cancers-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Clinical and Research Progress in the Resection of Gastro-Esophageal Cancer (2nd Edition)

A Special Issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) belonging to the section "Clinical Research in Cancer".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 August 2026 | Viewed by 1538

Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
Interests: inflammatory response to intra-operative ventilation and lung surgery; inflammatory response and risk of metastasis; inflammatory mechanisms of treatment-related lung injury; health-related quality of life in esophageal cancer
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Building upon the success of our previous Special Issue, “Clinical and Research Progress in the Resection of Gastro-Esophageal Cancer” (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/cancers/special_issues/Y6C48ZXO05), we are pleased to announce the second edition.

Gastro-esophageal cancers are a source of substantial global morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, non-metastatic cancers are treated with surgical resection, with a possible combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. These can also be sources of significant treatment-related toxicities. The resection of gastro-esophageal cancer is associated with some of the highest incidences of morbidity and mortality. The progress related to improving outcomes for patients with gastro-esophageal cancers is dependent on improving the morbidity and mortality associated with resection and surgery.

We encourage the submission of both original research articles and reviews on all aspects of the advances in resection and multi-modal management of gastro-esophageal cancer. All submitted articles will undergo peer review.

Dr. Biniam Kidane
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • gastro-esophageal cancer resection
  • multi-modal management
  • surgical morbidity and mortality
  • treatment-related toxicities
  • perioperative outcomes

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Other

33 pages, 634 KB  
Systematic Review
Surgery After Induction Therapy for Cervical Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Proposed Multidisciplinary Selection Framework
by Ismaell Massalha, Adham Hijab, Reem Zabit, Bilal Krayim, Wael Hozaeel, Moatz Safadi, Samer Hussany, Israel Sandler, Jamal Zidan, Ofir Cohen and Ory Wiesel
Cancers 2026, 18(11), 1736; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18111736 - 26 May 2026
Viewed by 1302
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Management of cervical esophageal cancer after induction therapy remains unsettled. Definitive chemoradiotherapy is the guideline default, but a subset of patients with residual but resectable disease may still benefit from surgery. No validated multidisciplinary selection framework exists for this subsite. Methods: We [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Management of cervical esophageal cancer after induction therapy remains unsettled. Definitive chemoradiotherapy is the guideline default, but a subset of patients with residual but resectable disease may still benefit from surgery. No validated multidisciplinary selection framework exists for this subsite. Methods: We conducted a systematic review registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD420261369102) and guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement, using searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from inception through 14 April 2026. We identified 1779 records, removed 873 duplicates, and screened 906 records; 87 full-text reports were assessed, of which 67 were excluded at the full-text stage (66 on population grounds—disease not cervical esophageal; and 1 because cervical-direct outcomes were not separable within a mixed cervical/thoracic cohort), leaving 20 cervical-direct studies included in the primary synthesis. Thoracic and meta-analytic sources are cited for indirect comparison and biological rationale but are not counted in the included set. Included studies were evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I); certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Formal meta-analysis was not performed because study design, treatment approach, and outcome reporting were too heterogeneous. Results: Cervical-specific evidence is predominantly retrospective but consistent in direction. Available cervical-specific observational data suggest benefit mainly in patients with biopsy-confirmed incomplete response, resectable residual disease, preserved performance status, and access to experienced centers. Larynx-preserving resection is feasible in 90% of T1–2 tumors and 54% of T3–4 responders. In thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy yields pathologic complete response rates of approximately 29–48%; in cervical disease, the SCENIC trial has reported interim clinical response of approximately 50% in 28 patients, but pathology-confirmed response is not yet available. We present a proposed multidisciplinary selection framework integrating response depth, post-induction stage, laryngeal preservation feasibility, sarcopenia, circulating tumor DNA dynamics, and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. The framework has not been prospectively validated and is presented as a hypothesis-generating, conceptual tool for multidisciplinary discussion rather than a clinically validated instrument. Adjuvant nivolumab is recommended for residual pathologic disease after margin-negative (R0) resection when surgery follows preoperative chemoradiotherapy; after PD-1-based induction, adjuvant checkpoint inhibition remains investigational. Conclusions: The available cervical-direct evidence is predominantly retrospective and selection-prone, and several inputs supporting the framework are extrapolated from thoracic ESCC cohorts; conclusions about the survival benefit of surgery should therefore be read as associations rather than causal claims. Surgery has a role after induction therapy in carefully selected incomplete responders. The proposed framework is designed for multidisciplinary use and requires prospective validation before routine clinical application. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop