Targeting Genomic Evolution and Cancer Progression

A special issue of Biology (ISSN 2079-7737). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Biology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2022) | Viewed by 6942

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Medical Oncology, Harvard (Dana Farber) Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
Interests: multiple myeloma; esophageal cancer; genomic instability; DNA damage respons
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues, 

Genomic instability and telomere maintenance (by telomerase and/or homologous recombination) are critical lifelines of cancer cells. Genomic instability, which seems to arise early at a premalignant stage (such as Barrett’s esophagus) and gradually intensifies, leads to a series of genomic changes, some of which underlie progression through successive stages of disease, development of drug resistance, and poor clinical outcome. The ability to constantly evolve not only enables the cancer cell to acquire new characteristics for the development and progression of disease but also presents a great challenge for cancer treatment and diagnosis. Moreover, the changes acquired as a consequence of genomic instability may also predict patient outcome. Genomic instability can be a consequence of a number of factors which can be extrinsic (such as exposure to harmful agents in food and environment and/or chemotherapeutic agents used in cancer treatment) or intrinsic (such as food metabolites and/or aberrations in pathway/s involved in genome maintenance). The mechanisms underlying genomic instability and their activation during carcinogenesis are not fully understood, and identification of these mechanisms (both extrinsic and intrinsic) could help in the development of novel strategies for cancer prevention and treatment. Recently, the role of inflammation in cancer has also emerged as being of great significance in translational cancer research. It has been demonstrated that inflammatory reactions can lead to aberrant expression of genes involved in DNA repair or maintenance, leading to genomic instability. Gastrointestinal tissues derived from diseases which have inflammation related to oncogenic process, including Barrett’s esophagus, chronic viral hepatitis, and inflammatory bowel disease, frequently display aberrant expression/function of activation-induced cytidine deaminase, a protein involved in DNA repair/maintenance.

We invite investigators to contribute review and/or original research papers describing recent findings in the fields of genomics/genomic instability, inflammation, and/or the environmental/dietary factors affecting cancers. The purpose of the research published under this topic will be to:

  • Understand molecular mechanisms and consequences of genomic instability and inflammation in cancer. Manuscripts may provide novel information in these fields separately or linking them together.
  • Identify new prognostic tools and novel therapeutic strategies targeting genomic instability and clonal evolution, telomere maintenance, inflammation, and/or other oncogenic processes.
  • Identify new potential carcinogens, evaluate the impact of chemotherapeutic agents on genomic instability and evolution, and present/test new ideas to reduce exposure and minimize the harmful genomic impact of genotoxins (including chemotherapeutic agents) and any other ideas to prevent cancer or its progression.

Dr. Masood A. Shammas
Guest Editor

Keywords

  • genomic instability and evolution
  • oncogenic processes
  • potential carcinogens
  • inflammation
  • environmental/dietary factors

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

16 pages, 1351 KiB  
Article
Integrated Genomic Analysis Identifies ANKRD36 Gene as a Novel and Common Biomarker of Disease Progression in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
by Zafar Iqbal, Muhammad Absar, Tanveer Akhtar, Aamer Aleem, Abid Jameel, Sulman Basit, Anhar Ullah, Sibtain Afzal, Khushnooda Ramzan, Mahmood Rasool, Sajjad Karim, Zeenat Mirza, Mudassar Iqbal, Maryam AlMajed, Buthinah AlShehab, Sarah AlMukhaylid, Nouf AlMutairi, Nawaf Al-anazi, Muhammad Farooq Sabar, Muhammad Arshad, Muhammad Asif, Masood Shammas and Amer Mahmoodadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Biology 2021, 10(11), 1182; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10111182 - 15 Nov 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3517
Abstract
Background: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is initiated in bone marrow due to chromosomal translocation t(9;22) leading to fusion oncogene BCR-ABL. Targeting BCR-ABL by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has changed fatal CML into an almost curable disease. Despite that, TKIs lose their effectiveness due [...] Read more.
Background: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is initiated in bone marrow due to chromosomal translocation t(9;22) leading to fusion oncogene BCR-ABL. Targeting BCR-ABL by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has changed fatal CML into an almost curable disease. Despite that, TKIs lose their effectiveness due to disease progression. Unfortunately, the mechanism of CML progression is poorly understood and common biomarkers for CML progression are unavailable. This study was conducted to find novel biomarkers of CML progression by employing whole-exome sequencing (WES). Materials and Methods: WES of accelerated phase (AP) and blast crisis (BC) CML patients was carried out, with chronic-phase CML (CP-CML) patients as control. After DNA library preparation and exome enrichment, clustering and sequencing were carried out using Illumina platforms. Statistical analysis was carried out using SAS/STAT software version 9.4, and R package was employed to find mutations shared exclusively by all AP-/BC-CML patients. Confirmation of mutations was carried out using Sanger sequencing and protein structure modeling using I-TASSER followed by mutant generation and visualization using PyMOL. Results: Three novel genes (ANKRD36, ANKRD36B and PRSS3) were mutated exclusively in all AP-/BC-CML patients. Only ANKRD36 gene mutations (c.1183_1184 delGC and c.1187_1185 dupTT) were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Protein modeling studies showed that mutations induce structural changes in ANKRD36 protein. Conclusions: Our studies show that ANKRD36 is a potential common biomarker and drug target of early CML progression. ANKRD36 is yet uncharacterized in humans. It has the highest expression in bone marrow, specifically myeloid cells. We recommend carrying out further studies to explore the role of ANKRD36 in the biology and progression of CML. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeting Genomic Evolution and Cancer Progression)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

19 pages, 1285 KiB  
Review
Dynamic Co-Evolution of Cancer Cells and Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts: Role in Right- and Left-Sided Colon Cancer Progression and Its Clinical Relevance
by Sahira Syamimi Ahmad Zawawi and Marahaini Musa
Biology 2022, 11(7), 1014; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11071014 - 6 Jul 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2977
Abstract
Cancer is a result of a dynamic evolutionary process. It is composed of cancer cells and the tumour microenvironment (TME). One of the major cellular constituents of TME, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are known to interact with cancer cells and promote colorectal carcinogenesis. The [...] Read more.
Cancer is a result of a dynamic evolutionary process. It is composed of cancer cells and the tumour microenvironment (TME). One of the major cellular constituents of TME, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are known to interact with cancer cells and promote colorectal carcinogenesis. The accumulation of these activated fibroblasts is linked to poor diagnosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and recurrence of the disease. However, the interplay between cancer cells and CAFs is yet to be described, especially in relation to the sidedness of colorectal carcinogenesis. CRC, which is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer globally, can be classified according to the anatomical region from which they originate: left-sided (LCRC) and right-sided CRC (RCR). Both cancers differ in many aspects, including in histology, evolution, and molecular signatures. Despite occurring at lower frequency, RCRC is often associated with worse diagnosis compared to LCRC. The differences in molecular profiles between RCRC and LCRC also influence the mode of treatment that can be used to specifically target these cancer entities. A better understanding of the cancer cell–CAF interplay and its association with RCRC and LRCR progression will provide better insight into potential translational aspects of targeted treatment for CRC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeting Genomic Evolution and Cancer Progression)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop