Application of Nuclear Medicine in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

A special issue of Current Oncology (ISSN 1718-7729).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 April 2025 | Viewed by 1085

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples, Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
Interests: nuclear medicine; peptide receptor radionuclide therapy; endocrinology; oncology; computed tomography
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Nuclear medicine has rapidly advanced in recent times. In just thirty years, it has made two significant leaps forward and is now on the brink of another breakthrough that could significantly affect cancer treatment within the coming years.

In the 1990s, FDG-PET revolutionized nuclear medicine by using a radioactive glucose analogue to detect cancer cells, becoming the standard for detecting cancer. In the early 2000s, hybrid imaging techniques like PET/CT, SPECT/CT, and PET/MRI further advanced the field, combining different technologies to improve patient care and detection of abnormalities.

Nuclear imaging is entering a new era called theranostics, combining cancer diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment. This approach utilizes new radiopharmaceuticals that specifically bind to and destroy tumor cells, targeting difficult-to-treat cancers like gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

I invite researchers to address this topic, providing insightful findings on the known and new applications of nuclear medicine in cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Dr. Michele Klain
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Current Oncology is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • PET/CT
  • imaging
  • nuclear medicine
  • cancer diagnosis

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 2268 KiB  
Article
The Safety and Efficacy of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single Center Experience
by Leandra Piscopo, Emilia Zampella, Fabio Volpe, Valeria Gaudieri, Carmela Nappi, Erica Di Donna, Stefania Clemente, Antonio Varallo, Mariano Scaglione, Alberto Cuocolo and Michele Klain
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(9), 5617-5629; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31090416 - 18 Sep 2024
Viewed by 813
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radionuclide therapy with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE according to our single center experience at the University of Naples Federico II. For the present analysis, we considered 21 patients with progressive, [...] Read more.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radionuclide therapy with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE according to our single center experience at the University of Naples Federico II. For the present analysis, we considered 21 patients with progressive, advanced, well-differentiated G1 and G2 in patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE according to the decisions of a multidisciplinary team. All patients underwent four cycles of 7–8 GBq of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE every 8 weeks. A whole-body scan (WBS) was performed 4, 48, and 168 h after each treatment. The dosimetry towards the organ at risk and target lesions was calculated. For each patient, renal and bone marrow parameters were evaluated before, during, and 3 months after the end of the treatment. Follow-up data were obtained and RECIST criteria were considered as the endpoint. Among 21 patients enrolled (mean age 65 ± 9 years); 17 (81%) were men and the small intestine was the most frequent location of disease (n = 12). A mild albeit significant variation (p < 0.05) in both platelets and white blood cell counts among all time points was observed, despite it disappearing 3 months after the end of the therapy. According to the RECIST criteria, 11 (55%) patients had a partial response to therapy and 8 (40%) had stable disease. Only one (5%) patient had disease progression 4 months after treatment. Our data confirm that [177Lu]Lu-DOTA is safe and effective in controlling the burden disease of G1/G2 GEP-NETs patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Nuclear Medicine in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop