.

Prof. Peter V. Paul
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • assessment
  • assistive hearing technology
  • d/Deaf and hard of hearing children
  • deaf “Plus” learners
  • inclusion
  • language development
  • literacy development

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (10 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

15 pages, 276 KiB  
Article
Reading Development of Students Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing in Inclusive Education Classrooms
by Khalid Nasser Alasim
Educ. Sci. 2019, 9(3), 201; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030201 - 30 Jul 2019
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 11616
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to discuss the major research findings associated with the reading/literacy development of students who are d/Deaf and hard of hearing (d/Dhh) in inclusive education classrooms. The conditions for developing effective literacy skills are also described. A professional [...] Read more.
The purpose of this article is to discuss the major research findings associated with the reading/literacy development of students who are d/Deaf and hard of hearing (d/Dhh) in inclusive education classrooms. The conditions for developing effective literacy skills are also described. A professional review approach was utilized, and relevant journal articles from 1985 to 2019, inclusive, were selected and analyzed. Other relevant publications including selected chapters and books were used to support the available salient findings. Results of the reviews, recommendations for future research and the limitations of the review process are also provided. Full article
21 pages, 348 KiB  
Article
Language and Literacy: Issues and Considerations
by Maria C. Hartman, Onudeah D. Nicolarakis and Ye Wang
Educ. Sci. 2019, 9(3), 180; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030180 - 12 Jul 2019
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 7666
Abstract
This article provides background on the major perspectives involving the development of English language and literacy with respect to the evolving demography of d/Deaf and hard-of-hearing children and adolescents. It synthesizes research and controversies on the developmental similarity hypothesis—that is, whether the acquisition [...] Read more.
This article provides background on the major perspectives involving the development of English language and literacy with respect to the evolving demography of d/Deaf and hard-of-hearing children and adolescents. It synthesizes research and controversies on the developmental similarity hypothesis—that is, whether the acquisition of English language and literacy of d/Deaf and hard-of-hearing students is developmentally similar to that of typical language/literacy learners. The outcomes of this discussion have instructional implications and proffer guidelines for teacher preparation programs. The article concludes with directions for further research. Full article
14 pages, 220 KiB  
Article
Language Development and Deaf/Hard of Hearing Children
by Jessica A. Scott and Hannah M. Dostal
Educ. Sci. 2019, 9(2), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020135 - 16 Jun 2019
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 13463
Abstract
This article explores the available research literature on language development and language interventions among deaf and hard of hearing (d/hh) children. This literature is divided into two broad categories: Research on natural languages (specifically American Sign Language and spoken English) and research on [...] Read more.
This article explores the available research literature on language development and language interventions among deaf and hard of hearing (d/hh) children. This literature is divided into two broad categories: Research on natural languages (specifically American Sign Language and spoken English) and research on communication systems (specifically iterations of signed English and cued speech). These bodies of literature are summarized, with special attention paid to intervention research and research exploring the impacts of language skills on literacy development. Findings indicate that there is generally a stronger research base on natural languages as compared to communication systems, though more studies in both categories are necessary. Additionally, there are very few intervention studies and even fewer that aim to intervene upon language with the explicit goal of impacting literacy; therefore, there is little known about whether and how interventions that aim to support language development may have direct or indirect impacts on literacy within this population. Further research on this topic, as well as replication studies and research with larger sample sizes, is strongly recommended. Full article

Review

Jump to: Research

14 pages, 278 KiB  
Review
Conclusion: Perspectives on Language, Literacy, and Deafness
by Peter V. Paul and Faisl Alqraini
Educ. Sci. 2019, 9(4), 286; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040286 - 1 Dec 2019
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4980
Abstract
As indicated in this Special Issue, there has been much debate on the development of English language and literacy in d/Deaf and hard of hearing (d/Dhh) students. Questions remain on the nature of the first language and the relation of this language to [...] Read more.
As indicated in this Special Issue, there has been much debate on the development of English language and literacy in d/Deaf and hard of hearing (d/Dhh) students. Questions remain on the nature of the first language and the relation of this language to the development of English literacy. There is also considerable controversy on the role of English phonology. Adding to the complexity is the increase of d/Dhh children for whom English is not the home language and the ongoing challenge of addressing the needs of those with disabilities or additional disabilities. After describing English literacy and the need for documenting desirable research characteristics, the authors of this conclusion article utilize a construct named the Qualitative Similarity Hypothesis (QSH) as the guiding framework for addressing issues such as the role of phonology and the nature of the through-the-air form of the language of print. The QSH asserts that d/Dhh students need to master the same set of fundamentals as typical English literacy learners. These fundamentals include code-related, language-related, and comprehension-related skills. One major assertion is that proficiency in the through-the-air form of English is essential for achieving proficiency in conventional English literacy skills. It is argued that the importance of English language proficiency has been emphasized in literacy models that delineate the strong connections among language, reading, and writing, even for second language learners of English or English learners. Another major assertion is that proficiency in English phonology is necessary (albeit not sufficient) for the development of emerging decoding skills. The use of English phonology facilitates the early and advanced literacy comprehension skills. The article concludes with recommendations for additional research, including the understanding of the visual representation of the structure of English, the development of comprehensive English language assessments, and the exploration of literacy-related skills such as decoding and comprehension. Finally, the validity of the QSH also needs to be further investigated. Full article
15 pages, 233 KiB  
Review
Assessment of Language and Literacy in Children Who Are d/Deaf and Hard of Hearing
by Lianna Pizzo and Amanda Chilvers
Educ. Sci. 2019, 9(3), 223; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030223 - 26 Aug 2019
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 6200
Abstract
This article presents theoretical orientations and practical applications for the assessment of d/Deaf and hard of hearing (d/Dhh) children. It discusses current approaches to assessment and the factors affecting d/Dhh children’s participation in assessments using those approaches. Gaps in the field around access [...] Read more.
This article presents theoretical orientations and practical applications for the assessment of d/Deaf and hard of hearing (d/Dhh) children. It discusses current approaches to assessment and the factors affecting d/Dhh children’s participation in assessments using those approaches. Gaps in the field around access to appropriate assessments are discussed. This review also shares information on the relationship between the purpose of the assessment and the approach selected. Basic considerations for both d/Deaf and hard of hearing multilingual learners (d/DMLs) and d/Dhh children with additional disabilities will be addressed. Finally, general recommendations are made for research and practice. Full article
14 pages, 220 KiB  
Review
Reading and Deafness: State of the Evidence and Implications for Research and Practice
by Beverly Trezek and Connie Mayer
Educ. Sci. 2019, 9(3), 216; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030216 - 14 Aug 2019
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 7139
Abstract
Over the years, persistently low achievement levels have led scholars to question whether reading skill development is different for deaf readers. Research findings suggest that in order for deaf students to become proficient readers, they must master the same fundamental abilities that are [...] Read more.
Over the years, persistently low achievement levels have led scholars to question whether reading skill development is different for deaf readers. Research findings suggest that in order for deaf students to become proficient readers, they must master the same fundamental abilities that are well established for hearing learners, regardless of the degree of hearing loss or communication modality used (e.g., spoken or signed). The simple view of reading (SVR), which hypothesizes the critical role both language abilities and phonological skills play in development of reading comprehension, provides a model for understanding the reading process for a wide range of students and has the potential to shed light on the challenges deaf students have historically experienced in achieving age-appropriate outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to review the components of the SVR and use this conceptual model as the basis for exploring and discussing both historical and current research evidence in reading and deafness, with a particular focus on phonological skills. Recommendations for future research and practice based on the existing body of literature will also be provided. Full article
16 pages, 260 KiB  
Review
Writing and Deafness: State of the Evidence and Implications for Research and Practice
by Connie Mayer and Beverly Trezek
Educ. Sci. 2019, 9(3), 185; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030185 - 17 Jul 2019
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 6492
Abstract
Although reading and writing play equally important roles in the literacy development of deaf individuals, far more attention has been paid to reading than to writing in both research and practice. This is concerning as outcomes in writing have remained poor despite changes [...] Read more.
Although reading and writing play equally important roles in the literacy development of deaf individuals, far more attention has been paid to reading than to writing in both research and practice. This is concerning as outcomes in writing have remained poor despite changes in communication philosophies (e.g., spoken and/or signed) and pedagogical approaches. Although there are indications of a positive shift as the context for deaf education has been transformed with advances in hearing technologies, challenges are ongoing. In order to better understand why deaf learners struggle to achieve age-appropriate outcomes in written language, the goal of this paper will be to take stock of the available research evidence in writing and deafness, and interpret it in light of both the Simple View of Writing (SVW), in which ideation or text generation is linked to oral language, and current models of the composing process. Based on this overview and analysis, implications and directions for future research and practice will be discussed. Full article
22 pages, 338 KiB  
Review
Assistive Hearing Technology for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Spoken Language Learners
by Rachael Frush Holt
Educ. Sci. 2019, 9(2), 153; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020153 - 19 Jun 2019
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 9534
Abstract
Radical advancements in hearing technology in the last 30 years have offered some deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children the adequate auditory access necessary to acquire spoken language with high-quality early intervention. However, meaningful achievement gaps in reading and spoken language persist despite the [...] Read more.
Radical advancements in hearing technology in the last 30 years have offered some deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children the adequate auditory access necessary to acquire spoken language with high-quality early intervention. However, meaningful achievement gaps in reading and spoken language persist despite the engineering marvel of modern hearing aids and cochlear implants. Moreover, there is enormous unexplained variability in spoken language and literacy outcomes. Aspects of signal processing in both hearing aids and cochlear implants are discussed as they relate to spoken language outcomes in preschool and school-age children. In suggesting areas for future research, a case is made for not only expanding the search for mechanisms of influence on outcomes outside of traditional device- and child-related factors, but also for framing the search within Biopsychosocial systems theories. This theoretical approach incorporates systems of risk factors across many levels, as well as the bidirectional and complex ways in which factors influence each other. The combination of sophisticated hearing technology and a fuller understanding of the complex environmental and biological factors that shape development will help maximize spoken language outcomes in DHH children and contribute to laying the groundwork for successful literacy and academic development. Full article
26 pages, 395 KiB  
Review
Children Who Are Deaf/Hard of Hearing with Disabilities: Paths to Language and Literacy
by Catherine Nelson and Susan M. Bruce
Educ. Sci. 2019, 9(2), 134; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020134 - 14 Jun 2019
Cited by 26 | Viewed by 15649
Abstract
Students who are Deaf with Disabilities (DWD) comprise an extremely heterogeneous population. Similar to students who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing (DHH), students who are DWD vary in terms of degree, type, and age at onset of hearing loss, amplification, and preferred [...] Read more.
Students who are Deaf with Disabilities (DWD) comprise an extremely heterogeneous population. Similar to students who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing (DHH), students who are DWD vary in terms of degree, type, and age at onset of hearing loss, amplification, and preferred communication method. However, students who are DWD are also diverse in terms of type, etiology, and number and severity of disability(ies). Presented in this article is an overview of DWD followed by foci on Deaf with learning disabilities, Deaf with intellectual disabilities, Deaf with autism spectrum disorder, and deafblindness. Particular attention is given to communication, language, and literacy development. Full article
30 pages, 422 KiB  
Review
Deaf Children as ‘English Learners’: The Psycholinguistic Turn in Deaf Education
by Amanda Howerton-Fox and Jodi L. Falk
Educ. Sci. 2019, 9(2), 133; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020133 - 14 Jun 2019
Cited by 33 | Viewed by 20273
Abstract
The purpose of this literature review is to present the arguments in support of conceptualizing deaf children as ‘English Learners’, to explore the educational implications of such conceptualizations, and to suggest directions for future inquiry. Three ways of interpreting the label ‘English Learner’ [...] Read more.
The purpose of this literature review is to present the arguments in support of conceptualizing deaf children as ‘English Learners’, to explore the educational implications of such conceptualizations, and to suggest directions for future inquiry. Three ways of interpreting the label ‘English Learner’ in relationship to deaf children are explored: (1) as applied to deaf children whose native language is American Sign Language; (2) as applied to deaf children whose parents speak a language other than English; and (3) as applied to deaf children who have limited access to the spoken English used by their parents. Recent research from the fields of linguistics and neuroscience on the effects of language deprivation is presented and conceptualized within a framework that we refer to as the psycholinguistic turn in deaf education. The implications for developing the literacy skills of signing deaf children are explored, particularly around the theoretical construct of a ‘bridge’ between sign language proficiency and print-based literacy. Finally, promising directions for future inquiry are presented. Full article
Back to TopTop