Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
8.8
4.4
Journals
Cancers
Special Issues
The Role of Aromatase Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Treatment
share announcement

The Role of Aromatase Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Treatment

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Therapy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 1 September 2025 | Viewed by 3438

Special Issue Editor

Dr. Chandra Bhushan Mishra

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
Interests: breast cancer; vitro anticancer; enzyme; novel inhibitors

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Aromatase inhibitors play a crucial role in breast cancer treatment by blocking the enzyme aromatase, which is responsible for estrogen production. Estrogen fuels the growth of hormone receptor-positive breast cancers, and these inhibitors help reduce estrogen levels, inhibiting cancer cell proliferation. Often used in postmenopausal women, aromatase inhibitors are a key component of hormone therapy, complementing other treatments to improve outcomes and reduce the risk of cancer recurrence.

Dr. Chandra Bhushan Mishra
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • aromatase inhibitors
  • breast cancer
  • enzyme aromatase
  • estrogen

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 2244 KiB  
Article
CDK4/6 Inhibitors-Induced Macrocytosis Is Not Associated with Hemolysis and Does Not Impact Hemoglobin Homeostasis
by Tiago Barroso, Leila Costa, Lisa Gonçalves, Vanessa Patel, João Araújo, Inês Pinho, Carolina Monteiro, Miguel Esperança-Martins, Catarina Abreu, Rita Teixeira de Sousa, Helena Pais, Gonçalo Nogueira-Costa, Sofia Torres, Leonor Abreu Ribeiro and Luís Marques da Costa
Cancers 2025, 17(9), 1567; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091567 - 5 May 2025
Viewed by 756
Abstract
Background: CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) are the first-line treatment for metastatic luminal-like breast cancer (BC). These drugs induce macrocytosis without anemia in most patients. The mechanism for the red blood cell (RBC) changes is unknown. In vitro and animal studies show that RBCs [...] Read more.
Background: CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) are the first-line treatment for metastatic luminal-like breast cancer (BC). These drugs induce macrocytosis without anemia in most patients. The mechanism for the red blood cell (RBC) changes is unknown. In vitro and animal studies show that RBCs from CDK6-knockout mice have increased membrane fragility, but the clinical impact of CDK4/6is on human RBC lifespan is not known. We sought to determine the impact of CDK4/6is on RBC lifespan and detect changes in the regulation of hemoglobin production. Using the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) measurements at several time points, we can study the evolution of MCV, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), and RBC count over time. From this, one can estimate the RBC lifespan under CDK4/6is. Methods: We performed a unicentric retrospective study. Based on published models of RBC population dynamics, we have coded a biologically inspired model which allowed us to extract values for biological parameters, including the RBC lifespan. Results: A total of 122 patients were identified, and 1959 laboratory measurements were analyzed. After the pre-treatment RBCs were replaced, the mean MCV increased by 12.6 femtoliter (fL) (95% Bayesian credible interval [CdI] 13–14), the MCHC increased slightly by 0.69 g/dL (95% CdI 0.42–0.96), and the RBC count decreased by 0.77 × 109/L (95% CdI 0.42 × 109/L–0.96 × 109/L). The net result was a 0.64 g/dL (95% CdI 0.48–0.80) rise in hemoglobin. The mean total RBC lifetime was 118 days (95% CdI 114–122), similar to the value measured in healthy persons. Discussion and Conclusions: These findings suggest that, despite changes in RBC volume, CDK4/6is do not predispose patients to RBC destruction and do not impair regulation of hemoglobin homeostasis. We show that CDK4/6is do not decrease the RBC lifespan in pre-treatment erythrocytes. Unfortunately, this method cannot determine the lifespan of post-treatment RBCs, but further research could help answer this question. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Aromatase Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Treatment)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1661 KiB  
Article
Subtype-Specific Survival of Young Women with Breast Cancer and Its Interaction with the Germline BRCA Status
by Anna Maria Hage, Pimrapat Gebert, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Elham Hedayati, Dorothee Speiser and Maria Margarete Karsten
Cancers 2024, 16(4), 738; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040738 - 10 Feb 2024
Viewed by 2033
Abstract
Data are scarce on the role of pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (gBRCAm) in subtype-specific survival in young women who develop breast cancer under the age of 40. This retrospective, real-world cohort study assessed the distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall [...] Read more.
Data are scarce on the role of pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (gBRCAm) in subtype-specific survival in young women who develop breast cancer under the age of 40. This retrospective, real-world cohort study assessed the distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) of young women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2008 and 2019 while taking into consideration the interaction of clinical subtypes and the gBRCA status. Among 473 women, HR+/Her2− was the most common subtype (49.0%), followed by TNBC (31.3%), HR+/Her2+ (13.7%), and Her2+/HR− (5.9%). The gBRCA status was known for 319 cases (gBRCAwt (wild-type – without pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2): 204, gBRCA1m: 83, gBRCA2m: 31, 1 patient with both). The distribution of clinical subtypes varied depending on the gBRCA status (p < 0.001). In survival analysis with a median follow-up of 43 months, the unadjusted DDFS and OS were worse for gBRCAwt TNBC compared to both HR+ subtypes, but not for gBRCAm TNBC patients. T-stage, nodal involvement, and the gBRCA status were identified as significant for survival in TNBC. In TNBC, gBRCAm was associated with better DDFS and OS than gBRCAwt (5-year DDFS 81.4% vs. 54.3%, p = 0.012 and 5-year OS 96.7% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001). In contrast, in HR+/Her2− patients, gBRCAm patients showed a tendency for worse survival, though not statistically significant. Subtype-specific survival in young women with breast cancer needs to be evaluated in interaction with the gBRCA status. For TNBC, gBRCAm is of favorable prognostic value for overall survival, while patients with gBRCAwt TNBC need to be considered to have the highest risk for adverse survival outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Aromatase Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Treatment)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-2
Back to TopTop