Critical Mathematics Education: Bridging Theory, Practice, and Social Change

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2025 | Viewed by 868

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
Interests: philosophy of education; educational assessment; mathematics education

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Critical mathematics education (CME) accentuates the social, political, and ethical dimensions of mathematics and challenges the traditional views of the discipline as a neutral and objective field of study. Rather, CME holds that mathematics is deeply entangled with societal structures, power relations, and cultural values. Pivotal aspects of CME include the following:

  • Illumination of social justice issues to address inequalities and injustices in society by developing students’ awareness of the ways in which mathematics is used to maintain or challenge power dynamics, such as in politics, economics, or environmental issues;
  • Empowerment of students, particularly those from marginalized communities, to use mathematics as a vehicle for understanding and effecting positive change in the world;
  • Encouragement of students to use mathematics for critical purposes (e.g., examining data critically, questioning mathematical modelling assumptions, and understanding how mathematical models influence decision-making and policy formulation), rather than solely for technical problem-solving;
  • Challenging dominant narratives in mathematics education, which have the potential to exclude diverse cultural perspectives or reinforce stereotypical views about what it means to be “good” at mathematics and who is “good” at the discipline.

This Special Issue seeks to make further innovative contributions to the field of CME, and we invite original research articles or reviews which align with this objective. Potential topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Practical implementation of CME strategies: how CME can be implemented in diverse educational contexts and successfully integrated into standard curricula and assessment systems without forfeiting its critical dimension, appropriate teacher training, and professional development in CME;
  • Cultural and contextual relevance to CME: how CME can be adapted to non-Western or indigenous contexts, how to adapt the principles of CME to empower students from different types of marginalized communities (e.g., based on race, gender, socioeconomic status, or disability status), and how various forms of oppression and inequality intersect with mathematical learning;
  • Student outcomes and impact of CME: how to gauge the effectiveness of CME;
  • Integration of CME with other disciplines: the optimal ways to integrate mathematics with subjects such as history, politics, economics, or environmental science in a manner that preserves the rigour of the individual disciplines but also addresses critical social issues;
  • Technology and CME: the role of CME in preparing students to critically assess algorithms, data collection, or AI systems that impact on social justice issues, and the role of technology in facilitating critical mathematical inquiry;
  • Student agency and voice in CME: how students from different backgrounds perceive and engage with CME, and how students view their own agency and capacity to use mathematics as a tool to effect social change;
  • Policy and institutional barriers to the implementation of CME: how educational policies and contemporary approaches to standardized testing may hinder or support the implementation of CME, how to advocate for policies that accommodate the broader goals of CME while still satisfying the demands of national education systems, the navigation of institutional constraints, overcoming resistance, and engaging policymakers, administrators and parents in supporting CME approaches.

Dr. Ian Cantley
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • practical implementation of CME
  • cultural and contextual relevance to CME
  • student outcomes and long-term impact of CME
  • integration of CME with other disciplines
  • technology and CME
  • student agency and voice in CME
  • policy and institutional barriers to CME implementation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 7113 KiB  
Article
Juggling Balls and Mathematics: An Ethnomathematical Exploration
by Giovanna Zito and Veronica Albanese
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(3), 387; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030387 - 20 Mar 2025
Viewed by 154
Abstract
Ethnomathematics, as a field of study, promotes recognizing the diversity in ways of thinking and doing mathematics, challenging the hierarchies and exclusions typical of traditional mathematics education. This research explores the practice of juggling, specifically analyzing three-ball juggling sequences to uncover the mathematical [...] Read more.
Ethnomathematics, as a field of study, promotes recognizing the diversity in ways of thinking and doing mathematics, challenging the hierarchies and exclusions typical of traditional mathematics education. This research explores the practice of juggling, specifically analyzing three-ball juggling sequences to uncover the mathematical structures and patterns embedded in this ancient art form. In a social association during a workshop, two jugglers and seven juggling learners interact with one of the researchers, a mathematics educator, to co-construct a shared model establishing a symmetrical dialogue based on the Alangui’s principles of “mutual interrogation” between the practice of juggling and the domain of mathematics. The knowledge exchange process is envisioned as a “barter” where both the mathematics educator and the jugglers contribute their unique perspectives to generate new and hybrid understandings. With a qualitative approach, from the analysis of the data collected during the ethnographic field work (notes, audiovisual recordings) emerges how the initial model, created by mathematicians and jugglers, was reinterpreted to better align with the cultural community’s practice. The research revealed that juggling serves as a concrete context for exploring abstract mathematical concepts and that mathematical analysis of juggling sequences helps jugglers gain a deeper understanding of underlying structures, enhancing their creativity. The hybrid model developed in this study offers a promising resource to integrating ethnomathematical perspectives into formal mathematics education, fostering a more situated and engaging learning experience for students. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop