Teachers and Teaching in Early Childhood Education and Care: Time to Think Otherwise

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Early Childhood Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2025) | Viewed by 4781

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Education, Faculty of Creative Industries, Education and Social Justice, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia
Interests: early childhood education and care workforce

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Education, Faculty of Creative Industries, Education and Social Justice, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia
Interests: early childhood leadership and workforce

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Teachers and teaching in early childhood education and care (ECEC) are recognised as important and complex, although at times misunderstood, with ongoing, persistent global attention from government, stakeholders, and educators themselves aiming to better understand, invest, and value the work in the profession. The momentum to grow and enable teachers’ work in early childhood education is underscored by concern over workforce shortages, particularly in the pre-school settings of kindergarten and long day care. These issues of workforce undersupply illuminate policy–workforce disconnections and pave the way for examining optimal, effective, and innovative considerations in the preparation, retaining, and sustaining of early childhood teachers.  

We propose that amidst the avalanche of both welcomed, and at times challenging, changes to the work of being an early childhood teacher, it is timely to reflect and do what Stephan Ball proposes as “thinking otherwise” (1998, p. 81).

We invite the submission of empirical and theoretical studies, as well as conceptual works, that highlight contemporary global approaches to understanding and supporting early childhood teachers and teaching. This Special Issue will illustrate diverse methodological approaches to examine pervasive early childhood workforce matters.

Topics may include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Early childhood teacher preparation/initial teacher education;
  • Early childhood qualifications;
  • Quality early childhood workforce;
  • Early childhood teacher professional development;
  • Retaining early childhood teachers;
  • Sustaining early childhood teachers;
  • Belonging as an early childhood teacher;
  • Pedagogical leadership;
  • Leadership;
  • Professional identity.

Ball, S. (1998). Educational studies, policy entrepreneurship and social theory. In R. Slee, G. Weiner & S. L. F. Tomlinson (Eds.), School effectiveness for whom? (pp. 70-83). London, UK: Falmer.

Dr. Megan Gibson
Dr. Marie White
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • early childhood workforce
  • initial teacher education
  • professional identity
  • workforce leadership

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 441 KB  
Article
Sustaining the Early Childhood Education and Care Workforce Through University-Led Innovations: The Role of the Teaching Coach
by Mandy Cooke, Rachel Foster and Katherine Bussey
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(12), 1707; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15121707 - 17 Dec 2025
Viewed by 57
Abstract
The importance of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) is recognised by Australian governments and significant reforms are being implemented to increase access to high-quality ECEC. Whilst increased recognition and access are vital, so are strategies to support a high-quality and sustainable workforce. [...] Read more.
The importance of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) is recognised by Australian governments and significant reforms are being implemented to increase access to high-quality ECEC. Whilst increased recognition and access are vital, so are strategies to support a high-quality and sustainable workforce. One strategy is for governments to partner with universities to support Diploma-qualified educators to upskill to become teachers. Providing support for Diploma pathway students to be successful in their studies and motivated and to stay in the profession post-graduation is vital. The aim of this study was to investigate a specific design element within one innovative initial teacher education programme for Diploma pathway students—the role of the teaching coach. The teaching coach role was designed to support Diploma pathway students to complete their degree and help create the professional networks needed to sustain them in the profession long term. Using a single site case study approach, qualitative data were collected via semi-structured interviews with teaching coaches. Using the theory of practice architectures to the analyse data, we interrogated the practices of the teaching coaches, how teaching coaches perceived they supported student success and the arrangements that enabled and constrained these practices. From the perspective of the teaching coaches, their role supported student learning and professional networks. The role also provided unanticipated benefits for the teaching coaches themselves. The study highlights the importance of universities going beyond traditional practices to contribute to professional learning and networks for ECEC professionals throughout their careers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 186 KB  
Article
Learning with Place©: Pedagogical Leadership for Doing ‘Otherwise’
by Jeanne Marie Iorio and Catherine Hamm
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(12), 1620; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15121620 - 2 Dec 2025
Viewed by 242
Abstract
The Learning with Place© framework is a process for change, grounded in positioning local Place first. Generated from a decade-long post-qualitative inquiry—Learning with Place©—focused on pedagogy and practices, the framework creates the conditions to rethink leadership as ‘otherwise’. In this paper, we will [...] Read more.
The Learning with Place© framework is a process for change, grounded in positioning local Place first. Generated from a decade-long post-qualitative inquiry—Learning with Place©—focused on pedagogy and practices, the framework creates the conditions to rethink leadership as ‘otherwise’. In this paper, we will offer pedagogical leadership as relational leadership situated in local Place that encompasses collective thinking and relational professional learning to disrupt expected hierarchical contextless leadership. Using speculative fiction, we will share what it means to reimagine pedagogical leadership in new ways, with the intention of offering the possibility of what can eventually happen in the practice of pedagogical leadership. Our speculations make visible how pedagogical leadership should move beyond education settings and be connected with local histories, stories, and the more-than-human. These entanglements provide innovative ways to engage with local and global issues and work towards the common good. Full article
15 pages, 288 KB  
Article
Cultivating Collaborative Practice to Sustain and Retain Early Childhood Educators
by Belinda Downey, Leanne Gibbs, Will Letts and Sharynne McLeod
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(11), 1451; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111451 - 1 Nov 2025
Viewed by 872
Abstract
The retention of educators is foundational to the provision of high-quality early childhood education and care (ECEC), yet the sector continues to face significant workforce challenges. This study explores how organisational climate and leadership influence collaborative practice and, in turn, educator retention. Using [...] Read more.
The retention of educators is foundational to the provision of high-quality early childhood education and care (ECEC), yet the sector continues to face significant workforce challenges. This study explores how organisational climate and leadership influence collaborative practice and, in turn, educator retention. Using a constructivist grounded theory (CGT) approach, data were collected through focus groups and interviews with 34 educators across diverse service types in the Northern Territory, Australia. In accordance with CGT, analysis revealed two core categories—‘struggle’ and ‘hope’—reflecting the impact of workplace relationships on collaborative practice. In ECEC settings where communication was limited and psychological safety was lacking, participants described resistant behaviours and horizontal violence, which contributed to educator stress and attrition. Conversely, environments that fostered open communication, reflective practice, and trusting relationships enabled collaborative practice that supported educator wellbeing and retention. The findings suggest that intentional leadership and an organisational climate that embodies ‘care’ are essential for cultivating collaboration, enhancing job satisfaction, and improving workforce stability. This paper proposes that ‘building connection builds retention,’ highlighting the importance of relational and reflective practices in sustaining the ECEC workforce. Full article
13 pages, 237 KB  
Article
Mindsets for Preschool Inclusion: Preschool Teachers’ Perspectives on Disability in Early Childhood Education
by Daniel Then and Agneta Floth
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(9), 1261; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091261 - 22 Sep 2025
Viewed by 1837
Abstract
Inclusion is a process of social transformation that is profoundly shaping the field of early childhood education. According to a narrow understanding of inclusion, the focus is on the joint participation of children with and without disabilities in general educational settings. How preschool [...] Read more.
Inclusion is a process of social transformation that is profoundly shaping the field of early childhood education. According to a narrow understanding of inclusion, the focus is on the joint participation of children with and without disabilities in general educational settings. How preschool teachers perceive and facilitate the inclusion of children with disabilities in this context depends significantly on their understanding of disability. This study therefore explores preschool teachers’ perspectives on the construct of disability. The data are based on interviews with n = 21 preschool teachers working in German preschools. The results show that teachers partially view disabilities as individual deficits of the child, partially as consequences of inadequate environmental conditions, and partially as something to be avoided and deconstructed. Most teachers combine multiple understandings of disability. Overall, the results indicate that a significant number of teachers hold a mindset shaped by the assumption of two distinct groups: those with and those without disabilities (dual-group theory). The results are discussed in the context of current debates on educational inclusion and the dual-group theory. Full article
16 pages, 752 KB  
Article
Exploring the Effectiveness of a Virtual Coaching Program to Support Staff Working at Families as First Teachers Playgroups in the Remote Northern Territory, Australia
by Jane Page, Isabel Brookes, Catriona Elek, Patricia Eadie and Lisa Murray
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(6), 699; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060699 - 4 Jun 2025
Viewed by 851
Abstract
Coaching is an important form of professional development for the early childhood education and care (ECEC) workforce. However, educators working in remote contexts do not always have access to this type of support. This paper explores the effectiveness of a virtual (online and [...] Read more.
Coaching is an important form of professional development for the early childhood education and care (ECEC) workforce. However, educators working in remote contexts do not always have access to this type of support. This paper explores the effectiveness of a virtual (online and telephone) coaching program focusing on the implementation of evidence-informed Conversational Reading strategies in supported playgroups for Aboriginal families in the Northern Territory of Australia. Fourteen Family Educators and Family Liaison Officers across ten Families as First Teachers playgroups in the Northern Territory participated in the coaching program over twelve months. Coaching records, planning documents, participant feedback, and video recordings of participants’ practice were analysed to explore the impact and acceptability of the coaching program. The findings indicate that participation in the cycle of virtual coaching, planning, and reflection supported participants in implementing evidence-informed teaching strategies, offering language-rich experiences to children frequently and with increased fidelity, and engaging with families about their use of these strategies in the home. The model of coaching developed shows promise for wider implementation in ECEC contexts, particularly in remote communities where access to high-quality professional learning and development can be limited. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop