Extending Learners’ Mathematical Thinking: Venues and Ventures

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 June 2021) | Viewed by 15150

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Teaching and Learning, College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Interests: mathematics cognition; mathematical discourse

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent years, a variety of metaphors have been introduced to characterize mathematics teaching in classrooms that focus on inquiry and development of conceptual understanding amongst learners. Common to all these various characterizations are three specific actions teachers need to do so to optimize both student autonomy, and their mathematical advancement, including eliciting, supporting and extending. Eliciting actions invite students to share their ideas and encourage elaborations on, and comparison of solution methods. Supporting actions attempt to coordinate and manage students’ work. Here, the teacher may suggest strategies, offer interpretations, record and/or re-voice student ideas. Extending actions have been less precisely described and considered to be interventions that move students beyond their initial solutions.

There is evidence that teachers frequently exhibit eliciting actions as they ask students to share ideas and then using them to encourage group discourse. The most prevalent supporting actions reported in the literature include reminding students of task goals, what they already know, re-voicing learners’ ideas and introducing alternative interpretations. Accounts of how teachers extend learners’ mathematical cognition, however, are rarely reported. Indeed, although common practices associated with extending have been conceptualized to include encouraging reasoning, encouraging reflection, and creating a space for development of new mathematical insights—research reports rarely cite evidence of extending actions beyond encouraging reflection or requesting explanations. It remains unclear what form or shape extending actions might take or the potential outcome of these actions relative to learners’ mathematical development. This Special Issue is devoted to disseminating current empirical research as well as theoretical views on the ways in which mathematical thinking of learners are extended through specific teacher questions, tasks, curricular materials and technological tools. Of particular interest is defining specific features of these interventions that lead to the development of deeper and more sophisticated mathematical knowledge. In a general sense, the Special Issue aims to offer an in-depth and current perspective on connections between teaching and learning. Some questions of interest that can inform the preparation of articles include, but are not limited to:

  • What theoretical models are used or being developed for capturing growth in mathematical thinking?
  • What is the impact of the concept/content under study on the type of extending actions that teachers need to do?
  • What types of mathematics-focused professional development models might be put in place to advance teachers’ capacity for extending learners’ mathematical thinking?
  • What methodologies are used in capturing moves towards extending learners’ mathematical thinking?
  • What theoretical lenses are useful for assessing the growth of learners’ mathematical thinking?

Dear Colleagues,

The Special Issue aims to offer an international perspective on current research on teaching and learning of mathematical thinking in educational settings. The venue chosen focuses on ways that learners’ mathematics is extended through deliberate and strategic interventions along with detailed discussion of short- and long-term outcomes of these interventions.

Prof. Dr. Azita Manouchehri
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Mathematical Reasoning
  • Extending Thinking
  • Teaching Mathematics
  • Theory and Practice

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 2249 KiB  
Article
Generative Unit Assessment: Authenticity in Mathematics Classroom Assessment Practices
by P. Janelle McFeetors, Richelle Marynowski and Alexandra Candler
Educ. Sci. 2021, 11(7), 366; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070366 - 20 Jul 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3622
Abstract
In our pursuit to broaden and deepen understandings of what it means to engage in an assessment activity, we explored the designing and implementing of a geometry performance task as an instantiation of authentic assessment to assess elementary school students’ mathematics learning. Using [...] Read more.
In our pursuit to broaden and deepen understandings of what it means to engage in an assessment activity, we explored the designing and implementing of a geometry performance task as an instantiation of authentic assessment to assess elementary school students’ mathematics learning. Using participatory action research, we incorporated a performance task as an end-of-unit assessment with grade 4/5 students. We found that the authenticity within what we are calling a generative unit assessment, is understood as a process that is dynamic in contrast to conventional unit tests. We established an innovative assessment practice that emerged from the student and teacher data and is illustrated through four features applicable to any content area. Through collaborative discussions and the ensuing creation of a generative unit assessment, we found spaces to authentically understand ontological growth and continual learning through assessment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extending Learners’ Mathematical Thinking: Venues and Ventures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1383 KiB  
Article
Venues for Analytical Reasoning Problems: How Children Produce Deductive Reasoning
by Susana Carreira, Nélia Amado and Hélia Jacinto
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(6), 169; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060169 - 24 Jun 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 5128
Abstract
The research on deductive reasoning in mathematics education has been predominantly associated with the study of proof; consequently, there is a lack of studies on logical reasoning per se, especially with young children. Analytical reasoning problems are adequate tasks to engage the solver [...] Read more.
The research on deductive reasoning in mathematics education has been predominantly associated with the study of proof; consequently, there is a lack of studies on logical reasoning per se, especially with young children. Analytical reasoning problems are adequate tasks to engage the solver in deductive reasoning, as they require rule checking and option elimination, for which chains of inferences based on premises and rules are accomplished. Focusing on the solutions of children aged 10–12 to an analytical reasoning problem proposed in two separate settings—a web-based problem-solving competition and mathematics classes—this study aims to find out what forms of deductive reasoning they undertake and how they express that reasoning. This was done through a qualitative content analysis encompassing 384 solutions by children participating in a beyond-school competition and 102 solutions given by students in their mathematics classes. The results showed that four different types of deductive reasoning models were produced in the two venues. Moreover, several representational resources were found in the children’s solutions. Overall, it may be concluded that moderately complex analytical reasoning tasks can be taken into regular mathematics classes to support and nurture young children’s diverse deductive reasoning models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extending Learners’ Mathematical Thinking: Venues and Ventures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2627 KiB  
Article
Teacher Interventions for Advancing Students’ Mathematical Understanding
by Xiangquan Yao and Azita Manouchehri
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(6), 164; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060164 - 18 Jun 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 5641
Abstract
The relationship between teacher interventions and students’ mathematical thinking has been the subject of inquiry for quite some time. Using the Pirie–Kieren theory for dynamic growth in mathematical understanding, this study documents teacher interventions that support students’ growth toward developing a general understanding [...] Read more.
The relationship between teacher interventions and students’ mathematical thinking has been the subject of inquiry for quite some time. Using the Pirie–Kieren theory for dynamic growth in mathematical understanding, this study documents teacher interventions that support students’ growth toward developing a general understanding of a mathematical idea in a designed learning environment. By studying the interactions of seven middle school students and the teacher-researcher working on a two-week unit on geometric transformations within a dynamic geometry environment, this study identified nine major categories of teacher interventions that support and extend students’ investigations of mathematical ideas around geometric transformations. The typology of teacher interventions reported in this study provides a cognition-based framework for teacher moves that extend and advance students’ mathematical understanding. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extending Learners’ Mathematical Thinking: Venues and Ventures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop