Diagnosis and Management of Liver Diseases—2nd Edition

A special issue of Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418). This special issue belongs to the section "Clinical Diagnosis and Prognosis".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 May 2025 | Viewed by 8810

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon 14584, Republic of Korea
Interests: liver cirrhosis; fatty liver; viral hepatitis; hepatocellular carcinoma
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Advances in the field of diagnostics of liver diseases have been spurred by the development of increasingly accurate biomarkers or image modalities that have helped to revolutionize the diagnostic accuracy and provided increased precision in targeted therapeutics.

This Special Issue welcomes contributions covering the current aspects of the diagnosis and management of liver diseases. Submissions may include articles presenting current original research, new experimental methodologies, and/or review articles summarizing the current state of the art for clinical diagnosis, state-of-the-art treatment, and management of liver disease. Discussions of the current drawbacks to diagnostic accuracy and future directions for improved accuracy and management are welcome. I look forward to scrutinizing your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Jeong-Ju Yoo
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Diagnostics is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • liver diseases
  • fatty liver
  • liver cirrhosis
  • viral hepatitis
  • hepatocellular carcinoma
  • diagnosis and Management

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

13 pages, 1168 KiB  
Article
Frailty and Sarcopenia Assessment in Patients with Advanced Chronic Liver Disease in a Tertiary Center in Romania
by Petruta Violeta Filip, Denisa Cuciureanu, Corina Silvia Pop, Andreea Nicoleta Marinescu, Florentina Furtunescu and Laura Sorina Diaconu
Diagnostics 2025, 15(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15010016 - 25 Dec 2024
Viewed by 345
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Sarcopenia and frailty are both multidimensional and interrelated problems for patients with cirrhosis and require prompt assessment and appropriate management because of their impact on disease outcomes. Our purpose is to identify the prevalence of sarcopenia and frailty in patients with [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Sarcopenia and frailty are both multidimensional and interrelated problems for patients with cirrhosis and require prompt assessment and appropriate management because of their impact on disease outcomes. Our purpose is to identify the prevalence of sarcopenia and frailty in patients with advanced liver disease. Furtherksdnvk more, our purpose is to explore the association between sarcopenia, frailty, and various complications and the impact of these conditions on short- and long-term hospital survival rates. Methods: A prospective, observational, unicentric study was conducted in an emergency university hospital in Romania between January 2021 and December 2023 that included patients with advanced liver diseases. The patients with sarcopenia and frailty were selected using measurements of handgrip strength (HGS), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), liver frailty index (LFI), and skeletal muscle index (SMI). Patients were divided into four groups based on the presence of sarcopenia and/or frailty. Results: This study included 128 patients. Younger patients associated with both sarcopenia and frailty (55.76 ± 10.46 years). Most males were without sarcopenia and frailty (63.93%) compared to those with both sarcopenia and frailty (36.07%). The Child–Pugh score C was identified in the majority of those with both sarcopenia and frailty (69.70%). Higher values for MELD-Na scores were obtained in the group with sarcopenia and frailty (25.45 ± 6.924). Biomarkers like albumin, sodium, C-reactive protein, bilirubin, and platelets were statistically significant as mortality predictors in all four groups. Patients with both sarcopenia and frailty presented more often with encephalopathy and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Survival rates in the short and long term were lower for the patients who associated both sarcopenia and frailty compared to those without sarcopenia and frailty. Conclusions: The presence of sarcopenia and frailty significantly impacts outcomes in patients with decompensated advanced liver disease. When both conditions coexist in the same patient, they markedly increase in-hospital mortality, as well as short- and long-term survival rates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Liver Diseases—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 702 KiB  
Article
The Role of Liver Stiffness Measurement and Spleen Stiffness Measurement in Predicting the Risk of Developing HCC
by Rui Gaspar, Joana Mota, Maria João Almeida, Marco Silva and Guilherme Macedo
Diagnostics 2024, 14(24), 2867; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14242867 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 494
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cause of cancer worldwide. More than 90% of cases occur in cirrhotic patients, with the degree of fibrosis being the main risk factor for the development of HCC. Liver biopsy is the gold-standard for [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cause of cancer worldwide. More than 90% of cases occur in cirrhotic patients, with the degree of fibrosis being the main risk factor for the development of HCC. Liver biopsy is the gold-standard for fibrosis assessment, but it is an invasive procedure. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) has shown high accuracy for diagnosing liver cirrhosis, as well as for predicting decompensation and HCC development. More recently, spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) has presented excellent results for ruling in/out high-risk varices and the presence of clinical significant portal hypertension. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between LSM and SSM and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: A prospective study on cirrhotic patients was performed in a tertiary center from January 2020 to May 2024. All patients were submitted to liver and spleen elastography (with a new probe of 100 Hz) by the same blinded operator and were treated in the same institution for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Results: We included 299 cirrhotic patients, 75.9% male, with a mean age of 61.8 years (±10.0). The median value of LSM was 25.7 kPa [4.5–75.0] and that of SSM was 44.6 kPa [7.9–100.0]. The median follow-up time was 505 days [114.0–1541.0]. During this period, 18 patients developed HCC, with a median time to HCC diagnosis after LSM and SSM of 321 days [63.0–1227.0]. LSM was the only factor associated with the development of HCC (p = 0.002) with an AUC of 0.715. On the other hand, SSM was not associated with the development of HCC. Conclusions: We found that the risk of developing HCC is associated with liver fibrosis but not with portal hypertension (assessed using SSM). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Liver Diseases—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3898 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Histologic Portal T-Cell Density on the Clinical Outcomes in Hepatic Graft-versus-Host Disease and Autoimmune Liver Diseases
by Soon Kyu Lee, Sung-Soo Park, Silvia Park, Sung-Eun Lee, Byung-Sik Cho, Ki-Seong Eom, Yoo-Jin Kim, Hee-Je Kim, Chang-Ki Min, Seok-Goo Cho, Jong Wook Lee, Seok Lee, Younghoon Kim, Ji Won Han, Hyun Yang, Si Hyun Bae, Jeong Won Jang, Jong Young Choi, Seung Kew Yoon, Dong Yeup Lee, Sung Hak Lee, Jae-Ho Yoon and Pil Soo Sungadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Diagnostics 2024, 14(16), 1745; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14161745 - 12 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1236
Abstract
Hepatic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) significantly impacts morbidity and mortality among allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. However, the relationship between clinical and immunopathological phenotypes and their influence on clinical outcomes in hepatic GVHD is not well understood. In this study, we aimed to [...] Read more.
Hepatic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) significantly impacts morbidity and mortality among allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. However, the relationship between clinical and immunopathological phenotypes and their influence on clinical outcomes in hepatic GVHD is not well understood. In this study, we aimed to study the implications of portal T-cell infiltration on the clinical outcomes in hepatic GHVD and its similarities to autoimmune liver disease. We analyzed 78 patients with biopsy-confirmed hepatic GVHD (n = 38) or autoimmune liver disease (n = 40) between 2016 and 2021. The cholestatic variant was defined by an R-value < 2.0, based on the ratio of alanine aminotransferase to alkaline phosphatase. The primary outcome was the biochemical response at 4 (early) and 8–12 (late) weeks after corticosteroid treatment. In hepatic GVHD patients, the hepatitic variant (n = 19) showed greater CD3+ T-cell infiltration than the cholestatic variant (n = 19; p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the infiltration of CD20+, CD38+, or CD68+ cells. The hepatitic variant had significantly better early and late responses and higher liver-related event-free survival than the cholestatic variants (p < 0.05). Concerning autoimmune liver diseases, the autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) group had significantly more portal T-cell infiltration and better treatment responses than the primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) group. In conclusion, higher portal T-cell infiltration may be associated with better clinical outcomes in patients with hepatic GVHD. Additionally, this study highlights similarities in portal T-cell infiltration and treatment response patterns between AIH and the hepatitic variant, as well as PBC and the cholestatic variant. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Liver Diseases—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1746 KiB  
Article
Fibrosis Progression in Patients with Budd–Chiari Syndrome and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS): A Long-Term Study Using Transient Elastography
by Martin Rössle, Dominik Bettinger, Lukas Sturm, Marlene Reincke, Robert Thimme and Michael Schultheiss
Diagnostics 2024, 14(3), 344; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14030344 - 5 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1251
Abstract
Hepatic vein outflow obstruction causes congestion of the liver, leading to necrosis, fibrosis, and portal hypertension (PH). A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) reduces congestion and PH by providing artificial outflow. The aim of the study was to investigate fibrosis progression in patients [...] Read more.
Hepatic vein outflow obstruction causes congestion of the liver, leading to necrosis, fibrosis, and portal hypertension (PH). A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) reduces congestion and PH by providing artificial outflow. The aim of the study was to investigate fibrosis progression in patients with Budd–Chiari syndrome (BCS) and TIPS using transient elastography (TE). From 2010 to 2022, 25 patients received 80 TEs using FibroScan®, Echosens, Paris, France (3.2 ± 2.1 per patient). TIPS function was assessed via Doppler ultrasound or radiological intervention. At the time of TE examination, 21 patients had patent shunts. Four patients had occluded shunts but normal pressure gradients during the intervention. The first TE measurement performed 9.8 ± 6.8 years after the BCS diagnosis showed stiffness values of 24.6 ± 11.5 kPa. A second or last measurement performed 7.0 ± 2.9 years after the first measurement showed similar stiffness values of 24.1 ± 15.7 kPa (p = 0.943). Except for three patients, the liver stiffness was always >12 kPa, indicating advanced fibrosis. Stiffness values obtained <5 years (n = 8, 23.8 ± 9.2 kPa) or >5 years after the BCS diagnosis (24.9 ± 12.7 kPa) did not differ (p = 0.907). In addition, stiffness was not related to the interval between BCS and TIPS implantation (p = 0.999). One patient received liver transplantation, and two patients died from non-hepatic causes. Most patients developed mild to moderate cirrhosis, possibly during the early phase of the disease. Timing of TIPS did not influence fibrosis progression. This and the release of portal hypertension may argue in favor of a generous TIPS implantation practice in patients with BCS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Liver Diseases—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2851 KiB  
Article
Addition of Kidney Dysfunction Type to MELD-Na for the Prediction of Survival in Cirrhotic Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation in Comparison with MELD 3.0 with Albumin
by Kyeong-Min Yeom, Jong-In Chang, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Ji Eun Moon, Dong Hyun Sinn, Young Seok Kim and Sang Gyune Kim
Diagnostics 2024, 14(1), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010039 - 25 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1275
Abstract
It is well known that renal dysfunction has a devastating effect on the prognosis of liver cirrhosis. In this study, the aim was to assess whether the incorporation of the kidney dysfunction type into the MELD-Na score enhances its predictive capacity for outcomes [...] Read more.
It is well known that renal dysfunction has a devastating effect on the prognosis of liver cirrhosis. In this study, the aim was to assess whether the incorporation of the kidney dysfunction type into the MELD-Na score enhances its predictive capacity for outcomes in patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT), compared to utilizing the MELD 3.0 score with albumin. In total, 2080 patients awaiting the LT were enrolled at two tertiary care institutions in Korea. Discrimination abilities were analyzed by using Harrell’s c-index and iAUC values between MELD-Na-kidney dysfunction type (MELD-Na-KT) and MELD 3.0 with albumin. Clinical endpoints encompassed 3-month survival, 3-month transplant-free survival (TFS), overall survival (OS), and total TFS. Out of the total of 2080 individuals, 669 (32.16%) were male. Regarding the types of renal function impairment, 1614 (77.6%) were in the normal group, 112 (5.38%) in the AKD group, 320 (15.35%) in the CKD group, and 34 (1.63%) were in the AKD on CKD group. MELD 3.0 with albumin showed better discrimination (c-index = 0.714) compared to MELD-Na-KT (c-index = 0.708) in predicting 3-month survival. Similar results were observed for OS, 3-month TFS, and total TFS as well. When divided by sex, MELD 3.0 with albumin showed the comparable prediction of 3-month survival to MELD-Na-KT (c-index 0.675 vs. 0.671, p-value 0.221) in males. However, in the female group, MELD 3.0 with albumin demonstrated better results compared to MELD-Na-KT (c-index 0.733 vs. 0.723, p-value 0.001). The integration of kidney dysfunction types into the MELD-Na did not yield superior prognostic results compared to the MELD 3.0 score with albumin. Rather, in the female group, the MELD 3.0 score with albumin was better able to predict survival. These findings suggest that laboratory values pertaining to liver dysfunction or creatinine levels may be more significant than the type of kidney dysfunction when predicting the short-term prognosis of LT candidates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Liver Diseases—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 859 KiB  
Article
Comparing Three Profoundly Influential Prognostic Scores in Cirrhotic Patients with Acute-on-Chronic-Liver Failure Admitted to the ICU: Prediction of One-Month Mortality—A Retrospective Cohort Study
by Shih-Hua Lin, Wei-Ting Chen, Ming-Hung Tsai, Wei-Liang Kuo, Sheng-Fu Wang, Yu Liu, Yu-Ting Chiu, Bo-Huan Chen, Chien-Hao Huang and Rong-Nan Chien
Diagnostics 2023, 13(20), 3160; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13203160 - 10 Oct 2023
Viewed by 1834
Abstract
Background: Acute-on-chronic-liver failure (ACLF) demonstrates high short-term mortality rates and usually requires intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Accurate prognostication of these patients is pivotal for timely referral for liver transplantation. The superiority of CLIF-C ACLF, CLIF-C ACLF lactate, and NACSELD-ACLF scores in Asian [...] Read more.
Background: Acute-on-chronic-liver failure (ACLF) demonstrates high short-term mortality rates and usually requires intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Accurate prognostication of these patients is pivotal for timely referral for liver transplantation. The superiority of CLIF-C ACLF, CLIF-C ACLF lactate, and NACSELD-ACLF scores in Asian patients with ACLF admitted to an ICU remains inconclusive. Aims: To compare the predictive performance of CLIF-C ACLF, CLIF-C ACLF lactate, and NACSELD-ACLF scores for one-month mortality. Methods: 276 consecutive cirrhotic patients with ACLF admitted to ICU were enrolled. The prognostic values for one-month mortality were assessed by AUROC analysis. Results: The primary cause of cirrhosis in this cohort was alcohol abuse (56.5%). AUROC analysis (95% confidence intervals) demonstrated that CLIF-C ACLF lactate [0.802 (0.747–0.856)] outperformed both CLIF-C ACLF [0.791 (0.733–0.848)] and NACSELD-ACLF [0.673 (0.606–0.740)] in predicting one-month mortality. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the predictive abilities of CLIF-C ACLF and CLIF-C ACLF lactate. Conclusions: In critically ill cirrhotic patients with ACLF admitted to the hepatology ICU, CLIF ACLF-lactate outperformed CLIF-C ACLF and NACSELD-ACLF in predicting one-month mortality. Nevertheless, no statistically significant difference was observed between CLIF-C ACLF and CLIF-C ACLF lactate. Larger-scale multi-center prospective studies are warranted to validate these results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Liver Diseases—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

17 pages, 1073 KiB  
Review
The Bleeding Edge: Managing Coagulation and Bleeding Risk in Patients with Cirrhosis Undergoing Interventional Procedures
by Rareș Crăciun, Cristiana Grapă, Tudor Mocan, Cristian Tefas, Iuliana Nenu, Alina Buliarcă, Horia Ștefănescu, Andrada Nemes, Bogdan Procopeț and Zeno Spârchez
Diagnostics 2024, 14(22), 2602; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14222602 - 20 Nov 2024
Viewed by 733
Abstract
This review addresses the peri-procedural bleeding risks in patients with cirrhosis, emphasizing the need for careful coagulation assessment and targeted correction strategies. Liver disease presents a unique hemostatic challenge, where traditional coagulation tests may not accurately predict bleeding risk, complicating the management of [...] Read more.
This review addresses the peri-procedural bleeding risks in patients with cirrhosis, emphasizing the need for careful coagulation assessment and targeted correction strategies. Liver disease presents a unique hemostatic challenge, where traditional coagulation tests may not accurately predict bleeding risk, complicating the management of procedures like paracentesis, endoscopic therapy, and various interventional procedures. As such, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of current data, guidelines, and practices for managing coagulation in cirrhotic patients, with a focus on minimizing bleeding risk while avoiding unnecessary correction with blood products. The objectives of this review are threefold: first, to outline the existing evidence on bleeding risks associated with common invasive procedures in cirrhotic patients; second, to evaluate the efficacy and limitations of standard and advanced coagulation tests in predicting procedural bleeding; and third, to examine the role of blood product transfusions and other hemostatic interventions, considering potential risks and benefits in this delicate population. In doing so, this review highlights patient-specific and procedure-specific factors that influence bleeding risk and informs best practices to optimize patient outcomes. This review progresses through key procedures often performed in cirrhotic patients. The discussion begins with paracentesis, a low-risk procedure, followed by endoscopic therapy for varices, and concludes with high-risk interventions requiring advanced hemostatic considerations. Each chapter addresses procedural techniques, bleeding risk assessment, and evidence-based correction approaches. This comprehensive structure aims to guide clinicians in making informed, evidence-backed decisions in managing coagulation in cirrhosis, ultimately reducing procedural complications and improving care quality for this high-risk population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Liver Diseases—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

3 pages, 4122 KiB  
Interesting Images
Atraumatic Hepatic Laceration with Hemoperitoneum
by Gaetano Maria Russo, Evangelia Zoi, Imma D’Iglio and Maria Luisa Mangoni di Santo Stefano
Diagnostics 2024, 14(18), 2088; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14182088 - 21 Sep 2024
Viewed by 616
Abstract
Introduction: A rare case of atraumatic liver laceration associated with hemoperitoneum is presented in a patient with amyloidosis who came to the hospital for abdominal pain. Case Presentation: The imaging findings reveal significant hepatomegaly with finely heterogeneous hepatic density and subcapsular hypo-dense streaks [...] Read more.
Introduction: A rare case of atraumatic liver laceration associated with hemoperitoneum is presented in a patient with amyloidosis who came to the hospital for abdominal pain. Case Presentation: The imaging findings reveal significant hepatomegaly with finely heterogeneous hepatic density and subcapsular hypo-dense streaks in segments VI and VII, likely representing lesions. Post-contrast enhancement shows a punctiform contrast medium extravasation within the subhepatic fluid collection, visible from the arterial phase and intensifying in subsequent study phases. Discussion: These imaging findings suggest an atraumatic hepatic laceration, a diagnosis confirmed by the presence of hemoperitoneum distributed bilaterally under the diaphragm, in the paracolic gutters, along the mesentery root, and predominantly in the peri-hepatic region. Conclusion: The detailed imaging analysis provided critical insights into the diagnosis and management of this rare clinical presentation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Liver Diseases—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop