Enhancing the Power of Video in Teacher Education

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Teacher Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 October 2024) | Viewed by 5489

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre for Educational Development, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
Interests: the (video-based) analysis of differences in expertise between experts and novices in the area of classroom management; teacher–student feedback and feedback from colleagues; research interventions on teacher competences

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The use of classroom videos has become a staple element of teacher education programs worldwide. Classroom videos serve as a powerful tool to bridge the gap between theory and practice, providing valuable situated learning experiences for both pre-service and in-service teachers. Extensive research highlights that video-based interventions tend to have a more significant impact on the development of (pre-service) teachers’ expertise compared to traditional methods such as text-based cases. Studies indicate that videos stimulate to a high degree of activation, immersion, motivation, and reflection. However, video usage can also entail potential drawbacks, such as attentional biases or cognitive overload. Attentional biases may restrict (pre-service) teachers to only notice limited aspects of classroom reality, while cognitive overload can overwhelm (pre-service) teachers due to the density of information in videos. To address these challenges and other limitations, researchers have analyzed instructional design elements for the effective integration of videos in teacher education in recent years.

This Special Issue aims to gather articles in this field to empower educators to maximizing the potential of classroom videos in teacher education. In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome that contribute to our knowledge on how video-based interventions can meet the learning needs of a target audience (e.g., novices vs. experts), on how video materials (e.g., video length) and tasks (e.g., prompts, observation guides) need to be designed to facilitate learning, or which role teacher educators play in video-based interventions. Contributions applying different modalities (face-to-face, online, blended), educational levels (pre-service teacher education, in-service teacher education), or from different educational fields (e.g., medical education) are welcome.

Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the following:

  • Pre-service teacher education/ in-service teacher professional development;
  • Video-based intervention studies ;
  • Systematic/scoping reviews;
  • Qualitative and quantitative research;
  • Impact of videos on different expertise levels (novice vs. expert);
  • Impact of video material design (e.g., length, authentic vs. staged, complexity);
  • Impact of task design (e.g., prompts, observation guides, annotations);
  • Role of teacher educators;
  • Innovative methodological approaches (eye-tracking, VR).

I look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Christopher Neil Prilop
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • pre-service teacher education
  • in-service teacher professional development
  • classroom videos
  • video-based intervention studies
  • systematic/scoping reviews
  • qualitative and quantitative research

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

28 pages, 1980 KiB  
Article
Developing and Validating a Video-Based Measurement Instrument for Assessing Teachers’ Professional Vision of Language-Stimulation Interactions in the ECE Classroom
by Lien Dorme, Anne-Lotte Stevens, Wendelien Vantieghem, Kris Van den Branden and Ruben Vanderlinde
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(2), 155; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020155 - 26 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1109
Abstract
This study reports on the development and validation of a video-based instrument to assess early childhood education (ECE) teachers’ professional vision (PV) of language-stimulation (LS) interactions. PV refers to noticing and reasoning about key classroom interactions, a skill that can be trained and [...] Read more.
This study reports on the development and validation of a video-based instrument to assess early childhood education (ECE) teachers’ professional vision (PV) of language-stimulation (LS) interactions. PV refers to noticing and reasoning about key classroom interactions, a skill that can be trained and distinguishes experts from novices. The instrument targets the PV of three language-stimulation (LS) strategies: language input (LI), opportunities for language production (OLP), and feedback (FB). The instrument measures noticing through comparative judgement (CJ) and reasoning through multiple-choice items. Construct validity was assessed using the AERA framework, using three samples: a sample of professionals (n = 22), a pre-service teachers’ sample (n = 107), and a mixed sample with in- and pre-service teachers (n = 6). Reliability and validity were confirmed, with strong reliability scores for the CJ aggregated “master” rank orders (SRR: 0.827–0.866). Think-aloud procedures demonstrated that respondents’ decisions during CJ were mainly based on LS-relevant video features. Decisions unrelated to LS require further study. Multiple-choice reasoning items were developed from professionals’ open-ended feedback. Pre-service teacher reasoning scores showed no significant predictors. Using real classroom videos, this instrument provides an ecologically valid, scalable tool for assessing teachers’ professional vision of LS interactions. This validated instrument offers a foundation for professional development programs aimed at addressing the theory–practice gap in early language education. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enhancing the Power of Video in Teacher Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1603 KiB  
Article
Teacher Candidates’ Perceptions of Peer and Instructor Feedback Through Video Annotations: Whose Advice Do They Prefer?
by Michael Otieno Okumu, Catherine Lammert and Halkano Michael Hargura
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(12), 1361; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121361 - 12 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1533
Abstract
Feedback literacy, defined as the ability to reflect on and implement constructive insights provided by others, is crucial for teachers’ professional growth. This study explores how Teacher Candidates (TCs) (n = 160) in an online reading methods course valued feedback on their teaching [...] Read more.
Feedback literacy, defined as the ability to reflect on and implement constructive insights provided by others, is crucial for teachers’ professional growth. This study explores how Teacher Candidates (TCs) (n = 160) in an online reading methods course valued feedback on their teaching videos from peers versus instructors, leveraging communities of practice as the theoretical framework. This study examines TCs’ preferences and rationales for feedback sources in design/development research, a unique contribution to feedback research in teacher education. Using a concurrent mixed-methods approach, we analyzed TCs’ ratings of the quality of tagged comments on videos of their classroom instruction provided by both groups, and we analyzed the reasons they provided for their ratings. Results of the independent samples t-test revealed that the TCs rated instructor feedback significantly higher than peer feedback. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data identified factors such as feedback specificity, constructive criticism, timeliness, expertise, emotional support, and practical application as central to TCs’ feedback preferences. However, TCs also recognized aspects of peer feedback they found valuable, underscoring the potential benefit of structured feedback training to improve peer feedback effectiveness. These findings highlight the need for targeted feedback literacy development to help TCs maximize the benefits of both instructor and peer feedback. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enhancing the Power of Video in Teacher Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 657 KiB  
Article
Preservice Teachers’ Reflection Processes When Collaboratively Reflecting on Videotaped Classroom Teaching
by Lisanne Rothe and Kerstin Göbel
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(12), 1357; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121357 - 11 Dec 2024
Viewed by 930
Abstract
It is imperative that (preservice) teachers engage in continuous reflection on their pedagogical practice to foster their continuous professional development. Teaching videos are therefore used in teacher education programmes to stimulate reflection. The authentic presentation of teaching through videos enables (preservice) teachers to [...] Read more.
It is imperative that (preservice) teachers engage in continuous reflection on their pedagogical practice to foster their continuous professional development. Teaching videos are therefore used in teacher education programmes to stimulate reflection. The authentic presentation of teaching through videos enables (preservice) teachers to reflect on certain aspects of teaching. To enhance the reflection quality of (preservice) teachers, it is essential that they receive structured support throughout the reflection process. The following article examines the reflection processes of preservice teachers who took part in the FLECTT project (Collegial video-based reflection on teaching in Reflecting Teams) at the University of Duisburg-Essen. During their practical semester, preservice teachers had the opportunity to reflect on videotapes of their own teaching in a collegial reflection setting. As only a few studies have investigated processes of collegial video-based reflection of preservice teachers, the following study addresses this research desideratum and investigates the reflection processes by means of an explorative, qualitative study. The findings suggest that preservice teachers engage intensively with the teaching video. They reflect on their personal experiences and develop new alternative courses of action. However, it seems to be crucial that the participants are familiar with the specific setting in order to be able to participate effectively in the reflection process. In addition, the high level of engagement with the teaching video seems to have an effect on the concentration or fatigue of the preservice teachers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enhancing the Power of Video in Teacher Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop