Strategies for Clinical Cancer Chemoprevention: From Bench to Bedside

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Clinical Research of Cancer".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 September 2023) | Viewed by 3151

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
Interests: cancer epidemiology; genitourinary oncology; cancer chemoprevention research interest group; cancer epidemiology program

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,   

Focusing on the earliest manifestations of cancer is the most promising approach to cancer prevention. Pre-malignancies may display simpler genomic aberrations that can increase the likelihood of pinpointing targets for transformational therapies. Prevention efforts require a thorough understanding of the mechanism of carcinogenesis. Knowledge of the molecular basis of carcinogenesis is critical, including elucidating the signaling and metabolic pathways and defining genetic progression models.

The use of this knowledge by transdisciplinary scientists in utilizing natural, synthetic, or biologic agents and vaccines to inhibit or reverse pre-invasive or early-stage carcinogenesis is called cancer chemoprevention.

Cancer chemoprevention is an active way of combating early-stage cancer and carcinogenesis. The aims of the cancer chemoprevention initiative is to produce regression of prevalent precursors of cancer, suppress recurrent precursors, and prevent incident precursors and/or cancer.

The identification of chemopreventive agents holds tremendous promise in reducing the burden of cancer. Our experience from past trials of preventive agents offers important lessons that can inform the design and conduct of future trials, revealing (a) the need for more preclinical and early-phase work before undertaking phase III trials; (b) the imperative for broad, sensitive toxicological and human safety assessments; (c) how safety can be improved in iterative generations of agents and trials; and (d) how synergy between agents can lead to lower doses, improved efficacy, and fewer or less severe toxicities. We have learned there are substantial benefits to employing germline, familial, or increased-risk cohorts, including, among others, accumulating more data over a shorter time frame. An assessment of endpoints in trials resulting in approval of a preventive agent reveals that nearly all have been approved on the basis of intraepithelial neoplasia, particularly in accessible organs. Lessons gleaned regarding the overall design of clinical trials underscore the importance of the randomized, placebo-controlled design and the need for long-term follow-up and monitoring to meet FDA requirements and promote acceptance in the marketplace. 

For this focused Special Issue, we are inviting authors/research teams to submit reviews and reports of the approaches used to identify and test promising chemoprevention agents and strategies for the primary and secondary clinical chemoprevention of breast, prostate, lung, colon, bladder, and other cancers. Reviews may utilize a systematic approach to summarize the safety, efficacy, and mechanisms of action based on evidence from in vitro and preclinical models of promising agents targeting these cancers. Furthermore, they may provide a rationale for translating this knowledge into an evaluation of the safety and efficacy of these agents in clinical trials targeting populations at risk due to exposure to carcinogenic agents, familial and genetic predisposition, or due to the presence of premalignant lesions, while validating intermediate endpoints of carcinogenesis and correlate these with clinical endpoints.

Dr. Nagi B. Kumar
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • carcinogenesis
  • cancer chemoprevention
  • chemoprevention agents
  • clinical cancer
  • clinical chemoprevention

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 265 KiB  
Article
Challenges to Recruiting Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in Clinical Chemoprevention Trials
by Nagi B. Kumar, Saira Bahl, Jasreman Dhillon, Michael Poch, Brandon Manley, Roger Li, Michael Schell and Julio Powsang
Cancers 2023, 15(4), 1257; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041257 - 16 Feb 2023
Viewed by 1264
Abstract
Clinical trials play a critical role in evidence-based medicine, when rigorous scientific methodology is utilized to discover and test the effectiveness and safety of new drugs to prevent or cure diseases, including cancer. Participation in clinical trials thus becomes key to successful completion [...] Read more.
Clinical trials play a critical role in evidence-based medicine, when rigorous scientific methodology is utilized to discover and test the effectiveness and safety of new drugs to prevent or cure diseases, including cancer. Participation in clinical trials thus becomes key to successful completion of these trials. Although it is estimated that >70% of Americans are inclined to participate in clinical trials, less than 5% of adult cancer patients participate in clinical trials. There is thus a large gap between those inclined to participate in clinical trials and actual participation in clinical trials. As with trials targeting men with prostate cancer (PCa) on active surveillance (AS), where the target population is mostly over 50 years of age, others have observed several challenges with recruitment and accrual in clinical trials. The participation rate is currently unavailable for men on primary and secondary chemoprevention trials. Additionally, with unanticipated environmental factors such as a pandemic or other natural emergencies that may severely impact the economy, personal property, travel and person-to person contact for study-related procedures, there is a need to continuously identify these challenges and determine solutions to recruitment barriers in chemoprevention trials to ensure timely completion of early phase trials. Recent studies regarding the impact of the pandemic on clinical trial recruitment have shown that cancer prevention trials were relatively more negatively impacted compared to cancer treatment trials. The goal of this manuscript is to review our experience in continuously evaluating the protocol and patient level challenges to recruiting subjects on AS for PCa in this cancer chemoprevention trial conducted at the Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) and report the contemporary strategies that we are utilizing to continue to recruit subjects in this trial. We provide data from our current trial as an example while discussing future strategies to improve overall clinical trial recruitment. These strategies can inform future design of contemporary cancer chemoprevention trials and, additionally, better select, focus and invest in strategies that are the most productive and efficient for recruiting target populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Strategies for Clinical Cancer Chemoprevention: From Bench to Bedside)
16 pages, 2026 KiB  
Article
Pharmacokinetic Basis for Using Saliva Matrine Concentrations as a Clinical Compliance Monitoring in Antitumor B Chemoprevention Trials in Humans
by Dinh Bui, Lenora A. McWilliams, Lei Wu, Haiying Zhou, Stuart J. Wong, Ming You, Diana S.-L. Chow, Rashim Singh and Ming Hu
Cancers 2023, 15(1), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010089 - 23 Dec 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1511
Abstract
This study reports the first clinical evidence of significantly high secretion of matrine in a multi-component botanical (Antitumor B, ATB) into human saliva from the systemic circulation. This is of high clinical significance as matrine can be used as a monitoring tool during [...] Read more.
This study reports the first clinical evidence of significantly high secretion of matrine in a multi-component botanical (Antitumor B, ATB) into human saliva from the systemic circulation. This is of high clinical significance as matrine can be used as a monitoring tool during longitudinal clinical studies to overcome the key limitation of poor patient compliance often reported in cancer chemoprevention trials. Both matrine and dictamine were detected in the saliva and plasma samples but only matrine was quantifiable after the oral administration of ATB tablets (2400 mg) in 8 healthy volunteers. A significantly high saliva/plasma ratios for Cmax (6.5 ± 2.0) and AUC0–24 (4.8 ± 2.0) of matrine suggested an active secretion in saliva probably due to entero-salivary recycling as evident from the long half-lives (t1/2 plasma = 10.0 ± 2.8 h, t1/2 saliva = 13.4 ± 6.9 h). The correlation between saliva and plasma levels of matrine was established using a population compartmental pharmacokinetic co-model. Moreover, a species-relevant PBPK model was developed to adequately describe the pharmacokinetic profiles of matrine in mouse, rat, and human. In conclusion, matrine saliva concentrations can be used as an excellent marker compound for mechanistic studies of active secretion of drugs from plasma to saliva as well as monitor the patient’s compliance to the treatment regimen in upcoming clinical trials of ATB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Strategies for Clinical Cancer Chemoprevention: From Bench to Bedside)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop