Generative AI in Education: Applications and Perspectives from Collaborative Learning

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Technology Enhanced Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 April 2026) | Viewed by 2671

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
UNESCO Center for Problem-Based Learning, Department of Sustainabililty and Planning, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Interests: PBL in engineering education; digital and cultural transformation of higher education; digital pedagogy; AI integration in education; culturally responsive teaching

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
UNESCO Center for Problem-Based Learning, Department of Sustainabililty and Planning, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Interests: digital technology; problem-based learning; self-directed learning

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Advanced Studies in Problem-Based Learning, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Interests: networked learning; problem-based learning (PBL); media pedagogy

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent years, tools and applications powered by Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) have become a focal source of disruption in educational ecosystems. As these tools continue to rapidly evolve and diffuse, new ways of using them in teaching and learning are emerging. Some reviews note that most GenAI and chatbot applications mirror dominant paradigms of teaching and learning, which remain largely teacher-centered and knowledge-transmission-focused (Xu & Ouyang, 2022), leaving open, group-based learning underexplored, despite the advantages and challenges highlighted by Bozkurt et al. (2023).

The many advantages of contemporary GenAI tools present opportunities to reimagine collaboration between humans and machines in education.  However, the adoption of GenAI also raises critical educational, environmental and societal concerns that must not be overlooked.

While general-purpose chatbots such as ChatGPT and Copilot have been reported to be the prevalent choices among students (Johnston et al., 2024; Sousa & Cardoso, 2025; von Garrel et al., 2023), their context-agnostic design seems to conflict with the dynamic nature of situated pedagogies—especially problem-based learning (PBL) and other open and collaborative learning formats.

We welcome submissions on collaborative learning across educational contexts using GenAI. Contributions may be empirical, conceptual or design-oriented, but should explicitly connect learning theory, learning design and the advantages/challenges of GenAI in education. Topics include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • GenAI-supported social and collaborative forms of learning, such as problem- or project-based learning;
  • Design frameworks aligning chatbot dialog with collaborative inquiry;
  • The GenAI-supported orchestration of group project work, reflection and assessment;
  • Ethical, equity-focused and transparency issues when deploying AI companions in teams;
  • Professional development for teachers to facilitate AI-supported collaboration;
  • Case studies of custom or open-source chatbots tailored to curricula;
  • Methodological innovations for studying joint knowledge construction with AI chatbots/agents, etc.

We welcome qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies; reviews; practice reports; and conceptual papers. Manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer review and will be published online immediately upon acceptance. The deadline for manuscript submissions is 15 April 2026.

References:

Xu, W., & Ouyang, F. (2022). A systematic review of AI role in the educational system based on a proposed conceptual framework. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 4195-4223. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-021-10774-y

Bozkurt, A., Junhong, X., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., ... & Romero-Hall, E. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 53-130. Available online:https://researchers.cdu.edu.au/en/publications/speculative-futures-on-chatgpt-and-generative-artificial-intellig

Johnston, H., Wells, R.F., Shanks, E.M. et al. Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. Int J Educ Integr 20, 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4

Sousa, A. E., & Cardoso, P. (2025). Use of Generative AI by Higher Education Students. Electronics14(7), 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14071258

von Garrel, J., Mayer, J. Artificial Intelligence in studies—use of ChatGPT and AI-based tools among students in Germany. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10, 799 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02304-7

Dr. Niels Erik Ruan Lyngdorf
Dr. Nicolaj Riise Clausen
Prof. Dr. Thomas Ryberg
Guest Editors

Sofie Otto
Guest Editor Assistant

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence in education (AIEd)
  • collaborative learning
  • education and pedagogy
  • learning design
  • participant-direction
  • educational technology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 2525 KB  
Article
AI-Powered Engagement Shots: Major-Specific Introductions, Applications, and Games to Spark Interest in Organic Chemistry
by Kassem Hallal, Rasha Hamdan and Sami Tlais
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(3), 355; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030355 - 24 Feb 2026
Viewed by 535
Abstract
This study examines artificial intelligence (AI) not only as a student resource but as a pedagogical enabler—capable of operationalizing strategies such as context-based learning, narrative framing, and gamification that enhance motivation and relevance but are often difficult for instructors to sustain. By automating [...] Read more.
This study examines artificial intelligence (AI) not only as a student resource but as a pedagogical enabler—capable of operationalizing strategies such as context-based learning, narrative framing, and gamification that enhance motivation and relevance but are often difficult for instructors to sustain. By automating the generation of tailored scenarios, prompts, and examples, AI can make it feasible to embed these approaches consistently across large, multi-major classrooms. We applied this design in an undergraduate organic chemistry course for non-majors (N = 69) including Biomedical Laboratory Sciences, Nutrition, and Biology students. Organic chemistry for non-majors typically presents both conceptual challenges and low motivation due to limited career relevance, making this cohort well suited for examining AI-assisted pedagogies. Within this context, AI chatbot was integrated into chapter introductions, career-aligned scenarios, real-time activities, take-home assignments linking molecules to real-world contexts, and a game-based challenge—allowing the instructor to shift from sole source of personalization to a facilitator who guided and validated AI-generated materials. Surveys administered at the start and end of the semester revealed notable gains: student interest in organic chemistry increased from 42.0% to 73.3%, perceived relevance to majors rose from 24.6% to 85.0%, and importance for careers grew from 20.3% to 83.3%. Feedback after each activity indicated stronger awareness of real-life applications, greater confidence, and appreciation for AI’s role in making chemistry approachable. Students valued the clarity of introductions, the applied focus of the “Celebrity Molecules” assignment, and the engaging, collaborative nature of the game. Findings suggest AI can make evidence-based strategies more feasible and scalable, enhancing motivation and relevance in courses where students often struggle. Future work should examine long-term learning outcomes and transferability across disciplines. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop